"But because he signed a bill allowing for human consumption of wild horses . . . the girls don't want any part of Obama.

It's all well and good to not allow horses to be slaughtered for food/dogfood but then you end up with nobody buying lame horses at auction so instead they live in horrible conditions and then die of starvation or disease or they freeze to death. I am betting the 70% of Americans that oppose the slaughter of horses are not willing to spend the hundreds a month to board and feed a single horse let alone the hundreds of thousands that will be nom, nom, nomed. I own horses and really think they are great animals but like with abortion it's just the lesser evil.

I guess they went back.

Half and Halfs are reasonably priced, but a Santorum will cost you extra.

This guy is hoping for the brothel vote in 2016:

GAT_00: this is something he should be proud of

Being able to stand by the things you think are right is a good thing. Whether those things are right is an entirely different discussion.

skinink: Half and Halfs are reasonably priced, but a Santorum will cost you extra.

Yeah, but under a RON PAUL administration, I'll be able to buy a Santorum Iowa-boat Surprise for just one silver nickel.

i heard drew chased around callista during the decorah nekkid olympics. i heard that. i really did.

here. i heard it here. just now.

GAT_00: eurotrader: Ron Paul at least keeps his ideals and does not change ... because they are a touch crazy

Yes, this is something he should be proud of, and you should be proud to back him for it.

This is how dysfunctional Republican politics have made this country.

Well, it is something he should be proud of, if you ask me (which you didn't). The dude may be crazy, but I can't help but like him. Not being a complete whore is a good thing.

Not such a good thing that we should allow that much crazy anywhere near the White House, but still.

MaxxLarge: I mean, if anyone should understand that sometimes it feels pretty good to come in #2, it's Rick Santorum.

I suspect that #2 would dispute Santorum having this knowledge.

Is this the guy with the plans for the sci-fi-themed cathouse?
Because that guy is brilliant.

Headso: It's all well and good to not allow horses to be slaughtered for food/dogfood but then you end up with nobody buying lame horses at auction so instead they live in horrible conditions and then die of starvation or disease or they freeze to death. I am betting the 70% of Americans that oppose the slaughter of horses are not willing to spend the hundreds a month to board and feed a single horse let alone the hundreds of thousands that will be nom, nom, nomed.

I'm with you on this one.

picodenico: Headso: It's all well and good to not allow horses to be slaughtered for food/dogfood but then you end up with nobody buying lame horses at auction so instead they live in horrible conditions and then die of starvation or disease or they freeze to death. I am betting the 70% of Americans that oppose the slaughter of horses are not willing to spend the hundreds a month to board and feed a single horse let alone the hundreds of thousands that will be nom, nom, nomed.

I'm with you on this one.

me too. i always wanted to end the problem of stray dogs with a fast-casual eatery called...yes....Hot Dogs. Why all the hate?

DrExplosion: Not such a good thing that we should allow that much crazy anywhere near the White House, but still.

Is that a joke? We haven't had a president who wasn't batshiat crazy since, err... wait, I'm thinking...

Ron Paul would be an upgrade.

Omahawg: Why all the hate?

ZOMG WE CAN'T EAT NORMAL PETS!!

Headso: "But because he signed a bill allowing for human consumption of wild horses . . . the girls don't want any part of Obama.

It's all well and good to not allow horses to be slaughtered for food/dogfood but then you end up with nobody buying lame horses at auction so instead they live in horrible conditions and then die of starvation or disease or they freeze to death. I am betting the 70% of Americans that oppose the slaughter of horses are not willing to spend the hundreds a month to board and feed a single horse let alone the hundreds of thousands that will be nom, nom, nomed. I own horses and really think they are great animals but like with abortion it's just the lesser evil.

I totally agree with you. I hate it when dimwits with only the most casual understanding of agriculture try to apply their "oh they are soooooo cute" logic outside of the pet store. Horses are large farm animals. They are expensive to care for while alive and even more so at end of life. Being able to 'humanely' and efficiently dispose of a lot of otherwise unwanted protein and fat is the only logical solution. It is an export product too. It isn't like McDonalds is going to sneak some into your burger.

People thinking that Ron Paul will make brothels legal.

eurotrader: The funny part is Ron Paul at least keeps his ideals and does not change them

Just what we want for a President. An inflexible jerk who refuses to adapt while the rest of the world keeps evolving.

That's not a virtue. That's just being a stubborn asshole.

I don't follow politics much. You're saying I shouldn't vote for Ron Paul?

Headso: It's all well and good to not allow horses to be slaughtered for food/dogfood

Citation needed.

How are these hoofed animals different than cattle?

lizaardvark: Is that a joke? We haven't had a president who wasn't batshiat crazy since, err... wait, I'm thinking...

Ron Paul would be an upgrade.

Just because we've done it before and are undoubtedly going to do it again doesn't make it okay.

Omahawg: me too. i always wanted to end the problem of stray dogs with a fast-casual eatery called...yes....Hot Dogs. Why all the hate?

My problem with this is that I can't imagine they would taste very good. The only people who would eat there are just weirdos who like the idea of eating stray dogs or people who think it makes them "edgy." Put them on the menu, sure, but you can't devote the entire restaurant to them. It's just a doomed business model.

/Likes dogs, but not like that
//Would still eat one if it came down to it

eurotrader: The funny part is Ron Paul at least keeps his ideals and does not change them for money or because they are a touch crazy.

He does not change his ideas because he is old. It is kind of funny that not changing your ideas to match the times and circumstances has become a desired/required trait. You would think that you would want someone with flexible new ideas to match whatever comes along. Now, if you change your mind on new data, you are a "flip flopper". Many is the company that failed to change with the times and went under, why does that not apply to managing a country?

Kuroshin: GAT_00: eurotrader: Ron Paul at least keeps his ideals and does not change ... because they are a touch crazy

Yes, this is something he should be proud of, and you should be proud to back him for it.

This is how dysfunctional Republican politics have made this country.

You can't hide the Dems from their whorish nature. Democrats are corrupt and malleable to the exact same degree as Republicans (that is, 100%).

Any politician that stands their ground and abides by their stated ideals (which they were elected upon) is admirable, even when they have conflicting beliefs to yours. It's what they're supposed to do. The key is to not elect people with crazy positions.

/really happy with Wyden, but he's a rare bird

Wow. This. I'd rather an honest (wo)man with whom I disagree get elected than the whores currently in office. At least I'd know how they're going to try and screw me.

Headso: "But because he signed a bill allowing for human consumption of wild horses . . . the girls don't want any part of Obama.

It's all well and good to not allow horses to be slaughtered for food/dogfood but then you end up with nobody buying lame horses at auction so instead they live in horrible conditions and then die of starvation or disease or they freeze to death. I am betting the 70% of Americans that oppose the slaughter of horses are not willing to spend the hundreds a month to board and feed a single horse let alone the hundreds of thousands that will be nom, nom, nomed. I own horses and really think they are great animals but like with abortion it's just the lesser evil.

About ten years ago California outlawed the transportation of horses for slaughter. This was a ballot initiative that was mostly driven by women horse owners. At the time, the primary supply of horses for slaughter (not counting wild horses) where the result of too many horses from private owners that could not be sold. Which were mostly women who thought their horse was so damn special that they just had to breed it because someone was bound to buy it for too much money. So the people primarily responsible for the problem outlawed the one viable solution to horse overpopulation without offering any kind of alternative.

Walker: Nadie_AZ: Not that the decision wasn't a tight squeeze. "We thought real closely about supporting Newt Gingrich, because he's a cheater and we like cheaters," said Hoff. Gingrich has been married three times. The then-U.S. House Speaker carried on a years-long affair with his future third wife, while still married to wife No. 2.

That. is. awesome.

They forgot to mention that his second wife was his mistress when he was with his first wife, then karma came round and the second wife/mistress became the one being cheated on by mistress #2 who became wife #3. Wonder if he is with a mistress now who will become wife #4?

Pretty much a commonplace that a man who marries his mistress is simply creating a job vacancy.

madgonad: Headso: "But because he signed a bill allowing for human consumption of wild horses . . . the girls don't want any part of Obama.


Around my house, when we have lamb, we tell the 12 year old that it's chicken. "Special chicken."

She'll eat the bird, but not the fuzzy little sheep.

kim jong-un: Headso: It's all well and good to not allow horses to be slaughtered for food/dogfood

Citation needed.

How are these hoofed animals different than cattle?

his argument wasn't that they're special, it was pointing out that NOT slaughtering them is actually incredibly expensive.

GAT_00: ChubbyTiger: Wow. This. I'd rather an honest (wo)man with whom I disagree get elected than the whores currently in office. At least I'd know how they're going to try and screw me.

The guy says all pork should be banned but keeps adding it to bills. He's no more honest than the rest of them.

------

so you're saying that Ron Paul is anti-bacon?

Is it just me, or does Dennis come across as a huge douchebag?

How much does sex cost at the bunny ranch? A friend wants to know.

soundguy: GAT_00: ChubbyTiger: Wow. This. I'd rather an honest (wo)man with whom I disagree get elected than the whores currently in office. At least I'd know how they're going to try and screw me.

The guy says all pork should be banned but keeps adding it to bills. He's no more honest than the rest of them.

------

so you're saying that Ron Paul is anti-bacon?

TV's Vinnie: People thinking that Ron Paul will make brothels legal.
[i204.photobucket.com image 250x187]

If he pledged he would Id give him a shot.
Going to get screwed ether way.

Kazan: tallguywithglasseson: The endorsement came after Hoff "polled all the girls," Fox News, the unofficial broadcast arm of the Republican Party, reported Thursday.

Lulz. Is that the seattlepi official blog?

accuracy in reporting.

Every other major news outlet on TV, the unofficial broadcast arms of the Democratic Party.
Kinda looks like this....



Don't know who this is? I'll give you a hint....


Approves.