Do you have adblock enabled?
 
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Fox News)   Couple sue In Vitro Fertilization Doctor for giving them what they wanted, but not how they wanted it   (foxnews.com ) divider line
    More: Fail, IVF, duty of care, obstetricians, The Sydney Morning Herald  
•       •       •

20314 clicks; posted to Main » on 02 Feb 2012 at 8:08 AM (4 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



83 Comments     (+0 »)
 
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2012-02-02 04:49:00 AM  
You ever think that nature gives some people clues about whether they shouldn't procreate?
 
2012-02-02 05:10:16 AM  

thelordofcheese: You ever think that nature gives some people clues about whether they shouldn't procreate?


Yeah I was coming here to sy something similar.
 
2012-02-02 05:15:00 AM  

Gwendolyn: thelordofcheese: You ever think that nature gives some people clues about whether they shouldn't procreate?

Yeah I was coming here to sy something similar.


Perhaps they see it as someone f*cking up a special order. They paid a premium and it isn't what they wanted, and now they can't return it.
 
2012-02-02 05:46:26 AM  
So let me see if I have this straight: These people absolutely had to have a little bundle of joy of their very own, a doctor did his best to help them reach that goal, the child was born with a birth defect due to his father's shiatty genes, and now the parents are all butt hurt over it?

Maybe they should sue whatever god they believe in?
 
2012-02-02 06:12:59 AM  
It sounds like alloimmune thrombocytopenia. This is a treatable condition, with a proper medical history of the parents. Remember how we used to have "blue babies" because Mom was A- and Dad A+? Kind of like that. Nowadays A- mothers just get a shot of Rhogam, and no more blue babies. With alloimmune thrombocytopenia, if mom is treated with intravenous gamma globulin during her pregnancy, no intracerebral bleeds in baby's brain. Healthy baby. I would say that the journalist leapt to a damned unfortunate conclusion without understanding the medicine. It's not a "wrongful birth." It's a failure to diagnose and treat alloimmune thrombocytopenia.
 
2012-02-02 06:52:07 AM  
Oh, and it's FOX News. We report without a clue, you decide.
 
2012-02-02 06:53:04 AM  
I'm curious whether they did PGD to specifically prevent it. I know some people who are carriers will do so for things like Tay-Sachs or CF. if they did PGD but the doctor screwed up, I can see where the case is. If it was just regular IVF, I don't quite see what grounds they have to sue. But since I'm not a lawyer, I could be missing something.
 
2012-02-02 06:58:29 AM  

MidnightSkulker: I'm curious whether they did PGD to specifically prevent it.



We'll never know. The test to determine whether a couple is incompatible for purposes of this condition is not routinely performed. Usually it's done after a couple has one child with the condition, with minor bleeds and little more than a rash, then the couple wish to become pregnant again. But, with in vitro, generally the genetic protocols are more stringent. With this lousy story, there's no way to tell.
 
2012-02-02 08:11:37 AM  
It's not nice to fark with Mother Nature.
 
2012-02-02 08:12:04 AM  

MidnightSkulker: But since I'm not a lawyer, I could be missing something.


A stacked jury?
 
2012-02-02 08:13:41 AM  
I love how this is not their first Wrongful Birth law suit.


/And by a show of hands, who thought that this was going to be about the Doc diddling the Wifey? I know I sure did...
 
2012-02-02 08:15:35 AM  
Days after Keeden was born in August 2000 he suffered a massive stroke causing brain damage and leaving him unable to walk, talk or go to the toilet unaided.


I know these are new parents and all, but surely they are aware that the average newborn can do none of those things?
 
2012-02-02 08:16:40 AM  
Well, you can't win them allrewardslink.info
 
2012-02-02 08:18:38 AM  

AbbeySomeone: Perhaps they see it as someone f*cking up a special order. They paid a premium and it isn't what they wanted, and now they can't return it.


That's how I took it.
 
2012-02-02 08:18:49 AM  

mekkab: I love how this is not their first Wrongful Birth law suit.


/And by a show of hands, who thought that this was going to be about the Doc diddling the Wifey? I know I sure did...


*raises hand*
/reads the article
//leaves disappointed
 
2012-02-02 08:19:07 AM  

mekkab: /And by a show of hands, who thought that this was going to be about the Doc diddling the Wifey? I know I sure did...


Yep. That was my prediction. Or that the doctor used his own sperm to fertilized instead of the husband's.
 
2012-02-02 08:25:32 AM  

BurnShrike: mekkab: /And by a show of hands, who thought that this was going to be about the Doc diddling the Wifey? I know I sure did...

Yep. That was my prediction. Or that the doctor used his own sperm to fertilized instead of the husband's.


That was my thought too.

I thought this kind of genetic goof was part of the assumed risk when you go in for IVF in the first place.

/learn something new every day.
 
2012-02-02 08:26:01 AM  
Sounds like "Dad" should sue himself. He's the one who's responsible.
 
2012-02-02 08:28:49 AM  
FTA: "We love Keeden now that he's here, but...."

And that may be all I need to know.
 
2012-02-02 08:32:52 AM  
FTFA: Debbie and Lawrence Waller [said] they love their son Keeden, but believe he should never have been born.

One day your kid may see these articles, asshats.

Stay classy!
 
2012-02-02 08:33:12 AM  

emersonbiggins: Days after Keeden was born in August 2000 he suffered a massive stroke causing brain damage and leaving him unable to walk, talk or go to the toilet unaided.

I know these are new parents and all, but surely they are aware that the average newborn can do none of those things?


Nice.
 
2012-02-02 08:35:38 AM  
I know this is from my very limited experience with other people having birth, but it seems like there always seems to be something not quite right with the babies born when IVF or other fertility treatments are used. That makes me sad because there are healthy babies out there who need adopting. :(

mekkab: I love how this is not their first Wrongful Birth law suit.


I didn't click through initially, so now I have more questions like...the kid's eleven? The first little blurb conveniently left out that the baby's not really a baby anymore.

And the first "wrongful birth" case didn't work, so they're trying again, it seems...

And saying something like, "We love him, but he shouldn't have been born" seems cold no matter which way you slice it.
 
2012-02-02 08:35:50 AM  

emersonbiggins: Days after Keeden was born in August 2000 he suffered a massive stroke causing brain damage and leaving him unable to walk, talk or go to the toilet unaided.

I know these are new parents and all, but surely they are aware that the average newborn can do none of those things?


: ) I am glad you are here to bring some levity.

/toss out the case and make the parents pay any of the doctor's legal fees.
 
2012-02-02 08:36:06 AM  

MorrisBird: It sounds like alloimmune thrombocytopenia. This is a treatable condition, with a proper medical history of the parents. Remember how we used to have "blue babies" because Mom was A- and Dad A+? Kind of like that. Nowadays A- mothers just get a shot of Rhogam, and no more blue babies. With alloimmune thrombocytopenia, if mom is treated with intravenous gamma globulin during her pregnancy, no intracerebral bleeds in baby's brain. Healthy baby. I would say that the journalist leapt to a damned unfortunate conclusion without understanding the medicine. It's not a "wrongful birth." It's a failure to diagnose and treat alloimmune thrombocytopenia.


Sorry, but no. "Wrongful life" is a specific cause of action, and the suit has to be filed as such.
 
2012-02-02 08:38:00 AM  
this is why you shouldn't put all your eggs in one basket uterus.
 
2012-02-02 08:39:14 AM  

MorrisBird: It sounds like alloimmune thrombocytopenia. This is a treatable condition, with a proper medical history of the parents. Remember how we used to have "blue babies" because Mom was A- and Dad A+? Kind of like that. Nowadays A- mothers just get a shot of Rhogam, and no more blue babies. With alloimmune thrombocytopenia, if mom is treated with intravenous gamma globulin during her pregnancy, no intracerebral bleeds in baby's brain. Healthy baby. I would say that the journalist leapt to a damned unfortunate conclusion without understanding the medicine. It's not a "wrongful birth." It's a failure to diagnose and treat alloimmune thrombocytopenia.


Yeah, the article that's linked at the bottom has a bit more information (though not the name of the disorder, that I can see). Here and Here

Basically, the argument is that before starting IVF, the couple told the doctor that the father had this rare blood condition, but the doctor did not inform them of the risks associated with it, or the 50% probability that it would be passed on to their son and possibility that it would cause major damage (in the form of a stroke soon after birth). Knowing that information could have meant that they might not have gone ahead with the decision to get IVF in the first place. Basically the argument is that he didn't give the the full information (which was his duty of care).

The doctor is saying that 1) he gave them the number of a genetic councillor (nature of the referral is disputed by the couple) and 2) There isn't explicit evidence of a link between this particular blood disorder and stokes.

So, it's not quite as silly as it sounds, but it isn't a strong case for them. If they do find a connection between the stroke and the condition, then they might have a case (far from a sure one), but not otherwise.
 
2012-02-02 08:40:28 AM  

emersonbiggins: Days after Keeden was born in August 2000 he suffered a massive stroke causing brain damage and leaving him unable to walk, talk or go to the toilet unaided.

I know these are new parents and all, but surely they are aware that the average newborn can do none of those things?


I thought that very thing when I read that. However, I chose not to burn in hell for actually saying it :-)
 
2012-02-02 08:43:59 AM  
Justice John Hislop heard that Dr James did not seek to find out the answer himself, but handed the couple the name and phone number of a genetic counsellor at Wollongong Hospital on a post-it note. It is alleged the note was given to the Wallers in the context of a discussion about fertility not genetics...

If someone refers you to a genetic counsellor, it's safe to figure that the discussion will be about your genetic risk factors (it's right in the name).

If the phone is the general hospital operator...good for you that you have the person's NAME!

/wife is a genetic counsellor.
//drives her nuts that I'm adopted.
 
2012-02-02 08:49:47 AM  
These people sound classy. Parents who love their children: "We love him but he won't sleep at night lol". These people, "We love him, but he should never have been born."
 
2012-02-02 08:51:13 AM  
If you're willing to sue for "wrongful birth," then you, by definition, wish your child had not been born. I find that incompatible with any claims to love said child. Medical malpractice, maybe- if the doctor withheld information that might have affected their course of treatment for the kid. But "wrongful birth"? WTH? They don't deserve to be parents.
 
2012-02-02 08:54:08 AM  
So...6 years ago this couple tried suing the OBGYNs and the IVF clinic and it was thrown out of court (for reasons the article doesn't mention). Now they're back with another attempt..this time targeting the IVF doctor specifically. If this one is also tossed out, who will they sue next time? The IVF clinic's nursing staff? The genetic counselor they were referred to?
 
2012-02-02 08:57:20 AM  

give me doughnuts: Sorry, but no. "Wrongful life" is a specific cause of action, and the suit has to be filed as such.


And you got your degree in Australian law at what specific law school in Kentucky?
 
2012-02-02 08:57:23 AM  

Feepit: FTFA: Debbie and Lawrence Waller [said] they love their son Keeden, but believe he should never have been born.

One day your kid may see these articles, asshats.

Stay classy!


Pretty sure the kid is too incapacitated to read.

At any rate it's pretty unbelievable that the father would not have known/sought out those risks beforehand.

He himself was already living with it with no major consequence before the kid was born. My cousin was born when I was in my teens. It was only after that that we learned that my aunt had been a fragile X carrier and that my cousin was Autistic because of it. That of course meant my father could also have it(although he would have a minor version as he functions pretty well) which would mean I, as a female would have it(comes down on the X chromosome, gets worse with all suceeding genertions) Finally, a few months ago, because there's ever the slim chance I could someday bear a child, I got my test done.

Turned out I didn't have it....but up until then I'd know if I did that I could have an autistic child.
 
2012-02-02 08:59:41 AM  
FROM TFA: Days after Keeden was born in August 2000 he suffered a massive stroke causing brain damage and leaving him unable to walk, talk or go to the toilet unaided.

Am I a monster for thinking this child should have been euthanized immediately after birth?
This article is light on details, but with this level of brain damage I'm assuming cognitive function has been significantly impaired as well.
Sentencing a human being to a lifetime in this condition seems cruel to me.
 
2012-02-02 09:00:21 AM  
their son Keeden

Oh for fark's sake.
 
2012-02-02 09:00:26 AM  
I'm ordering my next child with a side of fries.
 
2012-02-02 09:02:09 AM  

braedan: FROM TFA: Days after Keeden was born in August 2000 he suffered a massive stroke causing brain damage and leaving him unable to walk, talk or go to the toilet unaided.

Am I a monster for thinking this child should have been euthanized immediately after birth?
This article is light on details, but with this level of brain damage I'm assuming cognitive function has been significantly impaired as well.
Sentencing a human being to a lifetime in this condition seems cruel to me.


I agree, but there are numerous religious nutbags who would be willing to kill someone who did that. You know, to prevent the babby killing.
 
2012-02-02 09:06:43 AM  

theknuckler_33: their son Keeden

Oh for fark's sake.


I thought that was the lifelong debilitating condition. I guess he has two.
 
2012-02-02 09:12:19 AM  

dopeydwarf: So let me see if I have this straight: These people absolutely had to have a little bundle of joy of their very own, a doctor did his best to help them reach that goal, the child was born with a birth defect due to his father's shiatty genes, and now the parents are all butt hurt over it?

Maybe they should sue whatever god they believe in?


I"m thinking the same thing...the condition wasn't a side effect of the IVF, it was inherited from the father. Unless the doc was somehow legally obligated to screen their entire genetic makeup, I see no reason he'd be responsible. This could just as easily happened with natural birth.
 
2012-02-02 09:16:12 AM  

thelordofcheese: You ever think that nature gives some people clues about whether they shouldn't procreate?


Meh, the whole medical industry is based on subverting nature. You have cancer? Maybe it's nature's way of saying you shouldn't be here anymore. Birth control totally screws with a woman's natural hormones, pills for depressions change the natural chemistry of your brain, I could go on.
 
2012-02-02 09:17:11 AM  
Debbie and Lawrence Waller, of Kangaroo Valley, 95 miles south of Sydney, told The Sydney Morning Herald they love their son Keeden, but believe he should never have been born.

Someone
should never have been born in this situation, but it's not the kid.

/yes, I know there's a logical problem with that
 
2012-02-02 09:19:39 AM  

braedan: FROM TFA: Days after Keeden was born in August 2000 he suffered a massive stroke causing brain damage and leaving him unable to walk, talk or go to the toilet unaided.

Am I a monster for thinking this child should have been euthanized immediately after birth?
This article is light on details, but with this level of brain damage I'm assuming cognitive function has been significantly impaired as well.
Sentencing a human being to a lifetime in this condition seems cruel to me.


Yes.

You play the cards you are dealt.

(son has rare genetic disorder. Wife and I are both recessive carriers, but our son is the first in both families and genetic tests for it only started a few decades ago so we didn't know. He's well worth the extra work/cost.)
 
2012-02-02 09:23:28 AM  
what? no hawt pics of Octomom?
 
2012-02-02 09:25:30 AM  

Feepit:
One day your kid may see these articles, asshats.


I doubt it. I wonder if he'd even be able to read.
 
2012-02-02 09:28:01 AM  

ihatedumbpeople: dopeydwarf: So let me see if I have this straight: These people absolutely had to have a little bundle of joy of their very own, a doctor did his best to help them reach that goal, the child was born with a birth defect due to his father's shiatty genes, and now the parents are all butt hurt over it?

Maybe they should sue whatever god they believe in?

I"m thinking the same thing...the condition wasn't a side effect of the IVF, it was inherited from the father. Unless the doc was somehow legally obligated to screen their entire genetic makeup, I see no reason he'd be responsible. This could just as easily happened with natural birth.


See but that's the thing. When my wife got pregnant, they offered to do genetic screening to find out any risks. As far as I understand, IVF is more stringent and they make you do it and tell you about the genetic risks before they'll do the procedure. I could be wrong, but if this is the case and the doctor didn't convey those risks, he could be at fault.
 
2012-02-02 09:32:15 AM  

gyorg: braedan: Am I a monster for thinking this child should have been euthanized immediately after birth?
This article is light on details, but with this level of brain damage I'm assuming cognitive function has been significantly impaired as well.
Sentencing a human being to a lifetime in this condition seems cruel to me.

Yes.

You play the cards you are dealt.

(son has rare genetic disorder. Wife and I are both recessive carriers, but our son is the first in both families and genetic tests for it only started a few decades ago so we didn't know. He's well worth the extra work/cost.)


How does your son feel about the game? Maybe he farking hates playing cards, and would've preferred Scrabble.
 
2012-02-02 09:57:01 AM  

Smurfme: I'm ordering my next child with a side of fries.


If you come to where I work, you next order of fries could very well give you a child.
Or you could try the clam chowder too, but neither of them is what I would call 'clean food'.

But they do come with free 'special sauce' which I personaly make in small, limited batches of about 3-4 runs daily...5 If I haven't made any for a while.
 
2012-02-02 09:59:04 AM  
resources0.news.com.au

Unavailable for comment
 
2012-02-02 10:01:14 AM  
your average maint. man

what? no hawt pics of Octomom?

I did a GIS and it stated "There are no images anywhere on the internets that match this criteria"
 
2012-02-02 10:18:56 AM  

Dahnkster: FTA: "We love Keeden now that he's here, but...."

And that may be all I need to know.


Came here for basically this.

"We love Keeden now that he's here, but....we'd love him more if we had $10 million."
 
2012-02-02 10:33:20 AM  
Their intentions may be reasonable, but their way of expressing it is sad and sick.

I'm not all fuzzy-wuzzy about babies and parenthood and such, but damn, that is some cold-hearted crap to read.
"We love him, but wish he was dead."
Bloody hell, folks. My cynical side wonders why the kid didn't suffer an "accident" if they so much regret his birth.
They could have adopted a kid whose dad didn't give him damaged genes, the selfish wankers.
 
2012-02-02 10:36:23 AM  

MorrisBird: It sounds like alloimmune thrombocytopenia. This is a treatable condition, with a proper medical history of the parents. Remember how we used to have "blue babies" because Mom was A- and Dad A+? Kind of like that. Nowadays A- mothers just get a shot of Rhogam, and no more blue babies. With alloimmune thrombocytopenia, if mom is treated with intravenous gamma globulin during her pregnancy, no intracerebral bleeds in baby's brain. Healthy baby. I would say that the journalist leapt to a damned unfortunate conclusion without understanding the medicine. It's not a "wrongful birth." It's a failure to diagnose and treat alloimmune thrombocytopenia.


Well you are a festizio! See, I can make up words too.
 
2012-02-02 10:42:13 AM  

braedan:
Am I a monster for thinking this child should have been euthanized immediately after birth?

Sentencing a human being to a lifetime in this condition seems cruel to me.


Of course you're not. I've had to pull the plug on a family member before, and if the day comes that I'm in a persistent vegetative state I hope one of my kids plucks up the nerve to do the same for me. Or smother me with a pillow.

Before either of my kids were born, we paid for amniocentesis. The religious folks in North Georgia (everybody but us) scoffed, and asked if something had come back wrong, would you get an abortion? We said hell yes, which horrified them.

They said a mentally handicapped child was special and loving, etc, a gift from Heaven. We said we respected their opinion, but to us a mentally handicapped child was a shuffling, drooling abomination sent by the Lord of Hell to shadow our every step even unto Death, and that God had given us the means to avoid this happening to us or the child in question. If we did not avail ourselves of God's Help, we would have gotten what we deserved.

No offense meant to the upthread folks in this situation who were promoting it, of course, just a differing opinion to which I'm entitled.
 
2012-02-02 11:10:26 AM  

ajt167: ihatedumbpeople: dopeydwarf: So let me see if I have this straight: These people absolutely had to have a little bundle of joy of their very own, a doctor did his best to help them reach that goal, the child was born with a birth defect due to his father's shiatty genes, and now the parents are all butt hurt over it?

Maybe they should sue whatever god they believe in?

I"m thinking the same thing...the condition wasn't a side effect of the IVF, it was inherited from the father. Unless the doc was somehow legally obligated to screen their entire genetic makeup, I see no reason he'd be responsible. This could just as easily happened with natural birth.

See but that's the thing. When my wife got pregnant, they offered to do genetic screening to find out any risks. As far as I understand, IVF is more stringent and they make you do it and tell you about the genetic risks before they'll do the procedure. I could be wrong, but if this is the case and the doctor didn't convey those risks, he could be at fault.


As I mentioned above, apparently the thing was that the father had told the doctor about his genetic condition, but the doctor had not told them about the associated risks related to having a child with that condition. That said, it's also suggested that the stroke the son suffered might not have been related to the condition anyway, which would make the point moot, but it's not about what went wrong with the son, it's that the doctor did not perform due diligence in informing them about certain risks before undertaking the IVF proceedure. Even though those risks would not have been known had they conceived the old fashioned way, the argument is that the doctor should have talked to them when it had come up, which would have given them the information needed to make an informed decision about whether to go ahead with it. Still, it's a bit of a stretch about where a doctors due diligence ends, but it's not unfathomable.

Ithaca_StLondon: Their intentions may be reasonable, but their way of expressing it is sad and sick.

I'm not all fuzzy-wuzzy about babies and parenthood and such, but damn, that is some cold-hearted crap to read.
"We love him, but wish he was dead."
Bloody hell, folks. My cynical side wonders why the kid didn't suffer an "accident" if they so much regret his birth.
They could have adopted a kid whose dad didn't give him damaged genes, the selfish wankers.


No, I don't get them "wishing he was dead" from the quote. They wish that they had a chance to reconsider other options before he was conceived. There's really no other way to express the sentiment that they should have been warned ahead of time, when they might have made a different decision about receiving IVF, but that doesn't mean that they want him dead now. By the sounds of it, they've tried to do the right things for him. It doesn't mean it's not a frivolous law suit, but I don't think they're monsters as you seem to believe.
 
2012-02-02 11:13:48 AM  

Alpha Sierra Foxtrot: I know this is from my very limited experience with other people having birth, but it seems like there always seems to be something not quite right with the babies born when IVF or other fertility treatments are used. That makes me sad because there are healthy babies out there who need adopting. :(


You have it backwards, actually. My wife has been an elementary school teacher for 11 years, and she can easily identify adopted kids based on behavior and learning patterns. IVF/fertility - not so much. Adopted babies often come with a ton of baggage.
 
2012-02-02 11:14:21 AM  
$10 million? Really? And we don't need some reform in this area?
 
2012-02-02 11:14:41 AM  
With the name Keeden, HE's the one who will wish he'd never been born.
 
2012-02-02 11:15:24 AM  
Sadly if the doctor did boink the lady and then have a healthy baby none of these problems would of come up.
 
2012-02-02 11:21:41 AM  

The Singing Bush: You have it backwards, actually. My wife has been an elementary school teacher for 11 years, and she can easily identify adopted kids based on behavior and learning patterns. IVF/fertility - not so much. Adopted babies often come with a ton of baggage.


I didn't mean emotional concerns, necessarily. A few have been allergic to everything in the world and one is autistic.

But like I said, it's my limited experience.
 
2012-02-02 11:24:18 AM  
You gave him the disorder not the doctor.

This is like suing a buffet because the salad you put together at their salad bar wasn't very good.

And if they're complaining about a defective product shouldn't that include a recall? Seems hypocritical to biatch about what a company sold you then keep it and demand money.
 
2012-02-02 11:25:40 AM  

gyorg: braedan: FROM TFA: Days after Keeden was born in August 2000 he suffered a massive stroke causing brain damage and leaving him unable to walk, talk or go to the toilet unaided.

Am I a monster for thinking this child should have been euthanized immediately after birth?

Yes.

You play the cards you are dealt.

(son has rare genetic disorder. Wife and I are both recessive carriers, but our son is the first in both families and genetic tests for it only started a few decades ago so we didn't know. He's well worth the extra work/cost.)


I don't know how you play poker, but if I'm dealt a high card of 6, I fold and wait for the next hand.

My wife is on the fence, leaning toward no regarding having kids. I want children, but issues like this are the reason I've not discussed it further with her. She is a diagnosed with bi-polar disorder & other issues. That long with the potential for birth defects scare the hell out of me.
I do not want the responsibility of raising a child with a severe handicap.
 
2012-02-02 11:31:32 AM  
Honestly, they obviously don't want to be saddled with the kid (despite the completely transparent statement that "they love him now that he's here")...how hard is it to have an "accident" happen to a crippled infant...in farkin' Australia?

"Croikey, the man-eating digiridingo musta gotten in the poor bugger's crib as he slept...bloody shame, that is...Foster's, mate?"

...these people are just greedy, and there's no way they'd get away with anything now.
 
2012-02-02 11:55:54 AM  
In 2006, the High Court of Australia rejected a "wrongful life" claim made on behalf of Keeden

So it must be that a six-year old (probably) brain-damaged child asked his parents why he was ever born, since they brought the lawsuit in his name.

I had a conversation with a friend of mine once about whether or not we'd want to raise a damaged child. She asked me if I'd have an abortion if tests showed that the baby had Down's Syndrome. I said hell yes. She said no.

Maybe the fact that she was 42, about to get married, and was going to try to get pregnant had something to do with her answer.
 
2012-02-02 12:20:57 PM  

Gwendolyn: thelordofcheese: You ever think that nature gives some people clues about whether they shouldn't procreate?

Yeah I was coming here to sy something similar.


Infertility is nature's way of preventing certain genes from passing on. Start messing around with nature, deal with the consequences. These parents are just upset they didn't get their perfect little replicant.
 
2012-02-02 12:41:34 PM  

thelordofcheese: You ever think that nature gives some people clues about whether they shouldn't procreate?


Your parents ignored it.

/ fark you
// i have a test tube baby; worth every penny
 
2012-02-02 12:42:14 PM  

Mort_Q: thelordofcheese: You ever think that nature gives some people clues about whether they shouldn't procreate?

Your parents ignored it.

/ fark you
// i have a test tube baby; worth every penny


Does it have a belly button?
 
2012-02-02 12:46:49 PM  
I think they may have also won the Stupid Name Lottery, Australian Division.
 
2012-02-02 12:49:29 PM  

I should be in the kitchen: Gwendolyn: thelordofcheese: You ever think that nature gives some people clues about whether they shouldn't procreate?

Yeah I was coming here to sy something similar.

Infertility is nature's way of preventing certain genes from passing on. Start messing around with nature, deal with the consequences.


Cancer is nature's way of preventing your organs from functioning properly
A broken leg is nature's way of preventing you from walking
AIDS is nature's way of defeating your immune system so you'll die of a minor infection
ED is nature's way of preventing you from farking
Poor vision is nature's way of preventing you from seeing things that are far away
Heart attacks are nature's way of destroying your heart

Maybe we shouldn't treat these things either.
 
2012-02-02 12:51:41 PM  
rlv.zcache.com
 
2012-02-02 12:54:55 PM  
So the doctor did nothing wrong, it was daddy's defective spermmies.
 
2012-02-02 01:04:50 PM  
How did we make it so far into the thread without a Gattaca reference?
 
2012-02-02 01:27:58 PM  

Loaf's Tray: Mort_Q: thelordofcheese: You ever think that nature gives some people clues about whether they shouldn't procreate?

Your parents ignored it.

/ fark you
// i have a test tube baby; worth every penny

Does it have a belly button?


It's nose is a little smushed.

Also, it's an abomination to our Lord.
 
2012-02-02 01:30:18 PM  

Mort_Q: // i have a test tube baby; worth every penny


The best part about test tube babbys is that you can keep them on your piano with a few guppies.
 
2012-02-02 02:38:02 PM  
From the longer, linked article at the bottom of this article:
They claim that such responsibility as does exist was met by the referral of the Wallers to the genetic counsellor.

''There is no question that Debbie and Lawrence Waller have experienced a tragic event and that the Keeden Waller situation is extremely sad,'' counsel for Dr James, Jeremy Kirk, SC, said.

''But they are intelligent adults who were advised to speak to a genetic counsellor. They chose not to take up that advice.''


So let me get this straight. The couple was referred by the IVF doctors to a genetic counsellor, who would have told them about any possible genetic issues. The couple chose not to speak with the genetic counsellor. Now they blame the IVF doctors. Do I have that right? Yeebus.
 
2012-02-02 02:41:13 PM  
Buyers remorse.

Caveat emptor, baby.
 
2012-02-02 03:03:38 PM  
Let's put everything else aside and think about the impact that this has on the child. (Think of the children!, etc., etc.) By these parents taking this issue to court, they are basically saying to the child "Sorry, Keeden, we didn't really want you, we wanted a child like you who can run and play and piss in the loo without mummy and daddy to help you."

Legally, I see no basis for the suit and believe it should have been dismissed and laughed out of court. The blood-clotting condition was (and is) genetic; therefore, any reasonable parent would assume that their child--whether conceived naturally with the horizontal cha-cha or through IVF with a turkey baster--would stand a significant chance of inheriting the gene.

The parents claim they didn't have the "right information," but all they would have needed was a high school biology textbook to figure out that, wait for it, a genetic condition mgiht be passed down.

What's more shocking to me, however, is that the parents were specifically referred to a genetics specialist but did not follow up with one. While we're at it, the parents claim they called the hospital switchboard and no one answered. I personally conducted an experiment today by calling three hospital switchboards at 12:30 local time and...all three hospitals answered. So I don't believe they didn't follow up with the geneticist.

Finally, I would like to point out that the IVF specialist has essentially no duty to tell the parents that they carry genes which might possibly affect their test-tube baby. After all, the purpose of the IVF specialist is to make sure that the baby batter is made into a baby blastocyst and then--maybe, assuming the mother isn't screwed up in her lady parts--an actual baby.
 
2012-02-02 03:09:12 PM  

FirstNationalBastard: Buyers remorse.

Caveat emptor, baby.


Well, at least he wasn't the wrong color.
 
2012-02-02 03:19:07 PM  

Jeff_in_ATL: braedan:
Am I a monster for thinking this child should have been euthanized immediately after birth?

Sentencing a human being to a lifetime in this condition seems cruel to me.

Of course you're not. I've had to pull the plug on a family member before, and if the day comes that I'm in a persistent vegetative state I hope one of my kids plucks up the nerve to do the same for me. Or smother me with a pillow.

Before either of my kids were born, we paid for amniocentesis. The religious folks in North Georgia (everybody but us) scoffed, and asked if something had come back wrong, would you get an abortion? We said hell yes, which horrified them.

They said a mentally handicapped child was special and loving, etc, a gift from Heaven. We said we respected their opinion, but to us a mentally handicapped child was a shuffling, drooling abomination sent by the Lord of Hell to shadow our every step even unto Death, and that God had given us the means to avoid this happening to us or the child in question. If we did not avail ourselves of God's Help, we would have gotten what we deserved.

No offense meant to the upthread folks in this situation who were promoting it, of course, just a differing opinion to which I'm entitled.


I would have to agree with you both, for the most part...However, I should mention that I have Turner's Syndrome. I found out a few years ago that a high percentage of feti who test positive for TS are aborted. It kind of shocked me because, for me, TS basically just means I am short and can't have babbys. I's certainly not mentally deficient (at least not more so than any graduate of a public college in the U.S.) and I am actually fairly strong for my size and gender, physically. As to the no babbys, I could have invitro but, even if I had a husband and all that, I'd adopt. I kind of feel that invitro is immoral.

Anyway, none of that means I think either abortion or invitro should be illegal. They should be up to the mother and/or father and their doctor. I just thought I'd point out that some genetic abnormalities might not be so bad. I know that just because I think something is immoral doesn't mean that it should be illegal.
 
2012-02-02 03:36:53 PM  

mekkab: I love how this is not their first Wrongful Birth law suit.


/And by a show of hands, who thought that this was going to be about the Doc diddling the Wifey? I know I sure did...


I had thought he put his own sperm in the petri dish, and dad noticed that it looked a lot swarthier than he did. Leaving disappointed.
 
2012-02-02 04:54:50 PM  

thelordofcheese: You ever think that nature gives some people clues about whether they shouldn't procreate?


THIS
 
2012-02-02 06:00:55 PM  

Beerbarian: Justice John Hislop heard that Dr James did not seek to find out the answer himself, but handed the couple the name and phone number of a genetic counsellor at Wollongong Hospital on a post-it note. It is alleged the note was given to the Wallers in the context of a discussion about fertility not genetics...

If someone refers you to a genetic counsellor, it's safe to figure that the discussion will be about your genetic risk factors (it's right in the name).

If the phone is the general hospital operator...good for you that you have the person's NAME!

/wife is a genetic counsellor.
//drives her nuts that I'm adopted.



They heard what they wanted to hear.

They're probably hoping for a settlement, like those folks who sue (and win!) against condom manufacturers (or MJ), not because the companies (or MJ) did anything wrong, the attorneys just want the problem to go away and advise their clients accordingly.
 
2012-02-02 06:04:07 PM  
If you sued your parents for "wrongful birth", does that mean you can than legally commit suicide?

/dumb question on purpose
 
2012-02-02 07:32:41 PM  

Feepit: FTFA: Debbie and Lawrence Waller [said] they love their son Keeden, but believe he should never have been born.

One day your kid may see these articles, asshats.

Stay classy!


NO, he won't. That's the point. He will NEVER be able to read this nor will he be able to live a full life.
 
Displayed 83 of 83 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter






In Other Media
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report