It's Not News It's Fark.com
Real news. Real funny
Log In
|
Sign Up »
Login
Password
Forgot password?
X
Fark
TotalFark
my
Fark
About/FArQ
Contests
Store
Contact Us
Mobile
Search:
Password
Login
Turn on javascript (or enable it for Fark) for a better user experience.
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Main
Sports
Business
Geek
Entertainment
Politics
Video
Adrian Peterson will be permitted to change his number, so long as he buys the $1,000,000 worth of existing Reebok jerseys with his current number
(
startribune.com
)
34
More:
Amusing
,
Reebok
,
Vikings
• • •
2405
clicks; posted to
Sports »
on
02 Feb 2012
at
9:04 PM
|
Favorite
| share:
more»
|
shirt it!
Share this link:
URL:
http://fk.cm/go/6918895
Bookmark:
URL:
http://fk.cm/6918895
Bookmark:
Article
Comments
close
34 Comments
(
+0 »
)
Paginated (50/page)
Single page
Single page, reversed
Normal view
Change images to links
Show raw HTML
Show posts from ignored users
View Voting Results:
Smartest
and
Funniest
IAmRight
2012-02-02 07:50:49 PM
Hey, you could force a trade and then you wouldn't have to pay!
/trollface.jpg
//same rules everyone else has followed - you don't remember Ochocinco?
///I like how he has no reason for changing his number, either
Tickle Mittens
2012-02-02 09:24:38 PM
So let's see....the NFL is changing from Reebok to Nike, which basically means those jerseys are last year's junk, and basically a burden and he should have to buy? Yeah, that's a scam. I would be annoyed if I had one of his older jerseys, but it literally costs the various parties nothing for him to make this change now.
UNC_Samurai
2012-02-02 09:33:48 PM
Is that really a rule? I'm surprised the NFLPA was willing to agree to have that in a CBA.
SBinRR
2012-02-02 09:41:30 PM
$1,000,000?
The Bestest
2012-02-02 09:42:57 PM
UNC_Samurai
:
Is that really a rule? I'm surprised the NFLPA was willing to agree to have that in a CBA.
MLBPA, arguably the strongest of the players unions, agreed to that this recent CBA, so it doesn't surprise me at all that NFLPA.. one of the weakest, would.
Do You Know What I Am Saying
2012-02-02 09:47:45 PM
FTA:
Tweeted Peterson: "When it comes to top sales ! Why in the hell do I have to pay a Million dollars to change my number! I don't even get paid a million When it comes to top sales ! Why in the hell do I have to pay a Million dollars to change my number!
I don't even get paid a million Dollars by my sponsors a year!
Wow!!!
Somebody needs a new agent.
TonnageVT
2012-02-02 09:56:38 PM
NFL would just be called CREAM in an honest world.
alechemist
2012-02-02 10:01:05 PM
shouldn't that be less since there switching over to nike in the fall?
scotty3281
2012-02-02 10:32:21 PM
Ochocinco was told the same thing when he changed his name but he changed it in the off season and didn't have to pay. Is that the case with Peterson as well? Or did Ochocinco still have to pay the money? If he did I guess I missed the report. If Ochocinco didn't pay then there really is no difference in the two circumstances and Peterson shouldn't have to pay.
Changing a jersey whether it be a name or number means that the old is useless (in the Reebok's eyes of course) and they would be out either way. Or, I may just be thinking about this the wrong way.
animesucks
2012-02-02 10:35:41 PM
so adrian peterson is a whiny little brat. very not surprising.
davidphogan
2012-02-02 10:37:16 PM
alechemist
:
shouldn't that be less since there switching over to nike in the fall?
I'm wondering why Reebok has $1m of AP merch sitting around? Even at $100 per item, that's 10000 units already made with no buyers. What the fark, Reebok?
Primitive Screwhead
2012-02-02 10:46:34 PM
Is he changing his tech tree?
NotEric
2012-02-02 10:47:26 PM
scotty3281
:
Ochocinco was told the same thing when he changed his name but he changed it in the off season and didn't have to pay. Is that the case with Peterson as well? Or did Ochocinco still have to pay the money? If he did I guess I missed the report. If Ochocinco didn't pay then there really is no difference in the two circumstances and Peterson shouldn't have to pay.
Changing a jersey whether it be a name or number means that the old is useless (in the Reebok's eyes of course) and they would be out either way. Or, I may just be thinking about this the wrong way.
Ochocinco had to keep his original name on the back of his jersey for an extra year after the name change to avoid having to pay Reebok.
ArtosRC
2012-02-02 11:26:28 PM
Primitive Screwhead
:
Is he changing his tech tree?
You mean his
spec
?
DiamondDave
2012-02-02 11:44:18 PM
He would have to buy the remaining inventory if he changed his number right now. If he waits until the Reebok/NFL contract runs out (which happens in a week or two) he doesn't have to pay a dime. Nike has already stated that players will be allowed to change their numbers since their is no remaining Nike merchandise to buy up.
drewsclues
2012-02-02 11:51:27 PM
TonnageVT
:
NFL would just be called CREAM in an honest world.
dolla, dolla, bill ya'll.
Bunnyhat
2012-02-03 12:31:51 AM
DiamondDave
:
He would have to buy the remaining inventory if he changed his number right now. If he waits until the Reebok/NFL contract runs out (which happens in a week or two) he doesn't have to pay a dime. Nike has already stated that players will be allowed to change their numbers since their is no remaining Nike merchandise to buy up.
But only if the NFL agrees.
Apparently they aren't.
Harry_Seldon
2012-02-03 01:25:53 AM
Problems of the 1%
germ78
2012-02-03 02:10:34 AM
He should ask for a change of address, since he'll never win a Super Bowl in Minnesota.
JonPace
2012-02-03 03:26:44 AM
Is it only because Nike is taking it over next year? Because it seems like changing your number would be a good way to get people who already bought your Jersey to buy another one.
Milk D
2012-02-03 04:45:52 AM
this guy should be more worried about wins instead of the number on his back.
TheJoe03
2012-02-03 05:04:46 AM
Do players make money on their jersey sales?
gtfan92
2012-02-03 08:47:56 AM
FTA: "Peterson said,
er, tweeted
that the reason he wears No. 28 is his high school didn't have his preferred number, 29, which he liked because he admired Eric Dickerson. Peterson said,
er, tweeted
..."
Is this guy trying to sound like a prick?
rjakobi
2012-02-03 10:02:18 AM
UNC_Samurai
:
Is that really a rule? I'm surprised the NFLPA was willing to agree to have that in a CBA.
Isaiah Thomas ruined the CBA.
stewbert
2012-02-03 11:35:15 AM
This shiat is out of whack. If the team decides a player can switch numbers, it shouldn't have to answer to a company trying to make $ on merchandise. But, I guess that's the world we live in.
And, AP sounds like a whiny douche here.
Primitive Screwhead
2012-02-03 12:01:31 PM
ArtosRC
:
Primitive Screwhead: Is he changing his tech tree?
You mean his spec?
Yeah, that's it!
/haven't played an RPG in a while
chuggernaught
2012-02-03 01:48:30 PM
Non-story, this is standard NFL operating procedure. When Chad Johnson wanted to change his last name he had to go through the same deal.
IAmRight
2012-02-03 02:24:50 PM
I think if he wanted to actually get people on his side, he'd at least make up a good story for why he wanted a different number. Instead he talked about having reasons for his current number and another number...but not either of the numbers he was talking about switching to. He just sounds retarded (not to mention whiny).
PoochUMD
2012-02-03 02:56:52 PM
stewbert
:
This shiat is out of whack. If the team decides a player can switch numbers, it shouldn't have to answer to a company trying to make $ on merchandise. But, I guess that's the world we live in.
And, AP sounds like a whiny douche here.
It's the deal the NFL has with the manufacturers of the jerseys. There's a period before every season where a player is allowed to change jerseys without penalty. After that, it's not fair to Reebok/Nike to change your number making a million dollars of product they just bought worthless.
I'm not sure why he's getting all upset about it now because even if Reebok was still the uniform distributor, he would have the opportunity to change his number prior to next season like everyone else. Plus Nike has already said that anyone can change numbers once their contract starts. Seems someone at Reebok is making a last ditch effort to squeeze some remaining cash out of their contract that is about to expire.
IAmRight
2012-02-03 03:25:25 PM
PoochUMD
:
After that, it's not fair to Reebok/Nike to change your number making a million dollars of product they just bought worthless.
Not worthless! I buy them at huge discounts and have an instant throwback jersey.
stewbert
2012-02-03 03:55:17 PM
IAmRight
:
PoochUMD: After that, it's not fair to Reebok/Nike to change your number making a million dollars of product they just bought worthless.
Not worthless! I buy them at huge discounts and have an instant throwback jersey.
Plus, who cares if it's fair to Reebok? Nobody gives a shiat if it's fair to the average joe, who bought that shirt.
dmars
2012-02-04 01:21:15 AM
You think this would be a good thing.
I mean look at me, I bought a Roethlisberger jersey when he was a rookie and I only wear the thing on game day when I can watch, so it is still in great condition. I have no reason to buy another jersey even though it has been about 7 years. If Ben changes his number I would have to go something like 5+ years wearing an outdated jersey, which I have always hated until it gets old enough from a good franchise player or era to invoke nostalgia.
Peterson is a popular player and still very young in his career, you would think there would be a temporary increase in sales from new buyers that would offset the lost inventory.
Iceman208481
2012-02-04 12:20:30 PM
The Chad Johnson point doesn't make the sense that everyone is trying to make of it. He legally changed his name. He didn't put his nickname on there. That's his name now. You people sound stupid.
IAmRight
2012-02-04 03:32:46 PM
dmars
:
Peterson is a popular player and still very young in his career,
Well, no he's not. He's already probably past his peak, in fact. He has 2-3 good years left and he's done.
Displayed
34
of
34
comments
View Voting Results:
Smartest
and
Funniest
Redisplay/refresh comments
This thread is closed to new comments.
Submit a Link »
Like Fark!
+1 Fark!
Follow @fark on Twitter
Sports via RSS
Top Links
Top Comments
Top Submitters
Press/Publicity
Headlines of the Week
All Latest
Fark Forum
Link Voting
Sports Forum
Fark Blogs
Geek Forum
Fark Book
Entertainment Forum
Fark Travel Guide
Politics Forum
Fark Parties
Fark Party Forum
Fark Chat
Photoshop Forum
PS/Photo Browser
Farktography Forum
Fark Quiz
From the
Fark Shop
:
My Bunk. I'll Be In It.
Samurai Umbrella
Rotta Huttlet - Star Wars Backpack Buddy
Deluxe Toupee
More from the
Fark Shop
»
Stories from our partner sites:
5 Movie Roles Will Smith (Probably) N...
Katy Perry Seems Surprisingly Cool Ab...
The GIFs That Keep on Giving
Someone Put This Epic Sportscaster on...
More news at Scribol »
Memorial Day Marked with Events Acros...
3 Killed, Several Hurt in Crash in Wi...
2 Police Officers Hurt in Hit-and-Run...
Brush Fire Scorches 250 Acres Near La...
More news at KTLA »
Popular Characters Worse for Animals...
23 Instructional Signs That Must Exis...
4 Wildly Irresponsible Tests for 'Dia...
5 Seemingly Harmless Things That Are...
More news at Cracked »
Five Tools You'll Need to Survive, We...
Snakeskin pedicures and gold facials
Gorgeous Goth Girls
Never Pay For Laundry Again! (PICS)
More news at Village Voice »