If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Washington Post)   Wealthy Americans showing their love of country by renouncing their US citizenship before anti tax evasion law takes effect   (washingtonpost.com) divider line 370
    More: Obvious, tax laws, Marc Rich, political life, dual citizenship, Dan Balz, TPMDC  
•       •       •

27306 clicks; posted to Main » on 19 Jan 2012 at 3:23 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



370 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-01-19 06:40:51 PM
I'm an American overseas. I file my taxes, yadda yadda, but I don't earn a cent of my money in the US and haven't for nearly a decade. I don't make much a year because I only work part time, enough to put me below the poverty line in the US. Every year when I file, it seems to me like the Tax forms want me to put in my husbands income to tax that too, and every year I decline to mention his income. He's not American, he shouldn't pay US taxes. Now they want to pop their noses in our joint bank account? They want to tax me on assets purchased with Non-US money made by a Non-US citizen in a non-US country just because my name is on the deed?

I'm not rich, I own a crappy little house and we are just scarping by. If I'm reading the the analysis of the law correctly, I too would consider renouncing. I can't afford to pay taxes twice on a house that has nothing to do with the USA. I do recall reading somewhere that even after you renounce, you have to pay US taxes for 10 more years.
 
2012-01-19 06:42:27 PM
EatsCrayons Add Favorite User


Smartest
Funniest

Quote 2012-01-19 05:59:38 PM Ignore User
J B:
The problem some people in Canada are apparently having is that they thought they didn't have to file if they didn't owe anything...but now non-filers are supposedly being hit with massive fines.
(Thankfully not a problem I'm facing, but I can see how it could happen.)

There are a lot of Americans I know living in America who believe the same.

The Canadian government has also been very hard-lined about refusing to collect fines on behalf of the U.S. anyway. So if you have no intention of going back to the U.S. and have no assets (or future inheritance) there, the IRS won't be able to collect very effectively.


Not so fast there...

The CRA is incredibly cooperative with the IRS on collecting tax debts on Americans living in Canada. Thanks to the tax treaty, the CRA can garnish wages, levy accounts and attach property.
 
2012-01-19 06:43:39 PM
Let em go, don't let them back in, don't allow them to do business here.
 
2012-01-19 06:46:56 PM
I renounced my U.S. Citizenship but I did it because as a non citizen I would get more free-bees like housing, medical and foodstamps. While using a fake Social security number to work.

Chu-ching!
 
2012-01-19 06:46:59 PM
If you have that much money in foreign accounts you can afford to live anywhere you damn well please. Good for them.
 
2012-01-19 06:47:24 PM
Good. Get out and don't come back.
 
2012-01-19 06:50:51 PM
The Roman Empire started to decline when the tax rates went up and the wealthy retired to their estates in Gaul to avoid paying them.

Just sayin'.
 
2012-01-19 06:54:56 PM
timeentertainment.files.wordpress.com

hotlinked
 
2012-01-19 06:57:46 PM
MycroftHolmes: Aarontology: Then seize all their assets held in America.

Under what possible grounds, besides 'I want it, I want it, I want it'?


You caaaaaaan't have it!
 
2012-01-19 07:01:19 PM
If the money isnt being stored here then the US should not be taxing it. It was already taxed here when it was EARNED here if it was US income.

Fk the IRS.
 
2012-01-19 07:06:17 PM
orclover: I dont blame them for leaving. What do you get as a citizen? Healthcare? no? nothing at all. You get jackshiat for being an American citizen. If you are a Dual Citizen Canadian, stay in Canada, come to America every few decades to try some food and then go back to Canada where it is safer, cleaner and far more friendly. I wish I had something to offer Canada so I could move the family there, but I don't. So i'm stuck in Texas waiting to get pulled over someday by a cop and shot for reaching for my I.D.

At least I don't live in Mexico though, on small saving grace.


Dual Mexican/US citizenship here. I don't get shiat for either of them other than the hassle of trying to explain why I have two passports....

OTOH I can go to Cuba!
 
2012-01-19 07:08:46 PM
Surpheon
And you don't need to file. Indeed, the government won't even know (or care) you're a citizen unless you've taken some explicit step to assert it. Filing would likely confuse them.

Your advice is how people got into the mess their in to begin with!

You're wrong, plus new regulations are going into effect to force foreign banks (like in Canada) to report to the U.S. on all accounts held by American citizens. So if you haven't filed, they'll see a bit of a discrepancy.


que.guero:
Not so fast there...

The CRA is incredibly cooperative with the IRS on collecting tax debts on Americans living in Canada. Thanks to the tax treaty, the CRA can garnish wages, levy accounts and attach property.


Yes and no. I was basing that on Flaherty's multiple op-ed pieces in major American newspapers saying Canada's existing tax treaties - which as you correctly say are being supported by both sides - are plenty enough thankyouverymuch, but Canada has no intention of helping out with issues that are a result of FACTA. Its becoming a full-blown dispute.
 
2012-01-19 07:10:00 PM
que.guero: You sound like someone who's never lived outside the US.

Except I have lived in Germany for 5 years working for a German company and paying taxes in both Germany and the US.

So yeah, I re-iterate the fact that you were full of shiat.

But don't take my word for it - even the IRS says you are full of shiat:

http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc856.html
 
2012-01-19 07:10:51 PM
This is relevant to my interests.

I'm an American who moved to Scotland 5 years ago, I have residency here and will be pursuing dual citizenship. No intention of moving back to states. The current tax policy is once I earn over the equivalent of $91,500, then I have to start paying taxes back in states. I'm nowhere close to that, but as my career progresses, then 10-20 years from now, perhaps I will be.

I pay my UK taxes just as if I was a UK citizen. Yet without using american roads, government services, and everything else taxes pay for, then if I was over that earnings threshold, Uncle Sam would still want money from me. For what? I'm supporting myself here and paying my taxes here for the government here which is providing services for me.

Yes, rich American citizens hiding money in foreign accounts to dodge taxes is bad. But the blanket policy being applied means that once I start earning a decent amount, then the US gov't wants money for nothing from me. Is that fair?
 
2012-01-19 07:11:06 PM
capt.hollister: Kome: If a super rich person who lives in the United States renounces his citizenship in response to this, can we consider him an illegal immigrant at that point?

You do realize that if you live in United States you still have to pay taxes in the United States even if you are not a citizen, right ?

People aren't arguing against paying US taxes on money earned while living in the US, the problem is with having to pay US taxes on money earned, and taxed, in another country while living in that other country.


Calm down, it was a joke.
 
2012-01-19 07:14:39 PM
lilplatinum [TotalFark] Add Favorite User


Smartest
Funniest

Quote 2012-01-19 07:10:00 PM Ignore User
que.guero: You sound like someone who's never lived outside the US.

Except I have lived in Germany for 5 years working for a German company and paying taxes in both Germany and the US.

So yeah, I re-iterate the fact that you were full of shiat.

But don't take my word for it - even the IRS says you are full of shiat:

http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc856.html



Except that reg completely agrees with the fact that you do get to claim an exemption for income earned UNDER the exclusion amount, but you don't get to deduct the taxes paid to your tax home country from your worldwide income.

If you have been reporting your post-tax amount, you can expect a pretty nasty surprise from the IRS...

Also, lighten up Francis.
 
2012-01-19 07:15:30 PM
Ravengirl: They want to tax me on assets purchased with Non-US money made by a Non-US citizen in a non-US country just because my name is on the deed?

NO they don't. They want your to state that you own those assets. You are not being taxed on them.

You will be taxed on the capitail gains, if any, once you sell those assets, though.
 
2012-01-19 07:16:23 PM
Ravengirl: I do recall reading somewhere that even after you renounce, you have to pay US taxes for 10 more years.

What? Who the fark told you that??? No!

(Times like this Fark needs a headsmack smiley!)

You have to be up to date with the IRS to renounce, and if your income is high enough, pay an "exit tax". Once you renunciation is official, the IRS has a window of about three years (or thereabouts) to come after you if they plan on auditing your or something. After that you're free and clear.

But for the next 10 years, you are only allowed to visit the U.S. for no more than 30 days out of the calendar year.
 
2012-01-19 07:16:29 PM
The My Little Pony Killer: I had no idea this still was still happening.

The USA will recruit pretty much anyone who's willing to serve and meets the requirements. You won't get a clearance until you get your US Citizenship and likely renounce your old one, thus are restricted in what jobs you do, but for many it's a good way to get citizenship

OgreMagi: Only the USA requires people working over seas to pay income taxes on money earned that is never brought into the home country. This applies to everyone, not just the rich. Got a job in Europe? Better rethink it. You'll be paying double taxes, turning that nice looking paycheck into poverty wages. The only way to avoid this is to get citizenship in that country and renounce your American citicizenship.

Incorrect. You either get a credit for any foregin taxes paid or a deduction plus a 'foreign earned income' exclusion - $91,400 in 2009.

Foreign income isn't all that hard, as long as you're not making huge amounts of money or the US effective tax rate would be higher than the foreign one.
 
2012-01-19 07:19:21 PM
Warlordtrooper: The US Constitution does not only applies to US citizens, You want to renounce your citizenship, guess what? You no longer have the protections afforded in the Bill of Rights.

FTFY

Send these traitors to Gitmo.

A great example of things that the President can do on a whim to US citizens these days.
 
2012-01-19 07:19:22 PM
The Stealth Hippopotamus: Magorn: In fact let's go a step further, for every one of the rich idiots who renounces thier citizenship, that citizenship should be given to any US Soldier who isn't a citizen already.

I'm completely good with that.

I want to know why we are wait from someone to renounce?

/wants to know more


I for one welcome floggings instead of prison.
 
2012-01-19 07:20:13 PM
EatsCrayons: The U.S. is the only country that taxes people who have never lived there, never worked there, have no assets there, and in some cases weren't even born there. Someone like my cousin who was born in the UK is facing ruin. My cousin makes $32,000 a year and just found out that he's a U.S. citizen (via parentage). Surprise, he faces tens of thousands in penalties.

$32k/year is 1/3rd the foreign income deduction. He owes no taxes, and should therefore face no penalties. What the IRS tends to do though, is if you don't file, they don't assume any deductions other than 'standard'. So that's $3k or so of taxes a year, plus penalties for improper withholding, etc...

I'd just file for the old years with tax amounts of zero. A professional tax preparer would help, especially one experienced with this situation. Lots of tax experts won't be that familiar with this one.
 
2012-01-19 07:22:52 PM
Instead of calling them rats for deserting the sinking ship, perhaps instead notice that the ship is sinking?
 
2012-01-19 07:23:52 PM
que.guero: Except that reg completely agrees with the fact that you do get to claim an exemption for income earned UNDER the exclusion amount, but you don't get to deduct the taxes paid to your tax home country from your worldwide income.

Yes, you can either deduct your tax credits or choose the exclusion. Either way you are getting a tax credit for your foreign income, and most expats never pay any taxes to the US at all (although its shiattier in europe since the exchange rate was so uneven).
 
2012-01-19 07:25:33 PM
EatsCrayons: sethstorm: corn-bread:

I got those with the other passport I carry. Can I opt out of the U.S. version and save on my taxes?



Yes! In fact you should start tomorrow without delay. It is unjust for you to live even one more day in tax oppression.
 
2012-01-19 07:28:45 PM
EatsCrayons: You're wrong, plus new regulations are going into effect to force foreign banks (like in Canada) to report to the U.S. on all accounts held by American citizens. So if you haven't filed, they'll see a bit of a discrepancy.

Sure thing, Internet Expert. So cite one example - one - of a US citizen living abroad actually be screwed by your chicken little tax yarn. Sorta like losing the family farm to the inheritance tax, it just doesn't happen. Go ahead, cite a REAL example. Not some guy like Egoy3k who thinks they have a problem, but someone who REALLY had a problem. It doesn't happen.
 
2012-01-19 07:30:29 PM
mr lawson: ecmoRandomNumbers: Let them.

No tourist visas, no business visas, and absolutely no consulate support. GTFO and stay out.

Jingoism (new window)
look it up.

Free men enslaved to artificial boundaries wrapped up in tiny flags.


WTF does that have to do with tax evasion? Did you miss the point, or are you deflecting?
 
2012-01-19 07:31:01 PM
lilplatinum [TotalFark] Add Favorite User


Smartest
Funniest

Quote 2012-01-19 07:23:52 PM Ignore User
que.guero: Except that reg completely agrees with the fact that you do get to claim an exemption for income earned UNDER the exclusion amount, but you don't get to deduct the taxes paid to your tax home country from your worldwide income.

Yes, you can either deduct your tax credits or choose the exclusion. Either way you are getting a tax credit for your foreign income, and most expats never pay any taxes to the US at all (although its shiattier in europe since the exchange rate was so uneven).



Glad we could finally come to violent agreement on that.

What most expats get hosed on is the not filing part...
 
2012-01-19 07:33:31 PM
EatsCrayons: My cousin makes $32,000 a year and just found out that he's a U.S. citizen (via parentage). Surprise, he faces tens of thousands in penalties.

Oh please. How does the US 'know' about him, or care for that matter? If he doesn't have a SS#, he doesn't exist to the IRS. Pretty much everything is tied into that number, which is basically your laying claim to social security, medicare, and other benefits.

/Should direct my cousin, a Norwegian with a US passport, who worked in tax law for a while towards this thread. The stupid is hilarious.
//Did you hear the one that Obama is going to ban bullets - quick stock up!
 
2012-01-19 07:34:43 PM
Surpheon: shortymac: A lot of the problem is dual citizens who never knew they had to file, like the poster who moved to Canada when he was 5 or the kid whose Dad is an American and ergo he is. I think we can all agree if you have never lived in the US or left before 18 you shouldn't have to file, even if you are a US citizen.

And you don't need to file. Indeed, the government won't even know (or care) you're a citizen unless you've taken some explicit step to assert it. Filing would likely confuse them.


Actually, the IRS is starting to go after these people. The globe and mail (a toronto newspaper) did a feature on a couple. The wife moved to Canada when she was 13, never filed anything, was facing something like 200k+ in fines. It was on fark a while back.
 
2012-01-19 07:42:54 PM
shortymac: Actually, the IRS is starting to go after these people. The globe and mail (a toronto newspaper) did a feature on a couple. The wife moved to Canada when she was 13, never filed anything, was facing something like 200k+ in fines. It was on fark a while back.

I'd be interested in the actual citation. Just in case it was something like 'was facing 200k+ in fines when she asserted her citizenship, moved back, and signed up for welfare - and a judge immediately waived the fine as a matter of course'. I'm not a Mitt Romney, but I'd put money on her never having to pay more than a token amount (under a grand).
 
2012-01-19 07:46:25 PM
shortymac: Actually, the IRS is starting to go after these people. The globe and mail (a toronto newspaper) did a feature on a couple. The wife moved to Canada when she was 13, never filed anything, was facing something like 200k+ in fines. It was on fark a while back.

Surpheon built an hypothetical scenario of a kid who got out of the US without any official papers, therefore the IRS doesn't know he exists, who would decide out-of-the-blue to start filing US taxes. The IRS would go "thanks, but who are you?".

This is clearly not the case of the woman who was in the papers a while back.
 
2012-01-19 07:47:29 PM
Well, if they're already not paying taxes, I don't see this as a loss... unless 2013 was super seriously for real pinky swear the year they were going to get around to creating all those jobs. fark 'em. If they want back in, tell them to put on their running shoes, head to Nuevo Laredo, and earn it.
 
2012-01-19 07:48:14 PM
What most of you mouthbreathers are not comprehending is that this law interferes with the sovereignty of other nations by demanding that their banks collect and turn over information to the IRS, making them de facto extensions of the US government.

Imagine if France declared that all US banks must implement a system to keep track of the nationalities of the owners of every bank account in the country and then turn over that information to France on demand, regardless of whether tracking that information and turning it over to a foreign government violates your 4th Ammendment rights.

Let me guess... most of you would say, "Go fark yourself, France." Because there is no way in hell that the US should comply with a law from a foreign country that (a) violates the privacy rights of its own citizens and (b) adds financial burdens to American banks which will surely be passed on to American customers

Every other country in the world should band together and tell the US to take a long walk off a short pier. There are already rules and tax treaties in place for the US to go after tax cheats. But this law burdens everyone and makes the average American a criminal.

So, in summary, go fark yourself America.
 
2012-01-19 07:51:07 PM
Surpheon: shortymac: Actually, the IRS is starting to go after these people. The globe and mail (a toronto newspaper) did a feature on a couple. The wife moved to Canada when she was 13, never filed anything, was facing something like 200k+ in fines. It was on fark a while back.

I'd be interested in the actual citation. Just in case it was something like 'was facing 200k+ in fines when she asserted her citizenship, moved back, and signed up for welfare - and a judge immediately waived the fine as a matter of course'. I'm not a Mitt Romney, but I'd put money on her never having to pay more than a token amount (under a grand).


IIRC, she (with her husband) had close to $750,000 in total assets (house, RRSPs, other savings, etc...) and would have had to pay the $10,000 penalty for non disclosure of those each of those assets.

I can't find the original article, but here's an update on the situation. You will not be penalized for non-disclosure unless the IRS finds that you willfully omitted to declare those assets.
 
2012-01-19 07:52:21 PM
mr lawson: Prevailing Wind: I've seen this movie...doesn't end well.

Perhaps this would be a better example;
www.whiteandnoisy.org

... Though I personally say that as a Seasteading Institute member. My interest has more to do with social innovation than it does with not wanting to pay taxes.


Perhaps you would like this movie better (new window)

That autotuning is horrible.
 
2012-01-19 07:52:35 PM
que.guero: What most expats get hosed on is the not filing part...

Meh,, i know plenty of people who didn't do it for several years and then filed a bunch of retroactive ones later.. They don;t generally fark you if you didn't owe anything, and most of the expats who don't know better are the English teachers and other broke asses who don't make enough to owe anything anyway.
 
2012-01-19 07:52:41 PM
SpaceMoose: What most of you mouthbreathers are not comprehending is that this law interferes with the sovereignty of other nations by demanding that their banks collect and turn over information to the IRS, making them de facto extensions of the US government.

Imagine if France declared that all US banks must implement a system to keep track of the nationalities of the owners of every bank account in the country and then turn over that information to France on demand, regardless of whether tracking that information and turning it over to a foreign government violates your 4th Ammendment rights.

Let me guess... most of you would say, "Go fark yourself, France." Because there is no way in hell that the US should comply with a law from a foreign country that (a) violates the privacy rights of its own citizens and (b) adds financial burdens to American banks which will surely be passed on to American customers

Every other country in the world should band together and tell the US to take a long walk off a short pier. There are already rules and tax treaties in place for the US to go after tax cheats. But this law burdens everyone and makes the average American a criminal.

So, in summary, go fark yourself America.


Unless you are listed on NYSE, where none compliance with FATCA will result in seizure of a percentage of your income!
 
2012-01-19 07:52:47 PM
ChuDogg: Well considering some of the posts in this thread, it looks like I'm one of the only people here that actually knows some of these people. This has been on the radar for sometime now, and doesn't only affect the wealthy. Most are just regular folks for whom it's hard to understand the filing and reporting requirements for money they've earned overseas.

The main problem is among expats, Americans are generally the only ones required to do this. That's right, pretty much any other country in the world, money earned overseas, taxed overseas, and kept overseas, is left alone. The U.S. is the only one that requires reporting, and in some cases taxing of this income.

Unlike other countries, the US is willing and able to go the extra mile to handle tax evasion. This is mostly due to the fact that collecting taxes requires the ability to collect from these people.

If you want to thank anyone, you can thank every single tax evader for justifying such reach by the IRS.


Sounds rediculous, but it's really that bad. I know most folks on here love to take the pro-tax viewpoint but we are literally the only the country that does this and as a US citizen its almost as hard to escape the tentacles of the US government as it was for East Germans to escape the Stasi.


The US can go anywhere it wants to go. There simply is no place to hide, no matter where in the world you are.

/Pay to Caesar what is due to Caesar, pay to Him what is due to Him.
 
2012-01-19 07:54:56 PM
Flab: shortymac: Actually, the IRS is starting to go after these people. The globe and mail (a toronto newspaper) did a feature on a couple. The wife moved to Canada when she was 13, never filed anything, was facing something like 200k+ in fines. It was on fark a while back.

Surpheon built an hypothetical scenario of a kid who got out of the US without any official papers, therefore the IRS doesn't know he exists, who would decide out-of-the-blue to start filing US taxes. The IRS would go "thanks, but who are you?".

This is clearly not the case of the woman who was in the papers a while back.


According to the details of the law, it would be mandatory for foreign banks (in this case, Canadian) to collect the information from all American citizens (regardless of whether they've ever even lived or earned income in the US at any point in their lives) who have a bank account and provide it to the IRS. The law actual shifts the burden of collecting and reporting to FOREIGN banks.
 
2012-01-19 07:55:10 PM
SpaceMoose: What most of you mouthbreathers are not comprehending is that this law interferes with the sovereignty of other nations by demanding that their banks collect and turn over information to the IRS, making them de facto extensions of the US government.

Imagine if France declared that all US banks must implement a system to keep track of the nationalities of the owners of every bank account in the country and then turn over that information to France on demand, regardless of whether tracking that information and turning it over to a foreign government violates your 4th Ammendment rights.



If another country passed an act like that, American financial institutions would be free to decide whether or not they wished to do business within that country and thus subject themselves to that regulation. Financial institutions wishing to business in the U.S., likewise.

I don't necessarily agree with the law, but these banks all have a nexus in the U.S. For better or worse that makes them subject to U.S. banking regs. If they don't want to comply, they can leave.
 
2012-01-19 07:57:05 PM
SpaceMoose: What most of you mouthbreathers are not comprehending is that this law interferes with the sovereignty of other nations by demanding that their banks collect and turn over information to the IRS, making them de facto extensions of the US government.

It has nothing to do with soverignty, they are perfectly free to not comply to the IRS results and face whatever penalties we decide (with our sovereignty) to instill if said banks want to do business in America ever.
 
2012-01-19 08:00:32 PM
i44.tinypic.com
i44.tinypic.com
i44.tinypic.com
i44.tinypic.com
i44.tinypic.com
 
2012-01-19 08:00:41 PM
SpaceMoose: According to the details of the law, it would be mandatory for foreign banks (in this case, Canadian) to collect the information from all American citizens (regardless of whether they've ever even lived or earned income in the US at any point in their lives) who have a bank account and provide it to the IRS. The law actual shifts the burden of collecting and reporting to FOREIGN banks.

I know that, and it doesn't SHIFT the burden to the banks. It ADDS an additional burden to the banks. The US Citizen still have to report their assets.
 
2012-01-19 08:02:07 PM
wmoonfox: OgreMagi: Only the USA requires people working over seas to pay income taxes on money earned that is never brought into the home country. This applies to everyone, not just the rich. Got a job in Europe? Better rethink it. You'll be paying double taxes, turning that nice looking paycheck into poverty wages. The only way to avoid this is to get citizenship in that country and renounce your American citicizenship.

That's terrible, but it's irrelevant.

The target of this law is wealthy Americans who have moved their money offshore to avoid paying taxes on it. This isn't money made sewing shoes in a Turkish sweat shop; this is money made through investment profit generated right here in America. This is a well-known tactic of the super-wealthy, and you aren't fooling anyone with your appeal to emotion over dual-citizens working full-time jobs overseas.


Are you farking serious? The fact that this law is farking over regular folks is irrelevant because it was meant to target the super wealthy. Are you that dense? The target of the PATRIOT ACT is terrorists so I guess the fact that it shiats all over the rights of others is just fine with you. Right? This is a well-known tactic of the terrorist sympathizers, and you aren't fooling anyone with your appeal to emotion over brown people being singled out and profiled.
 
2012-01-19 08:03:45 PM
corn-bread: but these banks all have a nexus in the U.S.

No they don't necessarily do. Under the current law, a farmer's credit union in North Bumfark, Manitoba would have to report to the IRS the accounts of all its customers who happen to hold a US citizenship, even if said credit union has no point of presence in the US.
 
2012-01-19 08:03:49 PM
kayanlau: So what's so good about being an American again?

I was raised to believe that America was the finest country on Earth. Sure, she has flaws, but by comparison she's the embodiment of Freedontm and happiness, right?

I felt this way well through my 20s before things started to slip. I watched as an entire nation fell into the hypnosis of Freedomtm and Libertytm, all the while willfully avoiding their own interests just to cheer on a flag. I watched as the middle and lower classes became food in a trough that feeds the very few - again while waving flags and muttering cheap rhetoric. I watched as nearly half the country went off the rails when the current president dared suggest that maybe sick people shouldn't have to go bankrupt or die just because they can't afford a $600 a month premium. I saw them call him a communist and a traitor, and it made me lose my lunch especially when you consider the actual content of the bill.

I watch America bury herself and her treasury in sand halfway around the world for specious reasons. I watch her vilify the helpful Planned Parenthood. I watch our citizens being duped nightly by a massive propaganda network that would claim "Obama can't swim!" if he were seen walking on water.

So no, there really isn't anything special about my country. I'm a spoke on a rich man's wheel, which would be fine if their voice in government wasn't exponentially louder each cycle than mine is.

Go fark yourself, America. You're my family so I'll stick it out like family does. But still, go fark yourself.

/awaits 101st Chairborne to tell me to leave and post wellbye.jpg
//you can also go fark yourselves
 
2012-01-19 08:04:28 PM
SpaceMoose: What most of you mouthbreathers are not comprehending is that this law interferes with the sovereignty of other nations by demanding that their banks collect and turn over information to the IRS, making them de facto extensions of the US government.

Imagine if France declared that all US banks must implement a system to keep track of the nationalities of the owners of every bank account in the country and then turn over that information to France on demand, regardless of whether tracking that information and turning it over to a foreign government violates your 4th Ammendment rights.

Let me guess... most of you would say, "Go fark yourself, France." Because there is no way in hell that the US should comply with a law from a foreign country that (a) violates the privacy rights of its own citizens and (b) adds financial burdens to American banks which will surely be passed on to American customers

That's called cooperation. France would hand their list and the US would in turn hand over theirs.

If you wanted to interact with France, you'd be subject to their laws and regulations - where the 4th Amendment does not apply.


Every other country in the world should band together and tell the US to take a long walk off a short pier. There are already rules and tax treaties in place for the US to go after tax cheats. But this law burdens everyone and makes the average American a criminal.

So, in summary, go fark yourself America.


There is very little sympathy for willful tax evasion. While taxes are a very sore spot for many, you're expecting the protection of a nation that you attack. The hand that feeds you is not the one you should be biting.

The US would make short work of the parts of the world that tried. You do not fark with the only nation that is able to project its power anywhere it goes.
 
2012-01-19 08:09:53 PM
lilplatinum: que.guero: What most expats get hosed on is the not filing part...

Meh,, i know plenty of people who didn't do it for several years and then filed a bunch of retroactive ones later.. They don;t generally fark you if you didn't owe anything, and most of the expats who don't know better are the English teachers and other broke asses who don't make enough to owe anything anyway.



THIS!

This thread is loaded with $30,000 millionaires shaking in their boots yelling "they gonna take our shiatt!" Never you worry, Dollar Store All Stars, the odds are good this taxation won't affect you as you live the James Bond life overseas.

The exemption in the U.S. is $95,000 in USD. That's around 61,500 in UK Pounds. 61,500 pounds in a country with a median income of $25,000. "But ah", these up and coming Trumps say, "I live in London." Fine. Median there is 43,000 pounds (median of 900 pounds a week, you do the math). So you're *still* living well.

I don't have much sympathy for someone who is making that kind of money and won't break off a few bucks for some tax advice.
 
2012-01-19 08:10:27 PM
Flab: SpaceMoose: According to the details of the law, it would be mandatory for foreign banks (in this case, Canadian) to collect the information from all American citizens (regardless of whether they've ever even lived or earned income in the US at any point in their lives) who have a bank account and provide it to the IRS. The law actual shifts the burden of collecting and reporting to FOREIGN banks.

I know that, and it doesn't SHIFT the burden to the banks. It ADDS an additional burden to the banks. The US Citizen still have to report their assets.


You are correct, it adds.
Of course, that assumes that they (a) know the law and (b) know they're American.

IRS tars law-abiding expats with same brush as tax cheats (new window)

It's an incredibly stupid law that's trying to catch whales using a shrimp net.

Additional info: Tax Crackdown (new window)
 
Displayed 50 of 370 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report