If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Talking Points Memo) Dumbass Rick Perry's campaign death-knell continues on as he announces that he would put troops back into Iraq   (2012.talkingpointsmemo.com) divider line 91
More: Dumbass  
•       •       •

1956 clicks; posted to Politics » on 08 Jan 2012 at 3:52 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



91 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-01-08 01:51:32 AM
You know, Perry, we kind of left unfinished business in Vietnam, too...

/moron.
 
2012-01-08 01:59:12 AM
"We're going to see Iran in my opinion, move back in at literally the speed of light.

Y'know, if Iranians can move at literally the speed of light, I don't think having our ground troops there will make much of a difference.
 
2012-01-08 02:05:47 AM
Are you planning to reinvade? Any thought as to how the Iraqis would respond to that?
 
2012-01-08 02:07:34 AM
Snarfangel: You know, Perry, we kind of left unfinished business in Vietnam, too...

While we're at it, technically, the Korean War never ended...
 
2012-01-08 02:08:13 AM
Nobody cares what Rick Perry says. The powers that be have pronounced Mitt Romney their candidate. Mitt Romney it shall be. All of the rest is just sound and fury signifying nothing. We are a plutocracy. How clear we make it.
 
2012-01-08 02:12:41 AM
Paris1127: Snarfangel: You know, Perry, we kind of left unfinished business in Vietnam, too...

While we're at it, technically, the Korean War never ended...


And you know, Alexander never completely conquered India...
 
2012-01-08 02:17:38 AM
And the deficit explodes with delight.
 
2012-01-08 02:30:11 AM
propasaurus: "We're going to see Iran in my opinion, move back in at literally the speed of light.

Y'know, if Iranians can move at literally the speed of light, I don't think having our ground troops there will make much of a difference.


He's technically correct. If they were to "move back in" we'd see them at the speed of light, since the timing of our seeing them depends on the speed of the light bouncing off them and into our eyes.

/that hurt my brain
 
2012-01-08 02:54:44 AM
propasaurus: "We're going to see Iran in my opinion, move back in at literally the speed of light.
Y'know, if Iranians can move at literally the speed of light, I don't think having our ground troops there will make much of a difference.


Yeah, if they can move at literally the speed of light, I'm curious why they would bother farking around with trying to produce nuclear energy/weapons. It seems like they've already harnessed some pretty awesome sources of energy.
 
2012-01-08 03:58:29 AM
There's just no nice way to say it anymore. Republicans are insane.
 
2012-01-08 04:00:44 AM
Snarfangel: You know, Perry, we kind of left unfinished business in Vietnam, too...

/moron.


Hell, we left unfinished business in Stony Creek as well. Maybe we should re-invade Canada.
 
2012-01-08 04:01:14 AM
My wife and I are both vets...and we both think Iraq was a stupid.

/Perry is also...but so are most of his buds in the GOP "race"
//except Huntsman, but I'm not sure he is in the race
 
2012-01-08 04:02:10 AM
Is Perry like a neo-neocon?
 
2012-01-08 04:04:36 AM
I love that he named Joe Arpaio, yes sheriff Joe, to head his campaign in Arizona.
 
2012-01-08 04:06:28 AM
I'm sure he didn't say... *checks TFA*

Oh, no, he did say that.

Look I can understand (not agree with) the point of view that says 'we shouldn't have left yet'.

I however believe it would be complete insanity to say "We've left, hell get back on the road and go right back!" For one, you don't just call up Iraq and say "Oh by the by, we're parking ourselves back in your country, hope you're ok with that."

Look if you want to argue with the President you have to go after the economy, because with the exception of possibly frosty relations with Israel, I'd say that despite a logical skepticism before he took office, Obama has been relatively good at handling relations in the middle east.
 
2012-01-08 04:09:33 AM
Mentat: Are you planning to reinvade? Any thought as to how the Iraqis would respond to that?

They would embrace us as liberators, like they did the first time obviously.

MorrisBird: Nobody cares what Rick Perry says. The powers that be have pronounced Mitt Romney their candidate. Mitt Romney it shall be. All of the rest is just sound and fury signifying nothing. We are a plutocracy. How clear we make it.

That has a lot less to do with plutocracy as it does with Perry and others being farking idiots.
 
2012-01-08 04:10:56 AM
I'm not really sure how he thinks Iranians can move at thOHMYGODTHEY'REALLINMYHOUujhb bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb bbbbbbb
 
2012-01-08 04:19:44 AM
Mentat: Are you planning to reinvade? Any thought as to how the Iraqis would respond to that?

They would respond, as they did the last two times we invaded, by dying by the hundreds of thousands.
 
2012-01-08 04:23:55 AM
MorrisBird: The powers that be have pronounced Mitt Romney their candidate.

you mean the voters who picked romney in the opinion polls which have been taken over the last year ?
 
2012-01-08 04:25:23 AM
I still think that Perry is only here now to spend his pile of cash trying to sink Romney.
 
2012-01-08 04:33:12 AM
Mentat: Paris1127: Snarfangel: You know, Perry, we kind of left unfinished business in Vietnam, too...

While we're at it, technically, the Korean War never ended...

And you know, Alexander never completely conquered India...


While we're at it, Nobunaga never even reached China.
 
2012-01-08 04:48:38 AM
NobleHam: Mentat: Paris1127: Snarfangel: You know, Perry, we kind of left unfinished business in Vietnam, too...

While we're at it, technically, the Korean War never ended...

And you know, Alexander never completely conquered India...

While we're at it, Nobunaga never even reached China.


You know...Adam never was able to reclaim the Garden of Eden from God...
 
2012-01-08 04:49:18 AM
The Why Not Guy: There's just no nice way to say it anymore. Republicans are insane.

I've been saying this since last year. They've lost their farking minds and are so out of touch with what everyone not in their party wants. All this is pandering whether it be to the chicken hawks who want more brown people dead or the zealots who can't stand to think someone is doing something that their sky wizard wouldn't like. It's sickening and yet so fascinating.
 
2012-01-08 04:52:17 AM
I didn't know you fought and successfully relocated Iranians from Iraqi soil.

/the media blackout has gone too far
 
2012-01-08 04:54:51 AM
Doesn't Perry also want to invade Mexico?
 
2012-01-08 04:57:09 AM
Why stop there? Why not go ahead and put troops in Iran, Syria and Pakistan while you're at it? The U.S. hasn't been accused of being empire builders in at least a year or two. Perry is just the kind of candidate to fix that.
 
2012-01-08 04:57:23 AM
Either the last stupid thing republicans said on saturday or the first stupid thing they said on sunday.
 
2012-01-08 05:07:36 AM
Sunk cost fallacy, dumbass.
 
2012-01-08 05:14:00 AM
OMG I'm literally at the speed of light..

kubrickfilms.warnerbros.com
 
2012-01-08 05:26:09 AM
The US invaded Iraq because it was under too much Iranian influence?
 
2012-01-08 05:34:45 AM
Damn you, Chalabi
 
2012-01-08 05:42:49 AM
WTF Texas??!!!
I have given y'all the benefit of the doubt, but you guys are starting to show a pattern here.
If you really want fight someone, why not South Carolina?
 
Xai
2012-01-08 05:59:10 AM
Four more years?

More War Years!


/vote Rick Perry
 
2012-01-08 06:08:06 AM
Literally the speed of light? Literally?

GTFO.
 
2012-01-08 06:19:00 AM
farkityfarker: The US invaded Iraq because it was under too much Iranian influence?

No, but it IS a legit worry now that we've gone/are leaving.

Basically, the fear is that this (or at least something close) will happen again.

upload.wikimedia.org

Because if this happens, you have a united Shia Islamic country of Iran/Iraq (or somewhat more realistically, Iraq becomes a puppet state of Iran) controlling the Fertile Crescent, and there's really not a whole lot to stop that country from rolling over the oil-producing countries in the Arabian Peninsula (or more realistically turning them into puppet states as well). And then we're farked*. THAT was the underlying subtext behind the crushing of the Bahrain protests. The Saudis really do not want a Iranian client state sitting on their border.

*Or more likely Israel, the US, and any other countries who don't want Iranian domination of the Persian Gulf throw down in various overt and covert ways.

/This was a Tom Clancy book, but it was a somewhat realistic premise. Iraq collapses, which means that that particular balance of power ends, the Saudis lose their shield as Iran rolls into Iraq, and one day, we wake up to a Caliphate in the Gulf.
//Of course, Clancy was also smart enough to realize that the only way we wouldn't throw down with EVERYTHING we had was to hit us with Ebola.
 
2012-01-08 06:19:30 AM
shinji3i: You know...Adam never was able to reclaim the Garden of Eden from God...

Doesn't that just bring us right back to Iraq?
 
2012-01-08 06:26:26 AM
It's as if the GOP is saying "Oh, so you thought Dubya was dumb? Now that you've met Mrs. Palin, Mrs. Bachmann and Mr. Perry don't you feel bad for thinking that? You have no idea how deep our bench is with window-licking rapture-starters."
 
2012-01-08 07:09:04 AM
Stop me, if you've heard this one before......
 
2012-01-08 07:17:17 AM
GAT_00: And the deficit explodes with delight.

My Aircraft Carrier is full of eels!
 
2012-01-08 07:50:40 AM
meyerkev: farkityfarker: The US invaded Iraq because it was under too much Iranian influence?

No, but it IS a legit worry now that we've gone/are leaving.

Basically, the fear is that this (or at least something close) will happen again.

[upload.wikimedia.org image 300x207]

Because if this happens, you have a united Shia Islamic country of Iran/Iraq (or somewhat more realistically, Iraq becomes a puppet state of Iran) controlling the Fertile Crescent, and there's really not a whole lot to stop that country from rolling over the oil-producing countries in the Arabian Peninsula (or more realistically turning them into puppet states as well). And then we're farked*. THAT was the underlying subtext behind the crushing of the Bahrain protests. The Saudis really do not want a Iranian client state sitting on their border.

*Or more likely Israel, the US, and any other countries who don't want Iranian domination of the Persian Gulf throw down in various overt and covert ways.

/This was a Tom Clancy book, but it was a somewhat realistic premise. Iraq collapses, which means that that particular balance of power ends, the Saudis lose their shield as Iran rolls into Iraq, and one day, we wake up to a Caliphate in the Gulf.
//Of course, Clancy was also smart enough to realize that the only way we wouldn't throw down with EVERYTHING we had was to hit us with Ebola.


You know, i asked why a Caliphate was bad in a different thread (Trolling a troll), and didn't get an answer, so I'm glad you posted this. There would certainly be some major short term issues with such a power structure, but I tend to think that either a) it would implode under the weight of it's own fundamentalism and collapse into smaller nations (which would likely improve stability, since the borders of said nations wouldn't be based on arbitrary lines drawn without regard to tribal or religious strife) or b) be drawn into the 20th century by virtue of being a major world player a la China. Maybe I'm being optimistic, but it's not like our last century of Real Politick experimentation over there has worked.
/The Saudi's can go pound sand.
//Israel can either stop being a back assward theocracy or deal with their self inflicted issues by themselves.
 
2012-01-08 08:35:51 AM
In Rick Perry's defense, he is an idiot.
 
2012-01-08 09:01:30 AM
WhyteRaven74: I love that he named Joe Arpaio, yes sheriff Joe, to head his campaign in Arizona.

I don't see why that's surprising. He's not some rinky-dink small-town Sheriff. He somehow keeps getting elected by a county that holds 60% of the state's population. A larger electoral pool than 23 US States.
 
2012-01-08 09:15:05 AM
propasaurus: "We're going to see Iran in my opinion, move back in at literally the speed of light.

Y'know, if Iranians can move at literally the speed of light, I don't think having our ground troops there will make much of a difference.


All of the Iranian troops will be dead when they get there, so...other than picking up the tiny bits of Iranian army guys all over the place, I think they'll be okay.
 
2012-01-08 09:18:41 AM
Yes, clearly the possible Iranian dominance of Iraq is clearly Obama's fault. I mean, some nitpickers might go back to the decision to remove the counterbalancing Iraqi Sunni power structure that was made in 2003 as being the more significant precipitating factor, but clearly that line of reasoning is clearly faulty.

Clearly, the fault for this Mess-o-potamia rests clearly on the shoulders of Obama who clearly doesn't understand what's going on in Iraq. What we clearly need is a clear-minded Texan in the White House to put it all right again, just like the last one did.
 
2012-01-08 09:26:25 AM
Lawnchair: WhyteRaven74: I love that he named Joe Arpaio, yes sheriff Joe, to head his campaign in Arizona.

I don't see why that's surprising. He's not some rinky-dink small-town Sheriff. He somehow keeps getting elected by a county that holds 60% of the state's population. A larger electoral pool than 23 US States.


I'd imagine WhyteRaven74 finds it surprising because "Sheriff Joe" is a farking criminal.
 
2012-01-08 09:30:39 AM
Mr. Coffee Nerves: "You have no idea how deep our bench is with window-licking rapture-starters."

It truly is a sight to behold. Someday they'll figure out that this shiat ain't working. But hopefully they won't figure it out for the next ten years or so.
 
2012-01-08 09:38:04 AM
I'm sure we can allow Private Perry to to be the first one over the top so to speak.
 
2012-01-08 09:40:19 AM
Rick Perry: "I don't think we've sent enough soldiers to their miserable deaths for no apparent reason."
 
2012-01-08 09:42:38 AM
meyerkev: Because if this happens, you have a united Shia Islamic country of Iran/Iraq (or somewhat more realistically, Iraq becomes a puppet state of Iran) controlling the Fertile Crescent, and there's really not a whole lot to stop that country from rolling over the oil-producing countries in the Arabian Peninsula (or more realistically turning them into puppet states as well). And then we're farked*.

Step 1) Stop burning oil.
Step 2) Give the middle finger to the entire Middle East and let them go kill each other as much as they like.
 
2012-01-08 09:46:53 AM
weezbo: shinji3i: You know...Adam never was able to reclaim the Garden of Eden from God...

Doesn't that just bring us right back to Iraq?


Not if Romney gets elected--then we'll have to invade Missouri.
 
Displayed 50 of 91 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »