Loved the one of the birds in particular. Neat stuff.

FloydA: Sure, subby. What isn't?

(Except shaving- seriously- never shave when you're tripping. Trust me on this.)

Ah yes, the good ol' "start with a razor, freak out, move on to electric trimmers, and end up with tweezers" move.

But yeah, the birds picture was awesome.

/hot as microwaved milk

shaving isn't the best idea, but i've certainly spent a few hours (minutes?) in front of a running sink, dousing myself with water because water is the most amazing substance when TRIPPING BALLS.

Arcimboldo sees what you did there

I wonder if the nude woman in the Freud painting is supposed to be the mother of the kid in the foreground.

Tripping hedgehogs

Tripping.
Balls.

Most people can find all the horses but it takes a special eye to see the ducks and the ferris wheel.

I'm not saying I'm tripping balls, but I'm tripping balls

I discovered Arcimboldo while totally tripping balls.

After reading previous responses I'll keep in the holiday spirit and keep my thoughts to myself.

That's some awful painting going on right there. I mean, the idea is neatish, albeit a bit old, but the execution is just - I don't know - awful. Just full strokes. Just straight colours. Always the same character to the stroke (which precludes detailing and depth). No layering. Bah. Horrible, horrible style.

And it's not a slideshow!

FTFA: Mind games: This painting, titled Voyeur, shows Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis,peering over a lake checking out dat ass.

ms_lara_croft: Bob_Laublaw: Loved the one of the birds in particular. Neat stuff.

Same here. Very impressive one. The one of Freud also caught my attention. His face was well-hidden. Sub-conscious? :)

His wasn't too bad once I recognized the nude woman as forming the nose. The one about Ivar was difficult to see, even after I recognized the kneeling man as being the mustache and beard. I think the red robe kind of breaks the illusion since it isn't consistent with the color of the forehead and side of the head.

I vaguely recognized the leaf-bird immediately - or at least thought "yep, that's probably a bird" - even before reading the caption, but mostly only because they were facing the same direction. The form of the breast, beak, and crest are almost a give-away.

I don't know why I said all that.

Well guess what? You guys have just challenged three motherfarkers who are tripping their balls off right now!

FloydA: MoronLessOff: FTFA: Mind games: This painting, titled Voyeur, shows Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis,peering over a lake checking out dat ass.

[i105.photobucket.com image 634x614]
Q&D

farking brilliant.

FloydA: MoronLessOff: FTFA: Mind games: This painting, titled Voyeur, shows Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis,peering over a lake checking out dat ass.

[i105.photobucket.com image 634x614]
Q&D

Wow. Just wow. I can usually keep my laughter quiet as the tears pour out of my eyes, but not this time. That was fantastic!

Coming on a Bicycle: That's some awful painting going on right there. I mean, the idea is neatish, albeit a bit old, but the execution is just - I don't know - awful. Just full strokes. Just straight colours. Always the same character to the stroke (which precludes detailing and depth). No layering. Bah. Horrible, horrible style.

Bing-farking-o

GottaJibbooo: Well guess what? You guys have just challenged three motherfarkers who are tripping their balls off right now!

Dude, there's only one of you. You're tripping balls!

RE: the Lennon one

I get the boy playing the guitar. I get the angel/saint. But what's with the creepy guy with an eyeball for a head???

/Vecna lives

I liked his paintings when he was called Salvatore Dali.

A bit heavy handed but I enjoyed them. Dali FTTB

I don't see Ivan the Terrible, am I missing something?

zulius: I don't see Ivan the Terrible, am I missing something?

Throws pointed staff at FloydA

FTA "Look again, there's more than initially meets the eye: The intricate oil paintings that hide remarkable with double images"

Nothing more

/Caturday edition
//I have really nothing to add

Coming on a Bicycle: That's some awful painting going on right there. I mean, the idea is neatish, albeit a bit old, but the execution is just - I don't know - awful. Just full strokes. Just straight colours. Always the same character to the stroke (which precludes detailing and depth). No layering. Bah. Horrible, horrible style.

Coming on a Bicycle: That's some awful painting going on right there. I mean, the idea is neatish, albeit a bit old, but the execution is just - I don't know - awful. Just full strokes. Just straight colours. Always the same character to the stroke (which precludes detailing and depth). No layering. Bah. Horrible, horrible style.

THIS. Thank you for crystallizing my thoughts, eloquently.

Omg what heavy-handed shiat.