If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(CNN) Interesting Playboy magazine moving from Chicago to Los Angeles. Circulation office now nearer to their 12 subscribers   (money.cnn.com) divider line 58
More: Interesting, Playboy, Los Angeles, Playboy Mansion, Chicago, shares outstanding, magazines  
•       •       •

2246 clicks; posted to Main » on 15 Dec 2011 at 9:06 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



58 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-12-15 09:14:31 AM
Probably moving for all the quality air-brush artists that can be found in South Central.
 
2011-12-15 09:14:55 AM
HAAAAAAAAAAAA! it worked :D
 
2011-12-15 09:16:39 AM
And still the best thing to come out of Chicago is I-65 south.
 
2011-12-15 09:18:15 AM
So they'll show anal now?
 
2011-12-15 09:20:34 AM
I saw the leaked Lindsay Lohan pics. If those breasts are real and not shopped, then those breasts are impressive.
 
2011-12-15 09:21:34 AM
I ONLY READ IT FOR THE ARTICLES!!!!
 
2011-12-15 09:24:11 AM
dkimball: I saw the leaked Lindsay Lohan pics. If those breasts are real and not shopped, then those breasts are impressive.

Many moons ago, there were some rather trashy pics of her that were leaked where she was stripping for some random coke dealer, doing her best to look like the whore she has become; not much to see. The deal isn't "are they real?" it's: "Can you handle the used-up loser attached to them?"
 
2011-12-15 09:25:00 AM
Back in the day, I used to read it one-handed.
 
2011-12-15 09:25:41 AM
Those 12 subscribers buy a lot of copies. Sticky pages?

Playboy 1,509,982 (new window)
 
2011-12-15 09:33:12 AM
You'd think with office space costing so damn much more there (one would assume anyway) this wouldn't be a great idea. Playboy has never had issues finding 'talent' for their pages. Guess the old man is getting to old to travel.
 
2011-12-15 09:36:55 AM
The thing that present Playboy management seems to have forgotten is that Playboy bunnies (models) were supposed to be the finest of the fine. Used up D-list starlets or just any peroxide blonde won't do the trick anymore. I doubt that the magazine or the organization will make it thru this decade if they don't turn things around.
Playboy went down hill because their selection process and content has also went downhill.
Consider some of their classic bunnies through the years then compare with current issues, you'll see what I mean.
 
2011-12-15 09:37:18 AM
nyseattitude: Those 12 subscribers buy a lot of copies. Sticky pages?

Playboy 1,509,982 (new window)


More than 1 million people don't know about internet porn?
 
2011-12-15 09:42:12 AM
nyseattitude: Those 12 subscribers buy a lot of copies. Sticky pages?

Playboy 1,509,982 (new window)


Christ, that was depressing.

1 . . . AARP The Magazine. . . . . . 22,395,670
2 . . . AARP Bulletin . . . . . . . . . . . 22,236,761
3 . . . The Costco Connection . . . . 8,489,821
4 . . . Better Homes and Gardens . 7,648,900
5 . . . Game Informer . . . . . . . . . . . 5,954,884
6 . . . Reader's Digest . . . . . . . . . . 5,653,440

Nice to see National Geographic at #7, but I'll bet that's mostly dentist's offices.
 
2011-12-15 09:44:28 AM
soo people are jacking off to the AARP magazines now instead of the playboys? well atleast they are real
 
2011-12-15 09:45:39 AM
Kurmudgeon: The thing that present Playboy management seems to have forgotten is that Playboy bunnies (models) were supposed to be the finest of the fine. Used up D-list starlets or just any peroxide blonde won't do the trick anymore. I doubt that the magazine or the organization will make it thru this decade if they don't turn things around.
Playboy went down hill because their selection process and content has also went downhill.
Consider some of their classic bunnies through the years then compare with current issues, you'll see what I mean.


Point of order: Bunnies are cocktail waitresses, not nude models. You're thinking of Playmates.

Fun fact: Debbie Harry was a Bunny.
 
2011-12-15 09:45:49 AM
glassbottomboatcaptain 2011-12-15 09:21:34 AM

I ONLY READ IT FOR THE ARTICLES!!!!


I read it for Norman Mailer's latest claptrap about his waning libido

Actually, in its day, their interviews of politicians and celebrities were pretty good stuff. We're talking the seventies and earlier.
 
2011-12-15 09:49:42 AM
rdu_voyager: And still the best thing to come out of Chicago is I-65 south.

Ever see a map?
 
2011-12-15 09:51:23 AM
rdu_voyager: And still the best thing to come out of Chicago is I-65 south.

I are geographer.
 
2011-12-15 09:54:31 AM
Meh, it's still a good read. I especially like the fiction excerpts and 20Q.


/subscriber for four years now
//don't really look at teh bewbs (I see enough of my own, thx)
 
2011-12-15 09:56:45 AM
ihatedumbpeople: You'd think with office space costing so damn much more there (one would assume anyway) this wouldn't be a great idea. Playboy has never had issues finding 'talent' for their pages. Guess the old man is getting to old to travel.

Chicago probably isn't a whole lot less expensive than LA, maybe a couple, few bucks per square foot difference. Neither are cheap, both states will tax you up the wazoo but at least in LA they won't have to deal with long, cold, snowy winters.
 
2011-12-15 10:05:13 AM
Holy shiat the Jehovah's Witness mags have over 80 million subs combined.
 
2011-12-15 10:08:41 AM
My dad worked at the Playboy building in Chicago. He worked for a unrelated magazine but as a kid, going in to that building was cool. Officially, it was just an office building full of people in suits doing stuff but the story I told when I got back to kindergarten included nearly nekkid women walking around and people drinking and doing stuff (you know... stuff!)

In actuality, I sat in his office and watched them build the John Hancock tower. We had hot dogs for lunch ("Don't let him put ketchup on that dog in here, mister!") and riding the El back home, I nearly got off at the wrong station.

The unfactual story: "But, fellers, let me tell ya. You go to the Playboy building. You know, The Playboy building. You gotta know someone or they won't let you in. Did I tell you my dad works there? His secretary looked like her! She wore an outfit just like that with the stockings and everything! A guy came in and took her picture!"

Was in competition with the kid whose dad worked at Brachs and brought home boxes of candy. Could not win that one.
 
2011-12-15 10:12:55 AM
rdu_voyager: And still the best thing to come out of Chicago is I-65 south.

Whar Chicago?
 
2011-12-15 10:13:57 AM
As long as closeted college students need to put on an act for their parents and roommates, there will be a need for tame, heavily 'shopped nudity mags full of corn-fed, thick-maned blonde twenty-somethings from Nebraska and Georgia.

I can't imagine anyone actually using it for sexual fantasies. Most teen boys today would yawn at a grease-slathered daisychain of coked-up Hong Kong starlets wearing only harnesses and lurid tattoos, much less an almost-wholesome collection of bubble-bath shots and "oops, you caught me changing".
 
2011-12-15 10:17:02 AM
Harry Freakstorm: In actuality, I sat in his office and watched them build the John Hancock tower. We had hot dogs for lunch ("Don't let him put ketchup on that dog in here, mister!") and riding the El back home, I nearly got off at the wrong station.

I see what you did there.
 
2011-12-15 10:21:59 AM
Circulation is at the same level as Self, Fitness , Shape, Newsweek, etc. Not what it used to be, but what dead-tree mag is?

AARP sends out their rags to millions of people, like myself, that are not members of AARP and never will be.
 
2011-12-15 10:25:17 AM
Playboy is a pretty good read. I still subscibe. I don't know what happened, though, but the magazine took a horrendous nose dive in the 21st century and still hasnt recovered (if they ever will) I'm not talking about the chicks, but the writ9ing has seriously suffered. The worst victim? The jokes are pretty bad and recycled and the playboy adviser is not near as sharp as he (they) used to be.
 
2011-12-15 10:35:19 AM
SirEattonHogg: Actually, in its day, their interviews of politicians and celebrities were pretty good stuff. We're talking the seventies and earlier.


Even into the 80s, they had some excellent interviews and articles, but it died out during that decade.

Oh, and art too. Patrick Nagel and LeRoy Nieman were virtually unheard of until discovered and embraced by Hugh Hefner who to this day has the largest collection of original Nagel prints. They're not worth much now, but his kids will have a nice asset there in about 20 years +/- when the 50-year style nostagia kicks in (think of the art deco fad in the 1980s and the early-60s popularity now).
 
2011-12-15 10:40:36 AM
Do the kids still construct coke bindles out of the pages these days?
 
2011-12-15 10:53:34 AM
SirEattonHogg: Actually, in its day, their interviews of politicians and celebrities were pretty good stuff. We're talking the seventies and earlier.

Yeah, it was good. It was like The New Yorker with a few photos of girls and some risque cartoons. For anyone who forgot or didn't know how good it can be, they should check out the Playboy Archive - there's a whole bunch of free issues from the various periods of Playboy online.
 
2011-12-15 11:14:20 AM
thespindrifter: stripping for some random coke dealer

Man, that sounds classy.
 
2011-12-15 11:14:28 AM
RexTalionis: For anyone who forgot or didn't know how good it can be, they should check out the Playboy Archive - there's a whole bunch of free issues from the various periods of Playboy online.


If you can, check out the interview with Ted Turner in August 1978. It is an amazing snap-shot of time. Everything for which we think of him now had not yet happened nor even been predicted, and yet he was already famous for entirely different things like winning the America's Cup regatta and being banned from baseball for a year because of some of his comments. He talks about how he had been uplinking WTCG to a satelite for a couple of years in order to broadcast Braves games nationwide but nobody was downlinking it. Broadcasters were required back then to show x hours of news and public information per week, but "nobody likes the news," he said, "so we have fun with it ... sometimes we throw pies."

Within a few months, he started building CNN and got the FCC to rename WTCG to WTBS. Coincidentally, the issue featured not only this interview with one of the founders of cable/satellite TV as we now it, the "Girls of the Office" spread included a radio station secretary and voice-over reader who would become one of the original MTV VJs, Nina Blackwood (as a brunette with 70s bush).

Another great read anything Alex Haley wrote, of course. Not only did Playboy publish the first elements of what would become his signature opus, Roots, but they sent him, a Negro, to interview George Lincoln Rockwell, head of the American Nazi Party - and the result was an outstanding job.
 
2011-12-15 11:16:08 AM
i subscribed to playboy for several years, and honestly the pictorials were the last thing i looked at, if i even bothered to look at them at all. i read the advisor and the forum and read anything political. sometimes i checked out the fiction. and i always read the interview and the 20 questions, some of those interviews were great. the only time i made a point of checking out the pics was if they had a famous actress posing nude.

i quit subscribing because i simply didn't have time to read it anymore, and they started piling up on my coffee table. playboy really is a great magazine, but it bothers me when people call it a "porn" magazine, because playboy is about as pornographic as maxim. nudity does not equal pornography.
 
2011-12-15 11:21:29 AM
enderthexenocide: playboy is about as pornographic as maxim

Playboy's got just a bit less fabric and a lot more class. I saw an article in either Maxim or FHM (same difference, right) a few years ago about what to do when you shiat your pants. Yes really. I've never seen a more useless article.
 
2011-12-15 11:24:01 AM
Fuggin Bizzy: enderthexenocide: playboy is about as pornographic as maxim

Playboy's got just a bit less fabric and a lot more class. I saw an article in either Maxim or FHM (same difference, right) a few years ago about what to do when you shiat your pants. Yes really. I've never seen a more useless article.


How would you know? Have you soiled yourself in the meantime to assess the merit of the article?
 
2011-12-15 11:29:50 AM
Harry Freakstorm: My dad worked at the Playboy building in Chicago. He worked for a unrelated magazine but as a kid, going in to that building was cool. Officially, it was just an office building full of people in suits doing stuff but the story I told when I got back to kindergarten included nearly nekkid women walking around and people drinking and doing stuff (you know... stuff!)

In actuality, I sat in his office and watched them build the John Hancock tower. We had hot dogs for lunch ("Don't let him put ketchup on that dog in here, mister!") and riding the El back home, I nearly got off at the wrong station.

The unfactual story: "But, fellers, let me tell ya. You go to the Playboy building. You know, The Playboy building. You gotta know someone or they won't let you in. Did I tell you my dad works there? His secretary looked like her! She wore an outfit just like that with the stockings and everything! A guy came in and took her picture!"

Was in competition with the kid whose dad worked at Brachs and brought home boxes of candy. Could not win that one.


Indeed. A few years ago n employer leased temporary office space in the same building, and I was depressed
that it looked more like the typical inhabitant was an account rather than a buxom aspiring model/actress.
 
2011-12-15 11:50:19 AM
Wow, they are still in business? Why?
 
2011-12-15 11:53:02 AM
Harry Freakstorm Was in competition with the kid whose dad worked at Brachs and brought home boxes of candy. Could not win that one.

Brach's? I'll bet the kid w/the M&M/Mars dad kicked both yer asses
 
2011-12-15 11:59:01 AM
Not that I ever bought one, because, well, there's the same thing for free on the internet. I think their main problem started in the late nineties when someone in management thought "[insert bimbos name here] is in the news, we should get her to pose nude!" and it is still going on today. How good looking is Lindsay Lohan and when was the last time she was even close to famous?
 
2011-12-15 12:10:03 PM
IBelieveYouHaveMyStapler: Not that I ever bought one, because, well, there's the same thing for free on the internet. I think their main problem started in the late nineties when someone in management thought "[insert bimbos name here] is in the news, we should get her to pose nude!" and it is still going on today. How good looking is Lindsay Lohan and when was the last time she was even close to famous?


To be fair, that was how Hef launched the magazine in the first place, with the pre-star pics of Marilyn Monroe he bought. Hef and Christie continued to attract celebrity women to pose nude throughout their respective tenures. Remember Bo Derick? She was but one of many. They and Penthouse raced each other to press when the old photos of a hairy-armpitted Madonna surfaced in the 80s.
 
2011-12-15 12:14:55 PM
Madbassist1: Playboy is a pretty good read. I still subscibe. I don't know what happened, though, but the magazine took a horrendous nose dive in the 21st century and still hasnt recovered (if they ever will) I'm not talking about the chicks, but the writ9ing has seriously suffered. The worst victim? The jokes are pretty bad and recycled and the playboy adviser is not near as sharp as he (they) used to be.

Hep took over from his daughter and the mag has suffered from the delusions of that ancient cock ever since.
 
2011-12-15 12:28:51 PM
The magazine's interview with Groucho Marx in the early 1970s was hilarious.

It's also fascinating to see the issues from the 1970s and earlier and see what some of these prognosticators got right or got wrong.
 
2011-12-15 12:32:40 PM
LA is further from Amish country.
 
2011-12-15 12:55:14 PM
dkimball 2011-12-15 09:20:34 AM

I saw the leaked Lindsay Lohan pics. If those breasts are real and not shopped, then those breasts are impressive.




They're impressive, period. Real, fake, whatever. You won't touch them either way so what's difference?
 
2011-12-15 01:42:13 PM
Waxing_Chewbacca: So they'll show anal now?

dkimball: I saw the leaked Lindsay Lohan pics.
.

Waxing_Chewbacca: anal

dkimball: leaked

dkimball: Lindsay Lohan


Waxing_Chewbacca: anal
dkimball: leak
dkimball: Lindsay Lohan

i588.photobucket.com
 
2011-12-15 01:58:48 PM
Fuggin Bizzy 2011-12-15 11:21:29 AM
enderthexenocide: playboy is about as pornographic as maxim

Playboy's got just a bit less fabric and a lot more class. I saw an article in either Maxim or FHM (same difference, right) a few years ago about what to do when you shiat your pants. Yes really. I've never seen a more useless article.

seriously no if i want to see a playgirl I WANT THEM NEKAD and NOT fake!
 
2011-12-15 01:59:15 PM
I've been a subscriber for almost 20 years... I would have saved a fortune if I had gotten the lifetime subscription offered to me oh so long ago. I read it cover to cover (starting with the jokes, that are getting more and more recycled it seems) and my wife enjoys the interviews and 20Qs.

And no it is not porn and yes it is a bit over 'shopped.
 
2011-12-15 02:16:31 PM
What's a Playboy Magazine? Is that like porn except on paper? That must get really messy.
 
2011-12-15 02:28:51 PM
CravenMorehead 2011-12-15 02:16:31 PM
What's a Playboy Magazine? Is that like porn except on paper? That must get really messy.

//nicely played sir
 
2011-12-15 07:30:12 PM
What the hell is a magazine?
 
Displayed 50 of 58 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »