I want to know how he could fark her 11 times to need eleven pregnancy tests.

/she's a gonnie goo goo Gus

dahmers love zombie: They sell pregnancy tests at Dollar Tree. Right next to the drug tests. I'm not too sure whether I'd trust either.

You know this because you buy the dollar condoms?

Boy thats gonna be one hell of a Maury episode...

dahmers love zombie: They sell pregnancy tests at Dollar Tree. Right next to the drug tests. I'm not too sure whether I'd trust either.

And the dollar coat hangers are just one aisle over.

In the near future....

This kind of shiat wouldn't be a problem if Texas (and the other southern states for that matter) weren't so ass-backwards about sex ed and adamantly trying to defund Planned Parenthood Link (new window)

More like, people steal these kinds of items to return for money to then buy crack (or heroin) with. My friends brother is a junkie who has been arrested for doing returns at Wal-Mart so, getting a kick and all. Not really.

Why would you need eleven pregnancy tests?

Oh, wait...

jaytkay: Why would you need eleven pregnancy tests?

For each of your eleven girlfriends. A playa like me understands.

I don't think I've ever known a woman to use only one pregnancy test. It has been my experience that the minium is three with the average being seven. For some reason, when the test is positive women don't trust the first one, or three.

There's an article below that might be relevant to his interests. About wanting to stay in prison.

LeroyBourne: There's an article below that might be relevant to his interests. About wanting to stay in prison.

By getting a Liberal Arts degree?

Sandvich is loose cannon: More like, people steal these kinds of items to return for money to then buy crack (or heroin) with. My friends brother is a junkie who has been arrested for doing returns at Wal-Mart so, getting a kick and all. Not really.

I'd suspect that's what they were doing if it hadn't said in the article that the female removed them from the packaging before putting them in her purse. Can't return them without the box, so I'm left wondering exactly why the hell you'd steal 11 pregnancy tests.

umad: jaytkay: Why would you need eleven pregnancy tests?

For each of your eleven girlfriends. A playa like me understands.

Since your the beach and all. Do your girlfriends get sand up their vaginas?? And another thing. what about PENGUINS.. ASSUMING U DO LIVE SOUTH OF THE BORDER>>

Son i yam disappoint. his bail so high from drugs and other charges, real news plz?

minoridiot: man to use only one pregnancy test. It has been my experience that the minium is three with the average being seven. For some reason, when the test is positive women don't trust the first one, or three.

Indeed, they give false negatives, not false positives.

Those damn things are expensive.
Don't know why you need 11 though...

the_vegetarian_cannibal: LeroyBourne: There's an article below that might be relevant to his interests. About wanting to stay in prison.

By getting a Liberal Arts degree?

That too, apparently they're hiring.

Has anyone yet compared the cost of 11 piss sticks to the trillions stolen from our economy by wall street?

timujin: toddalmighty: Sorry, I meant 400,000 dimes, not dollars.

Subby

not really

<not_sure_if_serious.jpg>

/math

The hell are you quoting?

the_vegetarian_cannibal: This kind of shiat wouldn't be a problem if Texas (and the other southern states for that matter) weren't so ass-backwards about sex ed and adamantly trying to defund Planned Parenthood Link (new window)

I live in a part of Ohio where we were actually taught about sex ed. Trust me, that's not the problem with these farking idiots.

the_vegetarian_cannibal: This kind of shiat wouldn't be a problem if Texas (and the other southern states for that matter) weren't so ass-backwards about sex ed and adamantly trying to defund Planned Parenthood Link (new window)

I guess that's why D.C.'s rate (165 per 1000) is almost double that of TX (88 per 1000). Link (new window).

jmadisonbiii: I guess that's why D.C.'s rate (165 per 1000) is almost double that of TX (88 per 1000). Link (new window).

For a fair comparison, you need to compare DC to Houston and Dallas.

Ed Finnerty: Apparently a lot of people in this thread don't realize that pregnancy tests use a rock of crack cocaine to make that litmus paper turn blue or red. In the name brand tests, the size and purity is greater which is why they are more expensive than the knock-off brands which use a lot of baking soda.

I guess if more people knew, there would be more of these types of crimes.

Also on the a lot of people don't know list: most baby formula stolen is used for diluting (cutting) cocaine so the dealer can get more money.

/baby got crack

"Mitchell was first arrested in March, following an undercover investigation in 2010, in which he allegedly sold cocaine to confidential informants."

This tripped me up. Is it August 2012, or August 2011?

/

jaytkay: Why would you need eleven pregnancy tests?

Oh, wait...

[drlindagalloway.files.wordpress.com image 440x512]

No, that's why you need 36 packs of condoms. Or three packs if you're married.

/Don't use expired condoms.

While trying to conceive I got pregnancy tests in bulk at less than $.25 a pop on Amazon. I took 10 when one was positive 7 months ago. Even then my husband wouldn't get excited until the blood test confirmed it.

8 weeks till the bundle of joy wrecks my vagina!

Every time I see Eddie Murphy in "Raw", I remember being 15 or 16 years old playing Metroid on NES.

Fonda Furburger: While trying to conceive I got pregnancy tests in bulk at less than $.25 a pop on Amazon. I took 10 when one was positive 7 months ago. Even then my husband wouldn't get excited until the blood test confirmed it.

8 weeks till the bundle of joy wrecks my vagina!

You could always miscarry.

Fonda Furburger: 8 weeks till the bundle of joy wrecks my vagina!

It'll bounce back. My wife and I have 3 and I can't perceive any difference.

You can't leave the crack at home when you decide you are going to go steal pregnancy tests?

Is anybody sure that thing is female? It's farking UGLY!

jmadisonbiii: the_vegetarian_cannibal: This kind of shiat wouldn't be a problem if Texas (and the other southern states for that matter) weren't so ass-backwards about sex ed and adamantly trying to defund Planned Parenthood Link (new window)

I guess that's why D.C.'s rate (165 per 1000) is almost double that of TX (88 per 1000). Link (new window).

Because contrasting a single city with an entire large state is a fair comparison?

Here, let me help you.



Link (new window)

the_vegetarian_cannibal: jmadisonbiii: the_vegetarian_cannibal: This kind of shiat wouldn't be a problem if Texas (and the other southern states for that matter) weren't so ass-backwards about sex ed and adamantly trying to defund Planned Parenthood Link (new window)

I guess that's why D.C.'s rate (165 per 1000) is almost double that of TX (88 per 1000). Link (new window).

Because contrasting a single city with an entire large state is a fair comparison?

Here, let me help you.

[img513.imageshack.us image 593x638]

Link (new window)

No, because just maybe the epidemic is not so much "ass-backwards" Southerners as it is the minorities prevalent in the South who drive up the teen pregnancy statistics. The comparison with DC is fair because the people in, say, TX are all Southerm, as the people in DC are nearly all minorities. The dumbasses above attribute teen regnancies to "ass-backward" Southerners, I say it is disproportionately a minority problem. If the problem is "stupid" Southerners, why does NV have a higher rate than any Southern state, according to your link.

jmadisonbiii: the_vegetarian_cannibal: jmadisonbiii: the_vegetarian_cannibal: This kind of shiat wouldn't be a problem if Texas (and the other southern states for that matter) weren't so ass-backwards about sex ed and adamantly trying to defund Planned Parenthood Link (new window)

I guess that's why D.C.'s rate (165 per 1000) is almost double that of TX (88 per 1000). Link (new window).

Because contrasting a single city with an entire large state is a fair comparison?

Here, let me help you.

[img513.imageshack.us image 593x638]

Link (new window)

No, because just maybe the epidemic is not so much "ass-backwards" Southerners as it is the minorities prevalent in the South who drive up the teen pregnancy statistics. The comparison with DC is fair because the people in, say, TX are all Southerm, as the people in DC are nearly all minorities. The dumbasses above attribute teen regnancies to "ass-backward" Southerners, I say it is disproportionately a minority problem. If the problem is "stupid" Southerners, why does NV have a higher rate than any Southern state, according to your link.

Ah, just the typical response I was expecting. "It's all those damn minorities' faults! That's what the real problem is!" And conservatives claim that liberals are the ones who play the race card too much.

The regressive state governments (that are primarily, but not all) in the South, by design, encourage the existence of a perpetual underclass in society. It's very telling that you place the blame entirely on that underclass and not at all on the system itself.

Also, why do you make the distinction of a problem being "ass-backwards Southerners" or "minorities"? Why is that a difference? Aren't all people from the South still, by definition, Southerners regardless of what race they are? If the problem is that too many Southern blacks are getting pregnant, that's still a Southern problem. Or are you insinuating that minorities in the South are not "real Southerners"?

jmadisonbiii: The comparison with DC is fair

Also, I should point out the fact that DC is geographically south of the Mason-Dixon Line, which makes your "b-bu-but Washington DC!!!" copout excuse all the more hilarious.

the_vegetarian_cannibal: jmadisonbiii: the_vegetarian_cannibal: jmadisonbiii: the_vegetarian_cannibal: This kind of shiat wouldn't be a problem if Texas (and the other southern states for that matter) weren't so ass-backwards about sex ed and adamantly trying to defund Planned Parenthood Link (new window)

I guess that's why D.C.'s rate (165 per 1000) is almost double that of TX (88 per 1000). Link (new window).

Because contrasting a single city with an entire large state is a fair comparison?

Here, let me help you.

[img513.imageshack.us image 593x638]

Link (new window)

No, because just maybe the epidemic is not so much "ass-backwards" Southerners as it is the minorities prevalent in the South who drive up the teen pregnancy statistics. The comparison with DC is fair because the people in, say, TX are all Southerm, as the people in DC are nearly all minorities. The dumbasses above attribute teen regnancies to "ass-backward" Southerners, I say it is disproportionately a minority problem. If the problem is "stupid" Southerners, why does NV have a higher rate than any Southern state, according to your link.

Ah, just the typical response I was expecting. "It's all those damn minorities' faults! That's what the real problem is!" And conservatives claim that liberals are the ones who play the race card too much.

The regressive state governments (that are primarily, but not all) in the South, by design, encourage the existence of a perpetual underclass in society. It's very telling that you place the blame entirely on that underclass and not at all on the system itself.

Also, why do you make the distinction of a problem being "ass-backwards Southerners" or "minorities"? Why is that a difference? Aren't all people from the South still, by definition, Southerners regardless of what race they are? If the problem is that too many Southern blacks are getting pregnant, that's still a Southern problem. Or are you insinuating that minorities in the South are not "real Southerners"?

Ah, the typical response: "It's not their fault." The same excuse given for their extreme over-representation in crime statistics.

I guess California has a "regressive state government", as their numbers (again your chart) mirror those of states in the south. Nevada (a Blue state) has a higher rate than any Southern state, including Texas. DC is not a state, although many have argued for its statehood. No one would argue that their government is regressive or conservative. Why then are their numbers so high? What state government is keeping them down? The problem follows the minorities, wherever they are. Not just Blacks, hispanics also. What is that so hard to see? Are the high numbers in Detroit a Southern problem? Watts, California? Minorities also commit violent crime way out of proportion to their representation in society. I guess that's someone else's fault too. Lots of those crimes occur in the South, so is the fault of everyone in the South? Comparing the rates of city to those a state is fair because one has to go to a city level to find a sufficiently significant minority population to make the comparison. One cannot find a significant minority population without looking at the city level. Finally, if there is a system of government encouraging the existence of a perpetual existence of an underclass in society, it is the Federal system of entitlements.

the_vegetarian_cannibal: jmadisonbiii: The comparison with DC is fair

Also, I should point out the fact that DC is geographically south of the Mason-Dixon Line, which makes your "b-bu-but Washington DC!!!" copout excuse all the more hilarious.

Washington DC is not subject to any state's law, so your copout of "b-bu-but regressive state laws" is all the more pathetic. While DC may be a few miles, literally, below the Mason-Dixon line, it is worlds away from the typical Red Southern state, politically speaking.

jmadisonbiii:



I see that there's not much point in arguing with your stubbornness anymore. I'll just leave you with two more questions:

1. Where did I ever, at any point, try to claim that minority groups were entirely blameless for their problems? Could it be that their situation is a result of...*gasp* both their own decisions and the effects of society overall?

2. biatch, biatch, and biatch all you want about the South having too many minorities if you desire. Then take the time to ask yourself: whose fault is it that the South has so many minorities?

the_vegetarian_cannibal: jmadisonbiii:

[img444.imageshack.us image 402x604]

I see that there's not much point in arguing with your stubbornness anymore. I'll just leave you with two more questions:

1. Where did I ever, at any point, try to claim that minority groups were entirely blameless for their problems? Could it be that their situation is a result of...*gasp* both their own decisions and the effects of society overall?

2. biatch, biatch, and biatch all you want about the South having too many minorities if you desire. Then take the time to ask yourself: whose fault is it that the South has so many minorities?

OK....agreed. The problems are some combination of their own decisions and actions and social dynamics. And I'll grant you it's mostly Whitey's fault they're here: 17th-19th century Whitey, certainly not my fault or yours, or anyone else's alive today.