If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Columbia Tribune) Obvious 2011 Mizzou: "We spend $20 million annually on football. SEC: "Welcome Aboard, big-spender". 2012 Mizzou: "Um, about that..can you float me about 5 mil?"   (columbiatribune.com) divider line 57
More: Obvious, gymnastics, capital expenditures, U.S. Department of Education, Southeastern Conference, support function  
•       •       •

2160 clicks; posted to Sports » on 13 Jan 2012 at 11:41 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



57 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-01-13 10:37:12 AM
WVU > Mizzou
 
2012-01-13 10:45:04 AM
i don't think it matters to the SEC how much mizzou spends on football above the table.
 
2012-01-13 10:52:04 AM
To be fair, the accountants who made the error got their degrees from SEC schools..
 
2012-01-13 11:44:09 AM
We need about tree fiddy


/tree
//fiddy
 
2012-01-13 11:53:58 AM
I can't wait to see Missouri and aTm in the SEC. I know it hasn't fared all that well for Arkansas, but I have a soft spot for the way the Big Twelve plays on offense nowadays: big-armed gunslinger, jackrabbits for receivers, and one 6'5 oak tree/man-child AA feature wideout.

I know the SEC fans will laugh at me, but I see both of them doing serious work next year.
 
2012-01-13 11:57:28 AM
lecavalier: I can't wait to see Missouri and aTm in the SEC. I know it hasn't fared all that well for Arkansas, but I have a soft spot for the way the Big Twelve plays on offense nowadays: big-armed gunslinger, jackrabbits for receivers, and one 6'5 oak tree/man-child AA feature wideout.

I know the SEC fans will laugh at me, but I see both of them doing serious work next year.


At least academically. I've been told you actually have to know how to write full sentences to be at Texas A&M.
 
2012-01-13 12:12:47 PM
basemetal: WVU > Mizzou

What's that about? Mad that WVU didn't get an invite?
 
2012-01-13 12:13:59 PM
FTFA: A 2005 investigation by USA Today revealed that 34 percent of the 119 then-Division I-A member schools had at least one error in the 2003 and 2004 revenue and expense figures submitted to the Department of Education - including a $34 million data-entry error by Texas - and it is unclear if improved controls are in place.

Off by $34 million? You'd think with all the money they're pimping off the Big 12 and their TV network they could afford to hire non-UT grads to handle any math.
 
2012-01-13 12:34:16 PM
FiatJustitia: lecavalier: I can't wait to see Missouri and aTm in the SEC. I know it hasn't fared all that well for Arkansas, but I have a soft spot for the way the Big Twelve plays on offense nowadays: big-armed gunslinger, jackrabbits for receivers, and one 6'5 oak tree/man-child AA feature wideout.

I know the SEC fans will laugh at me, but I see both of them doing serious work next year.

At least academically. I've been told you actually have to know how to write full sentences to be at Texas A&M.


Well there's their problem right there.
 
2012-01-13 12:40:38 PM
lecavalier: I can't wait to see Missouri and aTm in the SEC. I know it hasn't fared all that well for Arkansas.

Arkansas has yet to win a SEC Championship, but it's not like it's been an unmitigated disaster. 3 time SEC West Champ and a SEC West Co-Champ. Rarely are the Hogs not competitive. Most of their time in the SEC was with a farking moron of a head coach. After watching Nutt run the Ole Miss program into the ground even by their meager standards it's a miracle the Hogs fared as well as they did.
 
2012-01-13 12:44:45 PM
velvet_fog: FTFA: A 2005 investigation by USA Today revealed that 34 percent of the 119 then-Division I-A member schools had at least one error in the 2003 and 2004 revenue and expense figures submitted to the Department of Education - including a $34 million data-entry error by Texas - and it is unclear if improved controls are in place.

Off by $34 million? You'd think with all the money they're pimping off the Big 12 and their TV network they could afford to hire non-UT grads to handle any math.


UT Engineering is in the Top 10 schools in the US. We have plenty of capable math folks, thank you.

Plus, UT brings in the most money of ALL programs in the country, so whats $34M here or there?
 
2012-01-13 12:48:07 PM
mynamebackwards: lecavalier: I can't wait to see Missouri and aTm in the SEC. I know it hasn't fared all that well for Arkansas.

Arkansas has yet to win a SEC Championship, but it's not like it's been an unmitigated disaster. 3 time SEC West Champ and a SEC West Co-Champ. Rarely are the Hogs not competitive. Most of their time in the SEC was with a farking moron of a head coach. After watching Nutt run the Ole Miss program into the ground even by their meager standards it's a miracle the Hogs fared as well as they did.


True enough. I was rooting for K-State (Big 12) in the Cotton Bowl but Arkansas put the wood to them. I hope Mizzou does ok but I'll admit, if A&M doesn't win another game for 20 years I wouldn't be upset. Hook 'em!!
 
2012-01-13 01:02:50 PM
How many years until Mizzou, Nebraska, and Colorado start talking about getting the Big 8 back together?

/getting the band back together.
 
2012-01-13 01:09:46 PM
THE HELL YOU SAY!

3.bp.blogspot.com

I'm shocked...SHOCKED, to discover Mizzou may have been bullshiatting their way out of the Big12. I mean, it's not like they've been whoring themselves up and down the Mississippi for the last two years or anything, begging either the Big10 or SEC to give them an invite.
 
2012-01-13 01:12:41 PM
fenianfark: Mad that WVU didn't get an invite?

Yeah, kicking around SEC pussies is what they do.
 
2012-01-13 01:23:30 PM
fenianfark: basemetal: WVU > Mizzou

What's that about? Mad that WVU didn't get an invite?


Well if you count BCS Bowl appearances...

WVU > TCU > TAMU > Mizzou (3>2>1>0)

Or better yet, BCS Bowl victories...

WVU > TCU > TAMU = Mizzou (3>1>0=0)

/The two joining are a lot better than the two leaving
 
2012-01-13 01:46:23 PM
As a fifth generation Missourian, fark you Mizzou. I'm done with Mizzou, on to Michigan State. If they'll have me.
 
2012-01-13 02:05:12 PM
iamskibibitz: fenianfark: basemetal: WVU > Mizzou

What's that about? Mad that WVU didn't get an invite?

Well if you count BCS Bowl appearances...

WVU > TCU > TAMU > Mizzou (3>2>1>0)

Or better yet, BCS Bowl victories...

WVU > TCU > TAMU = Mizzou (3>1>0=0)

/The two joining are a lot better than the two leaving


I have a feeling TCU's and WVU's BCS bowl appearances were due in no small part to the conferences they played in having much weaker competition than they will face in the Big 12.
 
2012-01-13 02:07:00 PM
ytterbium: As a fifth generation Missourian, fark you Mizzou. I'm done with Mizzou, on to Michigan State. If they'll have me.

WTF does this even mean? It's not like the school left the state. If you're so hot and bothered by the Big 12, why not root for another team in it. If you view the move to the SEC as an afront to the state of Missouri, why not root for another school in the state?
 
2012-01-13 02:16:37 PM
ytterbium: As a fifth generation Missourian, fark you Mizzou. I'm done with Mizzou, on to Michigan State. If they'll have me.

Come on up, we have punch and cake
 
2012-01-13 02:19:48 PM
ytterbium: on to Michigan State. If they'll have me.

i can only vouch for the MSU women, but in my experience they'll have anyone.
 
2012-01-13 02:27:49 PM
Shrugging Atlas: ytterbium: As a fifth generation Missourian, fark you Mizzou. I'm done with Mizzou, on to Michigan State. If they'll have me.

WTF does this even mean? It's not like the school left the state. If you're so hot and bothered by the Big 12, why not root for another team in it. If you view the move to the SEC as an afront to the state of Missouri, why not root for another school in the state?


It's an archaic thing, the switch to Big 12 and now the SEC. It will never be the same for me.

As far as the MSU thing, we're moving to MI soon and I'm assuming one of my kids will end up at a state school.

However, I will never be a Red Wings fan.
 
2012-01-13 02:29:04 PM
ytterbium: Shrugging Atlas: ytterbium: As a fifth generation Missourian, fark you Mizzou. I'm done with Mizzou, on to Michigan State. If they'll have me.

WTF does this even mean? It's not like the school left the state. If you're so hot and bothered by the Big 12, why not root for another team in it. If you view the move to the SEC as an afront to the state of Missouri, why not root for another school in the state?

It's an archaic thing, the switch to Big 12 and now the SEC. It will never be the same for me.

As far as the MSU thing, we're moving to MI soon and I'm assuming one of my kids will end up at a state school.

However, I will never be a Red Wings fan.


Amen brother. Former Missourian who went to MSU, although I add "never be a Tigers fan" to the mix also.
 
2012-01-13 02:37:04 PM
Here's an idea: raise the tuition on all the students at Mizzou! No, no, no... better thought: shut down all academic departments and spend all the money on the athletics department!

/seems to be what schools are doing now anyways
//sure we'll graduate a bunch of functional retards, but the football team will be competitive sometimes
 
2012-01-13 02:42:56 PM
$15 mil? Auburn paid almost that much for Cam Newton last year. Alabama paid LSU more than that to set Vegas up this year. These guys will never be able to compete in the SEC if that's all they are playing with.
 
2012-01-13 02:43:27 PM
germ78: Here's an idea: raise the tuition on all the students at Mizzou! No, no, no... better thought: shut down all academic departments and spend all the money on the athletics department!

/seems to be what schools are doing now anyways
//sure we'll graduate a bunch of functional retards, but the football team will be competitive sometimes


i can't speak for mizzou, but at most big programs the football program is a profit center that funds other sports and in some cases academic programs. unless your coach is sodomizing children's buttholes, football programs aren't fiscally detrimental to universities.
 
2012-01-13 02:59:10 PM
chuggernaught: How many years until Mizzou, Nebraska, and Colorado start talking about getting the Big 8 back together?

/getting the band back together.


Yeah, I wish. Big 8 with WVU, TCU, Boise State and BYU would be farking awesome.
 
2012-01-13 03:08:38 PM
basemetal: WVU > Mizzou

Maybe 5-10 years ago but its not that clear cut now.

And people really think a high powered offense with small receivers and linemen will have great success against sec teams?
 
2012-01-13 03:10:59 PM
thomps: germ78: Here's an idea: raise the tuition on all the students at Mizzou! No, no, no... better thought: shut down all academic departments and spend all the money on the athletics department!

/seems to be what schools are doing now anyways
//sure we'll graduate a bunch of functional retards, but the football team will be competitive sometimes

i can't speak for mizzou, but at most big programs the football program is a profit center that funds other sports and in some cases academic programs. unless your coach is sodomizing children's buttholes, football programs aren't fiscally detrimental to universities.


I'm aware that football generates large sums of money for the school. It's those large sums of money that cause athletics departments to think that they ARE the university; academics are just window dressing. At that point its the tail wagging the dog.

Penn State is the extreme example of what happens when you give the athletics department (football program, really) too much power.
 
2012-01-13 03:17:02 PM
germ78: thomps: germ78: Here's an idea: raise the tuition on all the students at Mizzou! No, no, no... better thought: shut down all academic departments and spend all the money on the athletics department!

/seems to be what schools are doing now anyways
//sure we'll graduate a bunch of functional retards, but the football team will be competitive sometimes

i can't speak for mizzou, but at most big programs the football program is a profit center that funds other sports and in some cases academic programs. unless your coach is sodomizing children's buttholes, football programs aren't fiscally detrimental to universities.

I'm aware that football generates large sums of money for the school. It's those large sums of money that cause athletics departments to think that they ARE the university; academics are just window dressing. At that point its the tail wagging the dog.

Penn State is the extreme example of what happens when you give the athletics department (football program, really) too much power.


if you agree that football generates large sums of money for the school, why do you think continued funding of those programs would require tuition increases and lowered academic funding? if football is self-supporting then your tying it to academic failures seems unreasonable.
 
2012-01-13 03:50:55 PM
I guess I simply don't get the butthurt over Mizzou (or any other team) changing conferences, particularly by fans of the school/team in question. There's the loss of tradition and rivalries I suppose, but on the other hand, if moving puts the school in a better financial position (thus allowing for better academic and sports programs), what's the problem?
 
2012-01-13 03:59:51 PM
T-Boy: $15 mil? Auburn paid almost that much for Cam Newton last year. Alabama paid LSU more than that to set Vegas up this year. These guys will never be able to compete in the SEC if that's all they are playing with.

Were talking about what the Athletic Dept pays above board.

That has little to do with what the boosters are handing out under the table
 
2012-01-13 04:14:44 PM
fenianfark: basemetal: WVU > Mizzou

What's that about? Mad that WVU didn't get an invite?


Why be mad about something Mizzou didn't earn? The only thing the SEC is interested in is TV sets. Because God knows Mizzou hasn't don't jack shiat in any sport to distinguish themselves.
 
2012-01-13 04:19:21 PM
thomps: *snip*

if you agree that football generates large sums of money for the school, why do you think continued funding of those programs would require tuition increases and lowered academic funding? if football is self-supporting then your tying it to academic failures seems unreasonable.


Because most of the revenue generated by football goes right back into the athletics department, or pads the pockets of administrators. It doesn't keep tuition down. Tuition rates have been skyrocketing over the last 20 years.
 
2012-01-13 04:21:21 PM
germ78: thomps: *snip*

if you agree that football generates large sums of money for the school, why do you think continued funding of those programs would require tuition increases and lowered academic funding? if football is self-supporting then your tying it to academic failures seems unreasonable.

Because most of the revenue generated by football goes right back into the athletics department, or pads the pockets of administrators. It doesn't keep tuition down. Tuition rates have been skyrocketing over the last 20 years.


right, but we both agree that those tuition increases aren't going to fund football programs, so it's not germane to the discussion, like at all.
 
2012-01-13 04:28:09 PM
lecavalier: I can't wait to see Missouri and aTm in the SEC. I know it hasn't fared all that well for Arkansas, but I have a soft spot for the way the Big Twelve plays on offense nowadays: big-armed gunslinger, jackrabbits for receivers, and one 6'5 oak tree/man-child AA feature wideout.

I know the SEC fans will laugh at me, but I see both of them doing serious work next year.


Arkansas is probably the closest analog (#29 offense, #47 defense) to A&M (#7 offense, #59 defense) and Mizzou (#12 offense, #61 defense). The problem for A&M is that they'll be in the same division as Arkansas, LSU, and Alabama. Mizzou might have a decent shot at success in the East.

It's impressive how diametrically opposed the Big 12 and SEC are. There were 9 SEC defenses ranked in the Top 50 in 2011 (5 in the Top 8) and only one Big 12 defense in the Top 50 (with 5 in the bottom 25). Conversely, there were 6 Big 12 offenses in the Top 50 (all in the Top 12) and only 3 SEC offenses in the Top 50 (with 6 in the bottom 25).
 
2012-01-13 04:28:33 PM
Shrugging Atlas: I guess I simply don't get the butthurt over Mizzou (or any other team) changing conferences, particularly by fans of the school/team in question. There's the loss of tradition and rivalries I suppose, but on the other hand, if moving puts the school in a better financial position (thus allowing for better academic and sports programs), what's the problem?

What you have to understand is that, at some point, keeping up the rivalry with KU became the academic equivalent of sticking your dick in crazy. Any thread, on any site, that is discussing Mizzou sports (or academics or politics or mascots or the farking weather for that matter) is populated by about 40% lonely beakers posting. KU fans are worried about our strength of schedule, worried we are losing the Kansas City market, worried we wont compete in the SEC. They often turn into "life long Mizzou fans" who now hate the team and are never ever coming back or hate a new hire and are never ever coming back! Sometimes they turn into SEC fans who are leaving the conference in disgust with such a disappointing addition. They are obsessed, and this is the issue they've chosen as a vehicle to manifest they're illness this season.

It would be quite the complement, if it wasn't so predictably uninspired.
 
2012-01-13 04:42:15 PM
Krymson Tyde: I have a feeling TCU's and WVU's BCS bowl appearances were due in no small part to the conferences they played in having much weaker competition than they will face in the Big 12.

I doubt they'll dominate the conference, but each has a winning record against Big 12 teams in the last ten years, and each has a win over Oklahoma. As long as Baylor, Kansas, Iowa State, and Texas Tech are still around, TCU and WVU should end up in the top half of the conference.
 
2012-01-13 04:43:36 PM
Kurmudgeon: fenianfark: Mad that WVU didn't get an invite?

Yeah, kicking around SEC pussies is what they do.


Selective memory strikes again I see.
 
2012-01-13 04:44:41 PM
Oh and BTW, I haven't been posting much lately due to work/travel, but Congrats on your win, Krymson Tyde.
 
2012-01-13 05:07:44 PM
theurge14: fenianfark: basemetal: WVU > Mizzou

What's that about? Mad that WVU didn't get an invite?

Why be mad about something Mizzou didn't earn? The only thing the SEC is interested in is TV sets. Because God knows Mizzou hasn't don't jack shiat in any sport to distinguish themselves.


Well to be honest, neither has WVU.
 
2012-01-13 05:18:06 PM
I thought football was greatest money generating aspect of any University, making profits far in excess of what they spend.
 
2012-01-13 05:50:01 PM
Tyrone Biggums: Oh and BTW, I haven't been posting much lately due to work/travel, but Congrats on your win, Krymson Tyde.

Cut out the travel part and this could have been my post. Congrats, Bama fans.

That said, if one of you two doesn't stab the other sometime within the next two weeks I'll have lost respect for both of you. I will not stand idly by and watch Auburn and Alabama fans play kissyface! No, sir, not on my watch.
 
2012-01-13 06:04:37 PM
robbiex0r: I thought football was greatest money generating aspect of any University, making profits far in excess of what they spend.

Most of which funds the other sports.
 
2012-01-13 06:12:56 PM
Wow. More "SEC students/fans are dumb" comments. You people are so clever.

Oh, wait, you're not. I graduated from a Big XII school and there were just as many idiots on campus as there were at the SEC schools I've attended. Unless you've gone to some highfalutin private school, you're no damned better than anyone else, and if you have gone to such a school, then your level of superiority doesn't begin at the Mason-Dixon line.
 
2012-01-13 07:09:17 PM
Shrugging Atlas: I guess I simply don't get the butthurt over Mizzou (or any other team) changing conferences, particularly by fans of the school/team in question. There's the loss of tradition and rivalries I suppose, but on the other hand, if moving puts the school in a better financial position (thus allowing for better academic and sports programs), what's the problem?

In my family, being a Mizzou fan is an inherited trait, like blonde hair and blue eyes. The tradition and rivalries is the whole point of collegiate sports, or at least, it used to be.

It seems like the Big 10 still has that old-time feel.
 
2012-01-13 07:13:20 PM
Tyrone Biggums: Oh and BTW, I haven't been posting much lately due to work/travel, but Congrats on your win, Krymson Tyde.

Thanks! It was a great game...at least for a Bama guy.
 
2012-01-13 07:15:59 PM
WoodyHayes: Tyrone Biggums: Oh and BTW, I haven't been posting much lately due to work/travel, but Congrats on your win, Krymson Tyde.

Cut out the travel part and this could have been my post. Congrats, Bama fans.

That said, if one of you two doesn't stab the other sometime within the next two weeks I'll have lost respect for both of you. I will not stand idly by and watch Auburn and Alabama fans play kissyface! No, sir, not on my watch.


Thanks!
Maybe we'll fight later on, right now the good feeling is too strong for fisticuffs.
 
2012-01-13 08:07:26 PM
Mizzou fans have been gluttons for punishment for decades. LSU can't be any worse than what Nebraska did to us over the years.
 
2012-01-14 12:12:13 AM
jayhawk88: I'm shocked...SHOCKED, to discover Mizzou may have been bullshiatting their way out of the Big12. I mean, it's not like they've been whoring themselves up and down the Mississippi for the last two years or anything, begging either the Big10 or SEC to give them an invite.

And I'm shocked that a Jayhawk fan starts masturbating like a howler monkey at the chance to attack Mizzou for something that he doesn't fully understand. And now we reach the point in the discussion where I make you look like the feces-throwing jackass Beaker you are.

Years before the realignment mess started, Missouri began raising private donations to build a new facility next to Faurot Field for the gymnastics team and Golden Girls dance team. The facility was recently completed this year, again using all private donations. In preparing the Equity in Athletics Disclosure report (which is non-auditable and only used as a general reference guide), the cost of the gymnastics facility was mistakenly counted as football profit. The error was self-identified and corrected. Moreover, even with the error corrected, Mizzou and Texas remain the only profitable athletic departments in the Big XII. Furthermore, the report had absolutely nothing to do with Mizzou moving to the Big Ten or the SEC. The due diligence the SEC conducted was far more thorough than grabbing a report off of a government website, though if Kansas fans don't understand that, it could explain why no other conferences except the Big East wanted your worthless dump ass university. Mizzou did nothing immoral, unethical or illegal and this error in no way impacts Mizzou's move to the SEC.

So please, do us a favor and stick to talking about basketball, since that's the only thing idiot Beakers are qualified to talk about. You sure as fark don't know anything about football, softball, baseball, soccer, pretty much every other sport except Quiditch, operating a profitable athletic department, not ripping off your season ticket holders and alumni via a ticket scalping scam run out of your own athletic department, not hiring recruit's dads as coaches, not stealing exercise equipment, academics, or anything else that most modern universities have figured out.
 
Displayed 50 of 57 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »