If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Minneapolis Star Tribune) Interesting Obamacare claims another victim, as United Health Group profits are up 21%   (startribune.com) divider line 68
More: Interesting, UnitedHealth Group, benefits  
•       •       •

970 clicks; posted to Politics » on 19 Jan 2012 at 3:00 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



68 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-01-19 11:52:37 AM
Yeah, millions of new customers will do that.
 
vpb [TotalFark]
2012-01-19 11:55:01 AM
Most of the bits that Insurance companies didn't like were removed.
 
2012-01-19 12:20:21 PM
Government takeover of healthcare
 
2012-01-19 12:29:45 PM
So socialized medicine if profitable?
 
2012-01-19 12:31:21 PM
This is bad news... for Obama?
 
2012-01-19 12:44:46 PM
um...death panels...?
 
2012-01-19 12:46:03 PM
vpb: Most of the bits that Insurance companies didn't like were removed.

The Administration cost versus medical cost will affect insurance companies more than anything else.
 
2012-01-19 12:46:08 PM
Ivory back-scratchers for everyone!
 
2012-01-19 12:47:31 PM
TROLOLOLO, subby... trololo.
 
2012-01-19 12:50:38 PM
Fartbamacare claims yet another victim: small profits.
 
2012-01-19 01:10:15 PM
Bunnyhat: vpb: Most of the bits that Insurance companies didn't like were removed.

The Administration cost versus medical cost will affect insurance companies more than anything else.


Its the only provision that matters. At least until they figure out how to fabricate a profit centre as a medical cost, say by having a subordinate but seperate corporate entity selling $10k syringes to a hospital, but having that hospital mandated to buy syringes only from that company for their insured patients.

Trust me, it'll happen. If there's one thing that Americans are good at, it's exploiting a loophole for profit.
 
2012-01-19 01:17:18 PM
Anything less than 100% is too uncertain, meaning Obama has to clean bedpans and Sarah President is automatically Queen of the United States.
 
2012-01-19 01:26:02 PM
Debate line:

"Hell, insurance company profits when up by more than you paid in taxes last year Mitt"
 
2012-01-19 01:38:38 PM
yeah that'll happen when we forgot to include a public option. thank god that was dropped so the senator from nebraska would have an easier time with reelection. how's that going...

/single payer
//also most of the reforms haven't taken effect yet
 
2012-01-19 02:33:07 PM
unyon: Its the only provision that matters. At least until they figure out how to fabricate a profit centre as a medical cost, say by having a subordinate but seperate corporate entity selling $10k syringes to a hospital, but having that hospital mandated to buy syringes only from that company for their insured patients.

They already are close. I'm in a battle with my insurance company over a bill from 2010. They want me to pay full, out of pocket price for labs because while my doctor is in their network, the lab he uses isn't.

I now have to tell him to use a lab he feels is inferior, so they will pay for it. Nobody can explain to me how the hell that makes any sense, how I am to know what lab my doctor sends blood to, and how I am supposed to enforce the contract between the insurance company and the doctor.
 
2012-01-19 03:01:40 PM
Is it a coincidence that our premiums went up the same amount?
 
2012-01-19 03:07:11 PM
Fartbongo, I love you. You make everyone from John Boehner to Rick Santorum to Grover Norquist look retarded. Have another cigarette. Have two. You have the entire sub-100 I.Q. world believing you farked the U.S. into oblivion, when you and I and historians know better, Mr. Soetoro Fartbongo, I do in fact love you.
 
2012-01-19 03:13:25 PM
Just wait until the individual mandate kicks in.
 
2012-01-19 03:15:03 PM
I'm glad I am making them shell out to fix my knee this year then. At least they didn't jack my premiums up (yet) and haven't given me any hassle about getting the surgery.
 
2012-01-19 03:19:28 PM
RussianPooper: Is it a coincidence that our premiums went up the same amount?

Mine just went up to $60/week -- and my boss kicks in additional money. The rate increase? 21%. Go figure.

And on top of the lab thing, they also know better than my doctor and rather than pay out for medication that doesn't have a generic (but works) they demand I take a generic of something else that doesn't work as well and makes me dizzy.

But you know, people are scared of anything coming between the doctor-patient relationship, which is why we shouldn't have a public option. Got it.
 
2012-01-19 03:21:35 PM
theknuckler_33: Just wait until the individual mandate kicks in.

Yep, infinite profits!

fulldaylearning.scholarschoice.ca
 
2012-01-19 03:27:53 PM
The "Obamacare" law that doesn't kick in until 2013 -2014?
 
2012-01-19 03:30:31 PM
AngryDragon: The "Obamacare" law that doesn't kick in until 2013 -2014?

No, the one whose main piece, the individual mandate, doesn't kick in until then, however other pieces are already in effect. That one.
 
2012-01-19 03:35:39 PM
coeyagi: AngryDragon: The "Obamacare" law that doesn't kick in until 2013 -2014?

No, the one whose main piece, the individual mandate, doesn't kick in until then, however other pieces are already in effect. That one.


what pieces are you referring to exactly?
 
2012-01-19 03:36:36 PM
So, if you force me to buy a product I don't necessarily want the profits for people selling it go up? Geddafuggowdahere!!!
 
2012-01-19 03:39:19 PM
socodog: So, if you force me to buy a product I don't necessarily want the profits for people selling it go up? Geddafuggowdahere!!!

that has not happened yet, sir
 
2012-01-19 03:41:30 PM
skullkrusher: what pieces are you referring to exactly?

The pieces that set up the death panels and limit your choice of doctors to people who can't speak English. I can't believe you didn't know about this. Wait til you lose a family member.
 
2012-01-19 03:42:42 PM
In a shocking turn of events, when more people are required to enroll in health care and you are required to keep administrative costs capped....your profits can go up.
 
2012-01-19 03:47:32 PM
socodog: So, if you force me to buy a product I don't necessarily want the profits for people selling it go up? Geddafuggowdahere!!!

No one has been forced to buy sh*t yet...
 
2012-01-19 03:50:14 PM
bulldg4life: In a shocking turn of events, when more people are required to enroll in health care and you are required to keep administrative costs capped....your profits can go up.

administrative costs are not capped. Companies are just required to pay out 80% of their premiums in benefits. Profit margins are capped (basically at a theoretical level of 20%). Administrative costs can unlimited.

No one has been required to enroll yet afaik
 
2012-01-19 03:51:48 PM
skullkrusher: coeyagi: AngryDragon: The "Obamacare" law that doesn't kick in until 2013 -2014?

No, the one whose main piece, the individual mandate, doesn't kick in until then, however other pieces are already in effect. That one.

what pieces are you referring to exactly?


1) Google: healthcare law timeline
2) Click First link.
3) Enjoy.
 
2012-01-19 03:52:45 PM
Diogenes: Anything less than 100% is too uncertain, meaning Obama has to clean bedpans and Sarah President is automatically Queen of the United States.

Awesome, is she going to sleep with all of us now?
 
2012-01-19 03:54:55 PM
It's easy to keep making money if nothing keeps you from jacking your prices up like say a well written HCB instead of the POS that was rushed to a vote instead.

/United Health customer
//Had rates hiked twice in the last few years
 
2012-01-19 03:57:02 PM
coeyagi: skullkrusher: coeyagi: AngryDragon: The "Obamacare" law that doesn't kick in until 2013 -2014?

No, the one whose main piece, the individual mandate, doesn't kick in until then, however other pieces are already in effect. That one.

what pieces are you referring to exactly?

1) Google: healthcare law timeline
2) Click First link.
3) Enjoy.


the parts of the law that people complained would hurt insurers haven't kicked in yet.
 
2012-01-19 03:57:47 PM
Profits are up, huh? At the expense of whom?
 
2012-01-19 04:03:21 PM
RussianPooper: Is it a coincidence that our premiums went up the same amount?

THIS

I gave up cigarettes about three years ago and have dropped bout 30 lbs. I notified my Florida Blue Cross of my smoking cessation in hopes of getting my premiums reduced. At the time I applied for coverage (about 10 years ago), I told them I was a smoker and no physical exam were required. I notify the company and let them know that I am non-smoker. There response: I must go to my primary physician and request blood work test to confirm I am off the tobacco. So 125 dollar office visit. Plus another hundred for lab work and 'fees'. Gawdamn these fu- king parasites. They had no problem accepting me at my word when I told them I was smoking, but now that I've chosen healthier lifestyle, they try to fark me up the ass. I only carry catastrophic $10,000 deductible health insurance on both myself and my spouse so we would not lose home in event of major health complication. So I get the test and labwork and then find out it will take almost three years, just to recover the cost of the test versus the "savings" on my premiums. I've been an RN for over 25 years and seriously phark the US Health Insurance Industry squarely in the ass with an AID's-dripping rusty dick!
 
2012-01-19 04:03:59 PM
Humean_Nature: Yeah, millions of new customers will do that.

Actually the amount of people with insurance has gone DOWN since that law was passed.
 
2012-01-19 04:04:49 PM
Dahnkster: They had no problem accepting me at my word when I told them I was smoking, but now that I've chosen healthier lifestyle, they try to fark me up the ass.

and you're puzzled by this?
 
2012-01-19 04:07:08 PM
Why do we allow insurance companies to profit at all?
 
2012-01-19 04:07:39 PM
The Numbers: Profits are up, huh? At the expense of whom?

Freedom loving Americans? Job creators? People starting plumbing businesses? I give up.
 
2012-01-19 04:08:43 PM
skullkrusher: administrative costs are not capped. Companies are just required to pay out 80% of their premiums in benefits. Profit margins are capped (basically at a theoretical level of 20%). Administrative costs can unlimited.

I want you to think about this.
 
2012-01-19 04:08:46 PM
Lost Thought 00: Why do we allow insurance companies to profit at all?

Stalin and Hitler. That's why.
 
2012-01-19 04:10:34 PM
blackminded: skullkrusher: administrative costs are not capped. Companies are just required to pay out 80% of their premiums in benefits. Profit margins are capped (basically at a theoretical level of 20%). Administrative costs can unlimited.

I want you to think about this.


I want you to think about it - specifically about how a company can operate at a net loss for the year
 
2012-01-19 04:11:44 PM
We are the only developed country in the world without universal healthcare. Tourists have to buy special traveler's insurance to cover an accident if they come here.
If you are a teabagger and try to compain about healthcare, have you ever been to the doctor in another country?
I told my English friend about how healthcare works in this country (he has type 1 diabetes). He asked "But what if you can't afford it?"
"Then you either find a free clinic or die."
His jaw dropped. "That's... horrible. How can they do that?!"

/USA! USA!
 
2012-01-19 04:14:33 PM
blackminded: skullkrusher: administrative costs are not capped. Companies are just required to pay out 80% of their premiums in benefits. Profit margins are capped (basically at a theoretical level of 20%). Administrative costs can unlimited.

I want you to think about this.


i figured it out. it's a jobs creation program. everyone can get a job sorting health insurance paperwork. you get a job. you get a job. you get a job. and with those job you can pay your high premiums. ta-da.
 
2012-01-19 04:17:12 PM
skullkrusher: coeyagi: skullkrusher: coeyagi: AngryDragon: The "Obamacare" law that doesn't kick in until 2013 -2014?

No, the one whose main piece, the individual mandate, doesn't kick in until then, however other pieces are already in effect. That one.

what pieces are you referring to exactly?

1) Google: healthcare law timeline
2) Click First link.
3) Enjoy.

the parts of the law that people complained would hurt insurers haven't kicked in yet.


For God's sake, I just responded to the guy who said it went into effect in 2013-14 when in reality, it has already kicked in to some degree. But go ahead, be argumentative for no apparent reason.

//BTW, look closer, I am pretty sure there are parts that have been implemented that people said would hurt insurers.
 
2012-01-19 04:17:51 PM
skullkrusher: blackminded: skullkrusher: administrative costs are not capped. Companies are just required to pay out 80% of their premiums in benefits. Profit margins are capped (basically at a theoretical level of 20%). Administrative costs can unlimited.

I want you to think about this.

I want you to think about it - specifically about how a company can operate at a net loss for the year


If my controller runs us at a loss for the year because he can't keep our costs under 20%, he's fired.

If your insurer runs on such razor thin margins that an 80% benefit mandate puts them under 1) you probably don't want them insuring you and 2) they don't deserve to be in business.
 
2012-01-19 04:18:00 PM
coeyagi: For God's sake, I just responded to the guy who said it went into effect in 2013-14 when in reality, it has already kicked in to some degree. But go ahead, be argumentative for no apparent reason.

the way you said it sounded like you were taking issue with his implication - that the headline is stupid because the law has not taken effect
 
2012-01-19 04:21:51 PM
blackminded: skullkrusher: blackminded: skullkrusher: administrative costs are not capped. Companies are just required to pay out 80% of their premiums in benefits. Profit margins are capped (basically at a theoretical level of 20%). Administrative costs can unlimited.

I want you to think about this.

I want you to think about it - specifically about how a company can operate at a net loss for the year

If my controller runs us at a loss for the year because he can't keep our costs under 20%, he's fired.

If your insurer runs on such razor thin margins that an 80% benefit mandate puts them under 1) you probably don't want them insuring you and 2) they don't deserve to be in business.


sure... that doesn't mean that there is a cap on administrative costs due to the legislation. That's what I took 'you are required to keep administrative costs capped' to mean anyway.
 
2012-01-19 04:22:57 PM
IgG4: Ivory back-scratchers for everyone!


Sweet, I've been dying to do this!

i.imgur.com
 
Displayed 50 of 68 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »