Ugh.. Why are they making it sound as if 4G coverage is equal to 3G coverage? 4G is only reliable if you're stationary. The signal is easily blocked, tons of dead zones. I live in a heavy 4G coverage area and I only trust it when I'll be somewhere for extended periods of time. Throw on Pandora and drive around and you're just going to have a bunch of cut outs as the service is lost, regained, lost, regained, lost, regained.

That lady in the picture looks like she's on a buffet line.
4G nom nom nom

I'm still waiting for my tax rebate for all the porn industry jobs I've personally created.

"Frankly, I didn't expect the numbers to be as good as they were," said Robert Shapiro, co-author of the study and former undersecretary of commerce during the Clinton administration. "We all knew there was job destruction associated with advancements in Internet technologies, but this proves that the job creation is significantly greater."

What it proves is that somebody is freaking looney tunes in the head.

"There is nothing linear about what people do with new technology," he said. "New generations of wireless networks create new use cases and businesses. We don't have a lot of data yet for 4G, but we have confidence that the effects we saw before will at least be duplicated, if not enhanced."

Why are you collecting data? You already wrote a paper and proved it.

Damn... I'm only 3G.

I will never escape this dreary, endless nightmare of middle-management.

Make a 4G cellphone as durable as this:



And then we'll talk.

/Seriously
//Those phones are inmortal

Hobodeluxe: if you want to fix the economy it's simple. Buy American

I'm bookmarking that.

Hobodeluxe: if you want to fix the economy it's simple. Buy American

That's a bookmark