Wish we could murder him again.

You know who else used female film directors to win executive power?

/Obama's Will Shall Triumph

Cry more, Republican pussies.

So they're still butthurt that their hero was taken out?

I hope it's as good as Flight 93 (2006)! LOL

Wow, that's totally not the lunatic ravings of a deranged mind.

Man, what must life be like when every little thing is a conspiracy out to get you and end your way of life?

Must be exhausting.

Well, it looks like subby needs another biatchslap for misuse of the HERO tag.

Do you even know what the word "HERO" even f*cking means?

Or is everything just "libsLibsLIBS" to you?

Meh. I already know how the movie ends.

JesusJuice: Wish we could murder him again.

Reagan wasn't murdered. But I know what you mean.

/Or do I?

I wonder what it's like to believe the entire world is against you while simultaneously believing that you represent a massive silent majority?

My brain just can't make that leap.

The mainstream MSM media is mostly to blame. The mainstream MSM media is mostly to blame.

Look guys, the pacific ocean is like really big, lets get to building a large island nation dead center and make it jesusland. they'll be free to polute, be bigots, etc. but they'll not have our military to protect them. Since you know, they're all armed...

This doesn't deserve a "Hero" tag. Where is the psychotic tag when you need it?

Fart_Machine: So they're still butthurt that their hero was taken out?

We're just bemused by liberals delighting that Obama ordered the extrajudicial assassination of an unarmed man in front of his family while illegally violating the territory of a nation that has never attacked us using intelligence gathered through torture.

yanoosh: This doesn't deserve a "Hero" tag. Where is the psychotic tag when you need it?

They got rid of the Walken tag.

beta_plus: Fart_Machine: So they're still butthurt that their hero was taken out?

We're just bemused by liberals delighting that Obama ordered the extrajudicial assassination of an unarmed man in front of his family while illegally violating the territory of a nation that has never attacked us using intelligence gathered through torture.

What an long-winded way of saying YES.

She can now make a movie about all the whining called The Butthurt Locker.

KingPsyz: Look guys, the pacific ocean is like really big, lets get to building a large island nation dead center and make it jesusland. they'll be free to polute, be bigots, etc. but they'll not have our military to protect them. Since you know, they're all armed...

but they're cool with paying for the military.

Tickle Mittens: JesusJuice: Wish we could murder him again.

Reagan wasn't murdered. But I know what you mean.

/Or do I?

Too bad we can't "murder" all the hero worship that still gets flung his way.

Kyro: obviously the goal was to use the film to give President Obama a reelection boost, not only with the film itself but also with the complicit news media using the film as an excuse to resurrect one of the President's only successes (thanks to the Bush Administrations willingness to waterboard.) make a shiatpot full of money.
I just felt part of my brain die.

FTFY

OK, Mods. Seriously. What's with all these neo-conservative articles getting Hero tags? This is getting out of hand. Sure, there are some brainwashed Farkers/ettes who think all this drivel is worthy of notice, but I'm willing to bet that the vast majority of us see these articles for what they are: The ravings of a bunch of juvenile-minded hangers-on hoping for a piece of the power pie once their masters get elected.

For the love of all that is sane in this world, please: Stop allowing these fools to use this tag...

beta_plus: Fart_Machine: So they're still butthurt that their hero was taken out?

We're just bemused by liberals delighting that Obama ordered the extrajudicial assassination of an unarmed man in front of his family while illegally violating the territory of a nation that has never attacked us using intelligence gathered through torture.

That's pretty farking rich seeing how Iraq was portrayed as Nazi Germany in the run to that bullshiat.

Funny how you guys only care about international law and extra judicial killing when a (D) is president. Hypocrite.

The jewish run liberal media definitely was behind that anti Semite OWS movement.

beta_plus: We're just bemused by liberals delighting that Obama ordered the extrajudicial assassination of an unarmed man in front of his family while illegally violating the territory of a nation that has never attacked us using intelligence gathered through torture.

Did you live under a rock for the entirety of the previous administration? Or is all of this stuff OK if a conservative Republican does it, but not a liberal Democrat? Please, enlighten me.

/but try not to get too much of your crazy on me

Sorry Butt hurt libs but Obama didn't really kill Osama in May of 2011. Your homeboy lied to you.

So try not to act shocked when the biatch boy hostage in chief signs stuff like the NDAA. He really doesn't have a choice.

Can we please stop using the HERO tag ironically?

Death to New Rome: Sorry Butt hurt libs but Obama didn't really kill Osama in May of 2011. Your homeboy lied to you.

So try not to act shocked when the biatch boy hostage in chief signs stuff like the NDAA. He really doesn't have a choice.

I mean, it's not like you guys even try anymore. It's depressing.

Death to New Rome: Sorry Butt hurt libs but Obama didn't really kill Osama in May of 2011. Your homeboy lied to you.

So try not to act shocked when the biatch boy hostage in chief signs stuff like the NDAA. He really doesn't have a choice.

8/10

I like the use of "homeboy" and "hostage in chief".

Death to New Rome: Sorry Butt hurt libs but Obama didn't really kill Osama in May of 2011. Your homeboy lied to you.

beta_plus: We're just bemused by liberals delighting that Obama ordered the extrajudicial assassination of an unarmed man in front of his family while illegally violating the territory of a nation that has never attacked us using intelligence gathered through torture.

Its almost as assuming as conservatives being outraged that Obama ordered a strike on the most wanted man by the US and bemoaning the way he did it.

TemperedEdge: OK, Mods. Seriously. What's with all these neo-conservative articles getting Hero tags?

The thing is, even though we're venting that sentiment here in the thread, perhaps what we should do is use the link at the bottom of the page.

It's trollish bullsh*t that deserves the Fark Gods' attention...

Mighty Taternuts: Man, what must life be like when every little thing is a conspiracy out to get you and end your way of life?

Must be exhausting.

Thinking that your enemies know where you sleep really gets you out of bed in the morning.

TemperedEdge: OK, Mods. Seriously. What's with all these neo-conservative articles getting Hero tags? This is getting out of hand. Sure, there are some brainwashed Farkers/ettes who think all this drivel is worthy of notice, but I'm willing to bet that the vast majority of us see these articles for what they are: The ravings of a bunch of juvenile-minded hangers-on hoping for a piece of the power pie once their masters get elected.

For the love of all that is sane in this world, please: Stop allowing these fools to use this tag...

headline seems pretty tongue in cheek to me. Along with the tag

I am confused I thought Citizen United decision Republicans loved because it lets any corporation get involved in political speech. Is it now unfair when it might help a Democrat?

skullkrusher: KingPsyz: Look guys, the pacific ocean is like really big, lets get to building a large island nation dead center and make it jesusland. they'll be free to polute, be bigots, etc. but they'll not have our military to protect them. Since you know, they're all armed...

but they're cool with paying for the military.

As long as the gays aren't afforded any rights, of course.

This article is seriously posing the question, "did Obama give Kathryn Bigelow classified information for her to put in a movie for public release?" If he doesn't care about keeping details secret, he could just declassify the information. If he does care, he's not giving it to a movie director to put in a movie which everyone will see.

obviously the goal was to use the film to give President Obama a reelection boost, not only with the film itself but also with the complicit news media using the film as an excuse to resurrect one of the President's only successes (thanks to the Bush Administrations willingness to waterboard.)

Even if this was all true, which I don't agree it is. Shouldn't Republicans be praising this as a victory for Citizen United Decision? Or is Citzen United now only "money" is free speech not actually speech and only if it helps Republicans.

Mighty Taternuts: beta_plus: We're just bemused by liberals delighting that Obama ordered the extrajudicial assassination of an unarmed man in front of his family while illegally violating the territory of a nation that has never attacked us using intelligence gathered through torture.

Its almost as assuming as conservatives being outraged that Obama ordered a strike on the most wanted man by the US and bemoaning the way he did it.

Even funnier is when they shouted themselves blue over Somalia supposedly offering to "hand Osama over on a silver plate".

But apparently taking out the worlds most wanted terrorist offends their noble sensibilities.

That's some fine conspiracy theory there, Lou.

Corvus: I am confused I thought Citizen United decision Republicans loved because it lets any corporation get involved in political speech. Is it now unfair when it might help a Democrat?

Exactly. What part of that is confusing?