If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(BBC) Asinine It seems nobody can spare $2 million a year to find out if we're alone in the Universe   (bbc.co.uk) divider line 40
More: Asinine, SETI Institute, radio signals, universe, Seth Shostak, Allen Telescope Array, Arecibo Radio Telescope, Larry Niven, ETS  
•       •       •

2541 clicks; posted to Geek » on 09 Jan 2012 at 9:59 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



40 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2012-01-09 09:57:40 AM
Brother, can you spare a gold-pressed bar of latinum?
 
2012-01-09 10:09:40 AM
There is life on other planets. The sheer number of planets in the universe makes it a statistical near-impossibility for there not to be.

Now, for that life to be sophisticated enough to send intentional signals out into space, and for them to be close enough for us to intercept those signals, and for this to occur during the short period of time where life on earth can decipher them, is highly unlikely.

For them to have actually traveled here and visited us, even more unlikely.
 
2012-01-09 10:24:24 AM
Twigz221: For them to have actually traveled here and visited us, even more unlikely.

Never underestimate the intergalactic draw of anal probing.
 
2012-01-09 10:24:27 AM
Twigz221: There is life on other planets. The sheer number of planets in the universe makes it a statistical near-impossibility for there not to be.

Now, for that life to be sophisticated enough to send intentional signals out into space, and for them to be close enough for us to intercept those signals, and for this to occur during the short period of time where life on earth can decipher them, is highly unlikely.

For them to have actually traveled here and visited us, even more unlikely.


All true, *EXCEPT* for the 'intentional signals out into space'. We've been radiating significant signals for decades, most of which aren't intentionally aimed at space, they just incidentally 'leak' into space. Some of them are quite powerful, too.
 
2012-01-09 10:27:39 AM
dittybopper: Twigz221: There is life on other planets. The sheer number of planets in the universe makes it a statistical near-impossibility for there not to be.

Now, for that life to be sophisticated enough to send intentional signals out into space, and for them to be close enough for us to intercept those signals, and for this to occur during the short period of time where life on earth can decipher them, is highly unlikely.

For them to have actually traveled here and visited us, even more unlikely.

All true, *EXCEPT* for the 'intentional signals out into space'. We've been radiating significant signals for decades, most of which aren't intentionally aimed at space, they just incidentally 'leak' into space. Some of them are quite powerful, too.


i39.tinypic.com
 
2012-01-09 10:28:42 AM
$2 million dollars? To search fer aliens?

What kinda commie Dumbocrat libtard are you, Subby? Everyone knows that we're alone in the universe cause God created us! It says so right in the Bible!
 
2012-01-09 10:37:21 AM
Someone should spread the rumor that their research could be used to find more effective ways of killing brown people. They'd need buckets to catch all the money.
 
2012-01-09 10:38:25 AM
For someone who knows more about this:

What happens if we find life out there? If we discover life on a planet that is too far away to visit/signal does that information really help us/ is it worth the millions spent to find it?
 
2012-01-09 10:42:02 AM
SETI is a scam anyway. Conditions have to be near perfect, to an incredibly high order of improbability for us to detect another sentient species.

Consider:

1. In order to reach Earth with a radio signal, it has to be very high-powered and pointed precisely at us
2. Technologically, radio usage will probably only represent a small period of time in our civilization (or any hypothetical aliens' civilization). More likely, we will use some sort of quantum entanglement-based form of communication in the future, removing the limitations of the speed of light and interference from cosmic radiation.
3. In the spans of time we are talking about, we have had radio for a little over a 100 years... out of BILLIONS. We would have to catch those hypothetical aliens at the precise point in their technological development that they were using radio and transmitting a high-powered signal directly at us, in a way that it reached us within our own window of radio usage.

It's also probably NOT a good idea to broadcast your presence to a universe that is a very hostile environment.... announcing your planet's viability to support life to hypothetical aliens that might not be friendly "E.T." type aliens... not that I believe our planet's broadcasts are all that discernible from cosmic background noise beyond our own Oort Cloud.

I also have a hard time believing the scientists behind SETI do not comprehend this, which brings to mind all sorts of scenarios as to why they are pushing this deception on the public, ranging from a simple money scam to interstellar conspiracy.
 
2012-01-09 10:43:43 AM
Carth: What happens if we find life out there? If we discover life on a planet that is too far away to visit/signal does that information really help us/ is it worth the millions spent to find it?

Probably depends on what you think mankind is capable of achieving. In time we'll likely develop interstellar flight, but if we knew there was life out there you can bet it would happen a lot sooner.
 
2012-01-09 10:47:33 AM
Carth: For someone who knows more about this:

What happens if we find life out there? If we discover life on a planet that is too far away to visit/signal does that information really help us/ is it worth the millions spent to find it?


I came here to mention this. There are several problems with the whole SETI concept. The first is the idea that can be best explained with the analogy of the two people trying to communicate here on Earth. Let's say we're both standing 100 miles apart in the middle of a desert. As a given, we're told there is someone out there but we have no idea what direction. Secondly, at our disposal, we have several different communication devices. Each device has different frequencies and channels they operate on. What are the chances we're going to select the same medium and same frequency, and same method of communication while randomly choosing the same direction so that we're facing each other? Aside from that, let's say we get a signal. No we've come to your point. So what? I think most intelligent people believe there is life in other areas of the universe. The money is better spent getting out there to see if we can find it. (More importantly, getting off this life raft we call Earth so all our eggs aren't in one basket, so to speak.)
 
2012-01-09 10:51:35 AM
You want to know how to contact other intelligent life in the universe? It's really quiet simple. Set up an outpost at the center of the galaxy. Everyone is going to want to check out the center eventually. Just make sure you're there to meet them when they do.
 
2012-01-09 10:52:27 AM
I am sure there is a joke involving femalien in this somewhere.
 
2012-01-09 10:53:11 AM
Old enough to know better: Someone should spread the rumor that their research could be used to find more effective ways of killing brown people. They'd need buckets to catch all the money.

FTFY. Killing is an age old business, and it's colorblind:

"In 1882 I was in Vienna, where I met an American whom I had known in the States. He said: 'Hang your chemistry and electricity! If you want to make a pile of money, invent something that will enable these Europeans to cut each others' throats with greater facility.'" - Hiram Stevens Maxim, inventor of the Maxim gun, used to great effect in WWI.
 
2012-01-09 10:57:22 AM
LesserEvil: 2. Technologically, radio usage will probably only represent a small period of time in our civilization (or any hypothetical aliens' civilization). More likely, we will use some sort of quantum entanglement-based form of communication in the future, removing the limitations of the speed of light and interference from cosmic radiation.

Quantum entanglement doesn't work that way. You get the 'spooky action at a distance', but you can't actually *USE* it to transmit information FTL.
 
2012-01-09 11:01:38 AM
dittybopper: Quantum entanglement doesn't work that way. You get the 'spooky action at a distance', but you can't actually *USE* it to transmit information FTL.

You can in Mass Effect 2, so it must be true.
 
2012-01-09 11:04:11 AM
dittybopper: LesserEvil: 2. Technologically, radio usage will probably only represent a small period of time in our civilization (or any hypothetical aliens' civilization). More likely, we will use some sort of quantum entanglement-based form of communication in the future, removing the limitations of the speed of light and interference from cosmic radiation.

Quantum entanglement doesn't work that way. You get the 'spooky action at a distance', but you can't actually *USE* it to transmit information FTL.


Yet
 
2012-01-09 11:08:41 AM
You know, instead of searching for intelligent live out there, maybe they should search for it back here. Heavens knows some countries/parties could do with some intelligence in leadership positions
 
2012-01-09 11:10:44 AM
Twigz221: There is life on other planets.

without evidence you gotta have faith I guess.
 
2012-01-09 11:15:08 AM
itsdan: Carth: What happens if we find life out there? If we discover life on a planet that is too far away to visit/signal does that information really help us/ is it worth the millions spent to find it?

Probably depends on what you think mankind is capable of achieving. In time we'll likely develop interstellar flight, but if we knew there was life out there you can bet it would happen a lot sooner.


That is true I guess if we find something it could be used as a motivator. I just think we spend so little on space exploration the 2 million a year could be better used on other projects/research until interstellar travel is a real possibility.
 
2012-01-09 11:16:24 AM
magic_patch: dittybopper: LesserEvil: 2. Technologically, radio usage will probably only represent a small period of time in our civilization (or any hypothetical aliens' civilization). More likely, we will use some sort of quantum entanglement-based form of communication in the future, removing the limitations of the speed of light and interference from cosmic radiation.

Quantum entanglement doesn't work that way. You get the 'spooky action at a distance', but you can't actually *USE* it to transmit information FTL.

Yet


You let me know when you figure out how to transmit information that way, because as a ham, I'd be interested in a new mode like that.

I'm not going to hold my breath waiting, however.
 
2012-01-09 12:24:16 PM
Twigz221: There is life on other planets. The sheer number of planets in the universe makes it a statistical near-impossibility for there not to be.
That fact (sheer number of planets) alone isn't enough to claim any statistical near-impossibility, without having at least a ballpark idea of the probability of life arising. Assume a million planets (I know there's much more), and the probability of life arising on a planet is 1 in 10 million. In that case we could be it, and even we got lucky.
 
2012-01-09 12:51:41 PM
With the human race barely even being in space, do we honestly want to find anyone right now? Hippies don't like it but shouldn't we have some sort of military presence in space before we start calling out in the jungle? Anyone that could actually make the journey here would roflstomp us.

/I'm sure all aliens are super cute and just want hugs.
 
2012-01-09 12:53:24 PM
Twigz221: There is life on other planets. The sheer number of planets in the universe makes it a statistical near-impossibility for there not to be.

Now, for that life to be sophisticated enough to send intentional signals out into space, and for them to be close enough for us to intercept those signals, and for this to occur during the short period of time where life on earth can decipher them, is highly unlikely.

For them to have actually traveled here and visited us, even more unlikely.


Your reasoning makes no sense... If you are going to cite the sheer astronomical numbers of planets as the belief in other life, then by the same token, there are enough planets for there to be sophisticated life.

Me? I don't believe it till i see it. There are millions and millions of grains of sand on earth, but the sheer number doesn't mean that some of them can walk and talk.
 
2012-01-09 01:05:39 PM
LesserEvil: I also have a hard time believing the scientists behind SETI do not comprehend this, which brings to mind all sorts of scenarios as to why they are pushing this deception on the public, ranging from a simple money scam to interstellar conspiracy.

Yes, because if there's one word I'd use to describe SETI scientists, it's "greedy". Those money-grubbing scientists... excuse me, I mean "scientists" do nothing all day except sit on their yachts, living off the hard work of others.

They need money for equipment to do their work. That, and whatever it takes to buy ramen noodles and diet-Rite for a few years. If it's a scam, it's pretty elaborate considering their work is reviewed constantly by peers and amateur-enthusiasts. Or are they all in on it too? These are people who believe in what they do. Yes, I know it's hard to comprehend beliefs that don't come from a holy book, but they do exist.
 
2012-01-09 01:45:13 PM
RobotSpider: LesserEvil: I also have a hard time believing the scientists behind SETI do not comprehend this, which brings to mind all sorts of scenarios as to why they are pushing this deception on the public, ranging from a simple money scam to interstellar conspiracy.

Yes, because if there's one word I'd use to describe SETI scientists, it's "greedy". Those money-grubbing scientists... excuse me, I mean "scientists" do nothing all day except sit on their yachts, living off the hard work of others.

They need money for equipment to do their work. That, and whatever it takes to buy ramen noodles and diet-Rite for a few years. If it's a scam, it's pretty elaborate considering their work is reviewed constantly by peers and amateur-enthusiasts. Or are they all in on it too? These are people who believe in what they do. Yes, I know it's hard to comprehend beliefs that don't come from a holy book, but they do exist.


I have no idea what the deal is, only that, in the most practical sense, SETI's objectives are pretty much impossible to achieve. You'll note I talked about "a range" of possibilities.

I have nothing against scientists getting money for worthwhile research, but SETI has glaring logical issues that no honest scientist can ignore, which brings to question what, exactly, is the whole charade about? Is it a distraction? Is it covering up something else?

It seemed cool when I was child, but SETI's methods don't stand up to the most simple logical examination as an adult. There are likely other methods that we can use to determine the existence of intelligent life out in the stars.
 
2012-01-09 01:57:56 PM
T.rex: Twigz221: There is life on other planets. The sheer number of planets in the universe makes it a statistical near-impossibility for there not to be.

Now, for that life to be sophisticated enough to send intentional signals out into space, and for them to be close enough for us to intercept those signals, and for this to occur during the short period of time where life on earth can decipher them, is highly unlikely.

For them to have actually traveled here and visited us, even more unlikely.

Your reasoning makes no sense... If you are going to cite the sheer astronomical numbers of planets as the belief in other life, then by the same token, there are enough planets for there to be sophisticated life.

Me? I don't believe it till i see it. There are millions and millions of grains of sand on earth, but the sheer number doesn't mean that some of them can walk and talk.


Except one grain of sand (earth) that apparently can walk and talk. So you argument is more "just because there is one grain of sand that can walk and talk doesn't mean any of the billion other ones like it can."
 
2012-01-09 02:02:09 PM
dittybopper: Quantum entanglement doesn't work that way. You get the 'spooky action at a distance', but you can't actually *USE* it to transmit information FTL.

Yet

You let me know when you figure out how to transmit information that way, because as a ham, I'd be interested in a new mode like that.

I'm not going to hold my breath waiting, however.


One thing to keep in mind is that the hypothetical ability to transmit information faster than light creates weird paradoxes and causality violations, similar to the more familiar problems involved with hypothetical time travel. Einstein figured this out (new window) over a hundred years ago. Basically, if you're able to transmit information faster than the speed of light, you can wind up with situations where the transmissions are received before they are sent, depending on your inertial frame of reference. This can, of course, lead to information-based versions of the grandfather paradox.

In a broader sense, I guess this is not definitive proof that FTL communication is impossible, but "paradox implies impossibility" does seem like a pretty handy rule from where I sit.
 
2012-01-09 02:16:34 PM
Martian_Astronomer: dittybopper: Quantum entanglement doesn't work that way. You get the 'spooky action at a distance', but you can't actually *USE* it to transmit information FTL.

Yet

You let me know when you figure out how to transmit information that way, because as a ham, I'd be interested in a new mode like that.

I'm not going to hold my breath waiting, however.

One thing to keep in mind is that the hypothetical ability to transmit information faster than light creates weird paradoxes and causality violations, similar to the more familiar problems involved with hypothetical time travel. Einstein figured this out (new window) over a hundred years ago. Basically, if you're able to transmit information faster than the speed of light, you can wind up with situations where the transmissions are received before they are sent, depending on your inertial frame of reference. This can, of course, lead to information-based versions of the grandfather paradox.

In a broader sense, I guess this is not definitive proof that FTL communication is impossible, but "paradox implies impossibility" does seem like a pretty handy rule from where I sit.


Exactly.
 
2012-01-09 03:03:38 PM
The ATA just makes the observations. It can be used for both SETI and hard science. Fund the damn thing.

T.rex
There are millions and millions of grains of sand on earth, but the sheer number doesn't mean that some of them can walk and talk.

The difference is that sand grains never "walk and talk" as they have no mechanism to do so. We know that stars and planets have a mechanism to produce intelligent life. Assuming we are unique seems silly.

LesserEvil

FTL communication is extremely unlikely. Radio will be useful for a decent span of time. Yes, finding intelligent beings elsewhere is unlikely to happen anytime soon. Doesn't mean we shouldn't be ready for when it does happen. It's fairly cheap.

WinoRhino
Aside from that, let's say we get a signal. No we've come to your point. So what?

So what? We'd get a better idea of how much intelligent life there is. At some point, we might be able to communicate. Both seem like good things.

The money is better spent getting out there to see if we can find it. (More importantly, getting off this life raft we call Earth so all our eggs aren't in one basket, so to speak.)

Enh, SETI is significantly cheaper than moving closer. Extending our presence is very important, but probably not because of aliens.
 
2012-01-09 03:43:07 PM
falkone32: LesserEvil

FTL communication is extremely unlikely. Radio will be useful for a decent span of time. Yes, finding intelligent beings elsewhere is unlikely to happen anytime soon. Doesn't mean we shouldn't be ready for when it does happen. It's fairly cheap.


Not only that, but radio waves are useful for things other than communications. Radar is a big one. It's useful to be able to detect objects remotely. No way 'quantum entanglement' is going to help you detect the presence of a rock on a collision course.
 
2012-01-09 04:02:12 PM
Caelistis: $2 million dollars? To search fer aliens?

What kinda commie Dumbocrat libtard are you, Subby? Everyone knows that we're alone in the universe cause God created us! It says so right in the Bible!


5hoursaday.com

"Ah, an alien. One of my father's side projects."
 
2012-01-09 04:37:49 PM
I just want to point out that all you nai-sayers of mathematical probabilities for life outside of this planet are greatly underestimating the numbers at hand.

There are about 200- 400 billion stars in our galaxy alone! and there are about 100- 200 billion galaxies in the view-able universe as we perceive it.

Multiply those numbers together and watch your calculator explode.
 
2012-01-09 04:51:13 PM
We had a billion a week for a war based on a complete lie. What's the farking problem?
 
2012-01-09 06:03:09 PM
so what if we find them and then, they change the channel
 
2012-01-09 06:51:05 PM
tsakali: I just want to point out that all you nai-sayers of mathematical probabilities for life outside of this planet are greatly underestimating the numbers at hand.

There are about 200- 400 billion stars in our galaxy alone! and there are about 100- 200 billion galaxies in the view-able universe as we perceive it.

Multiply those numbers together and watch your calculator explode.


...and all of them are so far out of range to get anything resembling a coherent radio signal that that same calculator will explode even more.

I do believe there are other planets out there with intelligent life, and if it is possible, a significant number of those civilizations have the ability to travel interstellar distances.

I only state that detecting them by trying to sniff out something resembling an artificial pattern in a radio signal is INCREDIBLY unlikely to produce any results.

I would find it far more likely that we discover signs of intelligent life outside of our solar system by detecting constructs (like a partial Dyson Sphere, for example) or engineering on a stellar scale, than by hoping some alien is pointing a high-powered radio transmitter at our podunk system on the odd chance we MIGHT have the ability to detect it, during this very narrow span of time we actually might detect it - particularly keeping in mind that such a signal could take years or centuries to reach here, if it's powerful enough to even reach us.

All of this also assumes that setting up a giant beacon that says "hey look here, intelligent species exist in this system" is a good idea that will never attract the wrong sort of attention. More than a few hard science sci-fi authors and scientists have admitted that our inability to hear anybody may be because it is akin to a wounded deer bleating near a pride of lions.
 
2012-01-09 07:02:38 PM
dittybopper: magic_patch: dittybopper: LesserEvil: 2. Technologically, radio usage will probably only represent a small period of time in our civilization (or any hypothetical aliens' civilization). More likely, we will use some sort of quantum entanglement-based form of communication in the future, removing the limitations of the speed of light and interference from cosmic radiation.

Quantum entanglement doesn't work that way. You get the 'spooky action at a distance', but you can't actually *USE* it to transmit information FTL.

Yet

You let me know when you figure out how to transmit information that way, because as a ham, I'd be interested in a new mode like that.

I'm not going to hold my breath waiting, however.


Quantum Entanglement would be a point-to-point communication technology. In such a topology, it would be akin to the internet, with devices set up as communication hubs, probably, and other devices might provide secure, direct communication between two points.

I suspect a HAM operator might be a bit disappointed in such an infrastructure.
 
2012-01-09 09:25:12 PM
LesserEvil: I suspect a HAM operator might be a bit disappointed in such an infrastructure.

It would have it's uses. We use point-to-point dedicated infrastructure for some things, and if you are talking about communication where conventional photon-based communications would result in a significant lag (say, Earth to a Mars colony*), it would definitely be a plus.

*Many astronauts are hams. There is a ham radio setup on the ISS.
 
2012-01-10 09:19:46 AM
tsakali: I just want to point out that all you nai-sayers of mathematical probabilities for life outside of this planet are greatly underestimating the numbers at hand.

There are about 200- 400 billion stars in our galaxy alone! and there are about 100- 200 billion galaxies in the view-able universe as we perceive it.

Multiply those numbers together and watch your calculator explode.


I think your numbers are the very low end estimate, too. I have seen estimates that say there are 500 billion stars in our galaxy, and 500 billion to a trillion galaxies in the observable universe. The observable universe is constantly growing, too (due to weird laws of physics).
 
2012-01-10 09:52:45 AM
that's like half a septillion stars... and then you'd have to multiply the number of planets (and yes possibly even moons) on each one of those star systems.
 
Displayed 40 of 40 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »