If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(New York Daily News) Stupid Having solved all the city's problems and determined to crush southern California's last remaining thriving business, LA City Council votes 11-1 to require condoms in porn productions   (nydailynews.com) divider line 84
More: Stupid, Los Angeles City Council, pornographic actor, film shot, Free Speech Coalition, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, adult films, Los Angeles, safe  
•       •       •

640 clicks; posted to Politics » on 11 Jan 2012 at 11:42 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



84 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-01-11 11:45:46 AM
That's farking stupid. The industry will just move somewhere else.
 
2012-01-11 11:49:29 AM
wax_on: That's farking stupid. The industry will just move somewhere else.

In the sprawling greater L.A. area, it isn't even inconvenient for them to relocate out of L.A. City proper.
 
2012-01-11 11:50:17 AM
wax_on: That's farking stupid. The industry will just move somewhere else.

I'm assuming Ventura or Orange county.
 
2012-01-11 11:51:59 AM
t2.gstatic.com
 
2012-01-11 11:56:21 AM
The council will change their minds when the 5 or 6 big porn companies relocate and they lose all those tax dollars.

Funny how a lot of people base their convictions and morals on tax incentives and deductions.
 
2012-01-11 11:58:40 AM
So, porn is now an "industry?" Because often the imagery resembles pile drivers at work? Mass production?
 
2012-01-11 12:00:35 PM
canyoneer: So, porn is now an "industry?" Because often the imagery resembles pile drivers at work? Mass production?

Where you been, Mars?
 
2012-01-11 12:02:16 PM
Well, a lot of people are simply perturbed about the dangers of STDs. The council is obligated to do something to stop all this mass turbation.
 
2012-01-11 12:02:16 PM
janaiblog.files.wordpress.com
 
2012-01-11 12:03:11 PM
I like my porn like I like my horseback riding......bareback
 
2012-01-11 12:03:51 PM
I don't understand why anyone in that industry would work without one. Nobody likes a case of the pimple-dick, or worse.
 
2012-01-11 12:04:00 PM
I'm sure pornography companies will be completely honest about where their films were shot.
 
2012-01-11 12:06:52 PM
Back when the HIV thing first came out they insisted on condoms and no anal. But that went away too.
 
2012-01-11 12:10:37 PM
cig-mkr: Back when the HIV thing first came out they insisted on condoms and no anal. But that went away too.

The risk factors and tests are much better understood now. Technically for the industry to truly be safe the pornstars should be absolutely barred from sex outside the profession...cloistered, if you will.
 
2012-01-11 12:17:36 PM
DubyaHater: I like my porn like I like my horseback riding......barebackwith an English saddle

I don't even know what that implies.
 
2012-01-11 12:17:58 PM
sprawl15: Well, a lot of people are simply perturbed about the dangers of STDs. The council is obligated to do something to stop all this mass turbation.

Well played.
 
2012-01-11 12:19:19 PM
Surely they could just shop out the condoms with movie magic, or make fancy flesh-colored ones (like they do flesh-colored underwear in some Hollywood "nude" scenes).

Though that stuff might be beyond the budget for the likes of Back Door Sluts 9...
 
2012-01-11 12:21:36 PM
That sound you just heard was the porn industry pulling out....of LA.
 
2012-01-11 12:23:58 PM
As long as this has no effect on lesbian porn...they could make the men wear a suit of armor and I would never know.

I am faithful, to lesbian porn.
 
2012-01-11 12:24:00 PM
Morally that's probably the right thing to do, but it's also economically stupid.

The choice is between morality and money. Who would have ever guessed?
 
2012-01-11 12:28:40 PM
Love the headline, subby.

If I lived down there, I'd put it on a sign and stand on a busy intersection. All day.
 
2012-01-11 12:32:18 PM
meh.: As long as this has no effect on lesbian porn...they could make the men wear a suit of armor and I would never know.

I am faithful, to lesbian porn.


Lesbian or girl/girl? I think lesbian porn is flannel shirts and crew cuts.
 
2012-01-11 12:33:26 PM
They'll just move production to Vancouver like the rest of the film and TV industry.
 
2012-01-11 12:33:53 PM
From the article it sounds like actors have to wear condoms at all times, even for bjs?

I thought the incidence of HIV Transmission through oral sex was almost nonexistent. If they are requiring condoms for oral sex will they also require dental dams, for females receiving oral sex?
 
2012-01-11 12:36:52 PM
As Mandingo, Shane Diesel and Lexington Steele prepare to say goodbye to LA.......
 
2012-01-11 12:39:07 PM
If I were another state I would be trying to entice those companies away. Poaching them off for the tax dollars seems fair game.
 
2012-01-11 12:41:06 PM
Jake Havechek: meh.: As long as this has no effect on lesbian porn...they could make the men wear a suit of armor and I would never know.

I am faithful, to lesbian porn.

Lesbian or girl/girl? I think lesbian porn is flannel shirts and crew cuts.


meh.: As long as this has no effect on lesbian porn...they could make the men wear a suit of armor and I would never know.

I am faithful, to lesbian porn.


I too, will be completely unaffected by this
 
2012-01-11 12:41:26 PM
The porn industry is also recession proof.
 
2012-01-11 12:43:59 PM
Yoeman: I don't understand why anyone in that industry would work without one. Nobody likes a case of the pimple-dick, or worse.

Wild guess: for the money.

You think those meat puppets can make demands?
 
2012-01-11 12:44:57 PM
Am I the only one enjoying the humor in this appearing under the politics tab?
 
2012-01-11 12:53:14 PM
They'll still whip the condom off to jizz all over the starlet's face at the end, right?
 
2012-01-11 01:03:45 PM
I don't actually have a problem with this. It's a field where it's hazardous to the workers to not use condoms. If you leave condom use optional, those who demand safe work conditions will just be fired and a new crop of actors/actresses willing to be less safe will take over. So leaving it up to the individuals and the companies isn't going to solve anything.

It's one of those, you either agree with things like OSHA or you think workers should be allowed to consent to whatever work conditions you like.
 
2012-01-11 01:03:57 PM
Welcome to Miami.
 
2012-01-11 01:05:54 PM
Gaseous Anomaly: Surely they could just shop out the condoms with movie magic, or make fancy flesh-colored ones (like they do flesh-colored underwear in some Hollywood "nude" scenes).

Though that stuff might be beyond the budget for the likes of Back Door Sluts 9...


BACK DOOR SLUTS 9!
 
2012-01-11 01:15:51 PM
Debeo Summa Credo: They'll still whip the condom off to jizz all over the starlet's face at the end, right?

no one is gonna watch compilations of people flushing rubbers down the toilet
 
2012-01-11 01:16:15 PM
lennavan: I don't actually have a problem with this. It's a field where it's hazardous to the workers to not use condoms. If you leave condom use optional, those who demand safe work conditions will just be fired and a new crop of actors/actresses willing to be less safe will take over. So leaving it up to the individuals and the companies isn't going to solve anything.

It's one of those, you either agree with things like OSHA or you think workers should be allowed to consent to whatever work conditions you like.


In theory it sounds fine, but it's a case of good intentions and unintended consequences.

Intention: to reduce the transmission of STDs
Unintended consequences: the flight of porn from LA

In this case, the unintended consequence is not hard to see; it's actually quite obvious.

Porn with condoms doesn't sell as well as porn without condoms. Therefore, the porn industry WILL leave and LA will lose whatever tax revenue they get from workers and production.
 
2012-01-11 01:18:40 PM
Always wanted to see a 3 minute money shot streaming from a pinhole in a condom.
 
2012-01-11 01:33:33 PM
MisterRonbo: Yoeman: I don't understand why anyone in that industry would work without one. Nobody likes a case of the pimple-dick, or worse.

Wild guess: for the money.

You think those meat puppets can make demands?


Yeah, dunno what the pay rate is for that, I guess it would depend on the equipment provided. Man, just thinking about it fills me with the urge to bathe in pure bleach!
 
2012-01-11 01:33:45 PM
This is not going to help A2OGM 12 at all.

My poor girlfriend is in for some rough times.
 
2012-01-11 01:34:15 PM
Will they have to wear a condom when they piss on her? Will it be ok to spit on the broom handle before they shove it up some guy's ass? Where is the horse supposed to get a condom?

It's not the laws that bug me, it's the gray area.
 
2012-01-11 01:34:19 PM
Just remember, as long as we take power away from that awful Federal government, state and local governments will always protect our freedoms.

/This is what Ron Paul really believes.
 
2012-01-11 01:36:05 PM
HighOnCraic: Just remember, as long as we take power away from that awful Federal government, state and local governments will always protect our freedoms.

/This is what Ron Paul really believes.


no it isn't
 
2012-01-11 01:37:23 PM
net result: the LA porn industry (and it's tax generating revenue) is moving down the road a little. Congratulations idiots.
 
2012-01-11 01:38:38 PM
Jake Havechek: meh.: As long as this has no effect on lesbian porn...they could make the men wear a suit of armor and I would never know.

I am faithful, to lesbian porn.

Lesbian or girl/girl? I think lesbian porn is flannel shirts and crew cuts.


Is there a gay analog to that? I mean:

"Gay or guy/guy? I think gay porn is assless chaps and leather hats."
 
2012-01-11 01:48:50 PM
Ricardo Klement: "Gay or guy/guy? I think gay porn is assless chaps and leather hats."

You know what they call chaps that aren't assless? Leather pants.
 
2012-01-11 01:48:56 PM
Yoeman: I don't understand why anyone in that industry would work without one. Nobody likes a case of the pimple-dick, or worse.

Unlike prostitution, they can control who is farking who and also test for STD's in the porn industry.

Just my guess.
 
2012-01-11 01:52:35 PM
Yoeman: I don't understand why anyone in that industry would work without one. Nobody likes a case of the pimple-dick, or worse.

Considering the nature of their work the STD rate among mainstream pornstars is remarkably low.

Mandatory testing prior to working makes sense. If you do a good job at keeping out infected individuals condoms are unnecessary.

/Californians seem to have an innate ability to build up profitable industries and then immediately turn around and drive those industries away.
 
2012-01-11 01:54:16 PM
skullkrusher: Ricardo Klement: "Gay or guy/guy? I think gay porn is assless chaps and leather hats."

You know what they call chaps that aren't assless? Leather pants.


It's fun to say, though.

"Assless chaps. Assless chaps. Assless chaps."
 
2012-01-11 01:55:33 PM
3.bp.blogspot.com

RIP
 
2012-01-11 01:55:52 PM
HighOnCraic: Just remember, as long as we take power away from that awful Federal government, state and local governments will always protect our freedoms.

/This is what Ron Paul really believes.


Huh?

A) Ron Paul hasn't really weighed in on bareback porn.
B) As long as this stuff is left to the states people can easily move to avoid onerous regulations. Do this on a national level and what can you do? Renounce your citizenship? That's a bit extreme.
C) this *is* a local issue that shouldn't be handled on the national level and doesn't really constitute a major violation of the constitution.
 
Displayed 50 of 84 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »