If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy) Amusing The gay and lesbian community of Minnesota apologize for forcing Amy Koch to have an affair and threatening "the institution of marriage"   (ontd-political.livejournal.com) divider line 151
More: Amusing, Amy Koch, Minnesota, gays and lesbians, marriages, gay community, involvement, Christian values, Michael Brodkorb  
•       •       •

7163 clicks; posted to Politics » on 22 Dec 2011 at 4:39 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



151 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
Codenamechaz [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 03:49:13 PM
Beautiful.
 
WhoIsWillo [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 03:55:19 PM
Codenamechaz: Beautiful.

I think you mean fabulous.
 
Quasar [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 04:02:02 PM
Awesome.
 
Vodka Zombie [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 04:02:51 PM
We need to see more things like this. This is snark at its finest.
 
Ni!
2011-12-22 04:25:03 PM
This is what Christmas is all about.
 
Diogenes [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 04:28:12 PM
Didn't the "accidentally the whole thing" meme originate here?
 
slayer199 [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 04:31:20 PM
LMAO. Well-played Minni-gays and lesbians.
 
WorldCitizen [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 04:31:51 PM
I approve.
 
Dancin_In_Anson [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 04:32:25 PM
Now THAT is how it's done. Well played!
 
Cubansaltyballs [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 04:34:33 PM
Wow. Awesome.
 
Diogenes [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 04:34:38 PM
slayer199: LMAO. Well-played Minni-gays and lesbians.

They come in miniature form now?

"Dear Santa..."
 
Ed Finnerty [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 04:35:26 PM
cdn.unicornbooty.com
 
kingoomieiii [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 04:39:06 PM
Diogenes: Didn't the "accidentally the whole thing" meme originate here?

Who knows. It's out in the wilderness now.

According to KnowYourMeme, this was the origin-

s3.amazonaws.com
 
bravian
2011-12-22 04:41:09 PM
slayer199: LMAO. Well-played Minni-gays and lesbians.

You're welcome.

/the fight has only started
//the MN GOP is completely imploding at the moment - its been fun to watch
 
Precious Roy's Horse Dividers [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 04:41:15 PM
I approve of this.
 
Corvus
2011-12-22 04:42:19 PM
OWNED!
 
TravisBickle62
2011-12-22 04:43:03 PM
Let's not forget the transgendered
 
MaxxLarge [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 04:43:19 PM
She just got hoisted by her own retard.
 
MSFT
2011-12-22 04:43:37 PM
First smile I've had all day.
 
DarwiOdrade [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 04:48:50 PM
i511.photobucket.com
 
Rann Xerox
2011-12-22 04:51:02 PM
Now that is some sick, sick burn.

*GOLF CLAP*
 
Bf+
2011-12-22 04:52:25 PM
win
 
KiltedBastich
2011-12-22 04:52:31 PM
Ahh, that was beautiful. Epic, finely tuned snark delivered with precision timing and rapier wit.

thelaughingmarcus.files.wordpress.com
 
Civil Discourse
2011-12-22 04:53:01 PM
That was amazing.
 
Stoker
2011-12-22 04:53:23 PM
Fabulous!
 
fusillade762
2011-12-22 04:53:35 PM
Kochsuckers!
 
HotIgneous Intruder
2011-12-22 04:54:11 PM
So.
What.
 
valar_morghulis
2011-12-22 04:55:31 PM
HotIgneous Intruder: So.
What.

UMAD?
 
Gotfire
2011-12-22 04:57:13 PM
t3.gstatic.comt2.gstatic.com
 
Ed Grubermann
2011-12-22 04:57:32 PM
 
qorkfiend
2011-12-22 04:59:45 PM

function ohSnap($person) {
     if(is_told($person)) die("Oh snap.");
     tell($person);
     ohSnap($person);
}
 
Theaetetus
2011-12-22 04:59:47 PM
Oh, snap.
 
improvius
2011-12-22 05:02:15 PM
Merry Christmas, hoe-hoe-hoe.
 
Karma Curmudgeon
2011-12-22 05:04:49 PM
Amy? Moar liek Any, amirite?
 
The Why Not Guy [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 05:06:51 PM
Snark aside, can someone from the Right explain why you don't go after adulterers with the same fervor as you do homosexuals when defending the sanctity of marriage?
 
FuturePastNow
2011-12-22 05:10:20 PM
heh heh heh
 
A Dark Evil Omen
2011-12-22 05:13:25 PM
Biz Markie, his mouth agape.
 
Precious Roy's Horse Dividers [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 05:21:21 PM
The Why Not Guy: Snark aside, can someone from the Right explain why you don't go after adulterers with the same fervor as you do homosexuals when defending the sanctity of marriage?

They do go after adulterers, so long as there is a d next to their name. See: Clinton, Bill
 
Pincy
2011-12-22 05:22:40 PM
The Why Not Guy: Snark aside, can someone from the Right explain why you don't go after adulterers with the same fervor as you do homosexuals when defending the sanctity of marriage?

I'm guessing the answer is something like "Ya, adultery is bad and all, but at least they aren't gay".
 
TommyDeuce
2011-12-22 05:24:11 PM
Having done a GIS for both parties involved in the affair, I can't decide if they are a good match, or if I should just go launch my lunch.

/Who am I kidding, I'll just go hit the net for some mind bleach when I get home.
//Though if I really did want to watch a couple that looked like that, there's always yuvutu . . .
 
CowboyNinjaD
2011-12-22 05:24:40 PM
The Why Not Guy: Snark aside, can someone from the Right explain why you don't go after adulterers with the same fervor as you do homosexuals when defending the sanctity of marriage?


Because... ugh... Socialism?
 
DarwiOdrade [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 05:25:11 PM
The Why Not Guy: Snark aside, can someone from the Right explain why you don't go after adulterers with the same fervor as you do homosexuals when defending the sanctity of marriage?

Obviously an obscure passage from Leviticus outweighs the ten commandments.
 
bravian
2011-12-22 05:25:25 PM
The Why Not Guy: Snark aside, can someone from the Right explain why you don't go after adulterers with the same fervor as you do homosexuals when defending the sanctity of marriage?

Adultery is more traditional than same-sex marriage.

/or something like that
 
Codenamechaz [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 05:25:46 PM
Precious Roy's Horse Dividers: The Why Not Guy: Snark aside, can someone from the Right explain why you don't go after adulterers with the same fervor as you do homosexuals when defending the sanctity of marriage?

They do go after adulterers, so long as there is a d next to their name. See: Clinton, Bill

Yeah.

If there's an R, they do their best to help them quietly shuffle it under the rug, at least until such time til the media finds out, at which point the rug becomes a bus.
 
Sock Ruh Tease
2011-12-22 05:27:28 PM
The Why Not Guy: Snark aside, can someone from the Right explain why you don't go after adulterers with the same fervor as you do homosexuals when defending the sanctity of marriage?

Because the commandment says "thou shalt not be a gay person", not "thou shalt not commit adultery".
 
gilgigamesh [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 05:30:11 PM
The Why Not Guy: Snark aside, can someone from the Right explain why you don't go after adulterers with the same fervor as you do homosexuals when defending the sanctity of marriage?

Because it has nothing to do with preserving marriage, and everything to do with legislating discrimination against a distinct, unpopular minority for the purpose of political gain.

There's really no more to it than that.
 
Stoker
2011-12-22 05:30:17 PM
Sock Ruh Tease: The Why Not Guy: Snark aside, can someone from the Right explain why you don't go after adulterers with the same fervor as you do homosexuals when defending the sanctity of marriage?

Because the commandment says "thou shalt not be a gay person", not "thou shalt not commit adultery".
-=-
King George version?
 
BitwiseShift
2011-12-22 05:30:41 PM
But wait, there's more. My dog, if I owned one, would also pen an apology for leading Amy Koch astray by sniffing other dog's butts, especially those my dog wasn't married to, at the time.
 
beerrun
2011-12-22 05:31:39 PM
Love it when someone gets told.

Bonus points for using proper professional correspondence structure, all while including the snark.
 
Exception Collection [TotalFark]
2011-12-22 05:32:14 PM
gilgigamesh: Because it has nothing to do with preserving marriage, and everything to do with legislating discrimination against a distinct, unpopular minority for the purpose of political gain.

There's really no more to it than that.

I don't think it's *all* about the political gain. There's some good old fashioned bigotry involved as well.
 
Displayed 50 of 151 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

Redisplay/refresh comments

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »