If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Athens Banner Herald)   In response to Georgia plan to drug-test welfare recipients, state lawmaker submits bill to require drug testing for state legislators. Hilarity ensues   (onlineathens.com) divider line 39
    More: Followup, welfare recipients, quizes, Department of Human Services, legislative session, drug tests, welfare, Georgia General Assembly  
•       •       •

28314 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Jan 2012 at 12:45 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



Voting Results (Funniest)
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


Archived thread
2012-01-09 12:31:24 PM
17 votes:
MaudlinMutantMollusk: I think I'd be happier if legislators were IQ tested before being sworn in

Why bother? We already know the results would come back negative.
2012-01-09 12:54:59 PM
7 votes:
I'm all for drug testing. Which one do I get to test first?
2012-01-09 12:22:38 PM
5 votes:
I think I'd be happier if legislators were IQ tested before being sworn in
2012-01-09 12:20:05 PM
4 votes:
I fully support mandatory drug testing of legislators. they should also wear one of those ankle monitoring bracelets we put on criminals. hey - they're important people, right? we need to know where they are at all times in case of terrorism or something.
2012-01-09 12:55:03 PM
3 votes:
Fark this story.... go to the sidebar!

i293.photobucket.com
2012-01-09 01:10:30 PM
2 votes:
LasersHurt: /I do not know why I'm talking to a troll, but here we are, aren't we.

I think of it as "attention welfare". You really need to stop giving him free comments, maybe he'd get off his ass and say something productive.
2012-01-09 12:59:18 PM
2 votes:
Jack Black 62: jayhawk88: Jack Black 62: Just end all forms of welfare and we won't have these problems.

Exactly. We'll have a whole slate of new, more interesting problems.

What people working for a change or dying off?


Children starving to death is FREEDOOOOOOOOM!
2012-01-09 12:51:18 PM
2 votes:
gwydion56: As a Georgia voter, I will be writing my lawmakers to push for passage of this bill, and lobby for stopping the paychecks of those who fail.

What is good for the goose...


This makes two of us, then. I would have loved to see the results from McKinney.
2012-01-09 12:48:47 PM
2 votes:
incendi: MaudlinMutantMollusk: I think I'd be happier if legislators were IQ tested before being sworn in

Why bother? We already know the results would come back negative.


3.bp.blogspot.com
2012-01-09 11:35:49 AM
2 votes:
Mandating drug tests to catch the 4-5 people who are actually using drugs = Cool!

Mandating vaccines to eradicate diseases and possibly save lives = Socialism!
2012-01-09 10:35:33 AM
2 votes:
Hold legislators accountable? Ha ha ha. Good one!
2012-01-10 02:01:56 AM
1 votes:
sonnymaou must be an alt of armoredbulldozer.
2012-01-10 01:04:19 AM
1 votes:
sonnymaou: I have admitted time and again in this thread that the single mom down on her luck after losing a husband and job and raising kids has been shat on by life and the compassionate thing for me to do- ME, not anybody else... ME- is to help her out. I do so gladly without governmental force.

You realize that tipping a dancer at the local strip joint isn't actually considered charity, right?
2012-01-09 05:55:12 PM
1 votes:
Mrtraveler01: What the hell did I just step into?

You've just crossed over into the Derp-light Zone.
2012-01-09 05:42:42 PM
1 votes:
Biological Ali: MrSid: lennavan: You think this bill is liberalism? You think liberals are for drug testing people to get their welfare checks? Wow, you're either misguided yourself, or a ... well I'll stick with misguided.

I think that more governmental oversight in the lives of the population is liberal. Yes. You need to get out of the democrat vs. republican funk and into the conservative vs liberal realm where I am.

Gay marriage bans and restrictions on abortion also represent "governmental oversight in the lives of the population". I suppose you believe liberals are responsible for that as well?


I believe that it is a liberal philosophy to ban gays from marrying each other. Like I said I have no problem accusing republicans of having liberal ideas when it suits them. This is why I dropped my affiliation with them. I know a few conservative democrats and a few liberal republicans, GET OFF THE PARTY IDEAS AND START TALKING IDEOLOGY!!!
2012-01-09 05:30:34 PM
1 votes:
Sergeant Grumbles: sonnymaou: My first few years of college were completed because of them.

Why is it the biggest assholes always had their parents pay for college?


Libertarian types always seem to be the people who had everything paid for by everyone. I really did the bootstrappy thing and now I'm a socialist...
2012-01-09 05:11:21 PM
1 votes:
sonnymaou: I'm teaching compassion. The part about Juan being worthless is for them to learn through experience and observation. (Dog eat dog, survival of fittest, etc...) Dude, at least be consistent in your worldview.

Also, I have no contempt for the poor. My parents were poor, but worked hard. My first few years of college were completed because of them. Now they are experiencing the benefits of raising a good kid. Or so I like to think. (Oh, and they never suckled the government teat. Gods bless 'em!)


Hahahahahahaha (gasp) hahahahahahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHA... (wheeze)

Oh man, that was REALLY funny!

You really think you kids will not catch on to your callousness and double standards? You really think they won't grasp that you are only compassionate to people who meet your standards, and sneer at many others as worthless. You really think they won't notice you doing that, and recognize it for the gross hypocrisy it is?! Really?!

And you honestly think that as poor people, nothing the government did helped you and your folks and it was all bootstrappiness?! Holy FSM, you're delusional!
2012-01-09 04:33:23 PM
1 votes:
Garbonzo42: sonnymaou: TFerWannaBe: Sally needs the money - she is 100% likely to use it and then spread around the benefit... Even if you and I use it is less beneficial to us than to Sally and her family - $20 to us doesn't mean very much because we have a good, solid income and balance. For Sally that's a good chunk of her grocery budget and she can't easily replace it. Sally gets more benefit from the same amount of money because she is less able to get more.

I'm so glad somebody finally brought this up, because it kills your argument.

Sally's not the only one! There are more and more of them every day.

Multiply that tiny $20 by... what? Hundreds of thousands? Millions?

Or, split that $20 between thousands (or more)... too small to make a difference, so we... what? Take more? And more... until what? Nobody has anything left to give the nanny state.

You see clearly, now, right?

Oh god! This slope! It's so slippery!


He also busted out North Korea earlier. It's like he lives in the side of a K-Y Jelly volcano.
2012-01-09 03:59:47 PM
1 votes:
sonnymaou: qorkfiend: sonnymaou: When I contribute to Sally's upkeep, she's the sole beneficiary.

Yeah, you don't benefit at all from having Sally be a healthy, productive member of society.

Thank you! We finally agree. Man, that wasn't so hard, was it?!

Psst, there is a part of the population we wouldn't miss if they were gone. I'm just being a realist. Gods love 'em and all that.


Conservatives?
2012-01-09 03:48:20 PM
1 votes:
YoungSwedishBlonde: Teabaggers consider all taxation "theft". More at 11.

As long as the money goes toward thing they want, like wars and other white people (not just any kind of white people... just white people like "them"), I don't think they have a problem with taxes as a concept. The issue is that 'baggers think all their money is going to high school dropout LaQueefa Bonifa Chicana Moreno Jackson to support her eleventy kids by twelvety fathers, while she drives around in her brand new Mercedes with twenty inch RRIIIIIIIIIMMMMMZZZZZZZZ to the grocery store, buying STEAKZ and SKRIMPS with her EBT card. She's got a refrigerator and a tv too, and heat, and actually lives INDOORS... how dare she get any of MY money (huff huff huff aneurysm)!!!!

Yes, it's stupid. That why they are 'baggers.
2012-01-09 03:07:20 PM
1 votes:
Philip Francis Queeg: sonnymaou: Philip Francis Queeg: When you pay your taxes you are paying to protect you in the form of welfare programs too.

But I don't want to. I have a retirement account that will let me live comfortably, even if I become disabled today. I'm FORCED to pay into government welfare.

See how that works?

BUZZZZZ! Try again.

How is that different than the Fire Department or the military then? What if I don't want to pay for those? Should I be forced to pay for them?

It's good to know that nothing could ever possibly happen to your retirement account and that it's so incredibly safe that you could never need any kind of help from society.


I've made this point before, and I will make it again: What happens if we allow people to simply exempt themselves from society? That means they pay no taxes, may use nothing that is publicly-owned and gain no protection of law. They wander in to the Department of Randroids office, sign a tihng, and then walk out and someone shoots them in the face and steals their shiat. Well, hey, no protection of law, right? I guess it's open season.

That's what these toolboxes are asking for with their "taxation is theft" rhetoric. Walk it back from that edge, though, and suddenly they have to actually defend their policy ideas on their merits instead of on some asinine pseudo-philosophical point, and that's much harder because their ideas have no merit.
2012-01-09 02:17:51 PM
1 votes:
advex101: I have been told that one of the problems with legalizing the use of marijuana is that at the moment they only have to prove use. If it becomes legal they would have to prove intoxication. Remember, there is a legal limit for alcohol. They would have to come up with some arbitrary (and demonstrable) value to say that you were impaired. Pot may be detectable in your system for quite a while even though you are by no means intoxicted or impaired. What fun we will have.

It's simple. Just ask the suspect "what is the meaning of life." If they go into a long rambling speech about the cosmic universal conscious, they are impaired. Or a liberal arts major. Either way, lock 'em up.
2012-01-09 02:10:37 PM
1 votes:
FarkedOver: Jack Black 62: Gergesa: Jack Black 62: Gergesa: Jack Black 62: Just end all forms of welfare and we won't have these problems.

If we just shoot all the poor people there won't be any poor!!

Or, you could be nice and support them through charity.

That's a great idea. The poor should be subject to the whimsical generosity of others. Everday should be a harrowing adventure in wondering if people were willing to give enough to feed those who need assistance.

I see. You would rather put a gun to someone's head and force them to take care of others.

You're absolutely right. We need to cut off all assistance to anyone. I mean there are a plethora of jobs and positions out there waiting to be filled! It's not like when desperate people get even more desperate bad things happen.


Desperate people never cause any problems. Its unheard of. They just chill out and nothing more costly in the long run ever happens.
2012-01-09 02:05:31 PM
1 votes:
Philip Francis Queeg: Or, you could be nice and support them through charity.

Philip Francis Queeg: Jack Black 62: Gergesa: Jack Black 62: Gergesa: Jack Black 62: Just end all forms of welfare and we won't have these problems.

If we just shoot all the poor people there won't be any poor!!

Or, you could be nice and support them through charity.

That's a great idea. The poor should be subject to the whimsical generosity of others. Everday should be a harrowing adventure in wondering if people were willing to give enough to feed those who need assistance.

I see. You would rather put a gun to someone's head and force them to take care of others.

Do you want to put a gun to peoples heads to make them pay for roads, sewers, police and fire protection, the military, the judicial system....?


No. Those things should be private as well, and voluntary.
2012-01-09 01:58:33 PM
1 votes:
stappawho: who, like welfare recipients, are the recipients of taxpayers' dollars

As a Fed employee, I do actually work for my pay.


DEATH TO ALL FED EMPLOYEES!!!*

*Hyperbolic humor. No intent to riot nor incite riot nor incite murder.
2012-01-09 01:36:28 PM
1 votes:
Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.

All here? Good. Go f*ck yourselves. This is America.
2012-01-09 01:08:35 PM
1 votes:
advex101: I have been told that one of the problems with legalizing the use of marijuana is that at the moment they only have to prove use. If it becomes legal they would have to prove intoxication. Remember, there is a legal limit for alcohol. They would have to come up with some arbitrary (and demonstrable) value to say that you were impaired. Pot may be detectable in your system for quite a while even though you are by no means intoxicted or impaired. What fun we will have.

That's easy. They just leave you alone with a can of Mountain Dew, a bag of Funyons and a box of Hostess Ho Ho's and tell you that you are free to go if you don't eat or drink any of them.
2012-01-09 01:08:22 PM
1 votes:
There's no defending this. I'm a registered republican but with all the crap going on in the State and Federal legistlatures I'm starting to seriously think about dropping that social stigma. My problem is liberalism has it all wrong on the national level. On one hand, liberals will take most of what I earn and dammit, that's mine. On the other hand, republicans keep pulling douchebag morality out of their collective azzes and sponser yet another bill telling me what I can and can't do with my own friggin body.

I'm in such a quandry, help me Kazan!
2012-01-09 01:07:58 PM
1 votes:
OneTimed: Why does noone ever point out that urinalysis is for the most part only useful in testing for THC? Most of the other actually dangerous drugs are out of your system within a few days while THC can stick around for a month or more.

I always found it funny when someone in the military would pop for cocaine, on a Wednesday, and try to claim that "it was just one time" or "someone spiked my whatever." I'm sorry, dude, but you have cocaine in your system on a Wednesday morning... nobody does coke on a Tuesday by accident or for the first time. Tuesday night is "fiend night." Cocaine is also a 100% criminal product; there's no way that in addition to breaking mil regulations that such users aren't fueling an entirely murderous, criminal machine.

Weed on the other hand, yeah that's much longer-lasting, yet can be sourced from non-murderous-gang growers.
2012-01-09 01:04:49 PM
1 votes:
Well, bless his satiric little soul!

Mass drug tests are intrusive without being effective. As a general rule, laws should not impose a heavy burden on the innocent and should not fail to efficiently and effectively impose a cost on the guilty due to lack of enforceability. I'd sooner see some of the guilty escape than everybody rounded up and treated like cattle. Some law-and-order types are just the opposite.

Cattle, by the way, are very likely NOT drug-tested en masse thanks to the laissez-faire, laissez-passer zeal of the cattle, packing, and agro-industrial industries.
2012-01-09 01:02:13 PM
1 votes:
Jack Black 62: Philip Francis Queeg: Jack Black 62: jayhawk88: Jack Black 62: Just end all forms of welfare and we won't have these problems.

Exactly. We'll have a whole slate of new, more interesting problems.

What people working for a change or dying off?

Children starving to death is FREEDOOOOOOOOM!

Or, you could help them by being charitable.


Or we can all help them by acting like a First World nation.
2012-01-09 01:01:40 PM
1 votes:
Jack Black 62: Or, you could be nice and support them through charity.

That'll never work. Since I'm too busy buying iPads and fancy coffee, I don't donate, therefore I will vote for people who promise to take more money in taxes from others.
2012-01-09 12:59:28 PM
1 votes:
You have the right to food money
As long as you don't mind a little
Investigation.
Humiliation.
And it has been suggested in some quarters
REHABILITATION!
2012-01-09 12:57:48 PM
1 votes:
Gergesa: Jack Black 62: Just end all forms of welfare and we won't have these problems.

If we just shoot all the poor people there won't be any poor!!


Or, you could be nice and support them through charity.
2012-01-09 12:55:46 PM
1 votes:
Think of all the people you know who never touched drugs. Now, think of them as the ones in complete control of government.

Douches ruling the world.
2012-01-09 12:54:51 PM
1 votes:
I forget what the exact figures were but I think rick scott might regret pushing it through. I believe it the cost was quite a few million to implement and the results showed that almost none of the recipients were on drugs.

On another level, it seems as though it is really mean spirited. You are poor? You want some money? Get on your knees and beg for it!!! Down I say!! Lower!!! Prostrate yourself before me and lick the floor!!!
2012-01-09 12:50:28 PM
1 votes:
Where's the farking hero tag?!
2012-01-09 12:49:55 PM
1 votes:
Jack Black 62: Just end all forms of welfare and we won't have these problems.

We can start with ending corporate welfare as a test case. If that goes well we can move on to eliminating other forms of welfare.
2012-01-09 12:47:50 PM
1 votes:
Just end all forms of welfare and we won't have these problems.
 
Displayed 39 of 39 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report