This story has a lot of interesting info, but what I would really like to know is the particulars of the argument so I can judge for myself who was in the right. I have a feeling that if it involved a cat and skin-care products, then the guy was probably in the right.

I've had arguments over stupider things, like last night when Lordfortuna realized the spaghetti wouldn't go far enough for his lunches AND his dinner... and chose not to eat real food for dinner.

/seriously, how hard is it to make more?

So.. DID it leave a mark or not?

ladyfortuna: I've had arguments over stupider things, like last night when Lordfortuna realized the spaghetti wouldn't go far enough for his lunches AND his dinner... and chose not to eat real food for dinner.

/seriously, how hard is it to make more?

It's pretty much empty calories anyway. He'd be better off sucking down another beer.

Shoot, a guy could have a pretty good weekend in Vegas with that stuff.

SpikeStrip: he lipsticked the cat's butt, didn't he?

that's my bet

also, Whats his FARK handle?

RexTalionis: ladyfortuna: I've had arguments over stupider things, like last night when Lordfortuna realized the spaghetti wouldn't go far enough for his lunches AND his dinner... and chose not to eat real food for dinner.

/seriously, how hard is it to make more?

That depends. How do you keep the water from igniting?

I don't understand the question.

SpikeStrip: he lipsticked the cat's butt, didn't he?

Came here for this ... still the funniest Fark thread - EVAR!

Kanemano: SpikeStrip: he lipsticked the cat's butt, didn't he?

that's my bet

also, Whats his FARK handle?

According to this thread _{(new window)}, his name is GoodCopBadCop

Estee Lauder

Errr... OK.
ESTEE!!!

FTFA: ...she submitted a victim-impact statement through a representative of Tubman Tub girl, a domestic violence agency.

///fixed it for ya

Just seen the photo for the first time in a Google search- NEVER want to see it again!

SpaceyCat: I love the comment about "provability issues". So you're going to charge the guy with something else because you can't prove that he actually did what you say he did. WTF?

I'd love to hear more on this because it sounds like there's been some....exaggeration...going on there.

It's a domestic dispute and he's a guy. He was farked the moment she decided she was gonna call the cops.

I don't understand why anyone would be upset by that. If a person of different religion wanted to presto-chango claim I'm made holy or whatever after I'm dead, why should it bother me? Just because I think they are wasting their time doesn't mean I'm offended.

I'm not a christian but a christian relative of mine left a donation to her church that means my name is listed with a bunch of others once a year in some prayer. I'm not upset by that. Nor would I be if the person was muslim or jewish or anything else.

The guy is a total gun nut/NRA diciple, no guns for you now. Courtesy the OFP and the VoWA Act.