If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Guardian)   The 100 greatest novels of all time   (observer.guardian.co.uk) divider line 549
    More: Unlikely  
•       •       •

26710 clicks; posted to Main » on 13 Oct 2003 at 2:24 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



549 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | » | Last | Show all
 
2003-10-13 01:45:55 PM
I've read 5 of them.

Last week I started Lord of the Flies and Cien Anos de Soledad (again) and I've tried reading The Trial and Lolita but have failed to make it passed the first page.
 
2003-10-13 01:52:36 PM
i have read 11 of them, but dont agree with the rankning. go fig.
 
2003-10-13 01:52:51 PM
I've read 32 of them and of those some should not be included in a top 100 list.
 
2003-10-13 02:16:28 PM
What was so great about Frankenstein?

Even my english teacher hated that book, and that is farking saying something...
 
2003-10-13 02:25:24 PM
I'm suprised that T.H. White's The Once and Future King isn't on this list...
 
2003-10-13 02:28:04 PM
"hop on pop" really ought to be at least in the top 10...
 
2003-10-13 02:28:42 PM
This is plain awful! Where are the greats? Where's Jude the Obscure? Where's Moby Dick? Where's The Big Sleep?
<reads article>
nevermind.
 
2003-10-13 02:29:06 PM
Robert Guillaume rejoices...

/dreaming the impossible dream...
 
2003-10-13 02:29:44 PM
where is American Psycho?
 
2003-10-13 02:30:50 PM
My Dad was an literature teacher and when I was required to read Jane Eyre in high school, he told me to read the Cliff's Notes and not waste my time with 'that piece of sh*t'. Thanks, Dad!
 
2003-10-13 02:31:35 PM
I got halfway into 'Don Quixote' before i lost intrest.

My fav line in in tho was when he said something like 'surely this story could only have been told by an Arab, for that race is prone to lies'
 
2003-10-13 02:32:34 PM
seems like the first 50 novels were all written more than 100 years ago....

No 1984 or Animal Farm? I'll even take Watership Down. Where are the animal allergories?
 
2003-10-13 02:32:47 PM
the great gatsby? I hate F. Scott Fitzgerald. stupid whiner.
 
2003-10-13 02:33:04 PM
so...where in the hell is the BIBLE?
 
2003-10-13 02:33:11 PM
17. Wuthering Heights Emily Bronte
Catherine Earnshaw and Heathcliff have passed into the language. Impossible to ignore.


I am turning the impossible into possible.
 
2003-10-13 02:33:22 PM
I'm glad to see that If On A Winter's Night A Traveler by Italo Calvino was on there. A most surreal read.
 
2003-10-13 02:33:26 PM
What, no narnia?
 
2003-10-13 02:33:51 PM
Where's Atlas Shrugged?

/I've read 11 of them, that's enough.
 
2003-10-13 02:34:23 PM
looks like it's just an excuse to make $$$ off an affiliates account...
 
2003-10-13 02:34:35 PM
I take it back, The BFG on the list, even though far down, makes up for all.
 
2003-10-13 02:35:14 PM
Why is "The Scarlett Letter" on there? I read a lot, and that was the worst.book.ever.

On The Road? I'm reading that now for class and it's taking me FOREVER to get through

To Kill A Mockingbird should not be number 73

Where the heck is "A Tree Grows in Brooklyn"???
 
2003-10-13 02:35:42 PM
Al Bundy's top 100 great works of literature:

1. TV Guide
 
2003-10-13 02:36:08 PM
Don Quixote is an obvious #1, even if it's outdate and almost unreadable today (at least in olde Castillian)

Lord of the Flies and Catcher in the Rye should be (way) above the awesome, yet not as good Brave New World.
 
2003-10-13 02:36:12 PM
This isn't a list of the greatest novels of all time, but a list of the few classics that Amazon.uk has in stock.
 
2003-10-13 02:36:33 PM
Why isn't "catcher in the Rye" higher on the list? Plus, they completely left out "Baron in the Trees," a Calvino book that was one hundred times more intersting than "Sacrltet Letter" or "Wuthering Heights."
Aye me....
 
2003-10-13 02:36:54 PM
I think I read two of these in high school, otherwise, nada. Reading novels should not be an exercise, literary or otherwise.

All Hail Cussler, Crichton, and King!
 
2003-10-13 02:37:06 PM

Where's The Illuminatus Trilogy!?

Hmm. Unless....

 
2003-10-13 02:37:10 PM
Catcher in the Rye is not in the top 10? The whole list is obviously America's top 100 and it's woefully inaccurate with such hits as Frankenstein and USA??? When did Fark get into posting stuff worthy of randomdrivel.com
 
2003-10-13 02:37:16 PM
Where's Atlas Shrugged?

I wondered how many posts it would be before someone brought that one up. It would be a much better book if Ayn Rand weren't such a megalomaniacal pretentious biatch.
 
2003-10-13 02:37:31 PM
I read 6. Not many, but surprising to me considering how much I read.

BackwardsHatClub: Check #59.
 
2003-10-13 02:37:47 PM
If your wordering where Narnia was, read the defense, they wanted to limit the quantity of children's lit, but they said it was close to making the list.

I read.. 16 of the 100. A few of those, I disagree with.
 
2003-10-13 02:38:50 PM
The Bible is not a "novel".

If this was for best literary works, the Bible could be #1, and William Shakesphere and Edgar Alan Poe would be there too. Angloparlants masturbate to Shakesphere so much that I wouldn't be surprised if an entire list of best literary works included only Shakesphere.

I'm stupid, educate me.
 
2003-10-13 02:38:50 PM
Emma over Pride and Prejudice? WTF? Feh....
 
2003-10-13 02:39:23 PM
9 of them
 
2003-10-13 02:39:38 PM
"so...where in the hell is the BIBLE?"

Under "F" for fiction
 
2003-10-13 02:39:46 PM
Ive only read 9.
Wonderful book I'm recommending to anyone who'll listen:
Skinny Legs and All, Tom Robbins
 
2003-10-13 02:40:31 PM
Where's "Gone With The Wind"??

And what about "The Old Man And The Sea" or "The Grapes Of Wrath"?
 
2003-10-13 02:40:46 PM
 
2003-10-13 02:40:47 PM
Not included:

The Grapes of Wrath
Dracula
War and Peace
Anything by Hemingway

Horrible list!
 
2003-10-13 02:40:53 PM
My, isn't that a wonderful list of Anglo-Saxon literature.

So it's the top 100 that happen to be in English. Woohoo.
 
2003-10-13 02:40:58 PM
No Vonnegut?
No Slaughterhouse Five or Cat's Cradle?

So it goes.
 
2003-10-13 02:40:59 PM
"so...where in the hell is the BIBLE?"

Under "F" for fiction
 
2003-10-13 02:41:49 PM
The Hemmingway is a book of short stories not a novel. This list, like most, is a joke.


As to "where's Atlas Shrugged?" the answer is on the dustbin of history.
 
2003-10-13 02:41:52 PM
Dammit I have to learn to stop hitting refresh.
 
2003-10-13 02:42:02 PM
Where's the Lord of the Rings Trilogy?
 
2003-10-13 02:42:28 PM
Where's the entire Babysitter's Club series? I figured that would take up at least fifty spots on the list.
 
2003-10-13 02:42:42 PM
Ok, I realize a lot of contemporary writing is pure crap, but The Prince of Tides really should've made the list. I agree with a lot of the choices, though. I was surprised to see Mrs. Dalloway on there. Awesome read.
 
2003-10-13 02:42:44 PM
"So it's the top 100 that happen to be in English. Woohoo."

did you read the list?
 
2003-10-13 02:43:00 PM
Is this the Rolling Stone top 100 books? It should be, then they could have the writers for AskMen.com ranked higher than George Orwell.
 
2003-10-13 02:43:13 PM
15.

/am I winning?
 
Displayed 50 of 549 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report