And the Court's judgment: the plaintiffs have no case and no credible evidence, and there is no law to support their claims. Judgment for the defendant, represented only by an empty table, on the merits. Or in this case, utter lack thereof.

That has to sting. Brave patriots that they are, I hope they continue to waste idiots' money get the truth out.

Can't wait for the birther blogs on this one. They had projected so damn hard that Obama was already off the ballot they were already congratulating themselves and throwing parties. Also sad they couldn't find one expert to testify on their behalf.

Can we deport her ass now?

Another thing Ornery Taint would lose to:

Ornery Taint vs.



Loser: Ornery Taint.

vs.:



Loser: Ornery Taint

And just a week or two ago she was crowing that she had a huge victory in the advancement of her case. Link (new window)

Panties, meet bunch.

Marcus Aurelius: Panties, meet bunch Orly Taitz, and defeat her in court.

The good folks over at World Net Daily are handling the news graciously.

no less than a declaration of total dictatorial authority (new window)

That's pretty hilarious.

Taitz v.



Loser: Taint

I'm sure that coont will quietly go away now.

To be fair, the empty table was more coherent.

AntiNerd: Aw c'mon you guys. We love us some Orly don't we?

To be fair, the chair and table obviously ganged up on her...

Confabulat: The good folks over at World Net Daily are handling the news graciously.

I love the photo they went with:

Corvus: Taitz v. Broken Pencil

[4.bp.blogspot.com image 278x388]
Loser: Taitz!

Tebow>Taitz

Does that ever happen? Does anyone ever lose to an empty chair? You challenge a ticket and the cop doesn't show up, you win.

My favorite parts:
They requested judgment on the merits, to try to get REAL judicial precedent in their favor, and if they'd left it alone, the judge would have issued a default judgment AGAINST Obama. Just had to have it, huh?

And...

Orly, counsel for the plaintiffs, testified. And was asked by the court to "submit any further testimony in writing" ("Shut the hell up").

Confabulat: The good folks over at World Net Daily are handling the news graciously.

no less than a declaration of total dictatorial authority (new window)

I am interested in the reaction from Free Republic.

GAT_00: Does that ever happen? Does anyone ever lose to an empty chair? You challenge a ticket and the cop doesn't show up, you win.

They demanded the judge go ahead with it. Default judgment isn't legally useful if you're trying to give other birthers a weapon.

GAT_00: Does that ever happen? Does anyone ever lose to an empty chair? You challenge a ticket and the cop doesn't show up, you win.

An attorney representing President Obama submitted a brief letter to the judge outlining the settled nature of Mr. Obama's United States citizenship. Mr. Obama's presence was not actually required, despite the claims of "birther" individuals who, due to confirmation bias, failed to understand the actual legal requirements of the hearing.

quizzical: HeartBurnKid: Taitz vs:

[images.wikia.com image 530x533]

Loser: Taitz

Naturally. The weighted companion cube is infinitely more likeable than Taitz, and would easily sway a jury.

The weighted companion cube will never threaten to stab the judge and, in fact, cannot speak. Both of those features present significant advantages over Orly Taitz.

kingoomieiii: GAT_00: Does that ever happen? Does anyone ever lose to an empty chair? You challenge a ticket and the cop doesn't show up, you win.

They demanded the judge go ahead with it. Default judgment isn't legally useful if you're trying to give other birthers a weapon.

So they actually killed their own victory by demanding it be tried on the merits and not automatically defaulted to them. That's beyond hilarious.

TF lawyer types: How did this woman even get a license to practice?

Taitz vs



Loser: Taitz

Taitz vs



Loser: Uh, huhuhuhuh, you said Taitz.

GAT_00: kingoomieiii: GAT_00: Does that ever happen? Does anyone ever lose to an empty chair? You challenge a ticket and the cop doesn't show up, you win.

They demanded the judge go ahead with it. Default judgment isn't legally useful if you're trying to give other birthers a weapon.

So they actually killed their own victory by demanding it be tried on the merits and not automatically defaulted to them. That's beyond hilarious.

No evidence suggests that a default victory would have occurred had Ms. Taitz not insisted upon presenting what she claimed to be evidence to the court.

I am somewhat surprised that no posting has yet utilized the phrase "empty suit".