If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy) Strange Happy Ending: Illinois Motorcycles, Bicycles can run red lights under new law   (chicago.cbslocal.com) divider line 143
More: Strange, happy ending  
•       •       •

8829 clicks; posted to Main » on 01 Jan 2012 at 2:54 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



143 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2012-01-01 10:50:40 AM
Any news yet on the over/under before someone t-bones a car while exercising their new right?

I'm guessing it'll happen before the end of the day.
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2012-01-01 10:54:19 AM
In Boston bicyclists already run red lights and police have a policy of not ticketing bicyclists for traffic violations.

If you want to get picky, bicyclists obey red lights 5% of the time, according to a local newspaper reporter who counted. But the ticket rate really is 0%.
 
2012-01-01 11:08:29 AM
1) Motorcycles have to stop first, they can't just blow through the stop sign. 2) Anyone who has ridden a motorcycle understands why this makes sense.
 
2012-01-01 11:12:11 AM
Many places have legislation to this effect. Motorcycles often don't trip stoplight sensors and so will be stuck at lights indefinitely.

Under legislation such as this, bikers can't blow through lights. They must stop first and wait and look for oncoming traffic; it's not as if they've impunity to disregard traffic signals.

Speaking as an every day motorcyclist, I support this action. Often are the times I'm coming back from work at night and have to make ridiculous J-turns or such because I can't trip a stoplight sensor. I also have to plan my left turns based on whether or not there's another car waiting or behind me that might trip the left-turn signal.
 
2012-01-01 11:20:16 AM
Sadly there are people that think this is strange.
 
2012-01-01 12:54:36 PM
Anyone who's ever bounced up and down like an idiot in a deserted interection on their motorcycle trying to trip the farking light sensor knows this is a welcome farking change to the law. Nothing to see here.
 
2012-01-01 12:59:44 PM
ZAZ: In Boston bicyclists already run red lights and police have a policy of not ticketing bicyclists for traffic violations.

If you want to get picky, bicyclists obey red lights 5% of the time, according to a local newspaper reporter who counted. But the ticket rate really is 0%.


Sounds like maybe that guy picked the wrong light. Theres no way it's that low overall.
Did his numbers include technically illegal stuff that everybody does in cars too, like turning right on red without coming to a complete stop? Or just driving straight through the light?
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2012-01-01 01:04:06 PM
serial_crusher

The article is long gone from the newspaper site and I can't give exact figures and location. The reporter went where the complaints were, near Kenmore Square.
 
2012-01-01 01:04:10 PM
drew46n2: Anyone who's ever bounced up and down like an idiot in a deserted interection on their motorcycle trying to trip the farking light sensor knows this is a welcome farking change to the law. Nothing to see here.

Sounds like they need better detectors if that's really the case. The ones in Austin are sensitive enough to detect what little metal there is in my carbon fiber frame bike. If even a motorcycle cant trigger the ones in your town, they should replace them.
 
2012-01-01 01:05:53 PM
serial_crusher: drew46n2: Anyone who's ever bounced up and down like an idiot in a deserted interection on their motorcycle trying to trip the farking light sensor knows this is a welcome farking change to the law. Nothing to see here.

Sounds like they need better detectors if that's really the case. The ones in Austin are sensitive enough to detect what little metal there is in my carbon fiber frame bike. If even a motorcycle cant trigger the ones in your town, they should replace them.



I don't have a bike ATM, but I had this problem alot in Corpus Christ, TX.
 
2012-01-01 01:06:37 PM
*Corpus Christi
 
2012-01-01 01:38:00 PM
Friskya: Any news yet on the over/under before someone t-bones a car while exercising their new right?

I'm guessing it'll happen before the end of the day.


came here to say this

also am confused
why isnt the other new law making the news??
The one where it is now legal to hit cyclists going the wrong way on a one way street?
Guess they were tired of the messengers downtown!!
 
2012-01-01 01:54:25 PM
CPT Ethanolic: 1) Motorcycles have to stop first, they can't just blow through the stop sign. 2) Anyone who has ridden a motorcycle understands why this makes sense.

Bingo. Misleading HL is misleading.
 
2012-01-01 02:42:13 PM
serial_crusher: drew46n2: Anyone who's ever bounced up and down like an idiot in a deserted interection on their motorcycle trying to trip the farking light sensor knows this is a welcome farking change to the law. Nothing to see here.

Sounds like they need better detectors if that's really the case. The ones in Austin are sensitive enough to detect what little metal there is in my carbon fiber frame bike. If even a motorcycle cant trigger the ones in your town, they should replace them.


I can imagine replacing those sensors isn't cheap. And, as one of those idiots who's had to bounce up and down at a deserted intersection at 2am, or hope another car comes along trying to trip the stupid sensor, I'm all for letting bikers go through the light.
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2012-01-01 02:55:50 PM
I can imagine replacing those sensors isn't cheap.

In-pavement sensors cost a few thousand dollars, installed. Video sensors are cheaper. Some think video doesn't work well in snow.
 
2012-01-01 02:57:08 PM
Illinios hates bikes. Nuff said.
 
2012-01-01 02:59:42 PM
No big deal.
In other words,for motorcycles, the red light is like a two way stop sign.
Why do people have a problem with this?
 
2012-01-01 03:00:49 PM
CPT Ethanolic: 1) Motorcycles have to stop first, they can't just blow through the stop sign. 2) Anyone who has ridden a motorcycle understands why this makes sense.

3) Under normal traffic conditions other vehicles trigger the sensors. At 2:00 AM you could be there for hours if you don't just run the light.
 
2012-01-01 03:02:14 PM
In other news, organ donations expected to increase in Illinois...
 
2012-01-01 03:03:09 PM
domo_kun_sai: No big deal.
In other words,for motorcycles, the red light is like a two way stop sign.
Why do people have a problem with this?


We're just concerned because a substantial number of motorcyclists drive like farking maniacs. Then, after being hit by a car after pulling a U-turn across three lanes without looking on a one-way street at 65 miles an hour through a red light, the motorist is the one who is ticketed.
 
2012-01-01 03:03:49 PM
supichoo: Sadly there are people that don't ride motorcycles think this is strange.

FIFY
 
2012-01-01 03:05:58 PM
p2.la-img.com

hotlink
 
2012-01-01 03:06:02 PM
I once watched a motorcyclist run a red light in Gurnee, but he was hit by someone with the right-of-way. I think he survived.
 
2012-01-01 03:06:49 PM
That's how a guy in my IL high school class got a whole page dedicated to him....
 
2012-01-01 03:07:23 PM
CPT Ethanolic: 1) Motorcycles have to stop first, they can't just blow through the stop sign. 2) Anyone who has ridden a motorcycle understands why this makes sense.

No, it does not make sense. A motorcycle is a motorized vehicle. You are not a pedestrian (and there are laws against jaywalking anyway). Leaving the door open for a motorcycle to ignore red lights means that four wheeled cars should be able to ignore red lights as well.

There is no where anyone needs to be that is so important that traffic lights can be or should be ignored. Assholes who think this law is cool are the reason why other assholes open car doors in front of motorcyclists splitting lanes. Neither asshole is in the right, but damn... respect the road, so other people will be more likely to respect you on it.
 
2012-01-01 03:07:33 PM
This passed in VA last year.

You are allowed to go through a red light if the freaking light does not recognize your vehicle.

Come to a red...wait, wait, wait. Why wait? Because the sensor in the road does not pick up your bike and turn the light.
So now you have two choices. Wait forever because the light will not change, or wait a reasonable time (TBD) and go through when it is safe.
This law legalizes option 2.
 
2012-01-01 03:07:33 PM
2 minutes is a long time to just sit there, but I guess it beats forever.

MrSid: Illinios hates bikes. Nuff said.

That's why there's no helmet law.

drew46n2: Anyone who's ever bounced up and down like an idiot

How does bouncing do anything when these are inductive sensors? I bet they could have a different amplifier fitted for $200 including labor and work just fine for bikes.
 
2012-01-01 03:08:29 PM
TwistedIvory: Many places have legislation to this effect. Motorcycles often don't trip stoplight sensors and so will be stuck at lights indefinitely.

A lot of cyclists will stick a couple of neodymium magnets somewhere on the bottom of the frame for just that reason.
 
2012-01-01 03:08:54 PM
I hate Ilinois bikers.
 
2012-01-01 03:09:57 PM
When I was working the late shift, I had to run a particular red light quite a bit. This light has ancient sensors and none of my motorcycles will trip it. No traffic at all out there either way and if I didn't run it, I'd sit there for 20 minutes. After a while, I just started treating it like a stop sign instead of sitting there hoping the light would change.

/Haven't had to so that since moving to earlier shifts
//Will not do that unless I don't have a choice
 
2012-01-01 03:10:47 PM
Bacontastesgood: How does bouncing do anything when these are inductive sensors? I bet they could have a different amplifier fitted for $200 including labor and work just fine for bikes

I would imagine the weather would be a factor in keeping these working. That is AFTER the expense of installing the improved sensors all over the place in a state that has the second worse economy in the nation.
 
2012-01-01 03:11:58 PM
Or, an ordinary day in the life of a cyclist
 
2012-01-01 03:12:00 PM
Sum Guye: CPT Ethanolic: 1) Motorcycles have to stop first, they can't just blow through the stop sign. 2) Anyone who has ridden a motorcycle understands why this makes sense.

3) Under normal traffic conditions other vehicles trigger the sensors. At 2:00 AM you could be there for hours if you don't just run the light.


I've been in a car stuck at a light after night shift, and the light never triggered. I took a right, u-turned at the first left-hand turn, then took a right so I could continue on my way. No waiting for hours. If it's a matter of sensors, the sensors need to be changed, made more sensitive. The cost of such sensors is a hell of a lot cheaper than the cost in human lives of folks getting in the habit of breezing through red lights.
 
2012-01-01 03:12:25 PM
TARGETS!
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2012-01-01 03:12:50 PM
ExperianScaresCthulhu: Leaving the door open for a motorcycle to ignore red lights means that four wheeled cars should be able to ignore red lights as well.

Great. I want that law. Red means the other direction has right of way. You go through red, any collision is your fault. Most traffic signals are installed to help share right of way during peak traffic hours, not because of safety problems.
 
2012-01-01 03:13:41 PM
ExperianScaresCthulhu: There is no where anyone needs to be that is so important that traffic lights can be or should be ignored.

So if you, in your car, come to a red light, and it never ever changes, what would you do?
Simply wait there forever? 5 mins, 10 mns, an hour?
Or treat it as broken, and proceed through when it is safe?
 
2012-01-01 03:14:15 PM
KrispyKritter: Got all three of those, and about eleven more.
 
2012-01-01 03:15:09 PM
drew46n2: Anyone who's ever bounced up and down like an idiot in a deserted interection on their motorcycle trying to trip the farking light sensor knows this is a welcome farking change to the law. Nothing to see here.

Yeah, this. I don't even farking ride motorcycles and know that riders have a problem with some trip censors. Hell, I know of a trip censor that won't even trip for my dinky-ass car.
 
2012-01-01 03:20:05 PM
TwistedIvory: Many places have legislation to this effect. Motorcycles often don't trip stoplight sensors and so will be stuck at lights indefinitely.

Under legislation such as this, bikers can't blow through lights. They must stop first and wait and look for oncoming traffic; it's not as if they've impunity to disregard traffic signals.

Speaking as an every day motorcyclist, I support this action. Often are the times I'm coming back from work at night and have to make ridiculous J-turns or such because I can't trip a stoplight sensor. I also have to plan my left turns based on whether or not there's another car waiting or behind me that might trip the left-turn signal.


For years city bikers (like myself) have used rare-earth magnets attached to our boots to trigger traffic lights.

Get some and try it. I know, there's no traffic, the intersection is clear. You're rarely hit by the car you see. I speak from experience.
 
2012-01-01 03:20:12 PM
This is a stunning vindication for every biker who has ever pulled up to a red light, waited patiently for it to change, realized that they weren't going to trigger the sensor, looked carefully to see there was no oncoming traffic, pedaled through the intersection as fast as they could, somehow attracted the attention of a cop who was a big enough prick to ticket them after they explained the situation, then immediately went out and bought one of these so the whole thing would never happen again.

I doubt the other 99.999999999% of bikers who do not fit those criteria will even notice the change in the law as they blow through lights with impunity just as they did before.
 
2012-01-01 03:21:25 PM
serial_crusher: The ones in Austin are sensitive enough to detect what little metal there is in my carbon fiber frame bike.

(whispers) Dude, they're *scanning* you.


Meh, the easiest/cheapest solution is to make motorcycles heavier and have cyclists push the pedestrian "walk" buttons.
 
2012-01-01 03:21:52 PM
120 turns of 28 gauge magnet wire around a 1 inch section of 3" dia PVC. 100 uF 25v electrolytic wired in series. 1k ohm across the cap to discharge it. Connect it momentarily to 12v via a solid state relay. It will trip the sensor, and it's only 1" x 3.2". Only runs current while the cap charges to 14v. Slowly discharges over a few milliseconds. You could build a circuit with a 555 to thwack the inductor every 3 seconds or so, but it would be a waste of battery power.
 
2012-01-01 03:23:19 PM
ExperianScaresCthulhu: CPT Ethanolic: 1) Motorcycles have to stop first, they can't just blow through the stop sign. 2) Anyone who has ridden a motorcycle understands why this makes sense.

No, it does not make sense. A motorcycle is a motorized vehicle. You are not a pedestrian (and there are laws against jaywalking anyway). Leaving the door open for a motorcycle to ignore red lights means that four wheeled cars should be able to ignore red lights as well.

There is no where anyone needs to be that is so important that traffic lights can be or should be ignored. Assholes who think this law is cool are the reason why other assholes open car doors in front of motorcyclists splitting lanes. Neither asshole is in the right, but damn... respect the road, so other people will be more likely to respect you on it.


It isn't about having somewhere so important to be you don't stop at all. They're talking about making the resonable amount of time 2 minutes. That's long enough that the light would change if it was triggered. I've sat in left turn lanes through multiple cycles because the light wouldn't change. Wouldn't run it even when clear because I don't want the ticket.

This isn't giving anybody the right to just blow through the light. But, is setting it so you are allowed to treat it as broken and proceed when safe.

BTW you can do the same thing in a car if the light won't change. Just be prepared to prove that the light wasn't working.
 
2012-01-01 03:24:48 PM
Desmo: TwistedIvory: Many places have legislation to this effect. Motorcycles often don't trip stoplight sensors and so will be stuck at lights indefinitely.

Under legislation such as this, bikers can't blow through lights. They must stop first and wait and look for oncoming traffic; it's not as if they've impunity to disregard traffic signals.

Speaking as an every day motorcyclist, I support this action. Often are the times I'm coming back from work at night and have to make ridiculous J-turns or such because I can't trip a stoplight sensor. I also have to plan my left turns based on whether or not there's another car waiting or behind me that might trip the left-turn signal.

For years city bikers (like myself) have used rare-earth magnets attached to our boots to trigger traffic lights.

Get some and try it. I know, there's no traffic, the intersection is clear. You're rarely hit by the car you see. I speak from experience.


Perhaps you should look both ways before you cross the street.
 
2012-01-01 03:25:58 PM
Several states have this law. It works fine. Who would think that bikers would look out for their own safety?
 
2012-01-01 03:32:04 PM
Two minutes is a heck of a long time to wait at a deserted intersection in the middle of the night.
 
ows
2012-01-01 03:35:09 PM
what about the nazis? i hate Illinois nazis.
 
2012-01-01 03:36:37 PM
ZAZ: In Boston bicyclists already run red lights and police have a policy of not ticketing bicyclists for traffic violations.

If you want to get picky, bicyclists obey red lights 5% of the time, according to a local newspaper reporter who counted. But the ticket rate really is 0%.


You sound really butthurt about it. U mad?
 
2012-01-01 03:37:49 PM
CPT Ethanolic: 1) Motorcycles have to stop first, they can't just blow through the stop sign. 2) Anyone who has ridden a motorcycle understands why this makes sense.

Or has a 4WD vehicle with a lift kit and big tires. I guess the geniuses in this thread think we should just sit at the light for hours.
 
2012-01-01 03:42:44 PM
home.earthlink.net

Newer signs have more sensible wording.

Some locations have dedicated bike loops.

On the other hand, I've had the dubious pleasure of sitting over a sensor through multiple light cycles in a car.

imgs.xkcd.com

For reals.
 
Displayed 50 of 143 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »