Of course.

Apos: What's the imbecile's FARK handle?

I could reveal my guesses, but that's a violation of the ToS.

So I'll go with Studman69 as my guess.

Rape.

/rape

Lesbianism?

Let's see...4 out of 5 participants enjoy gang rape so these number are pretty close.

I'd find this offensive if I didn't find it so funny.

I've never been caught. So I'm above elite.

Estelle Hart, national women's officer for the National Union of Students, has called for the website to be shut down for its "misogyny".

While I'd love to see the authors on this site suffer many unfortunate things, freedom of speech is still around.

Stay classy...

Sounds about right. Maybe a little low.

In other news, Plymouth University has no friggin' clue as to the extracurricular activities of their students, and the parents of the Plymouth student are going to be pissed when the school bounces him out on his ass.

What? She's just asking questions.

If they go unreported how does one collect statistics on it?

Does she lick a lot of carpet.
Does she havet a Indigo Girls CD? The guy at the record store said it was perfect.
Does she have killer Birkenstocks.


"This is a bunch a' crap! I've been licking this carpet for three hours and I still don't feel like a lesbian!"

ha-ha-guy: Estelle Hart, national women's officer for the National Union of Students, has called for the website to be shut down for its "misogyny".

While I'd love to see the authors on this site suffer many unfortunate things, freedom of speech is still around.

Freedom of speech, yes. Freedom of consequences for that speech, no.

You can be a misogynistic asshole all you like - just don't be surprised when you're kicked out of the university for it.

KaiserRoll: If they go unreported how does one collect statistics on it?

Field trials. Rape 10 women and see how many police reports come of it.

My Not CSB. I was hanging with some ladies a while back and this subject came up and prolly 85% of them had rape-esque stories (attempted, full on, and poorly attempted).

ha-ha-guy: Estelle Hart, national women's officer for the National Union of Students, has called for the website to be shut down for its "misogyny".

While I'd love to see the authors on this site suffer many unfortunate things, freedom of speech is still around.

Well, except that he'll likely be expelled from college.

What? Rape is funny.

ha-ha-guy: Estelle Hart, national women's officer for the National Union of Students, has called for the website to be shut down for its "misogyny".

While I'd love to see the authors on this site suffer many unfortunate things, freedom of speech is still around.

Came here to say this

And all rapes are not reported...remember.

Let's see. 85% of 40 lbs. is...carry the 2...

Wait. I was told there would be no math.

KaiserRoll: If they go unreported how does one collect statistics on it?

Personal experience? You know, commit a statistically significant number of rapes, see how many you get charged with.

FormlessOne: ha-ha-guy: Estelle Hart, national women's officer for the National Union of Students, has called for the website to be shut down for its "misogyny".

While I'd love to see the authors on this site suffer many unfortunate things, freedom of speech is still around.

Freedom of speech, yes. Freedom of consequences for that speech, no.

You can be a misogynistic asshole all you like - just don't be surprised when you're kicked out of the university for it.

I have no issue with the kids getting bounced. I'm betting when they enrolled they agreed to a code of conduct. They broke it and now they're done. However there is still no reason at all to call for the site to be shut down.

KaiserRoll: If they go unreported how does one collect statistics on it?

Rape 100 women and see how many report it, duh.

FormlessOne: ha-ha-guy: Estelle Hart, national women's officer for the National Union of Students, has called for the website to be shut down for its "misogyny".

While I'd love to see the authors on this site suffer many unfortunate things, freedom of speech is still around.

Freedom of speech, yes. Freedom of consequences for that speech, no.

You can be a misogynistic asshole all you like - just don't be surprised when you're kicked out of the university for it.

First off -- if one is expelled from university for the speech they make, the university can't exactly be said to support free speech.

Secondly -- this is the UK. They don't have free speech over there. You can be jailed based solely on expressing views the majority find offensive.

If it involved a telemarking firm selling something, a denial of service attack would probably ensue.

However, these are the guy whose ancestors sent the Pilgrims packing across the pond due to their unholy shenanigans.

Are we talking rape, or the less acceptable "rape-rape"?

/whoopi said rape twice.

Wikipedia: A 2007 government report in England says "Estimates from research suggest that between 75 and 95 percent of rape crimes are never reported to the police."[6]

So, yeah: the f'ing gov't says there are good odds 85% of rapes go unreported.

So what's the problem? Does she not understand the phrase 'good odds'?

fireclown: [scottthong.files.wordpress.com image 480x353]
Are we talking rape, or the less acceptable "rape-rape"?

/whoopi said rape twice.

She obviously doesn't understand the concept of "what goes around, comes around."

meanmutton: First off -- if one is expelled from university for the speech they make, the university can't exactly be said to support free speech.

Secondly -- this is the UK. They don't have free speech over there. You can be jailed based solely on expressing views the majority find offensive.

First, when has anyone ever argued that freedom of speech is insulation from all consequences? If the University boots them for breaking the code of conduct, that is fine. If their host kills the domain for breaking the host's policy on content, that's fine. There is a difference through between those things though and demands in the vien of "They published something that offends me! Delete their site NOW!".

Secondly, just because someone says freedom of speech doesn't mean they're just trotting out the American Bill of Rights version. Look at how things like SOPA/PIPA/the EU version of said bills/etc were a global issue. Internet censorship is internet censorship. If the UK government thinks they have the right to charge these kids with something, let them do it. Random biatching about being offended and demanding deletion of the site is still unacceptable censorship though.

FormlessOne: Freedom of speech, yes. Freedom of consequences for that speech, no.You can be a misogynistic asshole all you like - just don't be surprised when you're kicked out of the university for it.

Just curious what country you live in.

Here in the US, getting kicked out for your speech is pretty much a definition of not supporting free speech. Maybe it's different elsewhere, I guess I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case in Oceania.a href=

Does it count if you report the rape to a football coach?

Well is she?

fireclown: [scottthong.files.wordpress.com image 480x353]
Are we talking rape, or the less acceptable "rape-rape"?

/whoopi said rape twice.

15%? Challenge accepted.

Let me be the first to point out that the university kicking him out would be the hight of hypocrisy. Being liberal and against free speech are incongruous.

HailRobonia: KaiserRoll: If they go unreported how does one collect statistics on it?

Rape 100 women and see how many report it, duh.

You really need a lager pool of rape victims to get an accurate statistic. I think you would need to rape 10,000 women and then see how many report it.



/I said rape twice.

Lone Stranger: You really need a lager pool

You had me a lager pool.

I don't know what's more pathetic: the guys who run that website, or the fact that people think they should be able to shut down a website because they don't like what it says.