What's with the whiny pussy boy threads today?

brigid_fitch: ManateeGag: Yes, but not one of those questions is "WHAR BIRTH CERTIFICAT WHAR?!?"

Well, this question's bone-headed enough to replace it:

7) How do you decide which foreign leaders to submissively bow towards and why do you think that's appropriate for an American President?

*facepalm* There are no words...

As is this one:

14) Your stimulus bill cost more in real dollars than the moon landing and the interstate highway system combined. What do we have to show for all of that money spent?

Never mind the tiniest criticism of W Bush after 2002 would get you labeled an anti-American traitor.

Is it just me, or does anyone else only click on Town Hall links in hopes that the author is the guy that looks like Troy McGreggor?

\ROWSDOWER!

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: [2.bp.blogspot.com image 640x272]

Is that an arrow in his knee?

Sleeping Monkey: [images.huffingtonpost.com image 250x328]

I may just keep this link in my clipboard for the day

It'll be a long YEAR. Keep it around.

imapirate: "Through dubious means, you and your allies in Congress managed to push through an incredibly unpopular health care bill that helped lead to the worst election night for the Democratic Party in 50 years......."

That's an objective question, right?

The bill is unpopular and did have much to do with the shellacking the Democrats suffered in the 2010 congressional elections. The dubious means are maybe a bit much, but there were plenty of kickbacks and backscratching that made the whole process pretty disgusting even for the most ardent supporters of the bill's contents.

Impasse: Is it just me, or does anyone else only click on Town Hall links in hopes that the author is the guy that looks like Troy McGreggor?

\ROWSDOWER!

Hi, I'm Troy McGreggor, you may remember me from such Townhall derp-a-derps as "Obama's Secret Mooslim Atheist Gay Agenda" and "How Fight the Liberals' Plan to Outlaw Christianity."

Jake Havechek: Never mind the tiniest criticism of W Bush after 2002 would get you labeled an anti-American traitor.

Love it or leave it. that's what i got a lot.

ya, ya, liberal media conspiracy... uh huh... yep...suuuurrrreee.

Jake Havechek: Never mind the tiniest criticism of W Bush after 2002 would get you labeled an anti-American traitor.

By that same logic the tiniest criticism of Obama gets you labeled a racist from 2008 onward.

So . . . what's your point? That sometimes attacking the central figure of a political ideology will get you criticized by members of that ideology? Ok.

Nina_Hartley's_Ass: [2.bp.blogspot.com image 640x272]

Can someone explain why this keeps popping up?

mrshowrules: I'm pretty sure we are not dealing Edward R. Murrow here:

[rightwingnews.com image 450x340]

That looks like a young John Candy and Victoria Jackson if they averaged out their weight.

Wait... Gas was $1.74/gal when he took office? I don't remember that.

FTA: 1) Numerous Mexican citizens and an American citizen have been killed with weapons knowingly provided to criminals by our own government during Operation Fast and Furious. If Eric Holder was aware that was going on, do you think he should step down as Attorney General? Were you aware that was going on and if so, shouldn't you resign?

If Obama were a Republican then his answer would be, "Gun don't kill people; people kill people. Those drug lords would have gotten the gun whether through Fast & Furious or through other means.

VictoryCabal: Two whiney-assed Townhall crybaby threads in a row? Man up, conservatives. Stop trying to make yourselves the victim of everything.

Seems like a hallmark of authoritarianism, playing the victim.

/csb
I went to a meeting of the Mens group at my church (don't ask..), and expected to hear things about how we could be better husbands, fathers, citizens, etc. What I got instead was a pathetic mixture of "gays chose that way", "gay marriage today, dog weddings tomorrow", "abortion is the fault of feminism", nostalgia for a time which never existed (guy actually said he wanted things to be like Ozzie and Harriet), and an overall tone of "there is a war going on against us and people like us". One long, whiny session of victim-y butthurt from a bunch of people who were all 1.) White, 2.) Male 3.) Christian, and 4.) American. They hit the farking demographic lottery, yet still felt everyone and everything was actively working against them. Fark the lot of them.

The whole experience has pretty much made me non-religious at best, and agnostic at worst.

/end csb

Shaggy_C: The bill is unpopular and did have much to do with the shellacking the Democrats suffered in the 2010 congressional elections. The dubious means are maybe a bit much, but there were plenty of kickbacks and backscratching that made the whole process pretty disgusting even for the most ardent supporters of the bill's contents.

You're right. They should have offered a public option, or at the least a single-payer plan. Yes, it's unpopular, just not in the way you (or, rather, the people who pay you?) would like to imagine.

Sleeping Monkey: I may just keep this link in my clipboard for the day

Just wait until November...epic butt hurt if they keep making themselves look like asses.

watson.t.hamster: Jake Havechek: Never mind the tiniest criticism of W Bush after 2002 would get you labeled an anti-American traitor.

By that same logic the tiniest criticism of Obama gets you labeled a racist from 2008 onward.

So . . . what's your point? That sometimes attacking the central figure of a political ideology will get you criticized by members of that ideology? Ok.

this is America, you can be a racist coont if you want to be.

The media DOES treat BO the same as Republicans. If anything, they treat Republicans too well, consistently failing to challenge the nonsense Republicans spew for fear of being called librul.

Also, I like how the endless stream of Republican scandals and attacks on each other are the fault of some vast librul conspiracy.

EyeballKid: You're right. They should have offered a public option, or at the least a single-payer plan. Yes, it's unpopular, just not in the way you (or, rather, the people who pay you?) would like to imagine.

The individual components of the bill all poll very well, but mention "Obamacare" as a whole and instantly support plummets. People are idiots, and the Republicans did a good job poisoning perceptions.

John Hawkins.



Serious business.

Right - because the media totally hits Republicans with questions like those. If a reporter asked Gingrich or Romney questions with biased wording (corruption ... dubious ... incredibly unpopular ... demonized ... submissively ... wildly unpopular ... irresponsible ... risky ... wasted) without any sources for the weaselly worded questions (numerous ... a lot ... people who say), this fark would be screaming for that reporter to be fired.

I'm sorry that the GOP tends to nominate candidates who are befuddled when asked what newspapers they read, but that's not the fault of the media.