serpent_sky: You noticed her arms over the fact that she looks like the Joker on acid in that photo?

Yeah. Her arms were the last thing I noticed. GAH!!

Never Forget:

Yowza. Not again well it appears.

Madonna was on Graham Norton this week. Her arms didn't look bad.

The Stealth Hippopotamus: Strong need not be ugly

She's not ugly because she's "strong." She's ugly because she's incredibly unattractive.

/Always has been, too.

WTF submitter? The Erin Wasson thread is down the page a bit if you're looking for someone skinny with no personality.

Camerons arms look fine, you ought to mind your own business.

her hair style wasn't helping any but damn, i'm getting old, and so is Cameron Diaz apparently.

At least it takes the focus off her bag worthy face. It's only bearable if the make-up is troweled on.

She's looks fantastic and submitter is as gay as the Daily Fail's fashion writers.

The wall. Cameron Diaz has hit it.

Well, that is okay, because it is a nice change of pace from scaring the shiat out of me with her freakish face. You can call it not aging well or whatever, but our current Cameron Diaz looks nothing like Cameron Diaz circa The Mask. We have Bizarro Cameron Diaz now. I'm guessing the one from The Mask is on Bizarro World now and has probably become their queen.

I'd still hit it

I_Am_Weasel: Is it just me, or does anyone else think she's not aging well?

Came to say this glad someone else noticed as well.

Her arms aren't nearly as scary as Madonna's - remember those vein-encrusted sinews that wrapped their way from her wrist to her shoulder? Not the same.

She's still the goat's moustache.

God her face looks like a shoe. I would hit it but I would flip her over first.

TrainingWheelsNeeded: her hair style wasn't helping any

Something about the cheekbones and chin makes me think:

Her arms actually look pretty normal, especially when compared to that freakish face.

Her arms look fine to me but that smile. GEEESH

Too bad we couldn't time-freeze her when she hit "Mask" form.

amindtat: Something about the cheekbones and chin makes me think:

[i.dailymail.co.uk image 468x727][p1.la-img.com image 600x846]

Hah came hoping for that since I couldn't recall what it was.

Who could look past what happened to her face to notice her arms? She should sue someone. Either a doctor for farking up her face, or her parents for horrible genetics.

she kinda has that just had sex look and shiat-eating grin in the runway photos. Kinda like she cougared up on some young actor not too long beforehand.

Jubas preistoos, why do they do this to themselves.

Headed for this (new window).

If her cheeks each had a well-placed pimple you'd mistake them for breasts.

I_Am_Weasel: Is it just me, or does anyone else think she's not aging well?

Eh, the environment that they take those pictures in (in terms of lighting and what not) isn't very flattering. As can be seen by the large number of dresses that are usually translucent but end up being transparent, the lights used for those sorts of events are *very* bright. Everyone would look not so great in them after the age of 25 or so.

That said, I like my slender women with sexy muscles, so I have no problems with her or Madonna.

I_Am_Weasel: Is it just me, or does anyone else think she's not aging well?

I'm willing to bet she's a lot older than she claims she is. That's a very rough 39. I'd be saying more late 40s/early 50s.

Bigedmond: Who could look past what happened to her face to notice her arms? She should sue someone. Either a doctor for farking up her face, or her parents for horrible genetics.

I think it's because she tried to get her nose fixed in 2006 because it had been broken in the past. I'm almost certain she had other work done at the same time, and it just isn't gelling as she's getting older.

Sometimes you should leave imperfection alone.

TOO OLD AND NO LONGER PRETTY ENOUGH FOR THAT HAIR STYLE/COLOR.

It isn't her arms that are the problem...it's the rest of her.

neilbradley: I_Am_Weasel: Is it just me, or does anyone else think she's not aging well?

I'm willing to bet she's a lot older than she claims she is. That's a very rough 39. I'd be saying more late 40s/early 50s.

Bullshiat. Madonna is 50, and Diaz doesn't look that bad yet.

I am astonished that she has crows feet. Not that 39 year old women don't have them, but that a Hollywood actress wouldn't have done something about them already. It's a rarity to see them these days.

Seriously, her arms are awesome, I wish mine looked like that! One of my favorite instructors at the gym has great arms until she starts lifting and then they start to look Madonnaish with veins popping out everywhere. Still, I'd rather see veiny arms over obese arms.

I always thought Diaz was over-rated. Not that she's hideous or anything, but I always found her very average.

However, Miranda Kerr just a few scrolls down. YOWZA!

Good god, 20 years ago people wanted to tap that woman. Now it looks like she's been beaten with an ugly stick.

Lsherm: neilbradley: I_Am_Weasel: Is it just me, or does anyone else think she's not aging well?

I'm willing to bet she's a lot older than she claims she is. That's a very rough 39. I'd be saying more late 40s/early 50s.

Bullshiat. Madonna is 50, and Diaz doesn't look that bad yet.

I am astonished that she has crows feet. Not that 39 year old women don't have them, but that a Hollywood actress wouldn't have done something about them already. It's a rarity to see them these days.

Rwa2play stated it best: It isn't her arms that are the problem...it's the rest of her. And yes, she does look way older than she is - at least a decade.

Just the lighting folks. Paparazzi aren't exactly taking glamor shots, especially when close with a overpowered flash and straight on.

Shes still looking better than what 99% of Farkers wake up next to in the morning.

Oh, and they still think that whale Hendricks is hot.

neilbradley: Lsherm: neilbradley: I_Am_Weasel: Is it just me, or does anyone else think she's not aging well?

I'm willing to bet she's a lot older than she claims she is. That's a very rough 39. I'd be saying more late 40s/early 50s.

Bullshiat. Madonna is 50, and Diaz doesn't look that bad yet.

I am astonished that she has crows feet. Not that 39 year old women don't have them, but that a Hollywood actress wouldn't have done something about them already. It's a rarity to see them these days.

Rwa2play stated it best: It isn't her arms that are the problem...it's the rest of her. And yes, she does look way older than she is - at least a decade.

She doesn't look 49. She looks old for 39, but she looks young for 49. Her armpit skin and hands would be in far worse shape if she was 49.

This makes me sad. I guess good for her for aging "gracefully." At least she's not botoxed out (I'm assuming so due to all of the crows feet); however, she is looking a bit rough these days. She was stunning in the Mask and has never been quite as good looking since then. However, she was never unattractive to me until I saw these pictures.

Freakish arms? No
Freakish face? Yes

Cameron, what happened to you? Poor thing.