If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Scientific American) Cool Farker's artwork makes Scientific American's Image of the Week. With dinosaur goodness   (blogs.scientificamerican.com) divider line 31
More: Cool, Scientific American, blog network, deviantART, Canadian Auto Workers, theropod dinosaurs, primes  
•       •       •

5679 clicks; posted to Geek » on 24 Jan 2012 at 7:35 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



31 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2012-01-24 06:25:25 AM
Very cool indeed.
 
2012-01-24 07:34:41 AM
Good job. Looks great.
 
2012-01-24 07:40:26 AM
Very nice, it says painting, but it has a print quality to it. I've been wanting to do some silk screens and this gives me inspiration.
 
2012-01-24 07:45:46 AM
Nice image. It's good to see a Farker accomplishing something with their lives. I think that brings the total up to 5 or so.
 
2012-01-24 07:56:04 AM
img696.imageshack.us
 
2012-01-24 08:13:55 AM
www.rpgfan.com

Looks like a greasel.
 
2012-01-24 08:14:01 AM
DarnoKonrad: Very nice, it says painting, but it has a print quality to it. I've been wanting to do some silk screens and this gives me inspiration.

sayin ain't doin.
who cares if it's print or painting...
go do something and shush
 
2012-01-24 08:21:55 AM
James Scameron: who cares if it's print or painting...

I do, it's a different aesthetic, and that's what art's about. Aesthetics.
 
2012-01-24 08:32:35 AM
I like the choice of colors more and more as I look at it -- it's kind of unexpected and daring, and it works. Well done!

Are those Horsetails?
 
2012-01-24 08:40:10 AM
great work, colors, and recognition!

oblig

img406.imageshack.us
 
2012-01-24 08:58:32 AM
phaseolus: Are those Horsetails?

I notice ginkgoes, too. The oldest living angiosperm!
 
2012-01-24 09:04:59 AM
Cool artwork, bro
 
2012-01-24 09:06:55 AM
i44.tinypic.com

I, Powder,
and my brother, Ball,
Hero-like,
do conquer all.
 
2012-01-24 09:20:30 AM
DarnoKonrad: and that's what art's about. Aesthetics.

That's deep.
 
2012-01-24 09:22:51 AM
Excellent.
 
2012-01-24 09:23:16 AM
i527.photobucket.com
 
2012-01-24 09:24:07 AM
Since when does art require citations?

Badass piece, btw
 
Zel
2012-01-24 09:41:25 AM
croesius: Since when does art require citations?

Badass piece, btw


Because to be scientific it's supposed to show realistic plants and animals. Only recently do we have an idea what the plants and animals of the late dinosaur periods looked like.

When I was a kid dinosaurs didnt have feathers. Now they do.
 
2012-01-24 09:42:16 AM
croesius: Since when does art require citations?

This art requires a Citation:

farm4.staticflickr.com
 
2012-01-24 10:44:41 AM
Awesome job.
 
2012-01-24 10:51:13 AM
No looter guy? FAIL
 
2012-01-24 11:57:39 AM
Beautiful image. Congratulations.
 
2012-01-24 12:06:58 PM
Very cool.
 
2012-01-24 12:15:09 PM
I've met alaskanime, the Farker responsible. I have a McLargeHuge canvas print of this hanging on my wall. I'm hipper than you, Scientific American.

/apparently Costco of all places has a really good canvas printing department
 
2012-01-24 01:21:06 PM
The one and only opinion that I will ever hold in common with Newt Gingrich is that dinosaurs are awesome. Great print and congrats on the recognition!
 
2012-01-24 01:31:34 PM
What you can't see is the Daspletosaurus hiding behind the Ginkgo tree...

I love the attention to detail with the types of plants.
 
2012-01-24 02:11:21 PM
Ah,,so I should probably stop with the MS Paint then?

Very beautiful work there. Congratulations!
 
2012-01-24 02:47:26 PM
Dinodork: I love the attention to detail with the types of plants.

That's where my eye went first. I don't know why, but it's the sort of thing that can ruin an otherwise great image for me.

Very cool.
 
2012-01-24 03:03:04 PM
dittybopper: This art requires a Citation:

I love Carhenge. I went by in 1995, I'm glad it's still there.
 
2012-01-24 06:43:45 PM
Zel: croesius: Since when does art require citations?

Badass piece, btw

Because to be scientific it's supposed to show realistic plants and animals. Only recently do we have an idea what the plants and animals of the late dinosaur periods looked like.

When I was a kid dinosaurs didnt have feathers. Now they do.


when I was a kid... dinosaurs were extinct... just like they are now...
how old are you?
r u a wizard?
we have feathered dinosaurs now?
Im so confused.
 
2012-01-25 07:57:51 AM
2.bp.blogspot.com
 
Displayed 31 of 31 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »