If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(NPR) Asinine So, we're not taxing churches because...why now?   (npr.org) divider line 216
More: Asinine, Christian Coalition, Gary Bauer, Richard Land, Moral Majority, James Dobson, churches, Southern Baptist Convention, presidential candidate  
•       •       •

7386 clicks; posted to Politics » on 13 Jan 2012 at 1:45 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



216 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-01-13 11:41:59 AM
If religious types want government out of religion maybe religious types should keep their influences directly out of government.
 
2012-01-13 11:48:16 AM
Because Jesus famously said "Render unto God the things which are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's too -- and while you're at it, get filthy stinking rich and self-righteous in my name. It's party time! Suck it Magdalene."
 
2012-01-13 12:12:50 PM
Alright, let's just knock it off with the logical arguments, alright? Big-time religion wants power, influence, and money just like everybody else, and they want to pay no taxes, just like everybody else. How do you do that? It's obvious. You make up a wacky sciency-fictioney story and enthrall millions with it. People are idiots. Rich and powerful people know this.
 
2012-01-13 01:02:26 PM
Because they'll sick their god on us if we do?
 
2012-01-13 01:04:18 PM
Love this quote:

"And yet, Land says: "Before we marry the guy next door, don't you think we ought to have a fling with a tall dark stranger and see if he can support us in the manner to which we'd like to be accustomed? And if he can't, we can always marry the steady beau who lives next door."

So, they're advocating for gay flings, followed by settling for the guy next door anyway?
 
2012-01-13 01:05:20 PM
DarnoKonrad: Because Jesus famously said "Render unto God the things which are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's too -- and while you're at it, get filthy stinking rich and self-righteous in my name. It's party time! Suck it Magdalene."

And when he rose from the dead, he probably went back to Pilate's place and said "U mad?"

/for the holy lulz
 
2012-01-13 01:29:00 PM
And yet, Land says: "Before we marry the guy next door, don't you think we ought to have a fling with a tall dark stranger and see if he can support us in the manner to which we'd like to be accustomed? And if he can't, we can always marry the steady beau who lives next door."
That... was not the analogy I was expecting from the values-voter Southern Baptist.
 
2012-01-13 01:32:05 PM
Well, these aren't religious leaders speaking on behalf of their churches; these are religious leaders speaking on behalf of their own religious convictions. I have little doubt as to whether their highly Right Wing Authoritarian followers will be able to keep the distinction straight.


Personally, I'm hoping these guys unite behind Santorum, Perry, or Gingrich as an anyone-but-Romney candidate, and convince the other two to drop out. Huntsman doesn't seem to have much longer in the race. That then leaves a three-way race between Mr. Evangelical I'm-not-Romney, Mitt Romney, and Ron Paul -- who has enough of an obsessed fanbase that he'll be pushing hard until someone gets 50%+1 of the delegates locked up, and which may not happen, period.

And the DNC can recoup their investment in the popcorn market.
 
2012-01-13 01:37:56 PM
tallguywithglasseson: That... was not the analogy I was expecting from the values-voter Southern Baptist.

Marginally better than "Now we're just haggling over the price" I suppose. But yes, a bit odd.
 
2012-01-13 01:39:19 PM
Because, churches wouldn't be useful as tax shelters, would they?
 
2012-01-13 01:43:49 PM
DarnoKonrad: Because Jesus famously said "Render unto God the things which are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's too

Yah, and who's picture is on the quarters and sollars in the collection plate?
Washington's.

Render it over, baby.
Tax the everloving fark out of these nebby meddling dead guy on a stick and pedo whorshipers.
Nail teh Joos, too.
If you have a cult and an invisible friend and want to bribe your way out of the loonie bin, pay the fark up.
And stay our of politics.
 
2012-01-13 01:44:31 PM
"dollars"

even
 
2012-01-13 01:50:42 PM
Seeing as how they are non-profits, there would be very little to tax.
 
2012-01-13 01:50:44 PM
Not taxing churches has put the government into the position of being responsible for deciding what is and what isn't a tax-exempt religion. Christ, SCIENTOLOGY was able to lobby for that status, and to call them a religion is an insult to the word.

/ignostic
 
2012-01-13 01:51:16 PM
If they hadn't invested so much of their intellectual capital in concern-trolling over gay marriage, they could all unite behind Paul.

Oh wait, lemme correct that, If they hadn't invested so much of their intellectual capital in concern-trolling over gay marriage, and didn't believe that Genesis 12:3 applies to the modern State of Israel, they could all unite behind Paul.
 
2012-01-13 01:52:33 PM
It's political.

If a Democrat tries to remove that exemption, it's an attack on religion.
If a Republican tries to remove that exemption...hah, just kidding. They'd never try.
 
2012-01-13 01:52:45 PM
The same reason that unions don't pay taxes. They are operated for the benefit of their memebers.
 
2012-01-13 01:53:16 PM
Because they need that money to cover up child rape?
 
2012-01-13 01:53:23 PM
Cataholic: Seeing as how they are non-profits, there would be very little to tax.

Good point. Here's a picture of the headquarters of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, who occupy a small office space in an undesirable building in Madison, Wisconsin.

www.visitingdc.com
 
2012-01-13 01:53:41 PM
Cataholic: Seeing as how they are non-profits, there would be very little to tax.

Churches...
non-profit...

Do ho ho ho, you made a funny!
 
2012-01-13 01:53:44 PM
OneTimed: SCIENTOLOGY was able to lobby for that status, and to call them a religion is an insult to the word.

It's just as valid a religion as any other.
 
2012-01-13 01:53:46 PM
abb3w: tallguywithglasseson: That... was not the analogy I was expecting from the values-voter Southern Baptist.

Marginally better than "Now we're just haggling over the price" I suppose. But yes, a bit odd.


A rare unguarded moment of personal honesty escaping in the form of a metaphor. Remember, these are people who are shockingly low in self-reflection, and do not understand how their choices of metaphors can be informative of their personalities, goals, and private behaviours. They are the people who will turn to a minister or a priest rather than a psychologist.

So, this is really not that surprising. These are people for whom the public appearance of propriety and piety is more important than actual internalized values that match that ideology.

It's certainly ironically funny, though.
 
2012-01-13 01:54:59 PM
Because their members vote at a significantly higher percentage than the general population.

/Same reason we give Seniors free everything
 
2012-01-13 01:55:06 PM
cchris_39: The same reason that unions don't pay taxes. They are operated for the benefit of their memebers.

But the crazy thing is that unions can endorse politicians.

/are unions tax exempt?
 
2012-01-13 01:55:07 PM
Cataholic: Seeing as how they are non-prophets, there would be very little to tax.

FTFY
 
2012-01-13 01:55:22 PM
Maybe the ATF will raid the place while they're all at their little meeting trying to crown a new messiah and burn the farker to the ground.
 
2012-01-13 01:55:49 PM
Who would you want to show up at the doorstep the next time there is a natural disaster in your neighborhood?

FEMA? You go directly to jail if you don't cross the "t"s and dot the "i"s. If you get too much money, you had better give it back, or else!

In addition, we all know how long it takes for them to get to you. And as long as you don't need ice, they will be there with their cards.

Or

A church? After Katrina, many people from across the US came to the areas impacted to help: with medical, food, rebuilding, clearing lands, and assisting those in needs. Cost to the US taxpayer? zero.

Tax a church and this goes away.
 
2012-01-13 01:55:56 PM
"Before we marry the guy next door, don't you think we ought to have a fling with a tall dark stranger and see if he can support us in the manner to which we'd like to be accustomed? And if he can't, we can always marry the steady beau who lives next door."

Yeah, this is what men think women think, and they are right
 
2012-01-13 01:56:03 PM
Churches can afford it. Though they constantly plead poverty, even small churches are often sitting on $1 mil+.
 
2012-01-13 01:56:15 PM
The Entire point of the Separation of Church and state is to make sure the state does not support any 1 religion/church over another, So we should tax all Churches/religions equally.
 
2012-01-13 01:56:42 PM
Cataholic: Seeing as how they are non-profits, there would be very little to tax.

Get out of here with that logic and stuff. Fark just hates when someone interrupts a good hate!
 
2012-01-13 01:56:58 PM
qorkfiend: It's political.

If a Democrat tries to remove that exemption, it's an attack on religion.
If a Republican tries to remove that exemption...hah, just kidding. They'd never try.


I'm a Libertarian and I believe the tax exemption needs to go. It's patently unfair considering how much churches pull in to allow mega churches to be built and Tammy Faye to be rich.
 
2012-01-13 01:57:22 PM
Cataholic: Seeing as how they are non-profits, there would be very little to tax.

They're also exempt from sales taxes, at least in New York, though it takes the form of a reimbursement. I would imagine that they're largely exempt from property taxes, as well.

There's also payroll taxes for the church employee(s); probably exempt from those too.
 
2012-01-13 01:57:39 PM
Separation of church and state?
 
2012-01-13 01:57:53 PM
Quasar: OneTimed: SCIENTOLOGY was able to lobby for that status, and to call them a religion is an insult to the word.

It's just as valid a religion as any other.


No, it isn't. It's a pyramid scheme masquerading as a religion.

Say what you want about the silliness of Christianity, at least you aren't forced to pay to learn about Jesus.
 
2012-01-13 01:57:56 PM
imontheinternet: Churches can afford it. Though they constantly plead poverty, even small churches are often sitting on $1 mil+.

Pretty much the same scam that NPR runs.
 
2012-01-13 01:58:04 PM
Seriously; religions spend all of their tax-free contributions for the betterment of the poor and disadvantaged. This is, of course, their stated goal.

www.ldschurchtemples.com

img.timeinc.net

upload.wikimedia.org

mediad.publicbroadcasting.net
 
2012-01-13 01:58:38 PM
OneTimed: Quasar: OneTimed: SCIENTOLOGY was able to lobby for that status, and to call them a religion is an insult to the word.

It's just as valid a religion as any other.

No, it isn't. It's a pyramid scheme masquerading as a religion.

Say what you want about the silliness of Christianity, at least you aren't forced to pay to learn about Jesus.


*anymore
 
2012-01-13 01:59:05 PM
Churches could have a jar, similar to the "swear jar" at a bar, where people put in a buck every time they swear. In the case of the church, someone has to put in a buck every time they molest an altar boy. They can pay taxes with that fund.
 
2012-01-13 01:59:20 PM
while we are at it, lets go after all non profits.

lets start with unions.
 
2012-01-13 01:59:28 PM
Raharu: The Entire point of the Separation of Church and state is to make sure the state does not support any 1 religion/church over another, So we should tax all Churches/religions equally.

Even the religion I just made up 5 minutes ago?

/you get oreos instead if communion wafers
 
2012-01-13 01:59:29 PM
EnviroDude: Who would you want to show up at the doorstep the next time there is a natural disaster in your neighborhood?

FEMA? You go directly to jail if you don't cross the "t"s and dot the "i"s. If you get too much money, you had better give it back, or else!

In addition, we all know how long it takes for them to get to you. And as long as you don't need ice, they will be there with their cards.

Or

A church? After Katrina, many people from across the US came to the areas impacted to help: with medical, food, rebuilding, clearing lands, and assisting those in needs. Cost to the US taxpayer? zero.

Tax a church and this goes away.


That's actually not true. Refraining from taxing a non-profit is actually a kind of subsidy.
 
2012-01-13 01:59:54 PM
OneTimed: No, it isn't. It's a pyramid scheme masquerading as a religion.

Say what you want about the silliness of Christianity, at least you aren't forced to pay to learn about Jesus.


It meets the standard definition of religion. What they do with it is another matter entirely, and frankly, if you're stupid enough to pay Tom Cruise to remove the Thetans from your volcano or whatever, that's your own damn fault.
 
2012-01-13 02:00:38 PM
deadcrickets: qorkfiend: It's political.

If a Democrat tries to remove that exemption, it's an attack on religion.
If a Republican tries to remove that exemption...hah, just kidding. They'd never try.

I'm a Libertarian and I believe the tax exemption needs to go. It's patently unfair considering how much churches pull in to allow mega churches to be built and Tammy Faye to be rich.


Can we stop the farking Native Americans while we're at it too? They are basically doing the same thing with casinos....
 
2012-01-13 02:00:47 PM
tallguywithglasseson: And yet, Land says: "Before we marry the guy next door, don't you think we ought to have a fling with a tall dark stranger and see if he can support us in the manner to which we'd like to be accustomed? And if he can't, we can always marry the steady beau who lives next door."That... was not the analogy I was expecting from the values-voter Southern Baptist.

Ever notice how fat prudes are the only people that read romance novels?
 
2012-01-13 02:03:10 PM
miss diminutive: Raharu: The Entire point of the Separation of Church and state is to make sure the state does not support any 1 religion/church over another, So we should tax all Churches/religions equally.

Even the religion I just made up 5 minutes ago?

/you get oreos instead if communion wafers


Dominus Nabisco!
 
2012-01-13 02:03:15 PM
NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION
 
2012-01-13 02:03:48 PM
BECAUSE JESUS, THAT'S WHY
 
2012-01-13 02:04:07 PM
Why does scientology use a cross and not a DC-8? I don't see how that fits into their mythos at all.
 
2012-01-13 02:04:44 PM
papatex: deadcrickets: qorkfiend: It's political.

If a Democrat tries to remove that exemption, it's an attack on religion.
If a Republican tries to remove that exemption...hah, just kidding. They'd never try.

I'm a Libertarian and I believe the tax exemption needs to go. It's patently unfair considering how much churches pull in to allow mega churches to be built and Tammy Faye to be rich.

Can we stop the farking Native Americans while we're at it too? They are basically doing the same thing with casinos....


On their own lands under their own laws.
 
Displayed 50 of 216 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »