baka-san: All lies tied to stats misinterpreted by a fembot pretending to be a femputer!

Nonsense, women are recovering because of good fundamentals. Recovery comes from character, real situations. Not abstract craziness

miss diminutive: baka-san: All lies tied to stats misinterpreted by a fembot pretending to be a femputer!

Nonsense, women are recovering because of good fundamentals. Recovery comes from character, real situations. Not abstract craziness

Whatever, they still can't dunk.

baka-san: All lies tied to stats misinterpreted by a fembot pretending to be a femputer!

Awesome. I was just looking for a picture and a quote from that episode, heh heh.

So, this is about the prostitution trade then?

/dnrtfa

FTA: "Finally, women moved into the black at the end of 2011," said Joan Entmacher

I've seen that porno...

Yet no one talks about the Nigcession

I guess I'm not understanding what she's saying here.

Women didn't lose as many jobs during the recession, so it took them longer to create more jobs for women?


I'm confused.

yeah, wait until you hear the "I feel bloated" crap. then it's all down hill again.

Unavailable for comment.

/hot

Subby, you just lost your right to internet. Please turn over your keyboard and sit in the corner while you think about what you've done.

Wtf am I reading.

Why is this article stupid?

altinos: FTA: "Finally, women moved into the black at the end of 2011," said Joan Entmacher

I've seen that porno...

And it usually means the pornstar is leaving the industry.

I only read a few sentances and I feel dummr 4 it.

Was/is there a transcession, leading to a transcovery?

Although researchers couldn't pinpoint a definitive reason for why women didn't see job gains in the early stages of recovery

I wonder if it could be the fact that . . .

The Great Recession of 2007-09 included job losses that were so much greater for men than for women that some dubbed it the "mancession."

You don't really get to biatch about not being hired when you already have a job.

I imagine the, presumably paid, female writer of this likes to drive by the unemployment office and scowl at all the men, thinking about all the hypothetical jobs they may one day have and how unfair it is to her as a womyn.

meat0918: Men lost their jobs at a faster clip than women during the massive layoffs. Now that the recession is over and hiring is picking up, men are being hired back faster than women.

If you look at who was laid off most, it was in businesses dominated by men in the first place, things like construction and manufacturing. Now that those businesses are rehiring, of course more men are going to be hired back. You fired more of them to begin with and the pool of candidates is larger that than of fired women.

Why this is being spun the way this article spins it is saddening.

Proving the perpetual victimhood of women is a full time job, and feminists take it very seriously.

Only a feminist, with over 6 million fewer people working, could say the recovery has been good for women.

. . . the hell?

Sticky Hands: miss diminutive: baka-san: All lies tied to stats misinterpreted by a fembot pretending to be a femputer!

Nonsense, women are recovering because of good fundamentals. Recovery comes from character, real situations. Not abstract craziness

Whatever, they still can't dunk.

Somehow I doubt she had much to say about it when it was men getting their lives destroyed.

Hey ladies; you know that "math is hard" stereotype you all hate?
This article is not doing you any favors.

ph0rk: Somehow I doubt she had much to say about it when it was men getting their lives destroyed.

it's hard to talk when you are maliciously cackling with glee.

How can there not be enough work for women?

Have we run out of sammiches to make?

meat0918: Men lost their jobs at a faster clip than women during the massive layoffs. Now that the recession is over and hiring is picking up, men are being hired back faster than women.

If you look at who was laid off most, it was in businesses dominated by men in the first place, things like construction and manufacturing. Now that those businesses are rehiring, of course more men are going to be hired back. You fired more of them to begin with and the pool of candidates is larger that than of fired women.

Why this is being spun the way this article spins it is saddening.

Yeah, funny how MSLSD works, i'nit?

meanmutton: Sticky Hands: miss diminutive: baka-san: All lies tied to stats misinterpreted by a fembot pretending to be a femputer!

Nonsense, women are recovering because of good fundamentals. Recovery comes from character, real situations. Not abstract craziness

Whatever, they still can't dunk.

[1.bp.blogspot.com image 214x320]

Is that pic from a boys 8th grade team?

Most city champion boys HS teams would rout the WNBA champions.

/I feel better now

REAL men never left the work force because - conveniently enough - once you have no job, you're no longer a real man.

/remember children: money is not just religion, it's sex, too

Jobs recovery? I was told he died.

I see this woman is gearing up for a political run.

Numbers simplified for the women who may read:

100 men lose their jobs
40 women lose their jobs

40 men are re-hired
20 women are re-hired

Women are SO BEING OPPRESSED HERE! MEN ARE BEING HIRED BACK AT TWICE THE RATE OF WOMEN! fark MEN, WE DON'T NEED THEIR D*CKS AND WE CAN GET THEIR SPERM FROM OUR GIRLFRIENDS - the gay guys.

/my apologies to actual women

Jakamo: What about the shemaleaggeddon?
The he-shecession?
Are they just to be forgotten? If being featured on FARK is a job, then clearly, no.

G-d informs the leaders of the world's nations that he will end the world tomorrow.

The next day, the Wall Street Journal bears the headline, "World Ends Today, Market to Close Early."

The Jerusalem Post reads, "World Ends Today, Islamic Terrorism to End."

The Washington Post: "World to End, Women and Children Most Affected."

And the New York Times top headline: "World to End Today, Minorities Hardest Hit."

female employment creeping back up?

glad to hear Jimmy John's is hiring.

Fortunately since women only earn 77% of what men do they can afford it more easily.

skepticultist: meat0918: Men lost their jobs at a faster clip than women during the massive layoffs. Now that the recession is over and hiring is picking up, men are being hired back faster than women.

If you look at who was laid off most, it was in businesses dominated by men in the first place, things like construction and manufacturing. Now that those businesses are rehiring, of course more men are going to be hired back. You fired more of them to begin with and the pool of candidates is larger that than of fired women.

Why this is being spun the way this article spins it is saddening.

Proving the perpetual victimhood of women is a full time job, and feminists take it very seriously.

0/10

imprimere: /my apologies to actual women

Never apologize to a woman. It shows weakness.

Bagelox-99: imprimere: /my apologies to actual women

Never apologize to a woman. It shows weakness.

Heh. And just how do you get laid?

imprimere: Bagelox-99: imprimere: /my apologies to actual women

Never apologize to a woman. It shows weakness.

Heh. And just how do you get laid?

Not through weakness, obviously.

I find the "email the author" link and send something gratuitously insulting. Other people's pain gives me strength.

lazyguineapig33: has anyone else gotten to the point where if the article was written by a woman then you just close the window?

I've gotten to the point where if its about women I just plain don't read it. Unless its about women taking their clothes off, I don't farking care anymore. Too much crying wolf.

After years of being beaten over the head with this crap, I've decided that the feminists are right. They win. I give up: Clearly women are the weaker sex, and clearly women will never be able to accomplish anything unless men help them do it. Fine, feminists! You win! I admit it: Women can only get ahead if men let them. In fair competition, women will always lose to men, so men have to metaphorically tie an arm behind their back so women won't feel like the losers they so clearly are.

That was the point the feminists were making, right?

If feminists ever had a point, do you think for a minute that we would ever have let them make it?