Now if only she'd be willing to pull a Chloe Sevigny....sigh.

Hey maybe Sevigny can convince Amanda Seyfried to do it in the other Linda Lovelace movie. They worked together on Big Love and all....

As an aside, Weeds has gone downhill ever since they left Agrestic. Should have remained a show about a mom trying to raise her family by selling dope. Lost a lot of its charm when they left the burbs.

Of course, it was only after leaving the burbs that Parker started getting fully naked, so there's that.

But Demi sucks so much more...

AdolfOliverPanties: As an aside, Weeds has gone downhill ever since they left Agrestic. Should have remained a show about a mom trying to raise her family by selling dope. Lost a lot of its charm when they left the burbs.

I agree. That little community had so much potential, but, for whatever reason, they didn't explore it in the least and turned them into nomadic weed dealers instead. It kind of sucks now.

Vodka Zombie: AdolfOliverPanties: As an aside, Weeds has gone downhill ever since they left Agrestic. Should have remained a show about a mom trying to raise her family by selling dope. Lost a lot of its charm when they left the burbs.

I agree. That little community had so much potential, but, for whatever reason, they didn't explore it in the least and turned them into nomadic weed dealers instead. It kind of sucks now.

I liked Kevin Nealon's comment: "Weeds is now in its 8th season, and people still like it. The show, too"

Neigh, that horse faced...oh, Mary Louise Parker? Yeah she's still pretty hot. Never saw the show though. On first glance it looks like a more benevolent Breaking Bad.

Parker, yes.

But ...

That would be Sarah Jessica Parker, not Mary-Louise.

Upgrade, indeed.

/I would have also accepted "Jennifer Jason Leigh"

You know you're a geek when you read the title of that movie think it's about Ada.

OtherLittleGuy: Upgrade, indeed.

/I would have also accepted "Jennifer Jason Leigh"

Also on "Weeds," although not holding up as well as some of her contemporaries.

Link (new window)

Yeah, it's Sarah Jessica Parker. So, unless this is her from around "L.A. Story" or "Honeymoon in Vegas" time, this is not a good thing.

For some, but to be fair, she's perhaps the worst thing about Weeds. Mind you, a fair bit of that is the writing of the show and the character, but she doesn't make the the part sing. She is an actress that can sink my interest in a project. She's not quite the Anointed Boddhisatva of Suck like Kate Beckensale, but she's damn close.

It's not her Karmic gift to the world to alert folks to bloated, crappy projects, but she's still a crappy actress who has about three facial expressions and a lack of ability to create any connection with a character. So, have fun with that. I'll find something else.

?

They're both too old for the part.

AdolfOliverPanties: Of course, it was only after leaving the burbs that Parker started getting fully naked, so there's that.

I haven't watched Weeds in a while, but you've made me see the error of my ways.

AdolfOliverPanties: Link (new window)

Yeah, it's Sarah Jessica Parker. So, unless this is her from around "L.A. Story" or "Honeymoon in Vegas" time, this is not a good thing.

Ah. Entirely different. Ignore my Mary Louise Parker rant then...

optikeye: You know you're a geek when you read the title of that movie think it's about Ada.

And I would be one of those geeks.

theorellior: optikeye: You know you're a geek when you read the title of that movie think it's about Ada.

And I would be one of those geeks.

Haha. I was thinking, A movie about Ada Lovelace, Babbage, Lord Byron and betting on horse races would be great.

toddalmighty: They're both too old for the part.

Too old to play Gloria Steinem?