If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Fox News)   Well I'm just SHOCKED that no one is buying the Lindsay edition of Playboy   (foxnews.com) divider line 159
    More: Fail  
•       •       •

12947 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 18 Dec 2011 at 3:40 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



159 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-12-18 10:49:32 PM
contrapunctus: howlinmadmurphy: FMLYHM: contrapunctus:
//When I was your age, we had to go rummaging through the woods to find porn.

///I know every male born before 1985 has had that experience.

Dude, that's how I found all my porn. Usually by the creek, or in a field behind some apartments....

That is so crazy... in my youth I found porn in cleared out spots under trees by a creek behind my apartments or in the corn field next door. I thought it was teenagers but now I'm thinking porn fairies do exist...

Porno Claus is real. Every season, he flies in his magical Torino powered by Lowenbrau to deposit copies of "Oui" and "Juggs" at half finished construction sites and forest clearings.



I loved Porno Claus! One time, when i was a kid, he deposited a whole bag of porno in a trash can in the park behind my house. My older brothers brought it home and hid it in my toy box (I was around 6 years old). All I can remember was that I was mad because I couldn't use my toy box. If only I had known what a treasure chest it was. A couple days later, one of my brothers moved the stash and hid it under the carpet in his closet. We found it years later after he went in the army and my parents decided to recarpet the bedrooms.
 
2011-12-18 10:51:46 PM
Cuz the articles suck
 
2011-12-19 03:29:45 AM
The internet is 99% porn and people still buy Playboy? If for some bizarre reason I was going to buy a porn mag, I can guarantee it wouldn't have some skank like Lindsay Lohan in it.
 
2011-12-19 03:35:14 AM
Jizz Master Zero: Thing is, this is the second shoot that Hefner ordered and conceived after the first one turned out terrible. Just how bad was the first one if this was the publishable one?!

They did that because she demanded more than their original offer so they figured they'd make it difficult for her by telling her the first film rolls were exposed to sunlight before developing or something and she had to come back for another shoot.

/still waiting for it, have had a subscription for years
//lookin' at the nudie pics takes about 30 seconds -- girls who completely shave their beavers are stupid -- but the majority of their content is entertaining and informative
///i want a landing strip, goddamnit (at least)
//can't wait to see her on 'Faces of Meth 17' or some such
 
2011-12-19 09:25:21 AM
remember when they used to have cute barely 18 girls with some amount of natural beauty in there?

www.babble.com
 
2011-12-19 10:00:10 AM
BHShaman: remember when they used to have cute barely 18 girls with some amount of natural beauty in there?

[www.babble.com image 266x400]


Actually, there are a series of mags that cater exactly to that. I have a few.
 
2011-12-19 10:34:59 AM
Seems like Fox was wrong:

http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/18/showbiz/lohan-playboy-sales/index.html? h pt=hp_t3
 
2011-12-19 12:24:46 PM
MoronLessOff:
Actually, there are a series of mags that cater exactly to that. I have a few.


Oh, certainly. Just not Playboy (anymore).
 
2011-12-19 12:30:30 PM
BHShaman: remember when they used to have cute barely 18 girls with some amount of natural beauty in there?

[www.babble.com image 266x400]


Yes. Sadly, they put a stop to it right around the time that skank you posted was born.
 
Displayed 9 of 159 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report