Sha na na na, sha na na na na, (Ba doom)
Sha na na na, sha na na na na, (Ba doom)
Sha na na na, sha na na na na, (Ba doom)
Sha na na na, sha na na na na, (Yeah)
Yip yip yip yip yip yip yip yip
Mum mum mum mum mum mum
Get a job Sha na na na, sha na na na na

The Silhouettes

Why can't she go get a damn job? Are her legs broke?

WhiskeySticks: Why can't she go get a damn job? Are her legs broke?

That happens to all wives that haven't worked during the marriage then find themselves getting divorced. They liked having everything and not having to work for it....gimme gimme gimme.

sorry ladies...you leave the man, you leave the money too. and yes, I DO think it should work both ways. I'd say the exact same thing if (insert random rich lady here)'s husband decided to bail. sorry bud, you lost out.

/gotta take care of the kids though
//within reason
///"within reason" doesn't mean $25k a month either.

Must be the money

and if the kids are in need, they should be with dad. period. unless she can prove he's unfit to be a parent (good luck with that btw), there's no reason they shouldn't be with the father. and if she wants a phone and spending money, get a damn job. I'm sure some lame judge is going to give you a massive settlement eventually, you can hold out until then.

/how much you wanna bet she 'held out' quite frequently during their marriage...hence the divorce and the supposed demands?
//sounds like a husband that got sick and tired of his wife having 'headaches' every night.

DrewCurtisJr: Must be the money

Oh why must I feel this way?

This thread is useless without multiple pictures of Pilar Sanders.

Let's put it this way:

If she was regularly giving away the sexual favors, she'd get all the money she wants.

Therefore, she probably declared the sex embargo before he declared the money embargo.

This is what happens when you start acting like sexual intercourse within a marriage is a privilege, not a right (or obligation).

Yes, Ladies, I am saying that you really need to stay on top of your man's sexual desires. This means that you need to 'lady up' on a very regular basis (~ every 5-6 - your frequency may vary) and drain that snake. Be Good, Giving and Game. Don't make it a fight about your 'personal soveriegnty'. It's the cheapest, easiest gift for you to give him and it's the one that opens all the other doors of trust, affection, and attention. Turning him down is, in effect saying "I don't care at all about your needs, even if it would take 3 minutes of my time." And this isn't like borrowing a cup of flour from a neighbor (which, incidentally, takes longer than 3 minutes) in that he can't just keep going through the neighborhood until he finds his cup of flour. And it's not like you don't HAVE it. In effect you've decided he's too much trouble, that is a terrible thing to do to the person your pledged to spend your life with.

Now, I'm not saying that you have to give in all the time, but there ARE other options - a Quick 'manual override' or 'kiss' will satisfy most men in a bind, and the worst thing you need to fix that is a napkin or lipstick.

If you put it off like some kind of chore you might have had to do when you are a kid, then his mind will be less centered around your intimate personage (not your pooter - but you!). Wear perfume and makeup for him. Dress for him, and he will give you back all the things you got 'when you were dating'. Initiate a sexual cold war in your marriage and you might as well put a giant stake through its heart.

He don't love dem hoes.

rubi_con_man: Let's put it this way:

If she was regularly giving away the sexual favors, she'd get all the money she wants.

Therefore, she probably declared the sex embargo before he declared the money embargo.

This is what happens when you start acting like sexual intercourse within a marriage is a privilege, not a right (or obligation).

Yes, Ladies, I am saying that you really need to stay on top of your man's sexual desires. This means that you need to 'lady up' on a very regular basis (~ every 5-6 - your frequency may vary) and drain that snake. Be Good, Giving and Game. Don't make it a fight about your 'personal soveriegnty'. It's the cheapest, easiest gift for you to give him and it's the one that opens all the other doors of trust, affection, and attention. Turning him down is, in effect saying "I don't care at all about your needs, even if it would take 3 minutes of my time." And this isn't like borrowing a cup of flour from a neighbor (which, incidentally, takes longer than 3 minutes) in that he can't just keep going through the neighborhood until he finds his cup of flour. And it's not like you don't HAVE it. In effect you've decided he's too much trouble, that is a terrible thing to do to the person your pledged to spend your life with.

