If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Mediaite)   Rom-ney (v). 1. to defecate in terror   (mediaite.com) divider line 232
    More: Amusing, Rachel Maddow, seat belt laws, American middle class, Clark Griswold, long campaign, Tagg Romney, South Carolina, Mitt Romney  
•       •       •

4335 clicks; posted to Politics » on 13 Jan 2012 at 10:09 AM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



232 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-01-13 11:51:18 AM  

CPennypacker: Your post was pretty clear about you entertaining yourself. I was just pointing out that though you are entertaining yourself, everyone else here thinks you're a farkwit for it.


I know I am insulted when morons claim to speak for me. I'd imagine other people have the same pet peeve. You should be careful with that.
 
2012-01-13 11:51:43 AM  

skullkrusher: gimmegimme: It's being pointed out to you that your argument somehow manages to be ignorant and circular at the same time.

those are not mutually exclusive things. I know you tried to sound smart in that sentence, but you failed really really badly.

gimmegimme: It's impossible to engage you in real discussion (see yesterday's discussion about Mitt Romney la Meheecahnoh), so I am pointing out that you are willfully putting up psychological barriers that block information from reaching you.

it is not impossible at all. See, the issue is the barriers you hold up. You read something on the internet. It was critical of Romney and said by Maddow. Ergo, you cannot question it. What I am doing is asking why do we assume the dog shiat in terror? Was the dog up there for hours? Maybe it had to go to the bathroom? If the dog had been up there for hours, why did it take so long for it to shiat itself in terror? Did it shiat itself in terror again after being returned to the carrier?

Putting the dog up there in the first place sounds strange to me but TFA focuses on what Romney did after the pooptastrophe.

As for yesterday's discussion, it wasn't about Romney being a Mexican. Nice lie though.


He never said it was about him BEING Mexican. It was bout Mitt the Mexican.

Did someone issue a memo about there being a moratorium on reading?
 
2012-01-13 11:51:55 AM  

InmanRoshi: Remember folks, in Fark Independent mysterio world direct actions have direct consequences and people should be held accountable ... unless it involves a Republican. Maybe the dog strapped to the roof was shiatting itself out of terror or maybe it was shiatting itself out of joy that it's getting the fun ride that 99.999% of family pets would never get from their owners. It's all so vague and nebulous and ambiguous, so let's not judge.


Seriously! Let's focus on the fact that Fartbongo had the GALL to put Bo on the most recent White House Christmas card instead of traditional and religious signs of the season. (I'm not kidding. This is real: Link (new window) )

How about the accusation that the SeeKriT Muuslin is spending too much time shopping for his dog instead of working hard? (Not making this one up, either. Link (new window) )

Mitt values what is truly important instead of treating his animal like a little deity.
 
2012-01-13 11:52:41 AM  

Psylence: Since you admittedly know little about dogs, I'll clue you in.
shiat from a terrified animal is going to be quite different in consistency than a dogs regular bowel movement. A scared, distressed dog is going to be vile and squirty. Anyone who has owned a dog is familiar with the toilet habits of their animals. So chances are, Romney was well aware of the dogs distressed state and simply didn't care. Also, dogs that are used to being kenneled, as he claims this one was, will not shiat or piss in their boxes unless its a dire emergency....


FTA: "emotion-free crisis management" LMFAO, you mean compassion free right?

Dogs don't love being sprayed down and then freezing their balls off being strapped to a roof on a trip to Canada, while they are simultaneously having an intestinal illness.

Mitts cruelty in this story seems to be consistent with the callous nature that he has conducted his career, destroying the lives of others for his own benefit.
 
2012-01-13 11:52:48 AM  

coeyagi: He never said it was about him BEING Mexican. It was bout Mitt the Mexican.

Did someone issue a memo about there being a moratorium on reading?


that's some interesting and baseless word parsing there, chico
 
2012-01-13 11:54:18 AM  

skullkrusher: CPennypacker: Your post was pretty clear about you entertaining yourself. I was just pointing out that though you are entertaining yourself, everyone else here thinks you're a farkwit for it.

I know I am insulted when morons claim to speak for me. I'd imagine other people have the same pet peeve. You should be careful with that.


Let me know when you actually find someone stupider than you so you can test out that pet peeve. I'm sure it'll be quite the search.
 
2012-01-13 11:54:29 AM  

InmanRoshi: Remember folks, in Fark Independent mysterio world direct actions have direct consequences and people should be held accountable ... unless it involves a Republican. Maybe the dog strapped to the roof was shiatting itself out of terror or maybe it was shiatting itself out of joy that it's getting the fun ride that 99.999% of family pets would never get from their owners. It's all so vague and nebulous and ambiguous, so let's not judge.


it's really a matter of wanting proof for assertions and allegations. That's not much to ask, right? I mean, I understand that the feebleminded like to have their biases and beliefs supported and don't care much for the truth as long as the conversation confirms their preconceived notion of the matter but that's not how I roll.
 
2012-01-13 11:54:48 AM  

skullkrusher: CPennypacker: Your post was pretty clear about you entertaining yourself. I was just pointing out that though you are entertaining yourself, everyone else here thinks you're a farkwit for it.

I know I am insulted when morons claim to speak for me. I'd imagine other people have the same pet peeve. You should be careful with that.


Nope, I agree with him. That's why I have you highlighted in gray, so that I can identify all the DERP early on. BTW, do you even have a job? I swear you post like 200 times a day.

... or is THIS your job?
 
2012-01-13 11:55:00 AM  

skullkrusher: coeyagi: He never said it was about him BEING Mexican. It was bout Mitt the Mexican.

Did someone issue a memo about there being a moratorium on reading?

that's some interesting and baseless word parsing there, chico


He didn't say what the thread was about, he just said they were discussing Mitt the Mexican, leaving out the part that we discussed the label "hispanic" but not saying anything about him being Mexican.

I am sorry you are too much of a coward to admit you're wrong.
 
2012-01-13 11:55:33 AM  
Karac:
road head is better if you're also drinking a cartoon of milk with the girl's face on it.

i2.kym-cdn.com
 
2012-01-13 11:55:54 AM  

CPennypacker: skullkrusher: CPennypacker: Your post was pretty clear about you entertaining yourself. I was just pointing out that though you are entertaining yourself, everyone else here thinks you're a farkwit for it.

I know I am insulted when morons claim to speak for me. I'd imagine other people have the same pet peeve. You should be careful with that.

Let me know when you actually find someone stupider than you so you can test out that pet peeve. I'm sure it'll be quite the search.


who said that person has to be stupider than me? I just said "morons". Perhaps you should master reading before you try to insult people on what they wrote?
 
2012-01-13 11:55:59 AM  

skullkrusher: InmanRoshi: Remember folks, in Fark Independent mysterio world direct actions have direct consequences and people should be held accountable ... unless it involves a Republican. Maybe the dog strapped to the roof was shiatting itself out of terror or maybe it was shiatting itself out of joy that it's getting the fun ride that 99.999% of family pets would never get from their owners. It's all so vague and nebulous and ambiguous, so let's not judge.

it's really a matter of wanting proof for assertions and allegations. That's not much to ask, right? I mean, I understand that the feebleminded like to have their biases and beliefs supported and don't care much for the truth as long as the conversation confirms their preconceived notion of the matter but that's not how I roll.


That's a pretty longwinded translation of "I suck GOP cawk".
 
2012-01-13 11:57:08 AM  
So does anyone who's not a total jackass want to talk about this then?
 
2012-01-13 11:57:40 AM  

coeyagi: He didn't say what the thread was about, he just said they were discussing Mitt the Mexican, leaving out the part that we discussed the label "hispanic" but not saying anything about him being Mexican.

I am sorry you are too much of a coward to admit you're wrong.


No one called Mitt a Mexican though. That's not what was it was about. I am sorry that you don't understand things good.
 
2012-01-13 11:58:15 AM  

InmanRoshi: skullkrusher: InmanRoshi: Remember folks, in Fark Independent mysterio world direct actions have direct consequences and people should be held accountable ... unless it involves a Republican. Maybe the dog strapped to the roof was shiatting itself out of terror or maybe it was shiatting itself out of joy that it's getting the fun ride that 99.999% of family pets would never get from their owners. It's all so vague and nebulous and ambiguous, so let's not judge.

it's really a matter of wanting proof for assertions and allegations. That's not much to ask, right? I mean, I understand that the feebleminded like to have their biases and beliefs supported and don't care much for the truth as long as the conversation confirms their preconceived notion of the matter but that's not how I roll.

That's a pretty longwinded translation of "I suck GOP cawk".


you don't pay attention really well, do you?
 
2012-01-13 11:58:20 AM  

Notabunny: BloodySaxon: Old-ass non stories rock!

It shows one of Romney's character traits. It shows what kind of man he is. That it happened years ago and defends it today shows he hasn't changed. It was a deeply cruel and creepy thing to do, and will make most Americas pause when they think of Romney.


Really? My family had issues with a dog shiatting himself in a crate anytime we had to go to the vet. OH THE HUMANITY!

This is goofy. There are better things to dig up on Romney.

Next you're going to tell me that venture capitalism is chaotic and therefore EVIL!
 
2012-01-13 11:59:13 AM  

skullkrusher: CPennypacker: skullkrusher: CPennypacker: OK, maybe it shiat itself because it was sick. Shouldn't he take it down if its sick?

Or maybe it shat itself because Romney would make a bad President so that's why he put it back on the roof?

Do you have disassociative identity disorder or something?

why? because I find your attempts to find reasons why the dog shat itself aside from "dogs sometimes takes shiats" to be amusing?


Dogs don't normally shiat themselves. Whether it was in terror, due to sickness, or simply because of Romney's neglect in failing to pull over and walk the poor thing, something went terribly wrong there. And Romney's reaction was to just hose down the car and do it again.

This is how Romney treats his pets.
 
2012-01-13 11:59:23 AM  

spiderpaz: skullkrusher: CPennypacker: Your post was pretty clear about you entertaining yourself. I was just pointing out that though you are entertaining yourself, everyone else here thinks you're a farkwit for it.

I know I am insulted when morons claim to speak for me. I'd imagine other people have the same pet peeve. You should be careful with that.

Nope, I agree with him. That's why I have you highlighted in gray, so that I can identify all the DERP early on. BTW, do you even have a job? I swear you post like 200 times a day.

... or is THIS your job?


yeah, THIS is my job. I am one of those people you farking morons believe exist. People who are paid to post on Fark.
 
2012-01-13 11:59:33 AM  

skullkrusher: Who says the dog spontaneously shat itself? Maybe it had been up there for 5 hours and had to take a shiat? Dogs shiat several times a day, no? No, I haven't had a dog since I was very little.


Dogs can hold it extremely well. When I picked up my dog, it was a two day road trip. She held it the whole way, despite constant breaks to try to get her to go...turned out she's just picky, and as soon as we got home she recognized it as such and went. The only time dogs can't hold it are when they're abused (and lose their instinct to not shiat where they sleep), when they're sick, when they're scared (and even then, they'll only shiat when they already have to shiat, otherwise it's more musky grossness than feces), or when they get old and have bowel problems.
 
2012-01-13 11:59:42 AM  

BloodySaxon: Notabunny: BloodySaxon: Old-ass non stories rock!

It shows one of Romney's character traits. It shows what kind of man he is. That it happened years ago and defends it today shows he hasn't changed. It was a deeply cruel and creepy thing to do, and will make most Americas pause when they think of Romney.

Really? My family had issues with a dog shiatting himself in a crate anytime we had to go to the vet. OH THE HUMANITY!

This is goofy. There are better things to dig up on Romney.

Next you're going to tell me that venture capitalism is chaotic and therefore EVIL!


Was the crate strapped to the roof of your car while you and your family reached highway speeds?
 
2012-01-13 12:00:09 PM  

HeartBurnKid: skullkrusher: CPennypacker: skullkrusher: CPennypacker: OK, maybe it shiat itself because it was sick. Shouldn't he take it down if its sick?

Or maybe it shat itself because Romney would make a bad President so that's why he put it back on the roof?

Do you have disassociative identity disorder or something?

why? because I find your attempts to find reasons why the dog shat itself aside from "dogs sometimes takes shiats" to be amusing?

Dogs don't normally shiat themselves. Whether it was in terror, due to sickness, or simply because of Romney's neglect in failing to pull over and walk the poor thing, something went terribly wrong there. And Romney's reaction was to just hose down the car and do it again.

This is how Romney treats his pets.


hey look! It's a respectable lefty with interesting opinions who can discuss shiat honestly! Take notes, farkwits.

I'll cede the point.
 
2012-01-13 12:00:35 PM  

skullkrusher: InmanRoshi: skullkrusher: InmanRoshi: Remember folks, in Fark Independent mysterio world direct actions have direct consequences and people should be held accountable ... unless it involves a Republican. Maybe the dog strapped to the roof was shiatting itself out of terror or maybe it was shiatting itself out of joy that it's getting the fun ride that 99.999% of family pets would never get from their owners. It's all so vague and nebulous and ambiguous, so let's not judge.

it's really a matter of wanting proof for assertions and allegations. That's not much to ask, right? I mean, I understand that the feebleminded like to have their biases and beliefs supported and don't care much for the truth as long as the conversation confirms their preconceived notion of the matter but that's not how I roll.

That's a pretty longwinded translation of "I suck GOP cawk".

you don't pay attention really well, do you?


I think he nailed it. You used to occasionally have a point, but lately you've gone full GOPtard.
 
2012-01-13 12:00:45 PM  
so... now what do we talk about?
 
2012-01-13 12:03:49 PM  

skullkrusher: so... now what do we talk about?


The proper use of the Shift key.
 
2012-01-13 12:04:11 PM  

BloodySaxon: Notabunny: BloodySaxon: Old-ass non stories rock!

It shows one of Romney's character traits. It shows what kind of man he is. That it happened years ago and defends it today shows he hasn't changed. It was a deeply cruel and creepy thing to do, and will make most Americas pause when they think of Romney.

Really? My family had issues with a dog shiatting himself in a crate anytime we had to go to the vet. OH THE HUMANITY!

This is goofy. There are better things to dig up on Romney.

Next you're going to tell me that venture capitalism is chaotic and therefore EVIL!


Your dog rode on the roof of your car in freeway-speed winds for 12 hours on the way to the vet? You should look into vets a little closer to home.
 
2012-01-13 12:06:15 PM  

skullkrusher: CPennypacker: skullkrusher: CPennypacker: Your post was pretty clear about you entertaining yourself. I was just pointing out that though you are entertaining yourself, everyone else here thinks you're a farkwit for it.

I know I am insulted when morons claim to speak for me. I'd imagine other people have the same pet peeve. You should be careful with that.

Let me know when you actually find someone stupider than you so you can test out that pet peeve. I'm sure it'll be quite the search.

who said that person has to be stupider than me? I just said "morons". Perhaps you should master reading before you try to insult people on what they wrote?


Because, even a moron is probably smarter than you? We finally agree on something!
 
2012-01-13 12:07:41 PM  

skullkrusher: sometimes dogs shiat themselves because they have to shiat, no? Who says it "shiat itself in terror"? Dr Rachel?


I can't believe it took that long to ask a "critical thinking" question. My god, do people just accept the words of others without thinking on them?

Dogs shiat. Doesn't mean they're sick. My dog has some pretty friggin' splattery shiats sometimes when I simply give him a can of dog food.

Keep a dog in a cage without properly pooping him (i.e., take out for hour walk...all he does is piss...five minutes home and he shiats in the house) can cause a mess regardless. Dog had a wind screen to protect from cold air after the hosing....I really, really, really don't see how this is a problem.
 
2012-01-13 12:08:58 PM  

HeartBurnKid: skullkrusher: InmanRoshi: skullkrusher: InmanRoshi: Remember folks, in Fark Independent mysterio world direct actions have direct consequences and people should be held accountable ... unless it involves a Republican. Maybe the dog strapped to the roof was shiatting itself out of terror or maybe it was shiatting itself out of joy that it's getting the fun ride that 99.999% of family pets would never get from their owners. It's all so vague and nebulous and ambiguous, so let's not judge.

it's really a matter of wanting proof for assertions and allegations. That's not much to ask, right? I mean, I understand that the feebleminded like to have their biases and beliefs supported and don't care much for the truth as long as the conversation confirms their preconceived notion of the matter but that's not how I roll.

That's a pretty longwinded translation of "I suck GOP cawk".

you don't pay attention really well, do you?

I think he nailed it. You used to occasionally have a point, but lately you've gone full GOPtard.


et tu man? Sheeit.

I never, not once, EVER voice support for the majority of GOP positions. Everything from their opinions on the economy to their social conservatism to their foreign policy beliefs are almost always horseshiat. Quite literally, with very few exceptions. To me this is blatantly obvious and I assume it is blatantly obvious to everyone but a handful of true believers - most of whom I imagine are trolls. As a result, I don't find it terribly interesting to talk about the obvious ad naseum. There is rarely a serious GOP poster who is defending a position so the thread just because the same tedious crap of Democratic ninnies decrying the comment or action X over and over and over again. What I do find interesting, however, is the meta argument. People often call this pedantry... maybe it sometimes is. However, it should not be mistaken for support of the opposition. Romney is a farkwit. I would much rather see Barack Obama as President again than any of the Republican frontrunners. However, his farkwititude does not automatically make everything said against him true or valid. This is such an example. Some people with experience with dogs have explained that this reaction seems to have been one of terror for X, Y and Z reason. As a result, I have ceded the meta argument. Plus, I just really really like to argue and with 90% of all posts seeming from the Democratic side, ya gotta take the contrary to get something going :)

No, that is not an admission of trolling. Arguing the argument is not the same thing

That explain it?

I know people reading this will tomorrow say again that I am a shill or whatever. That's fine. At least then we'll know who the liars are.
 
2012-01-13 12:09:07 PM  

WhoGAS: My dog has some pretty friggin' splattery shiats sometimes when I simply give him a can of dog food.


Give him some kibble too, then. That dog needs fiber.
 
2012-01-13 12:09:49 PM  

skullkrusher: HeartBurnKid: skullkrusher: InmanRoshi: skullkrusher: InmanRoshi: Remember folks, in Fark Independent mysterio world direct actions have direct consequences and people should be held accountable ... unless it involves a Republican. Maybe the dog strapped to the roof was shiatting itself out of terror or maybe it was shiatting itself out of joy that it's getting the fun ride that 99.999% of family pets would never get from their owners. It's all so vague and nebulous and ambiguous, so let's not judge.

it's really a matter of wanting proof for assertions and allegations. That's not much to ask, right? I mean, I understand that the feebleminded like to have their biases and beliefs supported and don't care much for the truth as long as the conversation confirms their preconceived notion of the matter but that's not how I roll.

That's a pretty longwinded translation of "I suck GOP cawk".

you don't pay attention really well, do you?

I think he nailed it. You used to occasionally have a point, but lately you've gone full GOPtard.

et tu man? Sheeit.

I never, not once, EVER voice support for the majority of GOP positions. Everything from their opinions on the economy to their social conservatism to their foreign policy beliefs are almost always horseshiat. Quite literally, with very few exceptions. To me this is blatantly obvious and I assume it is blatantly obvious to everyone but a handful of true believers - most of whom I imagine are trolls. As a result, I don't find it terribly interesting to talk about the obvious ad naseum. There is rarely a serious GOP poster who is defending a position so the thread just because the same tedious crap of Democratic ninnies decrying the comment or action X over and over and over again. What I do find interesting, however, is the meta argument. People often call this pedantry... maybe it sometimes is. However, it should not be mistaken for support of the opposition. Romney is a farkwit. I would much rather ...


tl;dr. :p
 
2012-01-13 12:11:39 PM  

CPennypacker: He hosed the dog off then he put him back in the crate and kept driving. He was wrong and so are you.


He definitely should have left the dog in a crate on the side of the road hlfway to Canada.
 
2012-01-13 12:11:46 PM  

HeartBurnKid: skullkrusher: HeartBurnKid: skullkrusher: InmanRoshi: skullkrusher: InmanRoshi: Remember folks, in Fark Independent mysterio world direct actions have direct consequences and people should be held accountable ... unless it involves a Republican. Maybe the dog strapped to the roof was shiatting itself out of terror or maybe it was shiatting itself out of joy that it's getting the fun ride that 99.999% of family pets would never get from their owners. It's all so vague and nebulous and ambiguous, so let's not judge.

it's really a matter of wanting proof for assertions and allegations. That's not much to ask, right? I mean, I understand that the feebleminded like to have their biases and beliefs supported and don't care much for the truth as long as the conversation confirms their preconceived notion of the matter but that's not how I roll.

That's a pretty longwinded translation of "I suck GOP cawk".

you don't pay attention really well, do you?

I think he nailed it. You used to occasionally have a point, but lately you've gone full GOPtard.

et tu man? Sheeit.

I never, not once, EVER voice support for the majority of GOP positions. Everything from their opinions on the economy to their social conservatism to their foreign policy beliefs are almost always horseshiat. Quite literally, with very few exceptions. To me this is blatantly obvious and I assume it is blatantly obvious to everyone but a handful of true believers - most of whom I imagine are trolls. As a result, I don't find it terribly interesting to talk about the obvious ad naseum. There is rarely a serious GOP poster who is defending a position so the thread just because the same tedious crap of Democratic ninnies decrying the comment or action X over and over and over again. What I do find interesting, however, is the meta argument. People often call this pedantry... maybe it sometimes is. However, it should not be mistaken for support of the opposition. Romney is a farkwit. I woul ...


hehe cocksucker
 
2012-01-13 12:12:39 PM  

BloodySaxon: CPennypacker: He hosed the dog off then he put him back in the crate and kept driving. He was wrong and so are you.

He definitely should have left the dog in a crate on the side of the road hlfway to Canada.


No, he should have brought it into the car
 
2012-01-13 12:19:34 PM  

CPennypacker: skullkrusher: CPennypacker: Your post was pretty clear about you entertaining yourself. I was just pointing out that though you are entertaining yourself, everyone else here thinks you're a farkwit for it.

I know I am insulted when morons claim to speak for me. I'd imagine other people have the same pet peeve. You should be careful with that.

Let me know when you actually find someone stupider than you so you can test out that pet peeve. I'm sure it'll be quite the search.


You don't even realize that you're very clearly the retard here, do you CP? That's plenty of amusement all by itself. Your "points" are intellectually bankrupt, just like this whole "controversy." This has been a chuckle in MA since the last presidential cycle.
 
2012-01-13 12:20:33 PM  

Death_Poot: "Putting aside whether it's deliberately cruel, it strikes me as really really really weird."

I agree, but it won't affect whether or not I consider voting for him.


It would for me. I mean, I wouldn't vote for Mitt anyway, but this sort of thing definitely falls into the tiebreaker category.
 
2012-01-13 12:22:29 PM  

BloodySaxon: CPennypacker: skullkrusher: CPennypacker: Your post was pretty clear about you entertaining yourself. I was just pointing out that though you are entertaining yourself, everyone else here thinks you're a farkwit for it.

I know I am insulted when morons claim to speak for me. I'd imagine other people have the same pet peeve. You should be careful with that.

Let me know when you actually find someone stupider than you so you can test out that pet peeve. I'm sure it'll be quite the search.

You don't even realize that you're very clearly the retard here, do you CP? That's plenty of amusement all by itself. Your "points" are intellectually bankrupt, just like this whole "controversy." This has been a chuckle in MA since the last presidential cycle.


Seriously. Just like those Sarah McLachlan commercials. Those are a riot!
 
2012-01-13 12:22:32 PM  

BloodySaxon: CPennypacker: skullkrusher: CPennypacker: Your post was pretty clear about you entertaining yourself. I was just pointing out that though you are entertaining yourself, everyone else here thinks you're a farkwit for it.

I know I am insulted when morons claim to speak for me. I'd imagine other people have the same pet peeve. You should be careful with that.

Let me know when you actually find someone stupider than you so you can test out that pet peeve. I'm sure it'll be quite the search.

You don't even realize that you're very clearly the retard here, do you CP? That's plenty of amusement all by itself. Your "points" are intellectually bankrupt, just like this whole "controversy." This has been a chuckle in MA since the last presidential cycle.


Maybe to jackasses like you, but I don't really care if you think I'm the retard here considering where its coming from.

Which of my points are intellectually bankrupt? I said the dog shiat itself in terror. I was told dogs shiat themselves for other reasons. I asserted that none of the reasons given made it OK and the dog shiatting itself was still a sign to take it down.

I don't really care what Rachel Maddow says. I'm not enraged as a rabid lefty. I'm enraged as a dog lover.
 
2012-01-13 12:28:45 PM  

CPennypacker: BloodySaxon: CPennypacker: skullkrusher: CPennypacker: Your post was pretty clear about you entertaining yourself. I was just pointing out that though you are entertaining yourself, everyone else here thinks you're a farkwit for it.

I know I am insulted when morons claim to speak for me. I'd imagine other people have the same pet peeve. You should be careful with that.

Let me know when you actually find someone stupider than you so you can test out that pet peeve. I'm sure it'll be quite the search.

You don't even realize that you're very clearly the retard here, do you CP? That's plenty of amusement all by itself. Your "points" are intellectually bankrupt, just like this whole "controversy." This has been a chuckle in MA since the last presidential cycle.

Maybe to jackasses like you, but I don't really care if you think I'm the retard here considering where its coming from.

Which of my points are intellectually bankrupt? I said the dog shiat itself in terror. I was told dogs shiat themselves for other reasons. I asserted that none of the reasons given made it OK and the dog shiatting itself was still a sign to take it down.

I don't really care what Rachel Maddow says. I'm not enraged as a rabid lefty. I'm enraged as a dog lover.


As long as blind emotion is involved. Phew!

I too love dogs (and even cats) and I don't have to revert to a 9 year old pet obsessed girl everytime I notice discomfort in the animal kingdom.
 
2012-01-13 12:31:15 PM  

BloodySaxon: I too love dogs (and even cats) and I don't have to revert to a 9 year old pet obsessed girl everytime I notice discomfort in the animal kingdom.


It's your pet. If you don't treat it like family, then you shouldn't have a pet.
 
2012-01-13 12:31:59 PM  
I've always wondered why municipalities feel it's necessary to make those "don't shake your baby" PSAs. Now I know why.
 
2012-01-13 12:32:05 PM  

BloodySaxon: CPennypacker: BloodySaxon: CPennypacker: skullkrusher: CPennypacker: Your post was pretty clear about you entertaining yourself. I was just pointing out that though you are entertaining yourself, everyone else here thinks you're a farkwit for it.

I know I am insulted when morons claim to speak for me. I'd imagine other people have the same pet peeve. You should be careful with that.

Let me know when you actually find someone stupider than you so you can test out that pet peeve. I'm sure it'll be quite the search.

You don't even realize that you're very clearly the retard here, do you CP? That's plenty of amusement all by itself. Your "points" are intellectually bankrupt, just like this whole "controversy." This has been a chuckle in MA since the last presidential cycle.

Maybe to jackasses like you, but I don't really care if you think I'm the retard here considering where its coming from.

Which of my points are intellectually bankrupt? I said the dog shiat itself in terror. I was told dogs shiat themselves for other reasons. I asserted that none of the reasons given made it OK and the dog shiatting itself was still a sign to take it down.

I don't really care what Rachel Maddow says. I'm not enraged as a rabid lefty. I'm enraged as a dog lover.

As long as blind emotion is involved. Phew!

I too love dogs (and even cats) and I don't have to revert to a 9 year old pet obsessed girl everytime I notice discomfort in the animal kingdom.


You love dogs? Would you strap your dog in its crate to the roof of your car for a 12 hour highway drive? If the dog shiat itself, would you pull over, hose down the dog throw it back into its cage and keep driving?

Honestly?
 
2012-01-13 12:33:04 PM  

BloodySaxon:

Next you're going to tell me that venture capitalism is chaotic and therefore EVIL!


More Chaotic Neutral.

\badummtsshh
 
2012-01-13 12:34:46 PM  

CPennypacker: BloodySaxon: CPennypacker: BloodySaxon: CPennypacker: skullkrusher: CPennypacker: Your post was pretty clear about you entertaining yourself. I was just pointing out that though you are entertaining yourself, everyone else here thinks you're a farkwit for it.

I know I am insulted when morons claim to speak for me. I'd imagine other people have the same pet peeve. You should be careful with that.

Let me know when you actually find someone stupider than you so you can test out that pet peeve. I'm sure it'll be quite the search.

You don't even realize that you're very clearly the retard here, do you CP? That's plenty of amusement all by itself. Your "points" are intellectually bankrupt, just like this whole "controversy." This has been a chuckle in MA since the last presidential cycle.

Maybe to jackasses like you, but I don't really care if you think I'm the retard here considering where its coming from.

Which of my points are intellectually bankrupt? I said the dog shiat itself in terror. I was told dogs shiat themselves for other reasons. I asserted that none of the reasons given made it OK and the dog shiatting itself was still a sign to take it down.

I don't really care what Rachel Maddow says. I'm not enraged as a rabid lefty. I'm enraged as a dog lover.

As long as blind emotion is involved. Phew!

I too love dogs (and even cats) and I don't have to revert to a 9 year old pet obsessed girl everytime I notice discomfort in the animal kingdom.

You love dogs? Would you strap your dog in its crate to the roof of your car for a 12 hour highway drive? If the dog shiat itself, would you pull over, hose down the dog throw it back into its cage and keep driving?

Honestly?


What Romney did was illegal. There was a MA law against it at the time (not sure if there is now, but I would imagine so.)

If this is no big deal...why is it illegal?
 
2012-01-13 12:38:03 PM  

thismomentinblackhistory:
Honestly?

What Romney did was illegal. There was a MA law against it at the time (not sure if there is now, but I would imagine so.)

If this is no big deal...why is it illegal?


Ooh, I got this one. Because of hippie environmentalist wackos who want to kill business.
 
2012-01-13 12:44:10 PM  

BloodySaxon: I too love dogs


If you don't see the problem with what Romney did, you don't love dogs as much as you think you do.
 
2012-01-13 12:48:12 PM  

HeartBurnKid: BloodySaxon: I too love dogs

If you don't see the problem with what Romney did, you don't love dogs as much as you think you do.


Or he doesn't know what love is. Romney sounds more and more like a sociopath.

"...a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others that begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood."

Corporations are people.
I like to fire people.
We're not stopping this car!
 
2012-01-13 12:50:08 PM  

Le Bomb Suprize: Ricardo Klement: CPennypacker: Did you guys see that interview? Hilarious. He was trying to say that the dog was safe from the wind because he was in an airtight crate. Am I the only one who sees the problem with putting a dog in an airtight crate?

No. I was wondering why none of the pundits noticed. I think Romney said it was airtight to debunk the notion that feces could have escaped, but forgot that something has to get in.

I think he meant that it was wind proof in that the dog was not getting blasted by 75 mph winds. His explanation that the dog loved to ride up there doesn't work though. A 15 minute ride to the park is not quite the same as a 8-10 hour road trip. And the fact that he hosed the obviously distressed dog off and put him right back up there shows he lacks any empathy.

Although it's that calmness and ability to easily withstand others pain that made him a success at Bain, so I guess he has that going for him.


www.bizcardpro.com
Look at the subtle offwhite coloring. The tasteful hotness of the link. Oh god. It even has a watermark.

/GOP Candidate matchup based on American Psycho characters, go go.
 
2012-01-13 12:51:21 PM  

madcan34: Well at least Rachel Maddow is reporting on an important story and not just pushing a liberal agenda..


1. She's not a reporter; she's a pundit. It's in her job description.

2. She actually uses facts, instead of making them up, like your favorite pundits do.
 
2012-01-13 12:53:09 PM  
So, Mitt is an uber wealthy, ultra vanilla republican who lacks any discernible degree of compassion or empathy.

/And this surprises people why?
 
2012-01-13 12:54:33 PM  
Romney n. The frothy mixture of fecal matter that splatters your windshield because the asshole in front of you is driving around with a petrified dog tied to his roof.
 
Displayed 50 of 232 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report