If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post) Obvious Romney sticks the landing on the rarely seen triple flip: We should have invaded, we shouldn't have invaded, and we shouldn't leave   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 87
More: Obvious  
•       •       •

1773 clicks; posted to Politics » on 22 Dec 2011 at 2:05 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



87 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-12-22 10:19:10 AM
At this point voting for the GOP is voting for more wars in the Middle East.
 
2011-12-22 10:22:51 AM
Aarontology: At this point voting for the GOP is voting for more wars in the Middle East.

War is good for the economy!
 
2011-12-22 10:25:22 AM
I suppose you have to acknowledge that it's a difficult routine. But his execution is so sloppy!
 
2011-12-22 10:35:15 AM
"The president went in based upon massaged intelligence that they had weapons of mass destruction. Had he known that that was not the case -- which he did -- , the U.N. would not have put forward resolutions authorizing this type of action. The president would not have been pursuing that course, except the scheme of having the Office of Special Plans pull the wool over everyone's eyes actually worked. But we did not know that. Based upon what we knew at the time, we were very much under deliberately given the false the impression as a nation, by our president was under the impression, that they had weapons of mass destruction, that Saddam Hussein was intent on potentially using those weapons, and so he took action based upon what he knew that Saddam had tried to kill his Daddy. But to go back and say, well knowing what we know now would we have gone in. Well, knowing what we know now, and what the Bush administration knew then, they did not have weapons of mass destruction, there would have been no effort on the part of our president or others to take military action if they hadn't succeeded in tricking Congress with falsified intelligence."

Fixed that for ya, Guv'nah.
 
2011-12-22 10:36:46 AM
Should we re-invade? Because no one has quite clarified that point yet.
 
2011-12-22 10:39:20 AM
Mentat: Should we re-invade? Because no one has quite clarified that point yet.

From the sounds of things, if we give them a couple of weeks there won't be anything left to re-invade.
 
2011-12-22 10:39:38 AM
I'll never understand why they just didn't plant the goddamned WMDs in the first place if that was the bullshiat reason that they were trying to sell to the people for the invasion.
 
2011-12-22 10:39:57 AM
djkutch: War is good for the economy!

It'll create all sorts of jobs for contractors and mercenaries.
 
2011-12-22 10:41:35 AM
Aarontology: djkutch: War is good for the economy!

It'll create all sorts of jobs for contractors and mercenaries.


and funeral homes.
 
2011-12-22 10:41:41 AM
Mugato: I'll never understand why they just didn't plant the goddamned WMDs in the first place if that was the bullshiat reason that they were trying to sell to the people for the invasion.

Was probably too difficult to get in and do that once the U.N. got involved.
 
2011-12-22 10:42:56 AM
Mugato: I'll never understand why they just didn't plant the goddamned WMDs in the first place if that was the bullshiat reason that they were trying to sell to the people for the invasion.

I don't think it would be that easy to cover up. And if the truth came out... whoo boy.
 
2011-12-22 10:52:33 AM
Aarontology: At this point voting for the GOP is voting for more wars in the Middle East.

Four More Wars! Four More Wars!
 
2011-12-22 10:53:00 AM
gilgigamesh: I don't think it would be that easy to cover up. And if the truth came out... whoo boy.

This is America. We don't care about things like truth.
 
2011-12-22 10:56:20 AM
gilgigamesh: Mugato: I'll never understand why they just didn't plant the goddamned WMDs in the first place if that was the bullshiat reason that they were trying to sell to the people for the invasion.

I don't think it would be that easy to cover up. And if the truth came out... whoo boy.


Well I suppose if the President couldn't disappear the intern down the hall, doing the WMD thing might have been too tall an order. I had faith in my Gov't to be more duplicitous than that though.

/disillusioned
 
2011-12-22 11:16:56 AM
i249.photobucket.com
 
2011-12-22 11:19:36 AM
Aarontology: At this point voting for the GOP is voting for more wars in the Middle East.

Yeah, we should just do like Obama and only have limited airstrike engagements as directed under the NATO treaty.
 
2011-12-22 11:22:59 AM
xanadian: Yeah, we should just do like Obama and only have limited airstrike engagements as directed under the NATO treaty.

If it's big war vs. mini war, I'd go for the mini war. Just saying.
 
2011-12-22 11:23:30 AM
Mugato: I'll never understand why they just didn't plant the goddamned WMDs in the first place if that was the bullshiat reason that they were trying to sell to the people for the invasion.

Probably because Dubya honestly thought (and/or was led to believe) there were WMDs in Iraq. IIRC, he based his involvement off of faulty Italian intelligence.

I'm sure there were other reasons he wanted to go in there (I really believe Dubya wanted Saddam to be his Hitler), but having shaky-at-best intelligence was enough of a casus belli as anything else he was going to get.
 
2011-12-22 11:25:51 AM
sweetmelissa31: xanadian: Yeah, we should just do like Obama and only have limited airstrike engagements as directed under the NATO treaty.

If it's big war vs. mini war, I'd go for the mini war. Just saying.


If it's mini war vs. mini bar, I'll go for the mini bar every time.
 
2011-12-22 11:31:06 AM
Snarfangel: sweetmelissa31: xanadian: Yeah, we should just do like Obama and only have limited airstrike engagements as directed under the NATO treaty.

If it's big war vs. mini war, I'd go for the mini war. Just saying.

If it's mini war vs. mini bar, I'll go for the mini bar every time.


I'd invade that mini bar, yessirree!!
 
2011-12-22 11:51:52 AM
Did Romney bet $10,000 he could make this vault?
 
2011-12-22 11:54:59 AM
I was listening to McCain this morning blaming Obama for pulling out troops. Hellooo...BUSH set the timetable, remember? And Obama tried to keep troops there but Malaki wouldn't negotiate another SOFA agreement, so we left. Stop pandering--you're not campaigning anymore.
 
2011-12-22 11:57:46 AM
brigid_fitch: I was listening to McCain this morning blaming Obama for pulling out troops. Hellooo...BUSH set the timetable, remember? And Obama tried to keep troops there but Malaki wouldn't negotiate another SOFA agreement, so we left. Stop pandering--you're not campaigning anymore.

I feel like making a joke that's SOFA King funny, but why bother?
 
2011-12-22 12:02:36 PM
As I've said before, this guy has done more flip-flops than a Chinese acrobat
 
2011-12-22 12:12:47 PM
Snarfangel: brigid_fitch: I was listening to McCain this morning blaming Obama for pulling out troops. Hellooo...BUSH set the timetable, remember? And Obama tried to keep troops there but Malaki wouldn't negotiate another SOFA agreement, so we left. Stop pandering--you're not campaigning anymore.

I feel like making a joke that's SOFA King funny, but why bother?


Well, if you couch the joke just right, i'm sure it would be hilarious.
 
2011-12-22 12:29:24 PM
Triple Lindy?
 
2011-12-22 12:46:43 PM
FTA: "If we knew at the time of our entry into Iraq that there were no weapons of mass destruction, if somehow we had been given that information, obviously we would not have gone in."

Hans Blix, Scott Ritter and Joe Wilson would like to have a few words with you on that one.
 
2011-12-22 01:36:04 PM
CitizenTed: FTA: "If we knew at the time of our entry into Iraq that there were no weapons of mass destruction, if somehow we had been given that information, obviously we would not have gone in."

Hans Blix, Scott Ritter and Joe Wilson would like to have a few words with you on that one.


We went into Iraq for one reason and one reason only (according to everyone around me who supported it): Nine. Eleven.

We didn't need any evidence. We simply 'just knew' (according to them).

Iraq 2 Electric Bugaloo was the biggest foreign policy blunder we've had in the last 2 decades.
 
2011-12-22 01:37:09 PM
CitizenTed: FTA: "If we knew at the time of our entry into Iraq that there were no weapons of mass destruction, if somehow we had been given that information, obviously we would not have gone in."

Hans Blix, Scott Ritter and Joe Wilson would like to have a few words with you on that one.


This, despite Bush and Cheney saying that would have gone in anyway? The constant shifting of goalposts? Can we at least go 50 years before we start revising history? KTHNKSBY.
 
2011-12-22 02:10:24 PM
Snarfangel: sweetmelissa31: xanadian: Yeah, we should just do like Obama and only have limited airstrike engagements as directed under the NATO treaty.

If it's big war vs. mini war, I'd go for the mini war. Just saying.

If it's mini war vs. mini bar, I'll go for the mini bar every time.


If it's mini bar vs. mini skirt, I'll go for the mini skirt every time.

/you be the judge if I'm wearing it or chasing it...
//nttawwt
 
2011-12-22 02:12:35 PM
Triple Flip has nothing on the Triple Lindy...

thismighthurt.files.wordpress.com
 
2011-12-22 02:12:58 PM
Nadie_AZ: CitizenTed: FTA: "If we knew at the time of our entry into Iraq that there were no weapons of mass destruction, if somehow we had been given that information, obviously we would not have gone in."

Hans Blix, Scott Ritter and Joe Wilson would like to have a few words with you on that one.

We went into Iraq for one reason and one reason only (according to everyone around me who supported it): Nine. Eleven.


No, we went to bring freedom to the Eye-rackis.

// nothing about how the WMD Saddam supposedly had were the ones that we sold him in the 1980s?
 
2011-12-22 02:18:05 PM
Nadie_AZ:
Iraq 2 Electric Bugaloo was the biggest foreign policy blunder we've had in the last 2 decades.


I'm trying to think. Are you sure it wasn't even longer? What foreign policy disaster since the Vietnam War was greater?
 
2011-12-22 02:19:15 PM
Snarfangel: Aarontology: At this point voting for the GOP is voting for more wars in the Middle East.

Four More Wars! Four More Wars!


And the four countries I would invade are Iran, Syria, Yemen, and... I can't remember the last country. Oops.
 
2011-12-22 02:20:21 PM
That isn't a flip flop, that is hindsight.
 
2011-12-22 02:21:11 PM
"Well of course not. The president went in based upon intelligence that they had weapons of mass destruction. Had he known that that was not the case, the U.N. would not have put forward resolutions authorizing this type of action.

Well that certainly is one way of putting it. Another would be that we went in dispite having no record of weapons of mass destruction. Yet another would be that George Bush saw 9/11 as a perfect way to settle a grudge and had his staffers hype the threat of weapons of mass destruction that would whip the public into enough of a fear driven frenzy that he could claim a mandate to invade, weapons be damned.
 
2011-12-22 02:22:03 PM
PanicMan: Nadie_AZ:
Iraq 2 Electric Bugaloo was the biggest foreign policy blunder we've had in the last 2 decades.

I'm trying to think. Are you sure it wasn't even longer? What foreign policy disaster since the Vietnam War was greater?


Um ... Iran hostage crisis? That's about all I can think of.
 
2011-12-22 02:23:15 PM
...the U.N. would not have put forward resolutions authorizing this type of action.

The U.N. authorized the invasion of Iraq?

On September 16, 2004 Secretary-General of the United Nations Kofi Annan, speaking on the invasion, said, "I have indicated it was not in conformity with the UN Charter. From our point of view, from the charter point of view, it was illegal.
 
2011-12-22 02:23:38 PM
gilgigamesh: Mugato: I'll never understand why they just didn't plant the goddamned WMDs in the first place if that was the bullshiat reason that they were trying to sell to the people for the invasion.

I don't think it would be that easy to cover up. And if the truth came out... whoo boy.


What, people would get mad at the administration for invading Iraq under false pretenses?

Hahahaha. Yea, ok.
 
2011-12-22 02:24:55 PM
Nadie_AZ: PanicMan: Nadie_AZ:
Iraq 2 Electric Bugaloo was the biggest foreign policy blunder we've had in the last 2 decades.

I'm trying to think. Are you sure it wasn't even longer? What foreign policy disaster since the Vietnam War was greater?

Um ... Iran hostage crisis? That's about all I can think of.


Which, funny enough, ties back in with the whole program we had of furnishing Iraq with chemical weapons in order to use them as a pawn against Iran. But remember everyone, we're the good guys.
 
2011-12-22 02:28:56 PM
StrangeQ: Nadie_AZ: PanicMan: Nadie_AZ:
Iraq 2 Electric Bugaloo was the biggest foreign policy blunder we've had in the last 2 decades.

I'm trying to think. Are you sure it wasn't even longer? What foreign policy disaster since the Vietnam War was greater?

Um ... Iran hostage crisis? That's about all I can think of.

Which, funny enough, ties back in with the whole program we had of furnishing Iraq with chemical weapons in order to use them as a pawn against Iran. But remember everyone, we're the good guys.


I keep thinking Reagan must've done something colossally stupid during his tenure and yet I can't think of any ... Not like any arms deals to the enemy or funding the wrong people in the wrong parts of the world for some cause that might later come back to haunt the country ...
 
2011-12-22 02:29:37 PM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: As I've said before, this guy has done more flip-flops than a Chinese acrobat

Male or female?
 
2011-12-22 02:32:12 PM
Nadie_AZ: StrangeQ: Nadie_AZ: PanicMan: Nadie_AZ:
Iraq 2 Electric Bugaloo was the biggest foreign policy blunder we've had in the last 2 decades.

I'm trying to think. Are you sure it wasn't even longer? What foreign policy disaster since the Vietnam War was greater?

Um ... Iran hostage crisis? That's about all I can think of.

Which, funny enough, ties back in with the whole program we had of furnishing Iraq with chemical weapons in order to use them as a pawn against Iran. But remember everyone, we're the good guys.

I keep thinking Reagan must've done something colossally stupid during his tenure and yet I can't think of any ... Not like any arms deals to the enemy or funding the wrong people in the wrong parts of the world for some cause that might later come back to haunt the country ...


He was fight Communism my friend, and for that all his sins were washed away in a bath of Bald Eagle tears.
 
2011-12-22 02:32:22 PM
Gergesa: MaudlinMutantMollusk: As I've said before, this guy has done more flip-flops than a Chinese acrobat

Male or female?


No, that's thai.
 
2011-12-22 02:36:15 PM
Nadie_AZ: StrangeQ: Nadie_AZ: PanicMan: Nadie_AZ:
Iraq 2 Electric Bugaloo was the biggest foreign policy blunder we've had in the last 2 decades.

I'm trying to think. Are you sure it wasn't even longer? What foreign policy disaster since the Vietnam War was greater?

Um ... Iran hostage crisis? That's about all I can think of.

Which, funny enough, ties back in with the whole program we had of furnishing Iraq with chemical weapons in order to use them as a pawn against Iran. But remember everyone, we're the good guys.

I keep thinking Reagan must've done something colossally stupid during his tenure and yet I can't think of any ... Not like any arms deals to the enemy or funding the wrong people in the wrong parts of the world for some cause that might later come back to haunt the country ...


I'm sensing sarcasm in this remark, almost as if you're trying to imply that Reagan was anything but the greatest president we've ever had.
 
2011-12-22 02:37:09 PM
StrangeQ:

...would be that George Bush saw 9/11 as a perfect way to settle a grudge and had his staffers hype the threat of weapons of mass destruction that would whip the public into enough of a fear driven frenzy that he could claim a mandate to invade, weapons be damned.


That's exactly what happened. People don't really believe otherwise... do they?
 
2011-12-22 02:38:41 PM
buck1138: He was fight Communism my friend, and for that all his sins were washed away in a bath of Bald Eagle tears.

StrangeQ: I'm sensing sarcasm in this remark, almost as if you're trying to imply that Reagan was anything but the greatest president we've ever had.

I'd respond, but I've been asked to report to re-education camp room number 101 for the next 30 minutes ...
 
2011-12-22 02:38:43 PM
sonnyboy11: StrangeQ:

...would be that George Bush saw 9/11 as a perfect way to settle a grudge and had his staffers hype the threat of weapons of mass destruction that would whip the public into enough of a fear driven frenzy that he could claim a mandate to invade, weapons be damned.

That's exactly what happened. People don't really believe otherwise... do they?


You don't get out much, do you?
 
2011-12-22 02:44:14 PM
StrangeQ: sonnyboy11: StrangeQ:

...would be that George Bush saw 9/11 as a perfect way to settle a grudge and had his staffers hype the threat of weapons of mass destruction that would whip the public into enough of a fear driven frenzy that he could claim a mandate to invade, weapons be damned.

That's exactly what happened. People don't really believe otherwise... do they?

You don't get out much, do you?


Seriously. What Bush really cared about was the Iraqi People who were being oppressed. . . .



Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha h ahahahahaha
 
2011-12-22 02:45:42 PM
Got to pander HARD to the military-industrial-media complex who own this country's political system.

Can't win without them on your side.
 
Displayed 50 of 87 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »