It's Not News It's Fark.com
Real news. Real funny
Log In
|
Sign Up »
Login
Password
Forgot password?
X
Fark
TotalFark
my
Fark
About/FArQ
Contests
Store
Contact Us
Mobile
Search:
Password
Login
Turn on javascript (or enable it for Fark) for a better user experience.
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Main
Sports
Business
Geek
Entertainment
Politics
Video
Montanans launch Recall of Senators Max Baucus and Jonathan Tester, who approved NDAA Military Detention. The issue of federal official recall has never reached the federal courts
(
dailykos.com
)
186
More:
Interesting
,
Senator Max S. Baucus
,
Jonathan Tester
,
Montana
,
Joseph Lieberman
,
Denny Rehberg
,
human beings
,
ndaa
,
Carl Levin
• • •
11380
clicks; posted to
Main »
on
27 Dec 2011
at
3:21 PM
|
Favorite
| share:
more»
|
shirt it!
Share this link:
URL:
http://fk.cm/go/6846825
Bookmark:
URL:
http://fk.cm/6846825
Bookmark:
Article
Comments
close
186 Comments
(
+0 »
)
Paginated (50/page)
Single page
Single page, reversed
Normal view
Change images to links
Show raw HTML
Show posts from ignored users
View Voting Results:
Smartest
and
Funniest
First
|
«
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
»
|
Last
|
Show all
Weaver95
2011-12-27 02:17:26 PM
Good. recall the sons of biatches.
MaudlinMutantMollusk
2011-12-27 02:22:36 PM
I hope this marks the beginning of a trend
Weaver95
2011-12-27 02:24:27 PM
MaudlinMutantMollusk
:
I hope this marks the beginning of a trend
If more and more politicians are subjected to recall efforts due to their actions, I think the first thing we'll see is the repeal of laws that let us remove politicians from office.
Angry Drunk Bureaucrat
2011-12-27 02:28:04 PM
My guess is the SC would overturn this in the same way they overturned congressional term limits.
ZAZ
2011-12-27 02:46:06 PM
I'm with
Angry Drunk Bureaucrat
.
Marcus Aurelius
2011-12-27 02:48:49 PM
Weaver95
:
Good. recall the sons of biatches.
It's a shame we can't recall Toomey. He's as big a tool as Santorum was.
BritneysSpeculum
2011-12-27 02:55:23 PM
Angry Drunk Bureaucrat
:
My guess is the SC would overturn this in the same way they overturned congressional term limits.
I concur. Article 1 only allows the states authority with regard to the time, place and manner of election of reps and senators. The ability to remove is reserved to each house and only then with the concurrence of 2/3 of the members voting. See US Const. Art. 1, sec. 5, cl. 2.
brerrabbit
2011-12-27 03:04:39 PM
BritneysSpeculum
:
Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: My guess is the SC would overturn this in the same way they overturned congressional term limits.
I concur. Article 1 only allows the states authority with regard to the time, place and manner of election of reps and senators. The ability to remove is reserved to each house and only then with the concurrence of 2/3 of the members voting. See US Const. Art. 1, sec. 5, cl. 2.
Pretty much this.
DammitIForgotMyLogin
2011-12-27 03:16:18 PM
brerrabbit
:
BritneysSpeculum: Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: My guess is the SC would overturn this in the same way they overturned congressional term limits.
I concur. Article 1 only allows the states authority with regard to the time, place and manner of election of reps and senators. The ability to remove is reserved to each house and only then with the concurrence of 2/3 of the members voting. See US Const. Art. 1, sec. 5, cl. 2.
Pretty much this.
That depends on what your definition of 'may' is.
/not a lawyer, but I predict much, um,
reasoned discussion
over whether that phrase reserves those rights to the Senate or just spells out exactly how they can use them
DarnoKonrad
2011-12-27 03:25:43 PM
spiffy
Arkanaut
2011-12-27 03:26:37 PM
As a registered Democrat, I wouldn't be sad to see Baucus go. (Don't know much about Tester...)
fredsnake
2011-12-27 03:26:40 PM
they have twisted the law to suit their own agenda's rendering it w/o effect.
vudukungfu
2011-12-27 03:27:07 PM
After a fair trial and a hanging, it needn't bother the federal court system at all.
Outrageous Muff
2011-12-27 03:29:37 PM
So a handful of angry liberals decided they were going to circulate petitions to get their Democratic electeds recalled because they don't like one thing they did. However if they were to succeed they would get a Republican elected who would not agree with them on anything. What a sound plan.
hailin
2011-12-27 03:31:05 PM
They also are going after Denny Rehburg. I've wanted Baucus gone as long as I can remember and have NEVER voted for that arshole. I really hope we can actually do this. It would be awesome.
cuzsis
2011-12-27 03:32:33 PM
Good. Remove them. More should follow.
If the people are the ones who elect them, they should be the ones removing them. Leaving the fox to guard the hen house by only letting the House remove them will not work.
GentDirkly
2011-12-27 03:32:37 PM
Angry Drunk Bureaucrat
:
My guess is the SC would overturn this in the same way they overturned congressional term limits.
Quick question: If the more numerous branch of the state legislature has term limits, can the state enforce term limits on its House of Representatives delegation? Why or why not?
hailin
2011-12-27 03:33:37 PM
Outrageous Muff
:
So a handful of angry liberals decided they were going to circulate petitions to get their Democratic electeds recalled because they don't like one thing they did. However if they were to succeed they would get a Republican elected who would not agree with them on anything. What a sound plan.
Well they are also going after Rehberg who is Republican.
neversubmit
2011-12-27 03:33:41 PM
If the people would not vote assholes into office they wouldn't need to launch a recall. What's wrong with the people?
Smeggy Smurf
2011-12-27 03:34:58 PM
Back before Senators were elected, a state could replace them on a whim.
/it was a better system
The Gordie Howe Hat Trick
2011-12-27 03:35:43 PM
Every politician sucks...except my guy, he brings home the bacon.
FarkedOver
2011-12-27 03:36:35 PM
Every single one of these farkers should be scared shiatless to lose their jobs, during good times and bad. If politicians are content, us citizens are doing a shiatty job.
Greylight
2011-12-27 03:37:02 PM
Sounds like democracy in action to me. Agency is not simply waiting for an election.
Anavrinman
2011-12-27 03:37:23 PM
neversubmit
:
If the people would not vote assholes into office they wouldn't need to launch a recall. What's wrong with the people?
You're still operating under the impression that votes matter in an election.
DarnoKonrad
2011-12-27 03:37:51 PM
The Gordie Howe Hat Trick
:
Every politician sucks...except my guy, he brings home the bacon.
If they all 'brought home bacon' we'd be a better nation. But they seem to be intent on giving private interests public assets instead of the other way around.
natazha
2011-12-27 03:37:58 PM
Outrageous Muff
:
So a handful of angry liberals
I strongly doubt most or even many of the Oath Keepers are liberals:
"Oath Keepers is a non-partisan association of currently serving military, reserves, National Guard, veterans, Peace Officers, and Fire Fighters who will fulfill the Oath we swore, with the support of like minded citizens who take an Oath to stand with us, to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help us God. Our Oath is to the Constitution"
TheShavingofOccam123
2011-12-27 03:38:34 PM
Next comes elector nullification. Then judicial whamalamadingdongification. Then congressional it'smypartyandi'llcryifiwanttolification....
We are in two wars--one in Afghanistan and the other War on Terror. Habeas corpus has been suspended before in time of war and the constitution states the government can deny rights as long as it is by due process.
I'm not saying I like any idea of the government being able to violate habeas corpus but there is precedence and there are constitutional guidelines.
Aikidogamer
2011-12-27 03:38:52 PM
American Citizens get due process no matter what. This law will not stand. Seriously, "Terrorism" is defined very vaguely. Man I am glad I am going to law school to learn how to fight these farking stateists in a court room. I am tired of freedoms being taken away all in the name of "keeping me safe."
I tell you what, I will keep me safe and when I need help I will summon authorities to either help defend my rights, or to clean up the criminal's remains whom did not heed my warning.
American Citizens in the United States of America should not be detained unless they can be charged with in a reasonable amount of time, which is
usually
understood as, 3 days.
Dedmon
2011-12-27 03:40:41 PM
Outrageous Muff
:
So a handful of angry liberals decided they were going to circulate petitions to get their Democratic electeds recalled because they don't like one thing they did. However if they were to succeed they would get a Republican elected who would not agree with them on anything. What a sound plan.
There is such a thing as called going too far. Supporting this act has gone too far.
I will never vote for a Republican for the rest of my life, and unless I see the Democrats do an about face and stop being Republican sidekicks, I'll never consider voting for them again, either.
The signing over of the digustingly evil power of life in prison without trial to one man, by a margin of victory using the most bipartisian votes i've ever seen in this decade, is the last straw. Both PARTIES (not ideological sides necessarily) are bad. Don't vote for any of them. Stop throwing away your votes.
And dont you blame me for "throwing my vote away." I'm not throwing my vote away, I'm going to vote for whomever will represent my best interests, you are throwing your vote away on some power-grabbing president and his lackies from both parties. It is your fault as much as the Republican
moron
base is for voting for whoever the hell they vote for.
Gleeman
2011-12-27 03:41:08 PM
Remember, remember the 27th of December!
Gosling
2011-12-27 03:41:15 PM
Well, if it's never been actually tested in court? Worth a shot, I guess.
SnakeLee
2011-12-27 03:42:02 PM
natazha
:
Outrageous Muff: So a handful of angry liberals
I strongly doubt most or even many of the Oath Keepers are liberals
If only this were liberals leading the cause, the fact that the Oath Keepers are behind this basically makes it a side show. At least the Republicans won't be able to co-opt this movement, since even they wouldn't want to be associated with the Oath Keepers in public.
HotIgneous Intruder
2011-12-27 03:42:11 PM
I'm liking Montana more and more.
Gleeman
2011-12-27 03:43:11 PM
SnakeLee
:
natazha: Outrageous Muff: So a handful of angry liberals
I strongly doubt most or even many of the Oath Keepers are liberals
If only this were liberals leading the cause, the fact that the Oath Keepers are behind this basically makes it a side show. At least the Republicans won't be able to co-opt this movement, since even they wouldn't want to be associated with
the Oath Keepers
their real base
in public.
FTFY
FLMountainMan
2011-12-27 03:43:33 PM
Smeggy Smurf
:
Back before Senators were elected, a state could replace them on a whim.
/it was a better system
The State of Florida and its 3/4 Republican Legislature, all-GOP cabinet, and sub-40% registered Republican electorate would strongly disagree with you.
BullBearMS
2011-12-27 03:43:49 PM
Invalidating the Bill of Rights because we are fighting an undeclared war against a concept like "terror" is the most retarded thing imaginable.
How do you defeat "terror"? You can't.
FLMountainMan
2011-12-27 03:44:10 PM
FLMountainMan
:
Smeggy Smurf: Back before Senators were elected, a state could replace them on a whim.
/it was a better system
The State of Florida and its 3/4 Republican Legislature, all-GOP cabinet, and sub-40% registered Republican electorate would strongly disagree with you.
There's gotta be a better way to say that.
/Floridiot
HotIgneous Intruder
2011-12-27 03:44:27 PM
Dedmon
:
Outrageous Muff: So a handful of angry liberals decided they were going to circulate petitions to get their Democratic electeds recalled because they don't like one thing they did. However if they were to succeed they would get a Republican elected who would not agree with them on anything. What a sound plan.
There is such a thing as called going too far. Supporting this act has gone too far.
I will never vote for a Republican for the rest of my life, and unless I see the Democrats do an about face and stop being Republican sidekicks, I'll never consider voting for them again, either.
The signing over of the digustingly evil power of life in prison without trial to one man, by a margin of victory using the most bipartisian votes i've ever seen in this decade, is the last straw. Both PARTIES (not ideological sides necessarily) are bad. Don't vote for any of them. Stop throwing away your votes.
And dont you blame me for "throwing my vote away." I'm not throwing my vote away, I'm going to vote for whomever will represent my best interests, you are throwing your vote away on some power-grabbing president and his lackies from both parties. It is your fault as much as the Republican moron base is for voting for whoever the hell they vote for.
I'll be voting for Paul if he's on the ballot next November. If he's not, my dog is getting the write-in for president.
Callous
2011-12-27 03:44:46 PM
cuzsis
:
Good. Remove them. More should follow.
If the people are the ones who elect them, they should be the ones removing them. Leaving the fox to guard the hen house by only letting the House remove them will not work.
This. The elected should be afraid of the electorate. They are their to do a job that the electorate gave them and should be able to take away at any time should said electorate decide the need exists.
neversubmit
2011-12-27 03:45:05 PM
Anavrinman
:
neversubmit: If the people would not vote assholes into office they wouldn't need to launch a recall. What's wrong with the people?
You're still operating under the impression that votes matter in an election.
proof?
born_yesterday
2011-12-27 03:46:03 PM
natazha
:
Outrageous Muff: So a handful of angry liberals
I strongly doubt most or even many of the Oath Keepers are liberals:
"Oath Keepers is a non-partisan association of currently serving military, reserves, National Guard, veterans, Peace Officers, and Fire Fighters who will fulfill the Oath we swore, with the support of like minded citizens who take an Oath to stand with us, to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help us God. Our Oath is to the Constitution"
Shhhhh...you're spoiling the narrative.
groppet
2011-12-27 03:47:47 PM
Well if they cant be recalled and the public sentiment is against them, then I doubt they will last their next election anyways. You just have to hope that Montanans attention span is longer than most farkers dicks.
AbsentFriends
2011-12-27 03:49:27 PM
Weaver95
:
If more and more politicians are subjected to recall efforts due to their actions, I think the first thing we'll see is the repeal of laws that let us remove politicians from office.
Followed shortly by pitchforks, torches, and rope. The really scratchy kind.
fusillade762
2011-12-27 03:49:34 PM
natazha
:
Outrageous Muff: So a handful of angry liberals
I strongly doubt most or even many of the Oath Keepers are liberals:
"Oath Keepers is a non-partisan association of currently serving military, reserves, National Guard, veterans, Peace Officers, and Fire Fighters who will fulfill the Oath we swore, with the support of like minded citizens who take an Oath to stand with us, to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help us God. Our Oath is to the Constitution"
Also this:
"In the Southern Poverty Law Center's (SPLC) 2009 report The Second Wave: Return of the Militias, Larry Keller, a writer for the SPLC, wrote that the Oath Keepers "may be a particularly worrisome example of the Patriot revival."[8] Keller described Richard Mack, an Oath Keeper, as a "longtime militia hero"[8]:7[9] and quoted him as having said, "The greatest threat we face today is not terrorists; it is our federal government... One of the best and easiest solutions is to depend on local officials, especially the sheriff, to stand against federal intervention and federal criminality."
I don't agree with these folks on much, but I gotta go with them on this one.
TheShavingofOccam123
2011-12-27 03:50:02 PM
HotIgneous Intruder
:
Dedmon: Outrageous Muff: So a handful of angry liberals decided they were going to circulate petitions to get their Democratic electeds recalled because they don't like one thing they did. However if they were to succeed they would get a Republican elected who would not agree with them on anything. What a sound plan.
There is such a thing as called going too far. Supporting this act has gone too far.
I will never vote for a Republican for the rest of my life, and unless I see the Democrats do an about face and stop being Republican sidekicks, I'll never consider voting for them again, either.
The signing over of the digustingly evil power of life in prison without trial to one man, by a margin of victory using the most bipartisian votes i've ever seen in this decade, is the last straw. Both PARTIES (not ideological sides necessarily) are bad. Don't vote for any of them. Stop throwing away your votes.
And dont you blame me for "throwing my vote away." I'm not throwing my vote away, I'm going to vote for whomever will represent my best interests, you are throwing your vote away on some power-grabbing president and his lackies from both parties. It is your fault as much as the Republican moron base is for voting for whoever the hell they vote for.
I'll be voting for Paul if he's on the ballot next November. If he's not, my dog is getting the write-in for president.
Ron Paul wants to remove ALL federal court review over all abortion laws at any level of government. He's admitted it's the only way he will ever get abortion banned in this country. He's a religious bigot who wants to impose his beliefs on all Americans.
He's not going to respect civil rights any more than the people who support indefinite military detention.
You can read about Ron Paul's plan to rewrite the Constitution to ban federal court review of abortion on his webpage. He's actually proud of his plans to nationalize womens' private parts.
fusillade762
2011-12-27 03:50:39 PM
fusillade762
:
I don't agree with these folks on much, but I gotta go with them on this one.
Oh, and by "these folks" I mean the Oathkeepers, not the SPLC.
Arkanaut
2011-12-27 03:51:50 PM
BullBearMS
:
Invalidating the Bill of Rights because we are fighting an undeclared war against a concept like "terror" is the most retarded thing imaginable.
How do you defeat "terror"? You can't.
Fight terror with terror!
/I have a cunning plan...
AcneVulgaris
2011-12-27 03:52:58 PM
Outrageous Muff
:
So a handful of angry liberals decided they were going to circulate petitions to get their Democratic electeds recalled because they don't like one thing they did. However if they were to succeed they would get a Republican elected who would not agree with them on anything. What a sound plan.
There's disagreement, and there's treason.
Headso
2011-12-27 03:52:58 PM
too bad the republican freakshow is keeping Obama in office or I think there'd be a stronger call to stick to him too.
BullBearMS
2011-12-27 03:53:39 PM
groppet
:
Well if they cant be recalled and the public sentiment is against them, then I doubt they will last their next election anyways. You just have to hope that Montanans attention span is longer than most farkers dicks.
If you recall, Max Baucus is the guy who
took more than a million dollars from the insurance industry and then killed the public option that voters quite clearly supported by large margins
.
Is anyone shocked that he is still doing the bidding of his obscenely wealthy masters?
Displayed
50
of
186
comments
First
|
«
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
»
|
Last
|
Show all
View Voting Results:
Smartest
and
Funniest
Redisplay/refresh comments
This thread is closed to new comments.
Submit a Link »
Like Fark!
+1 Fark!
Follow @fark on Twitter
Fark via RSS
Top Links
Top Comments
Top Submitters
Press/Publicity
Headlines of the Week
All Latest
Fark Forum
Link Voting
Sports Forum
Fark Blogs
Geek Forum
Fark Book
Entertainment Forum
Fark Travel Guide
Politics Forum
Fark Parties
Fark Party Forum
Fark Chat
Photoshop Forum
PS/Photo Browser
Farktography Forum
Fark Quiz
From the
Fark Shop
:
Rejected Design
LEGO City Key Light - Fireman
The Beatles Yellow Submarine Cookie Cutter
Samurai Umbrella
More from the
Fark Shop
»
Stories from our partner sites:
5 Movie Roles Will Smith (Probably) N...
Katy Perry Seems Surprisingly Cool Ab...
The GIFs That Keep on Giving
11 Bizarre Gadgets You Don't Want You...
More news at Scribol »
Vintage Vegas: Rare Photos of a Deser...
Hell on Wheels: In Praise of Mutant B...
World War II: Pictures We Remember
Behind the Picture: The Liberation of...
More news at Life »
When Hollywood Runs Out of Books to T...
The 12 Best Moments from Mexico's Lea...
5 Infuriating Things Nobody Tells You...
The 5 Weirdest Things You Learn When...
More news at Cracked »
The New Hot Chip Video: A Supermodel...
The Polka-Dotted World Of Yayoi Kusama
Beauty Test Drive: Napoleon Perdis Of...
Watch The First Live Lip-Dub Marriage...
More news at The Frisky »