So what you're saying is that Sarah Palin's followers are revolting.

This is the kind of name calling we've come to expect from the Lame streaming media.

Typical liberal, so fearful of a strong woman.

I went onto her FB page, certain that the critics in TFA would be erased from her page by now. I'm not sure if they have or not but I can tell you there's a pretty fierce battle going on on her Wall. Lots of people criticizing Palin and breaking rank. It's a beautiful thing to see.

"OMG, how can you support Newt?"
"RON PAUL!"
"Newt broke the Contract With America! We should endorse Santorum!"
"A vote for Santorum is a vote for NObama! We've got to stick together and endorse RON PAUL!"

The only consistency I see is that they all hate Romney.

I'm pretty confident Palin's Facebook page will be getting a good scrubbing all day today... again...

I_Am_Weasel: So what you're saying is that Sarah Palin's followers are revolting.

This is the kind of name calling we've come to expect from the Lame streaming media.

Typical liberal, so fearful of a strong woman.

Count de Monet: It is said that the people are revolting.

King Louis XVI: You said it! They stink on ice!

I'm quite confident that those comments are from liberal imposters, not from genuine Tea Party patriots. Hell, it's obvious, just read them, and you will immediately see two very suspicious qualities about them, which all but prove that they're planted there by liberal imposters:

(1) The points they make are generally intellectually and factually consistent, and
(2) Virtually all the words are spelled correctly.

There's no way these were written by the average Teabagger.

Maybe the teabaggers are figuring out that you can't claim to be a "values" voter then vote for a scumbag like Newt.

I doubt that, though.

I feel bad for her PR folks who, right now, are dealing with Sarah shrieking "What do you MEAN I can't make any money off all these postings??"

She really has to be freaking out that no one has started a serious "SAVE US, SARAH! PALIN FOR PRESIDENT" campaign yet.

Cyberluddite: I'm quite confident that those comments are from liberal imposters, not from genuine Tea Party patriots. Hell, it's obvious, just read them, and you will immediately see two very suspicious qualities about them, which all but prove that they're planted there by liberal imposters:

(1) The points they make are generally intellectually and factually consistent, and
(2) Virtually all the words are spelled correctly.

There's no way these were written by the average Teabagger.

Has anyone written "rediculouse" yet?

That's really my favorite.

At this point, I have to suspect that Sarah, Cain and Newt pretty much just got in to punk the electorate...

Sarah Palin has followers who can use a computer? We can rule out that they're posting from a library because they don't know what one of those is. Hotels have computers you can use if you pretend to be a guest and can find someone to show you how to work it.

jake_lex: Maybe the teabaggers are figuring out that you can't claim to be a "values" voter then vote for a scumbag like Newt.

I doubt that, though.

Except they can claim that, over and over and over again. Lying isn't illegal in this country.

Mr. Coffee Nerves: She really has to be freaking out that no one has started a serious "SAVE US, SARAH! PALIN FOR PRESIDENT" campaign yet.



Could have told her that the 'coronation gambit' never works.

WinoRhino: This is somewhat shocking, really. It answers the question how derpy do you have to be to get the Palin faithful to snap out of it and realize she's an idiot?

I don't give them that much credit. Saint Sarah will reverse her position and endorse someone else (or nobody at all), and the Faithful will cleanse their minds of the whole ugly affair, and blame any mention of her Gingrich endorsement on liberal drive-by mainstream MSM liberal media drive-by mainstream media GOTCHA-ness. Then they'll raid Wikipedia to make it reflect their fantasy.