Somebody, some day is gonna snap on one of these groups. I for one almost can't wait to read about it. I may even giggle like a scholl girl. This nanny shiat has been getting more and more out of hand.

WTFDYW: Somebody, some day is gonna snap on one of these groups. I for one almost can't wait to read about it. I may even giggle like a scholl girl. This nanny shiat has been getting more and more out of hand.

Just wait until everyone has to have health insurance. The only unhealthy thing we won't hear about is getting nagged to death

WTFDYW: This nanny shiat has been getting more and more out of hand.

Ron Paul would put a stop to this crap and restore Liberty for all of us. Just wait until they start mandating calorie intake, you know, for Healthcare.

/just sayin

GaryPDX: WTFDYW: This nanny shiat has been getting more and more out of hand.

Ron Paul would put a stop to this crap and restore Liberty for all of us. Just wait until they start mandating calorie intake, you know, for Healthcare.

/just sayin

Bwhahahahahahahahahaha!!!

*wipes eyes*

Hahahahahaha!

*takes deep breath*

Oh. You guys are serious.

You actually managed to twist a story about a 501c3 that started in the halcyon days of the Bush administration which attempts to influence public health policy into blast at health care and another reason to support Grandpa Crazy.

Wait. Your trolled me, didn't you?

You crack me up.

The notion of a rigid separation between church and state has no basis in either the text of the Constitution or the writings of our Founding Fathers. - RON PAUL

Name one time that prohibition has been unsuccessful in this country. One. One..

Stupid libs.

Runs_With_Scissors_: GaryPDX: WTFDYW: This nanny shiat has been getting more and more out of hand.

Ron Paul would put a stop to this crap and restore Liberty for all of us. Just wait until they start mandating calorie intake, you know, for Healthcare.

/just sayin

Bwhahahahahahahahahaha!!!

*wipes eyes*

Hahahahahaha!

*takes deep breath*

Oh. You guys are serious.

You actually managed to twist a story about a 501c3 that started in the halcyon days of the Bush administration which attempts to influence public health policy into blast at health care and another reason to support Grandpa Crazy.

Wait. Your trolled me, didn't you?

You crack me up.

The notion of a rigid separation between church and state has no basis in either the text of the Constitution or the writings of our Founding Fathers. - RON PAUL

Don't include me in with the healthcare debate. Did you see it mentioned in my post?

Go lay down now.

Good.

Hell, I hope they're eventually successful with banning Tobacco completely so that the nutjobs can focus their full attention on Alcohol and fast food.

Everyone's so smug when it comes to giving smokers shiat, but they don't realize that once the nutjobs finish with their anti-smoking bullshiat, they're not going to sit at home and be happy, they're just going to focus on something else, something that the smug assholes might enjoy.

I'm glad I got to visit New York City before all the life was sucked out of it.

fark the smokers.
As for this 501c3 organization - LULZ go pound sand.



Just Another OC Homeless Guy: The notion of a rigid separation between church and state has no basis in either the text of the Constitution or the writings of our Founding Fathers. - RON PAUL

Thomas Jefferson was the one who coined the term "Separation of Church and State"

Wall of separation

Thomas Jefferson's response, dated January 1, 1802, concurs with the Danbury Baptists' views on religious liberty, and the accompanying separation of civil government from concerns of religious doctrine and practice. Jefferson writes: "...I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church & State."[5] This doctrine, known as the "wall of separation" or "strict separationism," would later become highly influential in 20th century Supreme Court understandings of the relationship between church and state. As a result, the relevance of this letter is a subject of heated debate, with scholars such as Robert Boston emphasizing its importance, and others such as Mark David Hall arguing that the letter was a historical outlier.[6][7]

Link (new window)

Yet ANOTHER reason to stay away from that shiathole. Liberals are for freedom...unless it's something they don't like.

jehovahs witness protection: Yet ANOTHER reason to stay away from that shiathole. Liberals are for freedom...unless it's something they don't like.

This.

I love 'daddy warbucks', as long as he's taking care of me.

/off to sing a song

WTFDYW: Somebody, some day is gonna snap on one of these groups. I for one almost can't wait to read about it. I may even giggle like a scholl girl. This nanny shiat has been getting more and more out of hand.

If someone were to attack them with a Molotov Cocktail, the justice would be...poetic.

FirstNationalBastard: Good.

Hell, I hope they're eventually successful with banning Tobacco completely so that the nutjobs can focus their full attention on Alcohol and fast food.

Everyone's so smug when it comes to giving smokers shiat, but they don't realize that once the nutjobs finish with their anti-smoking bullshiat, they're not going to sit at home and be happy, they're just going to focus on something else, something that the smug assholes might enjoy.

Tobacco will never be illegal in this country because, yes they have a very large and powerful lobby, but also it's not in the Government's best interest to outlaw a product that they can so easily control people with.

jehovahs witness protection: Yet ANOTHER reason to stay away from that shiathole. Liberals are for freedom...unless it's something they don't like.

I'm a liberal and I think this is stupid as fark. Thought banning smoking in bars was stupid, too.

It's almost as if liberals are individuals who don't share the same opinion on every issue.

But I know it's easier for you to be an asshole when you convince yourself they do. So carry on, Brainiac.

davidphogan: That's exactly the point of the headline. Screw them, they're not you.

screw them - they're violating the rights of others. drinkers who do not drive are not violating anyone's rights.

Ugh.

Kazan: davidphogan: That's exactly the point of the headline. Screw them, they're not you.

screw them - they're violating the rights of others. drinkers who do not drive are not violating anyone's rights.

If you think alcohol production does not pollute the air than you are a retard. Be it making the bottles that serve it, or boiling the wort, or distillation, or controlling temperature, someone is breathing smog so your smug ass can drink a cold one. I guess that is the way you like it. The pollution is once or twice removed and Kazan gets to feel smug.

zzrhardy: First they came for the smokers and I didn't speak up because... because... actually I am OK with this.

Smoking sucks.

WOOOOOSSHHHHH

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

I'm gonna go grab a smoke on my porch and read more about the batch of beer I'm brewing next. LIMIT THIS F***ERS


/so glad I don't live up North

NOT MAH BOOZE

That guy is STILL mayor? You guys in the big city running out of people to put in office?

It almost seems as though we've tried this before and it didnt work...

taurusowner: Not just health insurance, but government controlled health insurance. Wait til they can control if you have access to health care based on your habits. Ate red meat more than 3 times a month? Sorry, no health care. Drank more than once a week? Sorry, no health care. "Carbon footprint" too big? Sorry, no health care.

You can't possibly really believe that.

Well, maybe you can.

Apples and Oranges subby: Come back and talk to us when alcohol can kill you just by being within a few feet of it.


Look I believe that a private establishment should be able to make its own rules as long as the smoking allowed or smoking not allowed is clearly visible on the front door. That is the only regulation I care about. But please don't pretend as if alcohol and cigarettes are the same thing. If you want to kill yourself that is one thing but alcohol does not give off deadly gasses to be inhaled by the people around you.

In order for alcohol to kill you, you need to drink a ton of it. For tobacco to kill you, you just need to be standing near somebody who is smoking.