If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN) Followup Obama signs Boehner's extension   (cnn.com) divider line 91
More: Followup  
•       •       •

1535 clicks; posted to Politics » on 23 Dec 2011 at 5:14 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



91 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-12-23 05:06:05 PM
You were saving that one up. I know it.
 
2011-12-23 05:19:36 PM
wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?
I had a feeling the "House Republicans cave to outside pressure, agree to compromise with Democrats. This is not a repeat from ever " might be a tad premature when I read it yesterday.
 
2011-12-23 05:24:10 PM
Boehner not happy about length of extension, but relieved that it's finally out of the spotlight. Though unsure about the extension's ability to perform, Boehner was desperate to avoid the appearance of being dysfunctional.
 
2011-12-23 05:25:32 PM
relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?


He agreed to wait 60 days before rejecting the project.
 
2011-12-23 05:26:40 PM
Emposter: Boehner not happy about length of extension, but relieved that it's finally out of the spotlight. Though unsure about the extension's ability to perform, Boehner was desperate to avoid the appearance of being dysfunctional.

Hopes the bill will allow Keystone XL to lay some pipe.
 
2011-12-23 05:26:43 PM
relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?
I had a feeling the "House Republicans cave to outside pressure, agree to compromise with Democrats. This is not a repeat from ever " might be a tad premature when I read it yesterday.


The clause that said he must choose yes or no? That clause?
 
2011-12-23 05:27:30 PM
Ew.
 
2011-12-23 05:28:15 PM
It was pretty funny to watch the Republicans try to say no to a tax cut. Obama is learning to troll.
 
2011-12-23 05:28:44 PM
Emposter: Boehner not happy about length of extension, but relieved that it's finally out of the spotlight. Though unsure about the extension's ability to perform, Boehner was desperate to avoid the appearance of being dysfunctional.

This whole thing could hurt the GOP in the upcoming elections. And nothing's worse than electile dysfunction.
 
2011-12-23 05:30:10 PM
Masso: relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?
I had a feeling the "House Republicans cave to outside pressure, agree to compromise with Democrats. This is not a repeat from ever " might be a tad premature when I read it yesterday.

The clause that said he must choose yes or no? That clause?


you really can't tell he doesn't want to have to chose before the election and that's why he delayed the decision until after the presidential election? really?
 
2011-12-23 05:31:36 PM
relcec: Masso: relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?
I had a feeling the "House Republicans cave to outside pressure, agree to compromise with Democrats. This is not a repeat from ever " might be a tad premature when I read it yesterday.

The clause that said he must choose yes or no? That clause?

you really can't tell he doesn't want to have to chose before the election and that's why he delayed the decision until after the presidential election? really?


I don't see what the big farking deal is. It's a stupid pipeline for god sakes. People are acting like the pipeline is made of gold or something.
 
2011-12-23 05:31:51 PM
img508.imageshack.us
 
2011-12-23 05:33:04 PM
relcec: Masso: relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?
I had a feeling the "House Republicans cave to outside pressure, agree to compromise with Democrats. This is not a repeat from ever " might be a tad premature when I read it yesterday.

The clause that said he must choose yes or no? That clause?

you really can't tell he doesn't want to have to chose before the election and that's why he delayed the decision until after the presidential election? really?


We're having a presidential election in the next 60 days?
 
2011-12-23 05:33:25 PM
ivan: relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?


He agreed to wait 60 days before rejecting the project.


I'd bet a significant amount of money that he doesn't reject it. if he didn't have a problem with rejecting it he already would have done it. he just wants to wait until after the election to f*ck over the environmental folks.
 
2011-12-23 05:35:08 PM
ivan: relcec: Masso: relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?
I had a feeling the "House Republicans cave to outside pressure, agree to compromise with Democrats. This is not a repeat from ever " might be a tad premature when I read it yesterday.

The clause that said he must choose yes or no? That clause?

you really can't tell he doesn't want to have to chose before the election and that's why he delayed the decision until after the presidential election? really?

We're having a presidential election in the next 60 days?


you're too stupid to even have a conversation with.
 
2011-12-23 05:35:12 PM
relcec: ivan: relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?


He agreed to wait 60 days before rejecting the project.

I'd bet a significant amount of money that he doesn't reject it. if he didn't have a problem with rejecting it he already would have done it. he just wants to wait until after the election to f*ck over the environmental folks.


Link

Obama literally CANNOT lose with the oil pipeline thing.
 
2011-12-23 05:37:33 PM
I admit it. I chuckled.
 
2011-12-23 05:38:18 PM
thedarjeelingexpress.files.wordpress.com

/oblig
 
2011-12-23 05:39:21 PM
relcec: ivan: relcec: Masso: relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?
I had a feeling the "House Republicans cave to outside pressure, agree to compromise with Democrats. This is not a repeat from ever " might be a tad premature when I read it yesterday.

The clause that said he must choose yes or no? That clause?

you really can't tell he doesn't want to have to chose before the election and that's why he delayed the decision until after the presidential election? really?

We're having a presidential election in the next 60 days?

you're too stupid to even have a conversation with.


You're missing the point. The president has to approve or reject the project in the next 60 days. He can't wait until after the election.

If you're saying that he will reject the project in the next 60 days, and then somehow un-reject it after the elections, then say that.
 
2011-12-23 05:42:41 PM
Masso: relcec: ivan: relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?


He agreed to wait 60 days before rejecting the project.

I'd bet a significant amount of money that he doesn't reject it. if he didn't have a problem with rejecting it he already would have done it. he just wants to wait until after the election to f*ck over the environmental folks.

Link

Obama literally CANNOT lose with the oil pipeline thing.


sure he can. he lost today. you can't make both middle and the left happy with this kind of thing. so he didn't want to do anything.

the optimal solution for him was what he originally decided to do, delay the decision until when it no longer mattered and then do something.
being forced to deal with this again in 60 days is not optimal for him. he was put in a worse situation by this legislation.
 
2011-12-23 05:44:21 PM
ivan: relcec: ivan: relcec: Masso: relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?
I had a feeling the "House Republicans cave to outside pressure, agree to compromise with Democrats. This is not a repeat from ever " might be a tad premature when I read it yesterday.

The clause that said he must choose yes or no? That clause?

you really can't tell he doesn't want to have to chose before the election and that's why he delayed the decision until after the presidential election? really?

We're having a presidential election in the next 60 days?

you're too stupid to even have a conversation with.

You're missing the point. The president has to approve or reject the project in the next 60 days. He can't wait until after the election.

If you're saying that he will reject the project in the next 60 days, and then somehow un-reject it after the elections, then say that.


you're on ignore dumbass.
 
2011-12-23 05:47:49 PM
relcec: ivan: relcec: ivan: relcec: Masso: relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?
I had a feeling the "House Republicans cave to outside pressure, agree to compromise with Democrats. This is not a repeat from ever " might be a tad premature when I read it yesterday.

The clause that said he must choose yes or no? That clause?

you really can't tell he doesn't want to have to chose before the election and that's why he delayed the decision until after the presidential election? really?

We're having a presidential election in the next 60 days?

you're too stupid to even have a conversation with.

You're missing the point. The president has to approve or reject the project in the next 60 days. He can't wait until after the election.

If you're saying that he will reject the project in the next 60 days, and then somehow un-reject it after the elections, then say that.

you're on ignore dumbass.


Good, keep your filthy bulging eyes off my words.
 
2011-12-23 05:48:56 PM
relcec: ivan: relcec: ivan: relcec: Masso: relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?
I had a feeling the "House Republicans cave to outside pressure, agree to compromise with Democrats. This is not a repeat from ever " might be a tad premature when I read it yesterday.

The clause that said he must choose yes or no? That clause?

you really can't tell he doesn't want to have to chose before the election and that's why he delayed the decision until after the presidential election? really?

We're having a presidential election in the next 60 days?

you're too stupid to even have a conversation with.

You're missing the point. The president has to approve or reject the project in the next 60 days. He can't wait until after the election.

If you're saying that he will reject the project in the next 60 days, and then somehow un-reject it after the elections, then say that.

you're on ignore dumbass.


Oh, just walk it back. You didn't read it right in the first place and thought he gave in on the pipeline. So much effort to avoid admitting you were wrong.
 
2011-12-23 05:50:58 PM
Masso:
Obama literally CANNOT lose with the oil pipeline thing.

That was a damn good link, thanks for sharing.

I have to concur. The oil pipeline is a strategic, economic and environmental issue.

Strategic in that Canada's oil would come to us. Economic in that it would supply jobs and create a base of jobs. If planned correctly, it can easily avoid contaminating the oil supply.

The fact is this: If Obama can divert the pipeline away from the water supply, that would be a good thing, I don't care who you are. He'd be supporting business , Labor while keeping it all environmentally friendly - which all that environmentalist really ask for.

The over all package though, is that Obma, the Democratic party and the Senators have now finally called Boehner bluff. He's making them look weak in an election period, thus diminishing other times he "caved".

Fact of the matter is, Obma has been feeding them rope the whole time, allowing Republican to hang themselves.
 
2011-12-23 05:54:40 PM
Mrtraveler01: relcec: Masso: relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?
I had a feeling the "House Republicans cave to outside pressure, agree to compromise with Democrats. This is not a repeat from ever " might be a tad premature when I read it yesterday.

The clause that said he must choose yes or no? That clause?

you really can't tell he doesn't want to have to chose before the election and that's why he delayed the decision until after the presidential election? really?

I don't see what the big farking deal is. It's a stupid pipeline for god sakes. People are acting like the pipeline is made of gold or something.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
2011-12-23 05:55:22 PM
The extension which in other words means that you will pay another $400 to the gooberment for 10 months next year so that the democrats can make political hay.

/takes comfort that my grandmother won't have to eat alpo when SS goes broke quicker
 
2011-12-23 05:57:50 PM
EnviroDude: The extension which in other words means that you will pay another $400 to the gooberment for 10 months next year so that the democrats can make political hay.

/takes comfort that my grandmother won't have to eat alpo when SS goes broke quicker


Why would you let your grandmother eat alpo? Are you such a selfish fark head that you wouldn't help her out? What a farking dick you are.
 
2011-12-23 06:00:44 PM
Propain_az: EnviroDude: The extension which in other words means that you will pay another $400 to the gooberment for 10 months next year so that the democrats can make political hay.

/takes comfort that my grandmother won't have to eat alpo when SS goes broke quicker

Why would you let your grandmother eat alpo? Are you such a selfish fark head that you wouldn't help her out? What a farking dick you are.


Yeah, at least get her the Science Diet.
 
2011-12-23 06:01:22 PM
Propain_az: EnviroDude: The extension which in other words means that you will pay another $400 to the gooberment for 10 months next year so that the democrats can make political hay.

/takes comfort that my grandmother won't have to eat alpo when SS goes broke quicker

Why would you let your grandmother eat alpo? Are you such a selfish fark head that you wouldn't help her out? What a farking dick you are.


That sounds socialist.
 
2011-12-23 06:01:38 PM
If he pisses of the Environmentalists then who do they vote for instead of Obama? Republicans? Don't make me laugh (I have a cold and it hurts). At the very worst some of the hardcore enviros don't vote because this is thier #1 issue (very few).

Unions on the other hand are an entirely different story. If 6 states worth of Unions decide that they would be better off republican then they WILL swing their votes.
 
2011-12-23 06:03:45 PM
MrEricSir: It was pretty funny to watch the Republicans try to say no to a tax cut. Obama is learning to troll.

Yeah. Those evil Republicans passed a 1 year extension of the tax cut, but the Senate said no to that. They wanted only 2 months.
So it was definitely the Republicans saying no to a tax cut.

Obama is a master troll, but he's not trolling the Republicans. He's trolling the voters and you're buying it.
 
2011-12-23 06:06:50 PM
Dr.Zom: This whole thing could hurt the GOP in the upcoming elections.

Their voters' collective memory is about three days; I doubt this will do much.
 
2011-12-23 06:07:03 PM
EnviroDude: /takes comfort that my grandmother won't have to eat alpo when SS goes broke quicker

The payroll tax cut borrows from the general fund i.e. income taxes. Same as it did in 2010. The funding of SS is not affected.

Link (new window, .pdf)
 
2011-12-23 06:07:34 PM
Saturn5: MrEricSir: It was pretty funny to watch the Republicans try to say no to a tax cut. Obama is learning to troll.

Yeah. Those evil Republicans passed a 1 year extension of the tax cut, but the Senate said no to that. They wanted only 2 months.
So it was definitely the Republicans saying no to a tax cut.

Obama is a master troll, but he's not trolling the Republicans. He's trolling the voters and you're buying it.


Oh, yes, the bill was just the same except it was for a longer period of time.

/I roiled my eyes so hard I am now staring at the front of my brain.
 
2011-12-23 06:09:23 PM
Both Obama and Boehner won something here. Obama forced the House Republicans to stop holding the payroll tax cut hostage. The Republicans got to fast-track the pipeline issue.

Neither side got everything they wanted. If someone were to file this as a program bug at work, I'd mark it "working as intended".

By the way, you guys are hilarious. <3

/submistress
 
2011-12-23 06:10:05 PM
I'm sick of hearing about the Keystone XL. Just make it an above-ground pipe line, and get on with it.
 
2011-12-23 06:12:45 PM
Darth_Lukecash:
Fact of the matter is, Obma has been feeding them rope the whole time, allowing Republican to hang themselves.


As usual, you're over estimating Obama's political acumen. He had already agreed to the house deal until Senate Democrats decided they wanted to kick it around a little longer but needed to wait until after the holidays to do so. Obama doesn't care about the Environmentalists, it's not like they're going to vote for the Republicans anyway, so he's pretty comfortable, imho, in the notion that he can approve the pipe line, bask in the glow of creating jobs, and doing something about energy independence even if it gives the Republicans a minor win. The problem is, that Boehner didn't handle the messaging right when he first started backing away from the 2 month deal.

So no, Obama wasn't some chess playing political genius who saw this all play out as he had planned, he's a mediocre (at best) politician who was handed a silver platter by someone who really shouldn't be a leader in the opposition party, and probably won't be this time next year.
 
2011-12-23 06:17:32 PM
Man, can anyone imagine what politics would be like with single-issue bills and/or line item vetoes?
 
2011-12-23 06:18:27 PM
Emposter: Man, can anyone imagine what politics would be like with single-issue bills and/or line item vetoes?

awesome and effective?
 
2011-12-23 06:19:49 PM
Saturn5: Yeah. Those evil Republicans passed a 1 year extension of the tax cut, but the Senate said no to that. They wanted only 2 months.
So it was definitely the Republicans saying no to a tax cut.

Obama is a master troll, but he's not trolling the Republicans. He's trolling the voters and you're buying it.


[facepalm.jpg]
 
2011-12-23 06:21:15 PM
ultraholland: Emposter: Man, can anyone imagine what politics would be like with single-issue bills and/or line item vetoes?

awesome and effective?


Maybe the single-issue bills but line-item vetoes? (shudder).
 
2011-12-23 06:22:27 PM
Oh, look. This was reported on. A week later, how many "mainstream media" articles on NDAA have been written?

Oh, that's right. Still a blackout on that thing.
 
2011-12-23 06:24:51 PM
With respect to the pipeline, I'd like to see a comparison of the cost of building a pipeline from Canada to Texas with the cost of building a refinery just over the Canadian border, I suspect it would cost around the same and take the same amount of time, and frankly I'd rather build a big new refinery in Montana or North Dakota and ship the gasoline around with trucks and trains in the usual manner than split the country in two with a frigging pipeline.
 
2011-12-23 06:26:54 PM
"There's only 25-30 [House Rs] who understand how the world works. The rest of them are just nuts."--Rep. McDermott (D), a little pissed.

Link (new window)
 
2011-12-23 06:30:13 PM
clambam: With respect to the pipeline, I'd like to see a comparison of the cost of building a pipeline from Canada to Texas with the cost of building a refinery just over the Canadian border, I suspect it would cost around the same and take the same amount of time, and frankly I'd rather build a big new refinery in Montana or North Dakota and ship the gasoline around with trucks and trains in the usual manner than split the country in two with a frigging pipeline.

That sounds like a much more efficient use of the money, a local distribution point compared to a huge, new (risky and possibly redundant) infrastructure. How many billions will this 1,700 mile pipeline cost? Is this the best use of taxpayer money? How many lobbyists have pushed for this?
 
2011-12-23 06:31:17 PM
CanisNoir: So no, Obama wasn't some chess playing political genius who saw this all play out as he had planned, he's a mediocre (at best) politician who was handed a silver platter by someone who really shouldn't be a leader in the opposition party, and probably won't be this time next year.

Compared to Boehner and the rest of the House GOP, Obama looks a hell of a lot like Bobby Fisher.
 
2011-12-23 06:31:58 PM
Awesome, so we can go 2 years in a row of SS funds paying out more than they are taking in! USA USA.

Short sighted retarded motherfarkers.

Wait.. Dem Playbook time.

OMG YOU ENDED SS BECAUSE IT WAS CHANGED!

Really, this is retarded. This "tax break" is just the defunding of SS. Americans can't even save 40 bucks a paycheck for retirement. This is why there are poor old people. They need their cable now, god forbid they do some actual planning for their retirement. INSTANT GRATIFICATION!!!!! I want it now!!! The generation of WW2 is embarrassed for us all.
 
2011-12-23 06:37:14 PM
Sabyen91: relcec: ivan: relcec: ivan: relcec: Masso: relcec: wait, obama agreed to the pipeline clause?
I had a feeling the "House Republicans cave to outside pressure, agree to compromise with Democrats. This is not a repeat from ever " might be a tad premature when I read it yesterday.

The clause that said he must choose yes or no? That clause?

you really can't tell he doesn't want to have to chose before the election and that's why he delayed the decision until after the presidential election? really?

We're having a presidential election in the next 60 days?

you're too stupid to even have a conversation with.

You're missing the point. The president has to approve or reject the project in the next 60 days. He can't wait until after the election.

If you're saying that he will reject the project in the next 60 days, and then somehow un-reject it after the elections, then say that.

you're on ignore dumbass.

Oh, just walk it back. You didn't read it right in the first place and thought he gave in on the pipeline. So much effort to avoid admitting you were wrong.


I actually like it when people react like that.

It let's me know they're not worth my time.

/and I don't even have talk to them to find that out. Bonus!
 
2011-12-23 06:39:12 PM
MyRandomName: This "tax break" is just the defunding of SS.

Nope. Already covered.
 
2011-12-23 06:41:07 PM
So, why a pipeline? Why not a tanker boat? Parts of Canada border the ocean, in fact both oceans, and you can go into the Great Lakes to deliver farther inland if you have some time and patience. Wouldn't it be, say, easier to deliver the oil in tanker ships to the coast, and either truck or pipeline it out from there?

And if the oil is going from Canada TO America, same argument stands, but arguably easier coastal delivery.
 
Displayed 50 of 91 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »