The only reason RON PAUL isn't the winner is because the liberal media have conspired to keep people from knowing that he's actually more liberal than Obama who is just Bush lite. The republicans are in on it because they want to lose so they can blame Obama for their own farkups of the past decade.

The Republican base hates Obama more then they want to beat Obama.

Keep repeating the phrase "A vote for Romney is a vote for four more years of Obama."

edmo: Racism still sells in the South.

Maybe southerns just like people who cheat on their wives when they're dying of cancer?

ever think of that mr. know it all?

I've had my money on Obama since the start of this campaign cycle.

Romney and Paul are their best chance and I doubt they can bring Obama down. Paul's too radical to gain the moderate vote or any liberal votes and Romney just doesn't have what it takes.

Newt and Frothy would give Obama a landslide.

Outrageous Muff: Keep repeating the phrase "A vote for Romney is a vote for four more years of Obama."

It doesn't matter anymore, the only people left in the race are clowns that Obama will demolish. In fact Romney may have the best chance out of the people who are left.

Notabunny: Don't forget, there'll be nearly 3 Billion dollars spent on this election. That kind of money could even make a doofus like me seem like a plausible candidate.

Pop quiz: How much money did Ronald Reagan raise for his 1980 campaign?

Answer: None. It was publicly financed.

While that is true in general desperately needs to be changed, it really doesn't help the Republican nominees in this case. Obama collected a record amount for his campaign in 2008, and will likely crush the Republicans in the money race once again (and that's even with Hollywood boycotting him because of his stance of SOPA).

FriarReb98: ib_thinkin: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1453447/Vi c tory-for-Edwards-slows-Kerrys-bandwagon.html

Senator John Edwards, a charismatic southerner, scored a convincing victory in the South Carolina primary last night, boosting his hopes of mounting a strong challenge for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Exit polls and early results indicated that he had claimed a comfortable win, pushing the frontrunner, Sen John Kerry, the Vietnam war hero and veteran politician, into second place and leaving the other contenders far behind. With a third of the votes counted Mr Edwards had 45 per cent, against 29 per cent for Mr Kerry.

Nope, not a single parallel here. That's just crazy talk.

But-but, TFA says South Carolina's right 100% of the time! How can this be?

It's right for the GOP.

eddyatwork: The only reason RON PAUL isn't the winner is because the liberal media have conspired to keep people from knowing that he's actually more liberal than Obama who is just Bush lite. The republicans are in on it because they want to lose so they can blame Obama for their own farkups of the past decade.

DarnoKonrad: That's a funny headline subby,
but let's not start sucking each other's dicks quite yet.

That would be a Fark thread. The polls say something different.

People wondering how Newt pulled this off need to check out Nixon's 'Checkers' speech. Lets hope Newt doesnt fillow him down the path to Watergate.

eddyatwork: The only reason RON PAUL isn't the winner is because the liberal media have conspired to keep people from knowing that he's actually more liberal than Obama who is just Bush lite.

Right because making abortion "murder", allowing states to ban all homosexual acts, defining federally marriage is between a man and a woman, allowing states to make official religions is "LEFT" of Obama.

I know you probably only care about pot but there are more issues than that.

FTFA: There's another serious issue at hand: South Carolina conservatives dealt Romney a serious blow by overwhelmingly voting for Gingrich.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't South Carolina an open primary? Which would mean that it's possible that it wasn't just conservatives voting for Newt.

Burn_The_Plows: Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't South Carolina an open primary? Which would mean that it's possible that it wasn't just conservatives voting for Newt.

Operation Chaos 2: Electric Boogaloo!

GardenWeasel: Let's analyze this shall we?

[i.imgur.com image 500x427]

Huh.

It may actually have looked like there were blacks in the primary then there actually were, as there are many white people down south who suffer from an unfortunate skin condition called reverse vitiligo.

Does that baseball statistician still run that website where we uses polling data to predict the winners? He seemed spot on last election.

organizmx: Does that baseball statistician still run that website where we uses polling data to predict the winners? He seemed spot on last election.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

he does it for the NY Times now.

organizmx: Does that baseball statistician still run that website where we uses polling data to predict the winners? He seemed spot on last election.

NYT picked up his blog.

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/

Gwyrddu: Notabunny: Don't forget, there'll be nearly 3 Billion dollars spent on this election. That kind of money could even make a doofus like me seem like a plausible candidate.

Pop quiz: How much money did Ronald Reagan raise for his 1980 campaign?

Answer: None. It was publicly financed.

While that is true in general desperately needs to be changed, it really doesn't help the Republican nominees in this case. Obama collected a record amount for his campaign in 2008, and will likely crush the Republicans in the money race once again (and that's even with Hollywood boycotting him because of his stance of SOPA).

Obama isn't against SOPA. This is part of his Chicago lying ways. He'll put it on hold now and then allow it to be added to a military funding or school funding program. Similar to how he signed a law allowing indefinite incarcerations of US citizens without due process. Or after the election he will say fark you and just sign the law against the will of the people. See Obamacare

Thanks you both!

This Newtmenum is giving me hope of what I like to call my "Dream Scenario." Newt wins the GOP nomination against all odds because the establishment knows it's a bad idea. Huntsman and/or Johnson run third party candidate (maybe even a Teabagelical 3rd party too?!). Regardless, Newt gets LESS votes than a third party, disgracing the GOP and making them all rethink WTF they've been doing over the last two decades or so...all the while Obama wins a second term easily.

Lando Lincoln: Well, I don't know about that. This country voted for George Bush in 2004, so any level of complete stupidity is possible.

Yeah, that's why I think that any Dems planning to vote for Newt in open primaries (for the lulz) are just tempting fate.

Gwyrddu: Outrageous Muff: Keep repeating the phrase "A vote for Romney is a vote for four more years of Obama."

It doesn't matter anymore, the only people left in the race are clowns that Obama will demolish. In fact Romney may have the best chance out of the people who are left.

Yep, and it warms my little heart. Extremist idiots have gleefully run out side and grabbed the switch with which Obama is going to spank them. This is what happens when the GOP gets into bed with the teabaggers.

Nemo's Brother: Gwyrddu: Notabunny: Don't forget, there'll be nearly 3 Billion dollars spent on this election. That kind of money could even make a doofus like me seem like a plausible candidate.

Pop quiz: How much money did Ronald Reagan raise for his 1980 campaign?

Answer: None. It was publicly financed.

While that is true in general desperately needs to be changed, it really doesn't help the Republican nominees in this case. Obama collected a record amount for his campaign in 2008, and will likely crush the Republicans in the money race once again (and that's even with Hollywood boycotting him because of his stance of SOPA).

Obama isn't against SOPA. This is part of his Chicago lying ways. He'll put it on hold now and then allow it to be added to a military funding or school funding program. Similar to how he signed a law allowing indefinite incarcerations of US citizens without due process. Or after the election he will say fark you and just sign the law against the will of the people. See Obamacare

wow this is terrible

ox45tallboy: He also said he would never use it, and by the time it is tested by a future president, he'll have SCOTUS stacked with a bunch of young liberal OTW females that will shiat-can it where it belongs.

This is what suckers really believe.

Nemo's Brother: Gwyrddu: Notabunny: Don't forget, there'll be nearly 3 Billion dollars spent on this election. That kind of money could even make a doofus like me seem like a plausible candidate.

Pop quiz: How much money did Ronald Reagan raise for his 1980 campaign?

Answer: None. It was publicly financed.

While that is true in general desperately needs to be changed, it really doesn't help the Republican nominees in this case. Obama collected a record amount for his campaign in 2008, and will likely crush the Republicans in the money race once again (and that's even with Hollywood boycotting him because of his stance of SOPA).

Obama isn't against SOPA. This is part of his Chicago lying ways. He'll put it on hold now and then allow it to be added to a military funding or school funding program. Similar to how he signed a law allowing indefinite incarcerations of US citizens without due process. Or after the election he will say fark you and just sign the law against the will of the people. See Obamacare

Intrade has Obama's chances up 5% on the South Carolina news.

Outrageous Muff: The Republican base hates Obama more then they want to beat Obama.

THIS

Nail on the head. You just typed what will be the epitaph for the GOP's 2012 campaign. They're so angry they'll give anything to see the vicious attack dog go after Obama and tear him up because ooohhh! I hate him so much!

Now, how Fox News has created this rabid environment by letting people like Glenn Beck say whatever crazy Nazi end-of-times crap he wants, that's another story altogether...

You want to know your future? I know your future. It's covered in thick, black ooze. They're everywhere.

Nemo's Brother: Gwyrddu: Notabunny: Don't forget, there'll be nearly 3 Billion dollars spent on this election. That kind of money could even make a doofus like me seem like a plausible candidate.

Pop quiz: How much money did Ronald Reagan raise for his 1980 campaign?

Answer: None. It was publicly financed.

While that is true in general desperately needs to be changed, it really doesn't help the Republican nominees in this case. Obama collected a record amount for his campaign in 2008, and will likely crush the Republicans in the money race once again (and that's even with Hollywood boycotting him because of his stance of SOPA).

Obama isn't against SOPA. This is part of his Chicago lying ways. He'll put it on hold now and then allow it to be added to a military funding or school funding program. Similar to how he signed a law allowing indefinite incarcerations of US citizens without due process. Or after the election he will say fark you and just sign the law against the will of the people. See Obamacare

With all due respect, I would like to write "Obamacare" on a piece of cardboard and shove it up your ass. Tell us all why, genius, President Fat Load or President Gumby or President Old Man Yells at Cloud or President Frothy will be better. I would like three reasons, please.

Comments are funny. The ignorant Republicans are saying that Newton McPherson is exactly who is needed to take on the Republican establishment. McPherson *is* the Republican establishment.

trotsky: Nemo's Brother: Gwyrddu: Notabunny: Don't forget, there'll be nearly 3 Billion dollars spent on this election. That kind of money could even make a doofus like me seem like a plausible candidate.

Pop quiz: How much money did Ronald Reagan raise for his 1980 campaign?

Answer: None. It was publicly financed.

While that is true in general desperately needs to be changed, it really doesn't help the Republican nominees in this case. Obama collected a record amount for his campaign in 2008, and will likely crush the Republicans in the money race once again (and that's even with Hollywood boycotting him because of his stance of SOPA).

Obama isn't against SOPA. This is part of his Chicago lying ways. He'll put it on hold now and then allow it to be added to a military funding or school funding program. Similar to how he signed a law allowing indefinite incarcerations of US citizens without due process. Or after the election he will say fark you and just sign the law against the will of the people. See Obamacare

With all due respect, I would like to write "Obamacare" on a piece of cardboard and shove it up your ass. Tell us all why, genius, President Fat Load or President Gumby or President Old Man Yells at Cloud or President Frothy will be better. I would like three reasons, please.

Oh fark. Got trolled. That's what I get for hungover posting.

Doc Lee: Comments are funny. The ignorant Republicans are saying that Newton McPherson is exactly who is needed to take on the Republican establishment. McPherson *is* the Republican establishment.

Not a goldfish but #1 with goldfish.

eddyatwork: The only reason RON PAUL isn't the winner is because the liberal media have conspired to keep people from knowing that he's actually more liberal than Obama who is just Bush lite. The republicans are in on it because they want to lose so they can blame Obama for their own farkups of the past decade.

Did you learn all that from Ron Paul's newsletter?

//decriminalizing victimless crimes doesn't make you liberal when you go after women's rights and civil rights