Wtf is a rabbit punch?

Tony_Pepperoni: Bawhahahahaha.... Donkey Punch (new window)

Hahahahahaha! The illustration, it's killing me! Hahahahahaha!

/They should have given him the question. He was right.

I invented a violent sexual act, a number of years ago, I used to call "The Agitated Buccaneer".
Sadly, it never caught on.

I like this one.

Rake? Really? (new window)

FatalDischarge: I like this one.

Rake? Really? (new window)

His answer was correct, as was the fellow's in tfv.

Poindexter just confessed how his prom date ended up in the emergency room

I always thought rabbit punches were a quick series of jabs usually to the kidneys/liver area.
This man was right, Trebek. Give him his money!

Does anyone know the final outcome of the game? It would be funny if the guy lost by less than the total dollar swing of the question and Trebek had to explain on a future show why the guy was back on:

"Some of you tonight may recognize Mike who was a contestant back on our January 13th show. After further discussion that night, our judges concluded 'donkey punch' was indeed an acceptable response by Mike to the type of punch to the back of the neck that is named after an animal."

Donnchadha: Mr. Potatoass: I invented a violent sexual act, a number of years ago, I used to call "The Agitated Buccaneer".
Sadly, it never caught on.

Hey Honey, want to try something new in bed tonight? I learned it on the internet from a Mr. Potatoass. Seems legit.

Thanks, I just woke my Gf up from laughing too physically. That's what I get for Farking in bed.

Wait wait... How is the answer not donkey? There's a wikipedia page and everything.

Crap, my secret's out...

Somewhere, Kazuhiko Kato chuckles knowingly.

GAT_00: Fish in a Barrel: Tony_Pepperoni: Bawhahahahaha.... Donkey Punch (new window)

Hahahahahaha! The illustration, it's killing me! Hahahahahaha!

Ok, I'll click for that.

Oh holy hell Wikipedia. Who the fark made that?

File:Donkey punch.jpg

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result was no consensus. Kaldari (talk) 02:19, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Does File:Donkey punch.jpg provide a clear or ambiguous illustration of the subject of the article (i.e., should it be kept or removed)? -- Black Falcon (talk) 00:43, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
I think that the image fails to clearly illustrate the subject of this article. It is not at all clear that the image depicts a donkey punch, and it appears just as likely (if not more so) that the man is flexing his muscles while standing behind the woman or that he is simply preparing to punch a nude woman on all fours. I think it should be removed from the article on the grounds that it does not help readers' understanding of the topic. -- Black Falcon (talk) 00:50, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
RfC comment. Well, I learn something new every day! Anyway, I agree that the image is not very helpful, in that it is unclear where the puncher is aiming. Ideally, one would replace it with a better image, but I infer that removing it would leave the page without any illustration. That being the case, I don't think it makes that much of a difference. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:34, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Keep. I think it illustrates the basic idea, but I do agree that a better image could in principle be provided. Where I disagree however is with the notion that one should remove this image without a better image to replace it. The given image clearly helps the article. Unless a better alternative picture can be provided I'd say keep it else you would hurt the article. Preferably the image shouldn't be a cartoon, but actually showing a real couple.Chhe (talk) 01:16, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
RFC comment: Within context it make sense, so I've vote clear. To tell you the truth you're gonna have a problem representing Donkey Punch anyway: in other words, I don't think adding a new picture would provide clearer context. --Deathawk (talk) 07:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
RFC comment: I feel the picture in no way clarifies the article or the meaning. The angles make it look like he's going to punch her in the side or back more than the head or neck. I don't feel any picture could reasonably add to the article, and would leave it without a picture. SmokingNewton (MESSAGE ME) 19:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Keep. I like the picture. - Preceding unsigned comment added by user:RenamedUser5 1516:15, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Note: This user was banned. Kaldari (talk) 02:19, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Copy and paste keep since it was just brought up The picture is perfect. It illustrates the topic well. The Wikipedia Foundation recently heralded the used of media, there is a precedent for such images, and a policy WP:NOTCENSORED. The image dis not overly graphic which limits its shock factor. Although this is not necessary, this is something editors often ask for. I assume the reader would prefer this animated drawing over a video of it actually being done. It is a shocking topic and we should not pretend otherwise. There are options to disable such images if you prefer not to see them.Cptnono (talk) 04:08, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.