It's Not News It's Fark.com
Real news. Real funny
Log In
|
Sign Up »
Login
Password
Forgot password?
X
Fark
TotalFark
my
Fark
About/FArQ
Contests
Store
Contact Us
Mobile
Search:
Password
Login
Turn on javascript (or enable it for Fark) for a better user experience.
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Main
Sports
Business
Geek
Entertainment
Politics
Video
Remember that tidy 8.7% yearly profit you had on your Google stock yesterday? Well, hold on to those memories
(
reuters.com
)
19
More:
Fail
,
Google
,
Stifel Nicolaus
,
internet search engines
,
mobile software
,
net profits
,
Samsung Electronics
,
memory
,
research analysts
• • •
3001
clicks; posted to
Business »
on
20 Jan 2012
at
9:17 AM
|
Favorite
| share:
more»
|
shirt it!
Share this link:
URL:
http://fk.cm/go/6891185
Bookmark:
URL:
http://fk.cm/6891185
Bookmark:
Article
Comments
close
19 Comments
(
+0 »
)
Paginated (50/page)
Single page
Single page, reversed
Normal view
Change images to links
Show raw HTML
Show posts from ignored users
View Voting Results:
Smartest
and
Funniest
Sun Worshiping Dog Launcher
2012-01-20 09:22:31 AM
Yeah...I didn't buy Google so I could pee my pants in excitement on a quarterly basis. I bought it to have a stock that was worth a damn a decade or two from now.
steamingpile
2012-01-20 09:27:35 AM
Sun Worshiping Dog Launcher
:
Yeah...I didn't buy Google so I could pee my pants in excitement on a quarterly basis. I bought it to have a stock that was worth a damn a decade or two from now.
Who ever thinks making money every year off of stocks anyway?
You buy stocks for long term gain not for an income.
Sun Worshiping Dog Launcher
2012-01-20 09:31:49 AM
Also, FTA:
Google said on Thursday it earned $2.71 billion, or $8.22 per share, in the fourth quarter, compared with $2.54 billion, or $7.81 per share, a year earlier.
Excluding certain items, Google earned $9.50 per share, lagging estimates for $10.49 a share.
Some analysts questioned whether Google was investing heavily on projects -- such as its Android mobile software or Chrome Internet browser -- at the expense of the bottom line.
Another new initiative -- the fledgling Google+ -- appeared to be gaining momentum. Executives said three-fifths of the service's estimated 90 million users "engage" with it daily, and four-fifths do so weekly. User engagement or time spent on the social network, which Google hopes can eventually take on Facebook, is key to determining future revenue potential.
Several interesting things in here, starting with the fact that apparently Google+ not only isn't dead, but is actually doing okay. I had written it off months ago.
Second, it appears that their results were fine--they just weren't the lofty results that stock analysts had been hoping for.
Lastly, the concern that they are investing heavily in Android and Chrome at the expense of the bottom line...words fail me. Google is competitive and successful precisely because they invest in things like this. I'd rather they ding their bottom line doing R & D and implementing new technologies instead of always being second or third to market with a product and cruising on past successes. (Cough) Microsoft (Cough)
Cinaed
2012-01-20 09:43:34 AM
Soooo.... strong earnings, strong profits, extensive investment in new initiatives and products...
Sounds like a 8.7% discount on Google stock.
WhyteRaven74
2012-01-20 09:52:37 AM
This is why analysts need to be told to STFU and GTFO with earnings predictions or any predictions. It's not the job of any company to live up to predictions that may and often do have little connection to reality.
bhcompy
2012-01-20 10:16:36 AM
steamingpile
:
Sun Worshiping Dog Launcher: Yeah...I didn't buy Google so I could pee my pants in excitement on a quarterly basis. I bought it to have a stock that was worth a damn a decade or two from now.
Who ever thinks making money every year off of stocks anyway?
You buy stocks for long term gain not for an income.
You do, hedge funds and institutional investors and such(you know, the people controlling the vast majority of investments) don't
Magorn
2012-01-20 10:21:17 AM
Sun Worshiping Dog Launcher
:
Also, FTA:
Google said on Thursday it earned $2.71 billion, or $8.22 per share, in the fourth quarter, compared with $2.54 billion, or $7.81 per share, a year earlier.
Excluding certain items, Google earned $9.50 per share, lagging estimates for $10.49 a share.
Some analysts questioned whether Google was investing heavily on projects -- such as its Android mobile software or Chrome Internet browser -- at the expense of the bottom line.
Another new initiative -- the fledgling Google+ -- appeared to be gaining momentum. Executives said three-fifths of the service's estimated 90 million users "engage" with it daily, and four-fifths do so weekly. User engagement or time spent on the social network, which Google hopes can eventually take on Facebook, is key to determining future revenue potential.
Several interesting things in here, starting with the fact that apparently Google+ not only isn't dead, but is actually doing okay. I had written it off months ago.
Second, it appears that their results were fine--they just weren't the lofty results that stock analysts had been hoping for.
Lastly, the concern that they are investing heavily in Android and Chrome at the expense of the bottom line...words fail me. Google is competitive and successful precisely because they invest in things like this. I'd rather they ding their bottom line doing R & D and implementing new technologies instead of always being second or third to market with a product and cruising on past successes. (Cough) Microsoft (Cough)
This is why I think the stock markets and modern finacial practices in general are ruining America. Google is worth *% less today than it was yesterday, not because they did anything wrong-they didn't, Not because they didn't make a huge profit-they did, not even because they said they'd do better than they did-because they didn't. No they are taking a hit because some people
thought
they might do even better than they did, so when they didn't they got punished by the markets. And those analysts' biggest complaint? That they are investing in R&D rather than simply sitting on huge piles of profit so their stock price will go up and make those analysts more money.
MyPoolLeaks
2012-01-20 10:30:17 AM
That's ok subby, I'm still up 53.65% on GOOG since I bought it.
NURBS
2012-01-20 10:42:44 AM
Magorn
:
Sun Worshiping Dog Launcher:
This is why I think the stock markets and modern finacial practices in general are ruining America. Google is worth *% less today than it was yesterday, not because they did anything wrong-they didn't, Not because they didn't make a huge profit-they did, not even because they said they'd do better than they did-because they didn't. No they are taking a hit because some people thought they might do even better than they did, so when they d ...
I think the explanation is that, before the earnings were reported, the stock price had already taken into account the prediction. As in, the price will be A if the earnings are X, the price will be B if the earnings are Y, and so on. The earnings were expected to be some amount, so the stock price had gone up to that amount. Had the earnings been better than expected, the stock price would have jumped up to the new value associated with the actual earnings. Because the earnings were less than expected, the stock price fell to an amount more in line with the actual earnings.
Sorry if that's a confusing explanation. And I'm not saying that you're wrong, I agree that modern financial practices are ruining this country. But they're not being punished by the markets like you say, the price of the stock is just readjusting to account for the actual earnings since the predicted earnings were already factored into the stock price.
starsrift
2012-01-20 11:05:39 AM
Sun Worshiping Dog Launcher
:
Yeah...I didn't buy Google so I could pee my pants in excitement on a quarterly basis. I bought it to have a stock that was worth a damn a decade or two from now.
Nobody said you should.
But if, y'know, you wanted to, that would be kinda okay.
wee
2012-01-20 11:32:39 AM
Sun Worshiping Dog Launcher
:
Second, it appears that their results were fine--they just weren't the lofty results that stock analysts had been hoping for.
This is always the case. Google doesn't provide analysts with forward-looking information like many other companies do. So they guess that GOOG will have, say, a 91% increase in revenue. Then when it comes out that they "only" had an 87% increase, the stock slides $40. It's nuts. Any other company on the planet consistently increases revenue the way Google does and their stock would rival Berkshire Hathaway.
MyPoolLeaks
:
That's ok subby, I'm still up 53.65% on GOOG since I bought it.
Good on ya! I bought a bunch of my options at $200/share when I left and I'm hanging onto it as well. I think it'll go up.
Why Would I Read the Article
2012-01-20 11:56:46 AM
Magorn
:
This is why I think the stock markets and modern finacial practices in general are ruining America. Google is worth *% less today than it was yesterday,
No, Google is not worth less than it was yesterday, its market cap is just lower than it was yesterday. Don't confuse the market cap of a company with its value.
mainstreet62
2012-01-20 12:04:00 PM
GOOG will be a $700 stock in a year.
Apple will push past $550 this year.
/remember this post.
swaxhog
2012-01-20 12:42:53 PM
Post exaggerated predictions on a stock. When stock doesn't meed exaggerated predictions, stock price plummets 10% as idiots sell off. Buy up stock and watch stock go up 24 hours later. Profit.
Magorn
2012-01-20 01:20:49 PM
swaxhog
:
Post exaggerated predictions on a stock. When stock doesn't meed exaggerated predictions, stock price plummets 10% as idiots sell off. Buy up stock and watch stock go up 24 hours later. Profit.
You forgot after step one: Sell stock in a naked short. Though that probably veers into "pump and dump" territory
Mumbler
2012-01-20 05:05:54 PM
MyPoolLeaks
:
That's ok subby, I'm still up 53.65% on GOOG since I bought it.
I bought at 185, so I'm up 215%.
Don't mean to sound like bragging though, and I only have 10 shares. In fact it's the only company stock I have left, all the rest is in indexes, funds, GLD etc.
Nemo's Brother
2012-01-20 05:54:40 PM
Google is an evil fuvking company.
Saiga410
2012-01-20 05:58:00 PM
steamingpile
:
Who ever thinks making money every year off of stocks anyway?
Yearly? Pfffttt Daily. Sometimes by the second.
steamingpile
2012-01-21 01:07:27 AM
bhcompy
:
steamingpile: Sun Worshiping Dog Launcher: Yeah...I didn't buy Google so I could pee my pants in excitement on a quarterly basis. I bought it to have a stock that was worth a damn a decade or two from now.
Who ever thinks making money every year off of stocks anyway?
You buy stocks for long term gain not for an income.
You do, hedge funds and institutional investors and such(you know, the people controlling the vast majority of investments) don't
No, they look at the best investments for their clients which rely on reports but that is not what the subby implied.
Saiga410
:
Yearly? Pfffttt Daily. Sometimes by the second.
Then you are an idiot, day trading usually has worse odds that playing the slots.
Displayed
19
of
19
comments
View Voting Results:
Smartest
and
Funniest
Redisplay/refresh comments
This thread is closed to new comments.
Submit a Link »
Like Fark!
+1 Fark!
Follow @fark on Twitter
Business via RSS
Top Links
Top Comments
Top Submitters
Press/Publicity
Headlines of the Week
All Latest
Fark Forum
Link Voting
Sports Forum
Fark Blogs
Geek Forum
Fark Book
Entertainment Forum
Fark Travel Guide
Politics Forum
Fark Parties
Fark Party Forum
Fark Chat
Photoshop Forum
PS/Photo Browser
Farktography Forum
Fark Quiz
From the
Fark Shop
:
Total Fark
Super Mario Galaxy Desk Top Figures Gacha
Yoda Large Carry-All
Ladies Wallet - Woven Stainless Steel
More from the
Fark Shop
»
Stories from our partner sites:
5 Movie Roles Will Smith (Probably) N...
Katy Perry Seems Surprisingly Cool Ab...
The GIFs That Keep on Giving
This Baby Elephant is Almost Too Cute...
More news at Scribol »
Watercooler Stories
Jockstrip: The world as we know it.
Your Daily Horoscope
The almanac
More news at UPI »
Vintage Vegas: Rare Photos of a Deser...
Hell on Wheels: In Praise of Mutant B...
World War II: Pictures We Remember
Behind the Picture: The Liberation of...
More news at Life »
Five Tools You'll Need to Survive, We...
Snakeskin pedicures and gold facials
Gorgeous Goth Girls
Never Pay For Laundry Again! (PICS)
More news at Village Voice »