FARK.com: (6920054) 3 to 1 odds he finishes first (mildly NSFW)

If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

		3 to 1 odds he finishes first (mildly NSFW) (youtube.com)		52
		More: Video

• • •

12756 clicks; posted to Video » on 03 Feb 2012 at 11:48 AM | Favorite | share:

Share this link:

URL:

http://fk.cm/go/6920054

Bookmark:

Article Comments close

52 Comments (+0 »)

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

jaylectricity

2012-02-03 10:04:50 AM

What a stallion.

unyon

2012-02-03 10:42:33 AM

Mildly NSFW?

jaylectricity

2012-02-03 10:57:24 AM

unyon: Mildly NSFW?

Just a bum and some suggestive movements.

Grables'Daughter

2012-02-03 11:43:18 AM

jaylectricity: unyon: Mildly NSFW?

Just a bum and some suggestive movements.
Yeah, I think it was just fine.

TheMega

2012-02-03 11:55:33 AM

Grables'Daughter: jaylectricity: unyon: Mildly NSFW?

Just a bum and some suggestive movements.
Yeah, I think it was just fine.

That's what she sarcastically said...

DD44Dostivei

2012-02-03 12:04:50 PM

I, for one, welcome a future of impulsive nonchalant sex acts occurring commonly in public.

oldcrow95

2012-02-03 12:06:59 PM

Discovery channel?

Pelvic Splanchnic Ganglion

2012-02-03 12:14:33 PM

The fix was in! And then out. And then in again.

zerkalo

2012-02-03 12:27:15 PM

Damn, in that weather she probably felt nothing

michaelgvh

2012-02-03 12:29:16 PM

How drunk or brazen do you have to be to even think of trying that? Awesome!

Bf+

2012-02-03 12:32:20 PM

Amateurs...

quoinguy

2012-02-03 12:43:11 PM

I love how she was enjoying the race and no-one else was even looking at them, like it happens every day.

I really need to go there...

smartasspt

2012-02-03 12:49:48 PM

Baseball cap, looks like sweat pants, and a big poofy jacket. How do we know its a girl?

Langston

2012-02-03 12:56:23 PM

DD44Dostivei: I, for one, welcome a future of impulsive nonchalant sex acts occurring commonly in public.

Or as I call it, "Tuesday"

socodog

2012-02-03 12:57:52 PM

Classy.

Rising_Zan_Samurai_Gunman

2012-02-03 01:22:31 PM

I'm trying to figure out why he had to expose his ass - do they not have a fly in pants where ever this was filmed?

Headso

2012-02-03 01:23:08 PM

smartasspt: Baseball cap, looks like sweat pants, and a big poofy jacket. How do we know its a girl?

that's what I was thinking, seems like a couple dudes to me.

sanktp

2012-02-03 01:38:51 PM

It is two Norwegian guys. The humper just won 340$ and expresses his joy by simulating sex with his friend.
Source (autotranslated) (new window)

LeroyBourne

2012-02-03 01:45:39 PM

Why do Canadians only do it doggy style?

so they can both watch the hockey game.
/don't know where this was filmed, but they're serious about watching their horse and buggy races.

LoneVVolf

2012-02-03 01:47:46 PM

It wasn't until the last slo-mo replay that i saw that it was PEOPLE shagging... Is it bad that i was disappointed?

rkiller1

2012-02-03 02:10:07 PM

In Greece, how do you separate the men from the boys?
With a crowbar.

/I know, old joke, but it looks like two dudes, dude.

Tyrone Slothrop

2012-02-03 02:32:04 PM

Grables'Daughter: jaylectricity: unyon: Mildly NSFW?

Just a bum and some suggestive movements.
Yeah, I think it was just fine.

But given where you apparently work, they probably have looser standards.

Grables'Daughter

2012-02-03 02:36:14 PM

Tyrone Slothrop: Grables'Daughter: jaylectricity: unyon: Mildly NSFW?

Just a bum and some suggestive movements.
Yeah, I think it was just fine.

But given where you apparently work, they probably have looser standards.

Well that's certainly a fair statement.

Lars The Canadian Viking

2012-02-03 02:42:14 PM

sanktp: It is two Norwegian guys. The humper just won 340$ and expresses his joy by simulating sex with his friend.
Source (autotranslated) (new window)

Ewww.

hippyneil

2012-02-03 02:45:07 PM

sanktp: It is two Norwegian guys. The humper just won 340$ and expresses his joy by simulating sex with his friend.
Source (autotranslated) (new window)

FTA: "There was some risk of urinary tract infection".. what?!

sanktp

2012-02-03 03:13:04 PM

hippyneil: sanktp: It is two Norwegian guys[..]

FTA: "There was some risk of urinary tract infection".. what?!

Grim reality of living above the 55 parallel. You can get UTI (new window) from cold. But since it is mostly a female problem, I think he is joking by implying...that he is a woman?

DVDave

2012-02-03 03:38:48 PM

Bf+: [www.filmofilia.com image 320x213]
Amateurs...

Also came her for Crank 2: Crank-er

JoeCowboy

2012-02-03 03:55:36 PM

AND COMING DOWN THE BACKSTRETCH...

JC

Sin_City_Superhero

2012-02-03 05:29:49 PM

Is that Sarah Jessica Parker?

VvonderJesus

2012-02-03 06:15:07 PM

Rising_Zan_Samurai_Gunman: I'm trying to figure out why he had to expose his ass - do they not have a fly in pants where ever this was filmed?

I'm sure as hell not involving rapid penis movement near a zipper.

jaylectricity

2012-02-03 06:18:54 PM

jaylectricity

2012-02-03 06:21:29 PM

Just givin' ya sh*t, Grables'.

Mikey1969

2012-02-03 06:27:46 PM

Wow, all I can say is; can you imagine the set of balls on that guy? Does she have bruises on her inner thighs from the brass banging against them all the time?

Mikey1969

2012-02-03 06:30:29 PM

jaylectricity: Tyrone Slothrop: Grables'Daughter: jaylectricity: unyon: Mildly NSFW?

Just a bum and some suggestive movements.
Yeah, I think it was just fine.

But given where you apparently work, they probably have looser loser standards.

/sorry, pet peeve

Nope, he had it right the first time. 'looser' is an adjective describing the standards, while 'loser' is an adjective describing a person. Both the same part of speech, but different words.

defone

2012-02-03 06:31:59 PM

jaylectricity: Tyrone Slothrop: Grables'Daughter: jaylectricity: unyon: Mildly NSFW?

Just a bum and some suggestive movements.
Yeah, I think it was just fine.

But given where you apparently work, they probably have looser loser standards.

/sorry, pet peeve

Normally I am right there with you, but in this case the original was correct. Since the poster was talking about the rigidity of the standards and not the one that fails.

defone

2012-02-03 06:33:01 PM

That's what I get for walking away in the middle of a post.

Raddamant

2012-02-03 06:39:34 PM

So this is an excuse to post pictures of Amy Smart, yes? Yes.

www.amysmart.org

defone

2012-02-03 06:47:25 PM

Raddamant: So this is an excuse to post pictures of Amy Smart, yes? Yes.

[www.amysmart.org image 640x882]

[nenadristic.com image 350x500]

Why the hell would you need an excuse! The sky is blue, post Amy Smart. I breathe, post Smart.

Raddamant

2012-02-03 07:18:57 PM

defone:

Why the hell would you need an excuse! The sky is blue, post Amy Smart. I breathe, post Smart.

Oh no! Keep breathing! LIVE, DAMN YOU, LIVE!

http://www.actingmagazine.com/images/Celebrities/A/Amy-Smart/amy-smar t -photo-2.jpg

jaylectricity

2012-02-03 07:19:38 PM

Mikey1969: Nope, he had it right the first time. 'looser' is an adjective describing the standards, while 'loser' is an adjective describing a person. Both the same part of speech, but different words.

defone: Normally I am right there with you, but in this case the original was correct. Since the poster was talking about the rigidity of the standards and not the one that fails.

Apparently you missed my joke. It was obviously correct originally. I was changing it (a la rotsky) to suit a different meaning. As in, the standards at her job favor losers.

/I hate explaining jokes, but if you explain enough of them eventually people start to "get" you

Mikey1969

2012-02-03 07:25:24 PM

jaylectricity: Mikey1969: Nope, he had it right the first time. 'looser' is an adjective describing the standards, while 'loser' is an adjective describing a person. Both the same part of speech, but different words.

defone: Normally I am right there with you, but in this case the original was correct. Since the poster was talking about the rigidity of the standards and not the one that fails.

Apparently you missed my joke. It was obviously correct originally. I was changing it (a la rotsky) to suit a different meaning. As in, the standards at her job favor losers.

/I hate explaining jokes, but if you explain enough of them eventually people start to "get" you

Sorry, that kind of stuff doesn't translate well to message boards. My bad.

defone

2012-02-03 08:05:28 PM

Mikey1969: jaylectricity: Mikey1969: Nope, he had it right the first time. 'looser' is an adjective describing the standards, while 'loser' is an adjective describing a person. Both the same part of speech, but different words.

defone: Normally I am right there with you, but in this case the original was correct. Since the poster was talking about the rigidity of the standards and not the one that fails.

Apparently you missed my joke. It was obviously correct originally. I was changing it (a la rotsky) to suit a different meaning. As in, the standards at her job favor losers.

/I hate explaining jokes, but if you explain enough of them eventually people start to "get" you

Sorry, that kind of stuff doesn't translate well to message boards. My bad.

Yep, I missed it too, sorry.

hutchkc

2012-02-03 08:53:33 PM

Mikey1969: Wow, all I can say is; can you imagine the set of balls on that guy? Does she have bruises on her inner thighs from the brass banging against them all the time?

I believe the receiver was also male as from the translated article.

Smagma

2012-02-03 09:27:00 PM

defone: Mikey1969: jaylectricity: Mikey1969: Nope, he had it right the first time. 'looser' is an adjective describing the standards, while 'loser' is an adjective describing a person. Both the same part of speech, but different words.

defone: Normally I am right there with you, but in this case the original was correct. Since the poster was talking about the rigidity of the standards and not the one that fails.

Apparently you missed my joke. It was obviously correct originally. I was changing it (a la rotsky) to suit a different meaning. As in, the standards at her job favor losers.

/I hate explaining jokes, but if you explain enough of them eventually people start to "get" you

Sorry, that kind of stuff doesn't translate well to message boards. My bad.

Yep, I missed it too, sorry.

I got it.. grammar nazis arent very adept at detecting sarcasm..

pingpongalong

2012-02-03 09:43:37 PM

looks like some idiot just got outta jail and is still being a complete jerk, that was too much

SauceIT

2012-02-04 01:30:15 AM

Come on farkers! Where is the link to the couple finger blasting the woman at the baseball game with the fat guy sitting behind them? Wasn't it at Fenway?

I CAN'T FIND IT!

FiendishFellow05

2012-02-04 03:56:18 AM

SauceIT: Come on farkers! Where is the link to the couple finger blasting the woman at the baseball game with the fat guy sitting behind them? Wasn't it at Fenway?

I CAN'T FIND IT!

Here ya go, Sauce. Still can't believe they got away with that.

Happy Hours

2012-02-04 04:20:48 AM

FiendishFellow05: SauceIT: Come on farkers! Where is the link to the couple finger blasting the woman at the baseball game with the fat guy sitting behind them? Wasn't it at Fenway?

I CAN'T FIND IT!

Here ya go, Sauce. Still can't believe they got away with that.

What's even more shocking is someone was smoking a cigarette in the stands!!!

Those people could die from 2nd hand smoke!

Linux_Yes

2012-02-04 07:45:39 PM

well, they have proven beyond any doubt that the two of them are not rocket scientists.

Linux_Yes

2012-02-04 07:49:20 PM

sanktp: It is two Norwegian guys. The humper just won 340$ and expresses his joy by simulating sex with his friend.
Source (autotranslated) (new window)

no better aphrodisiac than cold hard cash. if it had been two americans, there would have been baby batter all over the race track.

Displayed 50 of 52 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Redisplay/refresh comments

This thread is closed to new comments.