It's Not News It's Fark.com
Real news. Real funny
Log In
|
Sign Up »
Login
Password
Forgot password?
X
Fark
TotalFark
my
Fark
About/FArQ
Contests
Store
Contact Us
Mobile
Search:
Password
Login
Turn on javascript (or enable it for Fark) for a better user experience.
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Main
Sports
Business
Geek
Entertainment
Politics
Video
First look at "Star Trek: The Next Generation" in high definition. THERE ARE FOUR VERY WELL-DEFINED LIGHTS
(
insidetv.ew.com
)
187
More:
Cool
,
Star Trek
,
Gene Roddenberry
,
high definitions
,
makeover
• • •
9834
clicks; posted to
Entertainment »
on
06 Jan 2012
at
12:11 PM
|
Favorite
| share:
more»
|
shirt it!
Share this link:
URL:
http://fk.cm/go/6862620
Bookmark:
URL:
http://fk.cm/6862620
Bookmark:
Article
Comments
close
187 Comments
(
+0 »
)
Paginated (50/page)
Single page
Single page, reversed
Normal view
Change images to links
Show raw HTML
Show posts from ignored users
View Voting Results:
Smartest
and
Funniest
First
|
«
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
»
|
Last
|
Show all
RexTalionis
2012-01-06 08:32:03 AM
Maybe it's just me, but doesn't it ruin the point of giving us a first look at Star Trek: TNG in high definition if the preview video is in standard def?
stpauler
2012-01-06 08:47:20 AM
Oh, it looks like ST:TNG took a Claritin.
Walker
2012-01-06 08:50:02 AM
You will see Wil's underage weener bulge in high def!
DamnYankees
2012-01-06 09:10:22 AM
RexTalionis
:
Maybe it's just me, but doesn't it ruin the point of giving us a first look at Star Trek: TNG in high definition if the preview video is in standard def?
We at least get to see the remastering.
Angry Drunk Bureaucrat
2012-01-06 09:15:30 AM
Do we *really* need to see a remastered version of that POS episode "Code of Honor"?
Really?
Dead for Tax Reasons
2012-01-06 09:29:28 AM
New hi def picard facepalms!
Nuclear Pancake
2012-01-06 09:46:05 AM
+1 Subby.
gridlocksammy
2012-01-06 09:51:06 AM
Walker
:
You will see Wil's underage weener bulge in high def!
[img.photobucket.com image 512x384]
bdub77
2012-01-06 10:12:24 AM
I'm really looking forward to seeing how much plaster they applied to Data's face.
Ennuipoet
2012-01-06 10:31:33 AM
FirstNationalBastard
2012-01-06 10:39:05 AM
So, did the remastering job clean up effects like the Farpoint alien that much, or is that new CGI?
DamnYankees
2012-01-06 10:43:03 AM
FirstNationalBastard
:
So, did the remastering job clean up effects like the Farpoint alien that much, or is that new CGI?
From what I understand, new CGI.
T. Dawg
2012-01-06 10:54:10 AM
Just got done watching TNG though on Netflix with my 4-yr old. She is now very excited about space and into math/science. She is also into robots and talks about Data a lot. And..... She likes Worf because "he's cute!"
BKITU
2012-01-06 11:17:09 AM
FirstNationalBastard
:
So, did the remastering job clean up effects like the Farpoint alien that much, or is that new CGI?
This isn't the Lucasverse we're dealing with here; it won't be all-new CGI. However Deanna's "GreaT joy, and graT-i-Tude" line will have even sharper "T" sounds.
GAT_00
2012-01-06 11:36:01 AM
DamnYankees
:
FirstNationalBastard: So, did the remastering job clean up effects like the Farpoint alien that much, or is that new CGI?
From what I understand, new CGI.
I figured they'd do the same thing to TNG that they did for the TOS upgrade, and redo a lot of the CGI.
Minus 1 Charisma
2012-01-06 12:16:59 PM
All new hi def camel-toes during the space workout!
Wellon Dowd
2012-01-06 12:17:18 PM
Can they remaster the scripts for the first two seasons?
GuyFawkes
2012-01-06 12:20:52 PM
Minus 1 Charisma
:
[t1.gstatic.com image 267x189]
All new hi def camel-toes during the space workout!
Anything with Troi in HD is a good thing.
/second only to Dax
//mmmm...Jadzia
PsyLord
2012-01-06 12:22:56 PM
Wellon Dowd
:
Can they remaster the scripts for the first two seasons?
I think we just found Lucas' Fark handle...
groppet
2012-01-06 12:25:32 PM
Will they edit out the phasers and CGI in walkie talkies?
peterthx
2012-01-06 12:26:44 PM
GAT_00
:
DamnYankees: FirstNationalBastard: So, did the remastering job clean up effects like the Farpoint alien that much, or is that new CGI?
From what I understand, new CGI.
I figured they'd do the same thing to TNG that they did for the TOS upgrade, and redo a lot of the CGI.
Except it's not correct.
They saved pretty much all the FX elements from the show, which was shot on film using models. In
Encounter At Farpoint
's case, the elements were shot at Industrial Light & Magic in VistaVision. All they are doing is scanning those elements in HD and recompositing them digitally. Certain elements, like phasers & photon torpedoes and other animation was done on the primitive computers of the time.
That
CG will be redone at HD resolution.
For TOS, the FX had to be redone in CG because the original elements weren't kept. Plus due to the primitive compositing at the time, huge amounts of grain and dirt had built up on the FX shots, making them look fairly noisy. You can see them with the "angle" feature on the Blu-ray.
The Farpoint alien was a puppet, which now in HD you can see was translucent.
FROGSTOMPER
2012-01-06 12:30:07 PM
GAT_00
:
DamnYankees: FirstNationalBastard: So, did the remastering job clean up effects like the Farpoint alien that much, or is that new CGI?
From what I understand, new CGI.
I figured they'd do the same thing to TNG that they did for the TOS upgrade, and redo a lot of the CGI.
that would be nice, I love watching the upgraded TOS every week, TNG would be that much better but they probably wouldn't show it on broadcast tv like TOS so I'd be out of luck cuz I ain't paying for it.
Mode101
2012-01-06 12:30:41 PM
The HD treatment must still be light years better than the Lucas treatment. Hopefully just cleanups and a slight enhancement here or there.
No stupid additional unnecessary scenes and changing plot lines (Han shot first).
No Jar Jar.
Probably a win just for that already!
Bye.
amindtat
2012-01-06 12:31:23 PM
That's going to look great streaming on Netflix.
IrateShadow
2012-01-06 12:35:56 PM
I hated the TOS CGI, and hope they don't do the same with TNG.
I Like Bread
2012-01-06 12:37:44 PM
And it's still in 4:3. What the crap?
tdpatriots12
2012-01-06 12:40:34 PM
Babylon 5 needs this much, much,
much
,
much
more.
JoeJitsu
2012-01-06 12:40:43 PM
Wellon Dowd
:
Can they remaster the scripts for the first two seasons?
No, but they are going to CGI a beard onto Riker for the first season so that people will think the writing's better.
Link
(new window)
Mad_Radhu
2012-01-06 12:40:47 PM
Fix old, no new?
That said, I'd sacrifice my left nut to see a remastered HD version of Bablyon 5 with updated CGI.
Precious Roy's Horse Dividers
2012-01-06 12:41:03 PM
I look forward to seeing Data's beer gut program unfold in HD
Detinwolf
2012-01-06 12:41:53 PM
Wellon Dowd
:
Can they remaster the scripts for the first two seasons?
We'd be better off just dropping those seasons entirely and starting at 3.
Sun Worshiping Dog Launcher
2012-01-06 12:42:00 PM
I can't wait for them to finally remaster some of the other classics:
A Fistful of Explosions
(new window)
and
The NaQed Now
(new window)
millia
2012-01-06 12:42:09 PM
peterthx
:
GAT_00: DamnYankees: FirstNationalBastard: So, did the remastering job clean up effects like the Farpoint alien that much, or is that new CGI?
From what I understand, new CGI.
I figured they'd do the same thing to TNG that they did for the TOS upgrade, and redo a lot of the CGI.
Except it's not correct.
They saved pretty much all the FX elements from the show, which was shot on film using models. In Encounter At Farpoint's case, the elements were shot at Industrial Light & Magic in VistaVision. All they are doing is scanning those elements in HD and recompositing them digitally. Certain elements, like phasers & photon torpedoes and other animation was done on the primitive computers of the time. That CG will be redone at HD resolution.
For TOS, the FX had to be redone in CG because the original elements weren't kept. Plus due to the primitive compositing at the time, huge amounts of grain and dirt had built up on the FX shots, making them look fairly noisy. You can see them with the "angle" feature on the Blu-ray.
The Farpoint alien was a puppet, which now in HD you can see was translucent.
And also, the main reason for the re-compositing is that the original filmed elements were composited on video, not film.
Rising_Zan_Samurai_Gunman
2012-01-06 12:42:23 PM
GAT_00
:
DamnYankees: FirstNationalBastard: So, did the remastering job clean up effects like the Farpoint alien that much, or is that new CGI?
From what I understand, new CGI.
I figured they'd do the same thing to TNG that they did for the TOS upgrade, and redo a lot of the CGI.
As I understand it, they have no choice but to remaster the effects, but they don't plan on replacing the effects - just making them look better. The show was shot on film stock, but all of the original effects were done
after
the footage was transferred to standard def video tape for editing, so in order to make the show high-def they have to go back to the original film stock, re-edit the footage to recreate the original episode and put the new remastered effects back in.
This article from September already discussed it
. According to that article they plan on simply remastering the previous effects, and only replacing a few pieces of effects footage that have apparently gone missing.
I'm most curious to see how they handle things like the neural parasites from the season 1 episode Conspiracy, which were originally choppy animation
Perlin Noise
2012-01-06 12:47:48 PM
Mad_Radhu
:
That said, I'd sacrifice my left nut to see a remastered HD version of Bablyon 5 with updated CGI.
oooo that would be nice ...I love that show
but the acting is so soooooooo bad. Even a hardcore fan like me has to cringe sometimes.
maxx2112
2012-01-06 12:48:22 PM
Did they remove the suck from the first two seasons?
Knara
2012-01-06 12:50:09 PM
I Like Bread
:
And it's still in 4:3. What the crap?
The original series was obviously edited to 4:3 for TV, since almost no one was doing 16:9 for TV at the time.
The series was, however, shot on film stock (though, strangely, edited on video for the first season or so), so it should end up looking pretty keen.
peterthx
2012-01-06 12:53:38 PM
Mode101
:
The HD treatment must still be light years better than the Lucas treatment. Hopefully just cleanups and a slight enhancement here or there.
No stupid additional unnecessary scenes and changing plot lines (Han shot first).
No Jar Jar.
Probably a win just for that already!
Bye.
tdpatriots12
:
Babylon 5 needs this much, much, much, much more.
Gah. I hate being a nerd sometimes. One of us always has to pollute a thread with Lucas-bashing and
Babylon 5
gushing.
dewright_ca
2012-01-06 12:54:39 PM
Minus 1 Charisma
:
All new hi def camel-toes during the space workout!
Im-Ok-With-This.JPG
//loved me some Gates and Marina
Knara
2012-01-06 12:57:34 PM
Perlin Noise
:
Mad_Radhu: That said, I'd sacrifice my left nut to see a remastered HD version of Bablyon 5 with updated CGI.
oooo that would be nice ...I love that show
but the acting is so soooooooo bad. Even a hardcore fan like me has to cringe sometimes.
Nah, the acting isn't bad, it's just overly dramatic at times. It's part of the charm of Babble-On 5.
Sadly, it will probably be 12 days after never for that show to get remastered. While that show was also done on film stock, the digital effect master files are totally missing (the ones from Foundation moved to Netter Digital which apparently promptly lost them), so it'd be a significant investment (the digital effects were also rendered in 4:3 so they'd need to be completely redone).
Some new CGI models and sequences have already been done that reconstruct shots from the original series, however. The
credit sequence for the "Lost Tales" DVD
(new window) is *not* the same model and scripting as was used in "Sleeping in Light". The station model is *much* more detailed, as are the explosion renderings and the Non-Aligned World ships. So it's *possible*, but since Babylon 5 was very influential for sci-fi writers, but not very influential amongst sci-fi *fans* (outside of Britain, where it was very popular), my hope for a remastering is very small indeed.
/plus, principle actors keep dying from that damn show, what the hell, man
Wellon Dowd
2012-01-06 12:59:17 PM
mjbok
2012-01-06 01:01:04 PM
Rising_Zan_Samurai_Gunman
:
I'm most curious to see how they handle things like the neural parasites from the season 1 episode Conspiracy, which were originally choppy animation
I wonder if they'll redo the Crystaline Entity, because it looks really, really bad.
Mugato
2012-01-06 01:02:00 PM
Wow, that first season really sucked.
mjbok
2012-01-06 01:03:44 PM
Ennuipoet
:
[freeversephotography.com image 636x480]
Is JJ Abrahms overseeing the remastering?
Shazam999
2012-01-06 01:04:05 PM
So TNG was shot on film? Because I thought that was the case, but the last time I brought it up I had a few zillion people jump on my back and say "Nuh uh, it was shot on video!".
peterthx
2012-01-06 01:05:39 PM
mjbok
:
Rising_Zan_Samurai_Gunman: I'm most curious to see how they handle things like the neural parasites from the season 1 episode Conspiracy, which were originally choppy animation
I wonder if they'll redo the Crystaline Entity, because it looks really, really bad.
They'll have to. It was completely CG.
The
Conspiracy
parasites were stop-motion animated. They could conceivably use the same animation and add blur to them.
HopScotchNSoda
2012-01-06 01:06:23 PM
So it really
was
lavender-hued. It's good to know that it wasn't just a problem with my television.
braedan
2012-01-06 01:07:02 PM
T. Dawg
:
She likes Worf because "he's cute!"
Uh oh, sounds like she got the bumpy headed jungle fever....
/I'm sorry, that's terrible.
//but srsly, no black guys, okay sweetheart?
scavenger
2012-01-06 01:07:45 PM
Locutus shot first
Knara
2012-01-06 01:10:04 PM
Shazam999
:
So TNG was shot on film? Because I thought that was the case, but the last time I brought it up I had a few zillion people jump on my back and say "Nuh uh, it was shot on video!".
Shot on film, edited on video for season 1 and *I think* part of season 2.
Displayed
50
of
187
comments
First
|
«
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
»
|
Last
|
Show all
View Voting Results:
Smartest
and
Funniest
Redisplay/refresh comments
This thread is closed to new comments.
Submit a Link »
Like Fark!
+1 Fark!
Follow @fark on Twitter
Entertainment via RSS
Top Links
Top Comments
Top Submitters
Press/Publicity
Headlines of the Week
All Latest
Fark Forum
Link Voting
Sports Forum
Fark Blogs
Geek Forum
Fark Book
Entertainment Forum
Fark Travel Guide
Politics Forum
Fark Parties
Fark Party Forum
Fark Chat
Photoshop Forum
PS/Photo Browser
Farktography Forum
Fark Quiz
From the
Fark Shop
:
F-cking Llamas
Salty the Snowman
Spider Byte - Earphone Cord Organizer
Eyes Of The Tiger - Knit Beanie
More from the
Fark Shop
»
Stories from our partner sites:
5 Movie Roles Will Smith (Probably) N...
Katy Perry Seems Surprisingly Cool Ab...
The GIFs That Keep on Giving
This Baby Elephant is Almost Too Cute...
More news at Scribol »
Five Tools You'll Need to Survive, We...
Snakeskin pedicures and gold facials
Gorgeous Goth Girls
Never Pay For Laundry Again! (PICS)
More news at Village Voice »
Watercooler Stories
Jockstrip: The world as we know it.
Your Daily Horoscope
The almanac
More news at UPI »
Nerdsourcing: Zombie Playgrounds, Fan...
Gaming Urban Legends - Monsters of Sa...
38 Studios Fallout Continues: R.A. Sa...
Darksiders 2 Hands-On Impressions --...
More news at G4TV »