If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Salon) Interesting How the Right brainwashes its followers to believe outright falsehoods about the government. A long, but interesting read   (salon.com) divider line 220
More: Interesting  
•       •       •

6619 clicks; posted to Politics » on 24 Jan 2012 at 5:27 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



220 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-01-24 11:11:33 AM
that, and it helps that its followers already want to believe what they're told.

it's like evolution vs creationism. creationists start with a conclusion and then cherry-pick "evidence" to support it. scientists, on the other hand, start with evidence and test it to form a conclusion.
 
2012-01-24 11:13:53 AM
I just washed my brain, and I can't do a thing with it
 
2012-01-24 11:14:53 AM
Oooh, scathing.
 
2012-01-24 11:27:18 AM
Ever turned a sandblaster on a Saltine cracker?
 
2012-01-24 11:37:06 AM
like I'll trust that liberal rag, Salon.
 
2012-01-24 11:38:36 AM
Ask a conservative you know if the Chamber of Commerce is part of the government. Go ahead.
 
2012-01-24 12:50:53 PM
img.ibtimes.com

LOL WHUT
 
2012-01-24 01:17:07 PM
As opposed to how the left brainwashes its followers into believing outright falsehoods about government.

At this point, anyone that believes either party is concerned about The People is a fool. They're only interested in one thing...increasing the size and power of the Federal government at the expense of individual liberty.
 
2012-01-24 04:13:56 PM
slayer199: As opposed to how the left brainwashes its followers into believing outright falsehoods about government.

At this point, anyone that believes either party is concerned about The People is a fool. They're only interested in one thing...increasing the size and power of the Federal government at the expense of individual liberty.


This.

Both sides suck.
 
2012-01-24 04:16:38 PM
Shortened version: he's black.
 
2012-01-24 04:23:14 PM
That was a really interesting read. I love it when stuff is analyzed in depth like that. I learned a few things myself.
 
2012-01-24 04:32:44 PM
slayer199: As opposed to how the left brainwashes its followers into believing outright falsehoods about government.

At this point, anyone that believes either party is concerned about The People is a fool. They're only interested in one thing...increasing the size and power of the Federal government at the expense of individual liberty.


I'll give you partial credit inasmuch as Dems are also in someone's pocket. But you lose the fed:liberty ratio argument. It's obvious that the GOP is the party that really wants to shove the federal government in your vagina, your vows, your bloodstream, and your schools. I'm no fan of modern Democrats (nowhere near liberal enough for me), but I'll give them partial credit for not brazenly attacking the lower and middle classes and entire segments of our diverse culture while waving a flag. Democrats provide a lot of cheap lip service, but they also fight for things like unemployment and other benefits that actually assist society when in need. They are also far more concerned with Individual Libertytm than your average Republican, the party who keeps tossing that phrase around as though it means something to them.

Yes, there are clear exceptions where Dems go off the rails and support bugfark crazy things like junk-touching and SOPA, but even after factoring for that they're still the party that even pretends to give a damn about actual liberty (not to be confused with Libertytm)

So stop with the "both sidez are teh bads" routine. Clearly, one of these groups is far, far more dangerous than the other. That Dems aren't perfect doesn't mean I won't support them in an attempt to combat what I feel is a clear and present danger to the people of the United States - the GOP.
 
2012-01-24 04:40:14 PM
slayer199: As opposed to how the left brainwashes its followers into believing outright falsehoods about government.

Seriously, what widely-held belief on the left compares to "Obama is a socio-fascist, Muslim dictator who wants to put our grandmas before death panels"?

It's a slow pendulum. Sometimes the left is nuttier, sometimes the right, then it swings back. Right now, so-called "conservatives" are unquestionably nuttier.
 
2012-01-24 04:43:16 PM
This article is just loaded with examples and facts and other liberally biased stuff like logic and reason.
 
2012-01-24 04:43:29 PM
"throwing out scary-sounding statistics to stampede the yahoos"

Yep. A friend has fallen for that tactic hook-line-and-sinker. Too bad. All I can say is, email filters are my friends.
 
2012-01-24 04:44:39 PM
slayer199: As opposed to how the left brainwashes its followers into believing outright falsehoods about government.

At this point, anyone that believes either party is concerned about The People is a fool. They're only interested in one thing...increasing the size and power of the Federal government at the expense of individual liberty.


Just like the article, it would help if you could provide some examples. Otherwise you're just repeating the rhetoric you heard on the TV/radio.
 
2012-01-24 04:45:15 PM
Another straw grasping attempted hit piece by the liberal media.

Salon is the very definition of the Left wing elitist know it all Hollywood limosine Ivory Tower lamestream homosexual Socialist Upper West Side ilberal media.
 
2012-01-24 04:46:43 PM
Speaking of yahoos.................
 
2012-01-24 04:50:37 PM
Marcus Aurelius: slayer199: As opposed to how the left brainwashes its followers into believing outright falsehoods about government.

At this point, anyone that believes either party is concerned about The People is a fool. They're only interested in one thing...increasing the size and power of the Federal government at the expense of individual liberty.

Just like the article, it would help if you could provide some examples. Otherwise you're just repeating the rhetoric you heard on the TV/radio.


Hush. He's BSABSVRing.
 
2012-01-24 04:51:09 PM
vernonFL: Another straw grasping attempted hit piece by the liberal media.

Salon is the very definition of the Left wing elitist know it all Hollywood limosine Ivory Tower lamestream homosexual Socialist Upper West Side ilberal media.


You forgot "entitlement".
 
2012-01-24 04:51:46 PM
dickfreckle

Every time I start to post something, you say it first, you say it eloquently, and so I can only say THIS

However, I must comment as to the whole mess of 2012

Dear GOP,
Allowing the fundies to take over your party you have become the very BEAST you spittle about. Before your derptastic takeover of words, your Rovian Derida blasting of political dialogs, I rejected the bible. I have since seen the light...you are in fact Legion. So fark you and the four horses you all rode in on.

STFU and DIAF
 
2012-01-24 04:52:56 PM
dickfreckle: slayer199: As opposed to how the left brainwashes its followers into believing outright falsehoods about government.

At this point, anyone that believes either party is concerned about The People is a fool. They're only interested in one thing...increasing the size and power of the Federal government at the expense of individual liberty.

I'll give you partial credit inasmuch as Dems are also in someone's pocket. But you lose the fed:liberty ratio argument. It's obvious that the GOP is the party that really wants to shove the federal government in your vagina, your vows, your bloodstream, and your schools. I'm no fan of modern Democrats (nowhere near liberal enough for me), but I'll give them partial credit for not brazenly attacking the lower and middle classes and entire segments of our diverse culture while waving a flag. Democrats provide a lot of cheap lip service, but they also fight for things like unemployment and other benefits that actually assist society when in need. They are also far more concerned with Individual Libertytm than your average Republican, the party who keeps tossing that phrase around as though it means something to them.

Yes, there are clear exceptions where Dems go off the rails and support bugfark crazy things like junk-touching and SOPA, but even after factoring for that they're still the party that even pretends to give a damn about actual liberty (not to be confused with Libertytm)

So stop with the "both sidez are teh bads" routine. Clearly, one of these groups is far, far more dangerous than the other. That Dems aren't perfect doesn't mean I won't support them in an attempt to combat what I feel is a clear and present danger to the people of the United States - the GOP.


NDAA. Signed by Obama the democrat.
 
2012-01-24 04:53:44 PM
Lionel Mandrake: It's a slow pendulum. Sometimes the left is nuttier, sometimes the right, then it swings back. Right now, so-called "conservatives" are unquestionably nuttier.

I wasn't alive for the 60s wingnuts, but a lot of what I've read about liberals from that era makes me headdesk. But yeah, for the past 10 years it's been the right spewing bullsh*t, and I don't see it stopping until the wheels fall off.

For one thing, it's profitable. I don't imagine Murdoch believing even half of the tripe his publications and airwaves spew forth. The guy is not exactly an idiot. Secondly - and I'm going to be flamed for this - the sort of rubes they're reaching are very susceptible to misinformation and emotive arguments in the first place. Before anyone replies angrily, ask yourself this: why has liberal-oriented media always trailed the likes of Hannity and Limbaugh? It's because we read real sources most of the time and aren't interested in listening to some junkyard dog working us into a froth. To put it bluntly, liberals trend toward intellectual appeals rather than anger.

Interestingly, the same people who levy the charge of "media brainwashing" against liberals are the same ones who love to gloat about how conservative media is so popular. Funny, that. If my AP and Reuters feeds are liberal brainwashing, whoa, I'm guilty as charged! Because I occasionally read Salon doesn't mean that I get my facts there. Conservatives seem content on getting their facts and opinions all in one walled garden of stupid, never daring to venture outside where the facts don't always confirm their presuppositions.

That's the big difference. I draw conclusions based on what is presented. Fox-types draw conclusions and then seek validation, which any number of outlets are only too happy to provide.
 
2012-01-24 04:54:52 PM
"both sides are bad"

No that is definitely not true. There is one side that has constantly come down on the side against the individual vs moneyed or corporation intrests.
 
2012-01-24 04:56:50 PM
Ggpearl: dickfreckle

Every time I start to post something, you say it first, you say it eloquently, and so I can only say THIS

However, I must comment as to the whole mess of 2012

Dear GOP,
Allowing the fundies to take over your party you have become the very BEAST you spittle about. Before your derptastic takeover of words, your Rovian Derida blasting of political dialogs, I rejected the bible. I have since seen the light...you are in fact Legion. So fark you and the four horses you all rode in on.

STFU and DIAF


Hey! You had no EIP, so thanks for that awesome link you gave last week!
 
2012-01-24 05:00:43 PM
EnviroDude: NDAA. Signed by Obama the democrat.

We've already had this argument to the point of dead horse. You also missed where I specifically pointed out that Dems are not perfect in terms of personal liberty. I merely claim that they are by far the least sinister even after factoring the mistakes.
 
2012-01-24 05:01:41 PM
EnviroDude: dickfreckle: slayer199: As opposed to how the left brainwashes its followers into believing outright falsehoods about government.

At this point, anyone that believes either party is concerned about The People is a fool. They're only interested in one thing...increasing the size and power of the Federal government at the expense of individual liberty.

I'll give you partial credit inasmuch as Dems are also in someone's pocket. But you lose the fed:liberty ratio argument. It's obvious that the GOP is the party that really wants to shove the federal government in your vagina, your vows, your bloodstream, and your schools. I'm no fan of modern Democrats (nowhere near liberal enough for me), but I'll give them partial credit for not brazenly attacking the lower and middle classes and entire segments of our diverse culture while waving a flag. Democrats provide a lot of cheap lip service, but they also fight for things like unemployment and other benefits that actually assist society when in need. They are also far more concerned with Individual Libertytm than your average Republican, the party who keeps tossing that phrase around as though it means something to them.

Yes, there are clear exceptions where Dems go off the rails and support bugfark crazy things like junk-touching and SOPA, but even after factoring for that they're still the party that even pretends to give a damn about actual liberty (not to be confused with Libertytm)

So stop with the "both sidez are teh bads" routine. Clearly, one of these groups is far, far more dangerous than the other. That Dems aren't perfect doesn't mean I won't support them in an attempt to combat what I feel is a clear and present danger to the people of the United States - the GOP.

NDAA. Signed by Obama the democrat.


NDAA was added by REPUBLICAN house to an DEFENSE bill that had to pass or the military would run out of funding during a war.
Obama weakend that segment and refuses to enforce it.

He should have vetoed-but he obviously thought compromise was the best path.
 
2012-01-24 05:04:34 PM
dickfreckle: Lionel Mandrake: It's a slow pendulum. Sometimes the left is nuttier, sometimes the right, then it swings back. Right now, so-called "conservatives" are unquestionably nuttier.

I wasn't alive for the 60s wingnuts, but a lot of what I've read about liberals from that era makes me headdesk. But yeah, for the past 10 years it's been the right spewing bullsh*t, and I don't see it stopping until the wheels fall off.

For one thing, it's profitable. I don't imagine Murdoch believing even half of the tripe his publications and airwaves spew forth. The guy is not exactly an idiot. Secondly - and I'm going to be flamed for this - the sort of rubes they're reaching are very susceptible to misinformation and emotive arguments in the first place. Before anyone replies angrily, ask yourself this: why has liberal-oriented media always trailed the likes of Hannity and Limbaugh? It's because we read real sources most of the time and aren't interested in listening to some junkyard dog working us into a froth. To put it bluntly, liberals trend toward intellectual appeals rather than anger.

Interestingly, the same people who levy the charge of "media brainwashing" against liberals are the same ones who love to gloat about how conservative media is so popular. Funny, that. If my AP and Reuters feeds are liberal brainwashing, whoa, I'm guilty as charged! Because I occasionally read Salon doesn't mean that I get my facts there. Conservatives seem content on getting their facts and opinions all in one walled garden of stupid, never daring to venture outside where the facts don't always confirm their presuppositions.

That's the big difference. I draw conclusions based on what is presented. Fox-types draw conclusions and then seek validation, which any number of outlets are only too happy to provide.


QFT.

I'm a center-leftie, and I follow quite a number of left, center and right sources, probably about equally. The right sources are usually for purposes of entertainment.
 
2012-01-24 05:05:20 PM
dickfreckle

I wasn't alive for the 60s wingnuts, but a lot of what I've read about liberals from that era makes me headdesk. But yeah, for the past 10 years it's been the right spewing bullsh*t, and I don't see it stopping until the wheels fall off.

For one thing, it's profitable. I don't imagine Murdoch believing even half of the tripe his publications and airwaves spew forth. The guy is not exactly an idiot. Secondly - and I'm going to be flamed for this - the sort of rubes they're reaching are very susceptible to misinformation and emotive arguments in the first place. Before anyone replies angrily, ask yourself this: why has liberal-oriented media always trailed the likes of Hannity and Limbaugh? It's because we read real sources most of the time and aren't interested in listening to some junkyard dog working us into a froth. To put it bluntly, liberals trend toward intellectual appeals rather than anger.

Interestingly, the same people who levy the charge of "media brainwashing" against liberals are the same ones who love to gloat about how conservative media is so popular. Funny, that. If my AP and Reuters feeds are liberal brainwashing, whoa, I'm guilty as charged! Because I occasionally read Salon doesn't mean that I get my facts there. Conservatives seem content on getting their facts and opinions all in one walled garden of stupid, never daring to venture outside where the facts don't always confirm their presuppositions.

That's the big difference. I draw conclusions based on what is presented. Fox-types draw conclusions and then seek validation, which any number of outlets are only too happy to provide.


Great post! Yep, my friend constantly forwards bullshiat that's easily proven as bullshiat if one knows how to use google at all. But I do have one correction -- the right has been spewing the bullshiat for more than 10 years. Since the Fairness Doctrine was repealed in 1987, AM radio has been mightily full of it.
 
2012-01-24 05:06:51 PM
Darth_Lukecash: He should have vetoed-but he obviously thought compromise was the best path.

...as he usually does, which makes the "Obama is a power-mad dictator" canard so hilarious.
 
2012-01-24 05:08:09 PM
dickfreckle

You are welcome. Keep posting!!
 
2012-01-24 05:11:10 PM
dickfreckle: If my AP and Reuters feeds are liberal brainwashing, whoa,

lol it's funny because both of those news organizations are conservative, AP's bias actually seeps out sometimes.
 
2012-01-24 05:17:42 PM
Lionel Mandrake: Darth_Lukecash: He should have vetoed-but he obviously thought compromise was the best path.

...as he usually does, which makes the "Obama is a power-mad dictator" canard so hilarious.


And that's what he actually ran on. But the far left was expecting him to be their version of W. Bush lockstep republicans.

Heck, my mom just said she wants to just vote out any encumbent.
 
2012-01-24 05:18:59 PM
Darth_Lukecash: Heck, my mom just said she wants to just vote out any encumbent.

which is a moronic policy. the incumbent on your ballot may not be responsible for the problem, and may be part of the solution.
 
2012-01-24 05:21:26 PM
vernonFL: Another straw grasping attempted hit piece by the liberal media.

Salon is the very definition of the Left wing elitist know it all Hollywood limosine Ivory Tower lamestream homosexual Socialist Upper West Side ilberal media.


You had me at "Another straw grasping attempted hit piece by the liberal media." Then you just phoned it in. C'mon, man. You're better than this!

:P
 
2012-01-24 05:22:44 PM
I'm not reading that.
Taxes are always bad. Small business and family values are the backbone of America. Say those things often enough and you've got my vote!
 
2012-01-24 05:23:48 PM

That entire article addresses one solitary Op-Ed writer named Philip Klein and his writings, solely. No one else.

One guy writes stuff. One different guy rebuts it. Somehow, for Submittard, that equates to -- "How the Right brainwashes its followers to believe outright falsehoods about the government"? To top it off the rebuttal article is filled with its own hooey and blathering nonsense as if attempting to brainwash the ilk of the Left with falsehoods. Ooookay then.

 

i157.photobucket.com
 
2012-01-24 05:26:02 PM
From Social Security hysteria to "Obamacare" madness, right-wing propaganda is increasingly divorced from reality

They just don't want a divorce. They want child support for kids that aren't ours.
 
2012-01-24 05:29:53 PM
How the Right brainwashes its followers to believe outright falsehoods about the government

Repetition, repetition, repetition. Aided by a news media unwilling call bullshiat.
 
2012-01-24 05:30:24 PM
Was that the whole article? 2 paragraphs?
 
2012-01-24 05:32:50 PM
slayer199: As opposed to how the left brainwashes its followers into believing outright falsehoods about government.

As opposed to how some people constantly blather on about how both sides are equally bad, when that is most certainly not the case.
 
2012-01-24 05:34:44 PM
You want to know how to defuse any conservative argument? It's this:

"Just because a Democrat did something doesn't give the Republicans carte blanche to do it. All it means is that Republicans are immature children that don't deserve power."

Seriously, when did 'b-b-b-b they did it' become a reasonable excuse?
 
2012-01-24 05:35:42 PM
I think you just have to accept that a significant part of the population is mentally ill/mentally deficient.
 
2012-01-24 05:36:20 PM
They lie and the media never calls them out, the end.
 
2012-01-24 05:36:22 PM
How the Right brainwashes its followers to believe outright falsehoods about the government. A long, but interesting read A liberal columnist writes a long-winded and boring counterpoint to a shiatty article by a hack conservative


FTFY, subby.
 
2012-01-24 05:36:25 PM
Lando Lincoln: As opposed to how some people constantly blather on about how both sides are equally bad, when that is most certainly not the case.

THIS
 
2012-01-24 05:36:40 PM
Darth_Lukecash: "both sides are bad"

one side is shoplifting and the other side is doing armed robberies.
 
2012-01-24 05:37:07 PM
A representative government is basically a union for the people to protect them from moneyed interests. They are against it for the same reason they are against unions -- they are the moneyed interests.
 
2012-01-24 05:38:36 PM
scottydoesntknow: Both sides suck.

yes, but not equally. comparing democratic bullshiat to republican bullshiat is like comparing a sand trap at pebble beach to the sahara farking desert.
 
2012-01-24 05:39:14 PM
Shaggy_C: How the Right brainwashes its followers to believe outright falsehoods about the government. A long, but interesting read A liberal columnist writes a long-winded and boring counterpoint to a shiatty article by a hack conservative


FTFY, subby.


the thing is, only the "liberal" used actual facts.
 
Displayed 50 of 220 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »