So a ten year old getting his dick pierced is still ok?

nekom: FirstNationalBastard: Howbout circumcision, then? Needless body modification (or mutilation, if you prefer) done on a newborn.

What about declawing them?

I wish. Do you know how sharp a newborn's nails are? I spend so much time trimming them with the tiny elf-sized nail clippers.

This is none of the state's farking business. (THIS is where your taxes go, by the way).

I also wonder if she'd be facing charges if she were white.

Molavian: So a ten year old getting his dick pierced is still ok?

Jacob's Ladder.

No YOU'RE a Towel: What about brainwashing them with fantasy stories about a demon who will torture you for eternity if you don't eat your peas?

What the shiat ......

Mother: Chuntera Napier
Living Son: Gaquan Napier
Dead Son: Malik Napier


Ha ha! Obviously this woman was so resentful of her shiatty name growing up, she decided to take it out on her children.

ArkAngel: "What do I say to a child who wants to remember his brother?"

You say no

Because it represent his braddah.

sno man: FirstNationalBastard: GAT_00: FirstNationalBastard: GAT_00: Ear piercings don't require surgery to remove. The hole will seal over time. And a tattoo on a 10 year old is stupid because it's guaranteed to stretch as he ages.

I don't know if I'd say that's arrestable, the statute aside, but it's sure as hell not the same thing as an ear piercing.

Howbout circumcision, then? Needless body modification (or mutilation, if you prefer) done on a newborn.

/let's get this thread started!

And fark you, I'm out.

Hey, Subby should have thought of circumcision for the headline, and prevented the need for some well-meaning soul to have to bring it up in the thread.

piercing is closer. circumcision was mostly for hygiene, back in the day. it's mostly cosmetic now, but history...

No, piercing isn't. Though it is needless cosmetic pain on the child, the hole isn't permanent. Tattooing a child or slicing off part of his dick, however.....

/prefers em cut

ecmoRandomNumbers: FirstNationalBastard: GAT_00: Ear piercings don't require surgery to remove. The hole will seal over time. And a tattoo on a 10 year old is stupid because it's guaranteed to stretch as he ages.

I don't know if I'd say that's arrestable, the statute aside, but it's sure as hell not the same thing as an ear piercing.

Howbout circumcision, then? Needless body modification (or mutilation, if you prefer) done on a newborn.

/let's get this thread started!

Came for this. Leaving before I have to break out the asbestos underwear.

Oh so itchy!

/ROTT?
// \ekg mode ftw

palad: This is none of the state's farking business. (THIS is where your taxes go, by the way).

I also wonder if she'd be facing charges if she were white.

Umm, this is cause to question the well being of the child, which isn't an entirely negative institution to have present in any society. I'm not sure whitey fares any better. She is encouraging and financing body modification on someone whom I'm sure we can agree cannot entirely understand the consequences.

Do you believe situations of abuse should be ignored?

HellRaisingHoosier: What the shiat ......

Mother: Chuntera Napier
Living Son: Gaquan Napier
Dead Son: Malik Napier


Ha ha! Obviously this woman was so resentful of her shiatty name growing up, she decided to take it out on her children.

They all look like muppets...with horrible teeth

I had "FARK YOU" tattooed on my 3 year old's forehead. I want to make sure he never collects a regular salary

ArkAngel: "What do I say to a child who wants to remember his brother?"

You say no

or... "Here's a photo".

FirstNationalBastard: GAT_00: Ear piercings don't require surgery to remove. The hole will seal over time. And a tattoo on a 10 year old is stupid because it's guaranteed to stretch as he ages.

I don't know if I'd say that's arrestable, the statute aside, but it's sure as hell not the same thing as an ear piercing.

Howbout circumcision, then? Needless body modification (or mutilation, if you prefer) done on a newborn.

/let's get this thread started!



And thank God for 'em. I don't let the underbrush or the hair on top of my head go Au-natural; I trim to look nice.

Same concept.

Mom already looks like a skeezy crack whore, why not let the boy pimp out his arms with a full sleeve dedicated to his dead brother. It's not like he was going to be the next president or anything.

You crazy Americans and your osteopaths.

A tattoo ? They must not have a piano.

so they arrest the mother, but the tattoo artist is "under investigation"? don't you think that the tattoo artist would have been more familiar with the law than the mother was? if he had told her "sorry lady, i can't tattoo your kid, that's against the law" then none of this would have happened.

Somehow I don't think having tatoos will affect this kid's career prospects.

One Bad Apple: A tattoo ? They must not have a piano.

You're making me loathe myself.

BarbadoSlim: Somehow I don't think having tatoos will affect this kid's career prospects.

/See my post above.

FirstNationalBastard: GAT_00: Ear piercings don't require surgery to remove. The hole will seal over time. And a tattoo on a 10 year old is stupid because it's guaranteed to stretch as he ages.

I don't know if I'd say that's arrestable, the statute aside, but it's sure as hell not the same thing as an ear piercing.

Howbout circumcision, then? Needless body modification (or mutilation, if you prefer) done on a newborn.

/let's get this thread started!

Ever stopped watching a porn b/c the guy was uncut? That stuff is sick. Glad I had it done when I was a newborn. I adulthood, I probably would have had it done if I wasn't. Sorry, but your argument is weak. Circs are done with anesthetics these days (unlike when it was done to me), so I didn't have any issues with my son getting it done.

A Georgia law from 1910 states, "It shall be unlawful for any person to brand the body of any person under the age of 18, unless the brander is dressed like a pirate."

Not a fan of tats and I wouldn't get a tat for the reason the kid did. However, the kid made a choice and mom chose to pay for it. If she didn't, the kid could've got it done later in life. I don't have a problem with that and neither should that low brow state. One of those state laws that are used to push people around. Kid is not harmed and is happy with how he will remember his brother, back off.

/I find it more distasteful to see a martini glass design cut into a boys hair
//still won't go ape-stupid over it

This mother seems to have made positive life choices so far. I trust her judgement. Dad's on board, right?

"When Chuntera Napier's son Gaquan Napier....."

Stupid names for stupid people.

Go figure.

FirstNationalBastard: GAT_00: Ear piercings don't require surgery to remove. The hole will seal over time. And a tattoo on a 10 year old is stupid because it's guaranteed to stretch as he ages.

I don't know if I'd say that's arrestable, the statute aside, but it's sure as hell not the same thing as an ear piercing.

Howbout circumcision, then? Needless body modification (or mutilation, if you prefer) done on a newborn.

/let's get this thread started!

We can compromise and say he can only get the tattoo on his foreskin.

Can't they just get a tacky car window decal like everyone else ?




Forever in our hearts....until I get a different car.

enderthexenocide: so they arrest the mother, but the tattoo artist is "under investigation"? don't you think that the tattoo artist would have been more familiar with the law than the mother was? if he had told her "sorry lady, i can't tattoo your kid, that's against the law" then none of this would have happened.

This.

And if I were here lawyer, I'd argue that the tattoo was for religious reasons.

ramblinwreck: FirstNationalBastard: GAT_00: Ear piercings don't require surgery to remove. The hole will seal over time. And a tattoo on a 10 year old is stupid because it's guaranteed to stretch as he ages.

I don't know if I'd say that's arrestable, the statute aside, but it's sure as hell not the same thing as an ear piercing.

Howbout circumcision, then? Needless body modification (or mutilation, if you prefer) done on a newborn.

/let's get this thread started!

Ever stopped watching a porn b/c the guy was uncut? That stuff is sick. Glad I had it done when I was a newborn. I adulthood, I probably would have had it done if I wasn't. Sorry, but your argument is weak. Circs are done with anesthetics these days (unlike when it was done to me), so I didn't have any issues with my son getting it done.

I always have to shake my head and sigh at the people who react to a natural intact penis like it's some kind of alien monster. It's some extra flesh the same color and consistency as the rest of the dick-flesh that covers and protects the glans. Slide it back and give it a rinse when you shower, takes ten seconds. Removing it is completely pointless, and any old wives' tales about it are just that.

FirstNationalBastard: GAT_00: Ear piercings don't require surgery to remove. The hole will seal over time. And a tattoo on a 10 year old is stupid because it's guaranteed to stretch as he ages.

I don't know if I'd say that's arrestable, the statute aside, but it's sure as hell not the same thing as an ear piercing.

Howbout circumcision, then? Needless body modification (or mutilation, if you prefer) done on a newborn.

/let's get this thread started!


Just like you to try to make a mountain out of a mohelhill.

\No tattoos
\\No piercings
\\\Father
\\\\I am okay with this

palad: This is none of the state's farking business. (THIS is where your taxes go, by the way).

I also wonder if she'd be facing charges if she were white.

White trash tends to immortalize their dead babies in more pathetic (but legal) way

Should gotten the kid some crayons, sidewalk chalk, or some spray paint to express his guilt for throwing his brother under the bus. Not the school bus.

ArkAngel: "What do I say to a child who wants to remember his brother?"

You say no

Or "some other way"

Not sure this is an arresting offence, but definitly tattoos should not be done for a kid this age.Ear piecing is pretty stupid too on a child, even dangerous(Really? a few months old? That stud comes lose and she could swallow it, or the earing could go into her eye or anything) but a tattoo is far more invasive.