Now, I'm not saying that you have to give in all the time, but there ARE other options - a Quick 'manual override' or 'kiss' will satisfy most men in a bind, and the worst thing you need to fix that is a napkin or lipstick.

If you put it off like some kind of chore you might have had to do when you are a kid, then his mind will be less centered around your intimate personage (not your pooter - but you!). Wear perfume and makeup for him. Dress for him, and he will give you back all the things you got 'when you were dating'. Initiate a sexual cold war in your marriage and you might as well put a giant stake through its heart.

*golf clap*

Well said sir, well said.

rubi_con_man: I'm printing that for my wife lol...

Women... don't take this the wrong way, but if you want to be treated as equals, then STFU and stop living off the man after the divorce. I can understand child support within reason. And perhaps some alimony to get you back on your feet if you have been a housewife since the dawn of time. But once the marriage is over, get a job. Now if you don't want to be treated as an equal, then STFU and get back to the kitchen and fix him a sammich.

Old joke, but relevant to this thread

On their wedding night, the young bride approached her new
husband and asked for $20.00 for their first lovemaking encounter. In his highly aroused state, her husband readily agreed.

This scenario was repeated each time they made love for more than 30 years, with him thinking that it was a cute way for her to afford new clothes and other incidentals that she needed.

Arriving home around noon one day, she was surprised to find her husband in a very drunken state. During the next few minutes, he explained that his employer was going through a process of corporate downsizing, and he had been let go. It was unlikely that, at the age of 59, he'd be able to find another position that paid anywhere near what he'd been earning, and therefore, they were financially ruined.

Calmly, his wife handed him a bank book which showed more than thirty years of steady deposits and interest totaling nearly $1 million. Then she showed him certificates of deposits issued by the bank which were worth over $2 million, and informed him that they were one of the largest depositors in the bank.

She explained that for the more than three decades she had "charged" him for sex, these holdings had multiplied and these were the results of her savings and investments.

Faced with evidence of cash and investments worth over $3 million, her husband was so astounded he could barely speak, but finally he found his voice and blurted out, "If I'd had any idea what you were doing, I would have given you all my business!"

ihatedumbpeople: and if the kids are in need, they should be with dad. period. unless she can prove he's unfit to be a parent (good luck with that btw), there's no reason they shouldn't be with the father. and if she wants a phone and spending money, get a damn job. I'm sure some lame judge is going to give you a massive settlement eventually, you can hold out until then.

/how much you wanna bet she 'held out' quite frequently during their marriage...hence the divorce and the supposed demands?
//sounds like a husband that got sick and tired of his wife having 'headaches' every night.

Agreed, 100%!

If she cannot provide for the children or prove that he is an unfit father, the children need to be with Dad.

Maybe Pilar needs to go on some auditions?

And you're right, it is extremely hard to prove someone to be an unfit parent.

/been there
//done that
///have the t-shirt
////proved that my ex was unfit
//in Texas
//have custody of my children
//fought the fight
//my children have a chance

4NTLRZ: ihatedumbpeople: and if the kids are in need, they should be with dad. period. unless she can prove he's unfit to be a parent (good luck with that btw), there's no reason they shouldn't be with the father. and if she wants a phone and spending money, get a damn job. I'm sure some lame judge is going to give you a massive settlement eventually, you can hold out until then.

/how much you wanna bet she 'held out' quite frequently during their marriage...hence the divorce and the supposed demands?
//sounds like a husband that got sick and tired of his wife having 'headaches' every night.

Agreed, 100%!

If she cannot provide for the children or prove that he is an unfit father, the children need to be with Dad.

Maybe Pilar needs to go on some auditions?

And you're right, it is extremely hard to prove someone to be an unfit parent.

/been there
//done that
///have the t-shirt
////proved that my ex was unfit
//in Texas
//have custody of my children
//fought the fight
//my children have a chance

Good jerb!

rubi_con_man: Let's put it this way:

If she was regularly giving away the sexual favors, she'd get all the money she wants.

Therefore, she probably declared the sex embargo before he declared the money embargo.

This is what happens when you start acting like sexual intercourse within a marriage is a privilege, not a right (or obligation).

Yes, Ladies, I am saying that you really need to stay on top of your man's sexual desires. This means that you need to 'lady up' on a very regular basis (~ every 5-6 - your frequency may vary) and drain that snake. Be Good, Giving and Game. Don't make it a fight about your 'personal soveriegnty'. It's the cheapest, easiest gift for you to give him and it's the one that opens all the other doors of trust, affection, and attention. Turning him down is, in effect saying "I don't care at all about your needs, even if it would take 3 minutes of my time." And this isn't like borrowing a cup of flour from a neighbor (which, incidentally, takes longer than 3 minutes) in that he can't just keep going through the neighborhood until he finds his cup of flour. And it's not like you don't HAVE it. In effect you've decided he's too much trouble, that is a terrible thing to do to the person your pledged to spend your life with.

Now, I'm not saying that you have to give in all the time, but there ARE other options - a Quick 'manual override' or 'kiss' will satisfy most men in a bind, and the worst thing you need to fix that is a napkin or lipstick.

If you put it off like some kind of chore you might have had to do when you are a kid, then his mind will be less centered around your intimate personage (not your pooter - but you!). Wear perfume and makeup for him. Dress for him, and he will give you back all the things you got 'when you were dating'. Initiate a sexual cold war in your marriage and you might as well put a giant stake through its heart.

Pretty much hit the nail on the head. And plenty of blow jobs.

She is fine... I wonder what else he would want in a woman. I'm not aware of a specimen of the female species who looks better than her.

Well Pilar, that pole ain't going to blow itself.

JC

Why am I thinking the "offered sexual favors for cash was" something along the lines of "You want more money? fark you, I want you to suck my dick."

ihatedumbpeople: 4NTLRZ: ihatedumbpeople: and if the kids are in need, they should be with dad. period. unless she can prove he's unfit to be a parent (good luck with that btw), there's no reason they shouldn't be with the father. and if she wants a phone and spending money, get a damn job. I'm sure some lame judge is going to give you a massive settlement eventually, you can hold out until then.

/how much you wanna bet she 'held out' quite frequently during their marriage...hence the divorce and the supposed demands?
//sounds like a husband that got sick and tired of his wife having 'headaches' every night.

Agreed, 100%!

If she cannot provide for the children or prove that he is an unfit father, the children need to be with Dad.

Maybe Pilar needs to go on some auditions?

And you're right, it is extremely hard to prove someone to be an unfit parent.

/been there
//done that
///have the t-shirt
////proved that my ex was unfit
//in Texas
//have custody of my children
//fought the fight
//my children have a chance

Good jerb!

In retrospect, those were the best tens of thousands of dollars I've ever spent. The hardest part was that my ex had (and still has) a nasty habit of feeding false information to the children in the hopes that she'll "win them over" & they'll "hate Dad" for making to so that they don't live with Mom. She thought it'd be a good idea to thrust the children smack-dab in the middle of situations that are only suitable for lawyers & adults in the hopes of being awarded custody and child support payments so large that she wouldn't have to get off her dead ass & work. Luckily the court reckognized that she was using the kiddos as pawns in the whole ordeal. My refusal to discuss it with my children made it really difficult because I so badly wanted to tell them the truth of what was going on. It all worked out in the best interest of the kids, though, and that's all that matters.

While I have no idea what's going on in with these two, it does stink of a woman who is trying to bilk her former partner for everything she can get so she doesn't have to do anything for herself.

4NTLRZ:
My refusal to discuss it with my children made it really difficult because I so badly wanted to tell them the truth of what was going on.

As a guy who has gone/is going through a similar situation (divorced, won custody, etc), I can say that keeping my mouth shut about the horrible "parenting" of my ex is probably the most difficult part!

IamSoSmart_S_M_R_T: 4NTLRZ:
My refusal to discuss it with my children made it really difficult because I so badly wanted to tell them the truth of what was going on.

As a guy who has gone/is going through a similar situation (divorced, won custody, etc), I can say that keeping my mouth shut about the horrible "parenting" of my ex is probably the most difficult part!

Oh, absolutely.

As a parent, you want your children to have all of the pertinent information available in order to formulate their own, educated, opinions about issues. But it's totally inappropriate to do under those circumstances. Children should never, ever, ever, ever be put in the middle and made to feel like they have to choose sides. It happens all the time, though, & it's just flat wrong. It's already tough enough for them. Looking at it through their eyes, they're seeing the death of their family. Their entire world is in a state of upheaval, they're usually afraid of the future, feel helpless & powerless. It's an extremely difficult situation for them to navigate and make sense of, and putting them in the middle only adds to their pressure & stress level. Bottom line, it's not fair to them. They're dealing with enough as it is. The only people that win in divorce/custody proceedings are the lawyers. For everyone else, it's just varying degrees of loss.

But it's just so hard to bite your tongue and not point out exactly where your ex is dead-wrong, where she is feeding them a line of bullshiat and what her true motives are (because after you've been married to someone for more than a decade let's face it, you damned well know exactly who they are & what they're up to).

That's why you get a good attorney, talk to them about what your ex is doing and crucify her in family court.

Carpe jugular, man. Carpe jugular. Then be nice to your ex when you're around the kids, as difficult as it may be, after it's all over.

If you can't stand up for yourself in the face of lies, you should not have kids.

Standing up for yourself and stating facts is not a "me vs. you" game, either.

rubi_con_man: Let's put it this way:

If she was regularly giving away the sexual favors, she'd get all the money she wants.

Therefore, she probably declared the sex embargo before he declared the money embargo.

This is what happens when you start acting like sexual intercourse within a marriage is a privilege, not a right (or obligation).

Yes, Ladies, I am saying that you really need to stay on top of your man's sexual desires. This means that you need to 'lady up' on a very regular basis (~ every 5-6 - your frequency may vary) and drain that snake. Be Good, Giving and Game. Don't make it a fight about your 'personal soveriegnty'. It's the cheapest, easiest gift for you to give him and it's the one that opens all the other doors of trust, affection, and attention. Turning him down is, in effect saying "I don't care at all about your needs, even if it would take 3 minutes of my time." And this isn't like borrowing a cup of flour from a neighbor (which, incidentally, takes longer than 3 minutes) in that he can't just keep going through the neighborhood until he finds his cup of flour. And it's not like you don't HAVE it. In effect you've decided he's too much trouble, that is a terrible thing to do to the person your pledged to spend your life with.

Now, I'm not saying that you have to give in all the time, but there ARE other options - a Quick 'manual override' or 'kiss' will satisfy most men in a bind, and the worst thing you need to fix that is a napkin or lipstick.

If you put it off like some kind of chore you might have had to do when you are a kid, then his mind will be less centered around your intimate personage (not your pooter - but you!). Wear perfume and makeup for him. Dress for him, and he will give you back all the things you got 'when you were dating'. Initiate a sexual cold war in your marriage and you might as well put a giant stake through its heart.

That's right. Fark their orgasms. Their fake anyways.

They're ...not their...the second one...oh what ever it's not like anyone's gonna read this anyway.

A got a few bucks tell her to call me, well phone money anyways.