Penis trifecta in play?

Subby said 'penis' twice.

Obviously a false charge, because as we all know, an Eagle Scout cum Scoutmaster would never, ever want to touch a Scout's pee-pee. Only a liberal would do that and, as we also all know, the Scouts don't allow those who have the ghey.

Wow, throw more java-script crap up on that website why don't you. Can't we get an elf dancing across the bottom or something?

Are you trying to tell me my old Boy Scout Penis-measuring Merit Badge is a fake?

Don't you worry about the size of your cousin's penis. Let me worry about blank.

Strange coincidence. My scoutmaster was very worried about his cousin's bunghole.

We need to get rid of these perves and focus these kids on more normal activities.

You can laugh, but I fall for that one every. single. time.

/I'm pretty sure the guy outside the strip club was legit, though. His cousin was inside at a bachelor party and didn't trust the strippers' assessments. So I let him take some pics and he gave me $20. Win-win!

*waiting patiently for the lesbian sex scandals in the Girl Scouts*

...what do you mean "trick"

Walker: The indecent exposure charge does not reflect Lewis exposing himself, but rather that he allegedly attempted to get the victims to expose themselves.

WTF? Does that mean if you tell a woman "Tits or GTFO" you can be arrested for indecent exposure for trying to get her to expose herself?

Attempted indecent exposure?

Knara: *waiting patiently for the lesbian sex scandals in the Girl Scouts*

If I had a nickel for every time I fell for that....

how come the guy just didnt molest his cousin who is the same age.

oh, he was looking for a bigger unit. makes sense.

how sad would it be if the cousin was real and was rejected for being molested for an inadequate weenie.

I'm not going to judge this one so quick. Maybe he was a doctor? My doc stretches and measures my penis every visit to make sure my mastitis is in check.

I'm sure I'll be reprimanded by scads of "right-thinking" Murricans, but I don't think such behavior should be a hanging offense. It is a bit creepy but it's more ridiculous than dangerous. According to TFA, the first "victim" complied once but then refused and the second did nothing but refuse his requests; I've seen nothing about force or threats of force, and I think regarding this as "an extremely serious, grave matter" can only happen in a very boring neighborhood.

If he's found guilty then the court should give him a good talking to, fine him and put him on probation for a while. If her keeps this shiat up after that humiliation that'll be a sign that there's something seriously wrong with him, e.g., that he is incorrigibly stupid, at which point he might need to be taken more seriously.

By the way, I read something somewhere about a British pediatrician who allegedly thought anal rape of little boys (like 6 year olds) by their fathers or stepfathers was a serious social problem so he devised a test: he'd slipped on a glove, lube it up and then insert his fingers in the boy's rectum. If one finger went in easily without much resistance, he said, he regarded that as a "red flag," so he'd insert a second finger.

He would then notify the child protection bureaucracy that he had medical proof of sexual abuse, demand that charges be filed and then testify as an expert witness that these little kids' accommodating anuses could only happen if they were used to people sticking things up their butts -- and that most such abusers were the boy's own daddies (this much is actually true). He succeeded in ruining several family's lives and having several dads publicly humiliated and sent to prison during his career as a "Guardian of Children."

Eventually somebody thought to investigate whether sticking one's fingers up a kid's butt was a common practice for pediatricians (it's not), what other pediatricians thought ("That's creepy!") and if any other cause might account for these anal accommodations (yes, including the doctor getting plenty of practice at this technique, and most kids being taught to obey authority figures -- including doctors who order and encourage the child to relax his sphincter).

Then the doctor was arrested tried for sticking his fingers up so many kids' butts, his "expert testimony" was used as evidence against him, and he was sent up; the wrongly convicted dads who were still in the poky were freed and lots of fathers had to be exonerated and apologized to. Of course your life can never really be fixed after that, and in many cases the mothers -- who believed the experts and ditched the guy to protect the children -- had already gone irrevocably away and remarried; some even insisted that "where there's smoke there's fire" so of course the dad was truly guilty.

Now that pedophiliac physician should have been hung, drawn and quartered, as should every cop, judge, juror and reporter who accepted his "method" and went along with his decades-long career of digital rape at innocent men's expense.

Like I said this is something I'm sure I read someplace online, and y'all can Google it (and correct my mistakes) if you doubt that such things can happen in real life.

"Irregardless", if your child reports the doctor trying to stick something up his/her butthole you might become concerned, and in fact it might be a good idea for a parent to be present for routine pediatric examinations and procedures, as th most dangerous predators don't waste their time becoming Sunday school teachers or camp counselors when they could have so much more heavy-breathing fun with an MD.

In closing, those Farkers who are concerned about the size of their penii and who can prove they are over 18 are welcome to send me photos of their johnsons stretched out alongside rulers so that I might compare the data and decide who among you has a teensy weensy willy. Then when you've sobered up enough to work Paypal you'll be welcome to pay me not to publicize my findings. Doesn't that sound exceedingly scientific?

Oh canteen boy...

Ah, the old "my cousin is concerned about the shape of her vagina , let me see yours" trick

Like this one better.

Knara: *waiting patiently for the lesbian sex scandals in the Girl Scouts*

Are you kidding? Carpet munchers don't talk about it. It's just the girls' dirty little secret.

david1963: In closing, those Farkers who are concerned about the size of their penii and who can prove they are over 18 are welcome to send me photos of their johnsons stretched out alongside rulers so that I might compare the data and decide who among you has a teensy weensy willy. Then when you've sobered up enough to work Paypal you'll be welcome to pay me not to publicize my findings. Doesn't that sound exceedingly scientific?

I am willing to perform similar research on boobies. However, no pay is required; I do it for the pure pursuit of science.

/you're welcome

Old pedo that lives down the street just died this year. Decades ago, when I was 8 or 9, he tried the old "you need a shower after exercising" trick on me after he took me running once (failed, as I have my own shower, thanks, so I wasn't Sandusky'd)

Guy I know who lives down the street told me the aforementioned pedo, a scout leader type, brought a blacklight on camping trips to show the kiddies, "look, I can see some pee on your underwear, let's check everyone!" trick. Kind of ingenious, in a pedo sort of way.

stuffy: Ah, the old "my cousin is concerned about the shape of her vagina , let me see yours" trick

Like this one better.

Wow, that's a big vagina. Wow, that's a big vagina.

HailRobonia: stuffy: Ah, the old "my cousin is concerned about the shape of her vagina , let me see yours" trick

Like this one better.

Wow, that's a big vagina. Wow, that's a big vagina.

Echo...echo...echo...

Hello...hello...hello...

david1963: I'm sure I'll be reprimanded by scads of "right-thinking" Murricans, but I don't think such behavior should be a hanging offense. It is a bit creepy but it's more ridiculous than dangerous. According to TFA, the first "victim" complied once but then refused and the second did nothing but refuse his requests; I've seen nothing about force or threats of force, and I think regarding this as "an extremely serious, grave matter" can only happen in a very boring neighborhood.


Apparently he fondled the boys genitalia as part of his scheme. I'd say sexual assault on a minor at least. And telling the boy not to tell anyone else makes it clear that he knew what he was doing was a crime.

I agree it's not a "hanging offence" but a couple of years in prison and the next few decades on the sex offenders list seems about right.

StanTheMan: Old pedo that lives down the street just died this year. Decades ago, when I was 8 or 9, he tried the old "you need a shower after exercising" trick on me after he took me running once (failed, as I have my own shower, thanks, so I wasn't Sandusky'd)

Guy I know who lives down the street told me the aforementioned pedo, a scout leader type, brought a blacklight on camping trips to show the kiddies, "look, I can see some pee on your underwear, let's check everyone!" trick. Kind of ingenious, in a pedo sort of way.

StanTehMan, do you like gladiator movies?

"
"Whoever said there's no wrong way to eat a reeses should have told that to my Uncle. He used to put them in my underware"