If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Fark)   LP 400 - Last Post wins a modest prize. . No purchase necessary. Void everywhere. LGT LP399   (fark.com) divider line 12780
    More: Fail, Last Post  
•       •       •

12426 clicks; posted to Main » on 14 Dec 2011 at 1:59 PM (2 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



12780 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | » | Last
 
2011-12-14 04:13:55 PM
Nope
 
2011-12-14 04:14:23 PM
images.cheezburger.com
 
2011-12-14 04:14:48 PM
blogs.artinfo.com
 
2011-12-14 04:14:55 PM
i.imgur.com
 
2011-12-14 04:14:57 PM
t2.gstatic.com
 
2011-12-14 04:15:02 PM
.
 
2011-12-14 04:15:06 PM
if this thread is not closed ASAP I WILL post links to her music

images.askmen.com
 
2011-12-14 04:15:09 PM
searchingforgrace.com
 
2011-12-14 04:15:12 PM
img822.imageshack.us
 
2011-12-14 04:15:38 PM
i.imgur.com
 
2011-12-14 04:16:11 PM
www.pooporchocolateblogs.com
www.pooporchocolateblogs.com
www.pooporchocolateblogs.com
www.pooporchocolateblogs.com
www.pooporchocolateblogs.com
 
2011-12-14 04:16:11 PM
i738.photobucket.com

SQUUEEEEEEEEEEEEEECH!
 
2011-12-14 04:16:39 PM
images.cheezburger.com
 
2011-12-14 04:18:08 PM
It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will obviously be considered reckless by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it must be stated that I went puce with rage when I first heard Mr. Drew Curtis say that he can convince criminals to fill out an application form before committing a crime. Wait! Before you dismiss me as feebleminded, hear me out. Many of us are too naïve and trusting. It takes a lot of convincing to get us to see a person as inherently complacent or inherently selfish. Alas, Drew is doing all he can to provide us with unmistakable proof that he is inherently both. For instance, Drew constantly insists that he can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom. But he contradicts himself when he says that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life.

We should preach a message of community and brotherly love. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) Drew says that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They're not in here!"? Last summer, I attempted what I knew would be a hopeless task. I tried to convince Drew that his language consists largely of euphemism, question-begging, and sheer, cloudy vagueness. As I expected, Drew was unconvinced.

Drew has convinced a lot of people that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. One must pause in admiration at this triumph of media manipulation. In a vain effort to exculpate himself, he has been proclaiming to the world that he has done no wrong. Rather, it was his apple-polishers who have been destroying our culture, our institutions, and our way of life. I suppose the next thing he'll have us believe is that he is a refined gentleman with the soundest education and morals you can imagine. Lastly, I can't end this letter without mentioning that there's a distinction to be made here.
 
2011-12-14 04:18:36 PM
img15.imageshack.us
 
2011-12-14 04:18:39 PM
i1020.photobucket.com
 
2011-12-14 04:18:46 PM
i73.photobucket.com
 
2011-12-14 04:19:00 PM
FIRST!!!!1!

Oh, wait... how do you play this game again?
 
2011-12-14 04:19:04 PM
Maybe I'm naturally oversensitive, or maybe someone just slipped me decaf coffee this morning, but fark.com's outrage at complaints about it is indicative of its self-esteem and value system. Here's how this letter works: I'll offer ideas and a theory to explain things. You bring your own experiences to bear on the matter of fark.com's sinful biases, supplementing them where necessary with information from this letter. Together we will avoid the extremes of a pessimistic naturalism and an optimistic humanism by combining the truths of both. Believe you me, everyone knows of the lust and driving passion that has caused this problem. Still, I recommend you check out some of fark.com's morals and draw your own conclusions on the matter. The time is always right to do what is right. That's why we must give parents the means to protect their children. The first step in that process is to realize that it accuses me of being imprudent whenever I state that we are materially and adversely affected by its schemes to treat anyone who doesn't agree with it to a torrent of vitriol and vilification. All right, I'll admit that I have a sharp tongue and sometimes write with a bit of a poison pen, but the fact remains that courage is what we need to feed the starving, house the homeless, cure the sick, and still find wonder and awe in the sunrise and the moonlight-not politeness, not intellectual flair, not cleverness with words, just courage. And it sometimes takes a lot of courage to look a self-pitying twit in the eye and tell him that such conduct as fark.com's induced the despotism of Cromwell and the two Bonapartes. Regular readers of my letters probably take that for granted, but if I am to turn fark.com's thrasonical quips to our advantage, I must explain to the population at large that an organization that wants to get ahead should try to understand the long-range consequences of its actions. Fark.com has never had that faculty. It always does what it wants to do at the moment and figures it'll be able to lie itself out of any problems that arise.

It may not be within the scope of this letter to encourage people to challenge fark.com to defend its declamations or else to change them, but I would like to mention that if there's an untold story here, it's that fark.com's passive-aggressive expositions impact heavily on our security and survival. Once we realize that, what do we do? The appropriate thing, in my judgment, is to view the realms of isolationism and paternalism not as two opposing poles but as two continua. I say that because it's trying to get us to acquiesce to a Faustian bargain. In the short term this bargain may help us substitute movement for stagnation, purposive behavior for drifting, and visions of a great future for collective pettiness and discouragement. Unfortunately, in the long term it will enable fark.com to pose a threat to the survival of democracy.

Fark.com wants nothing less than to weave its purblind traits, lawless precepts, and xenophobic fibs into a rich tapestry that is sure to sully my reputation, hence its repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of its pugnacious antics. Apparently, you may be wondering why disgraceful heresiarchs latch onto fark.com's pronouncements. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why I recently informed fark.com that its lickspittles make a mockery of the term "lithochromatographic". Fark.com said it'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further. After all, I call upon it to stop its oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon it to be an organization of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon it to forgo its desire to entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of the ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice of self-centered drunks. In summary, things are apt to get worse before they get better. Is anyone listening? Does anyone care?
 
2011-12-14 04:19:42 PM
thenjunderground.com
 
2011-12-14 04:19:49 PM

InfrasonicTom: It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will obviously be considered reckless by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it must be stated that I went puce with rage when I first heard Mr. Drew Curtis say that he can convince criminals to fill out an application form before committing a crime. Wait! Before you dismiss me as feebleminded, hear me out. Many of us are too naïve and trusting. It takes a lot of convincing to get us to see a person as inherently complacent or inherently selfish. Alas, Drew is doing all he can to provide us with unmistakable proof that he is inherently both. For instance, Drew constantly insists that he can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom. But he contradicts himself when he says that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life.

We should preach a message of community and brotherly love. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) Drew says that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They're not in here!"? Last summer, I attempted what I knew would be a hopeless task. I tried to convince Drew that his language consists largely of euphemism, question-begging, and sheer, cloudy vagueness. As I expected, Drew was unconvinced.

Drew has convinced a lot of people that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. One must pause in admiration at this triumph of media manipulation. In a vain effort to exculpate himself, he has been proclaiming to the world that he has done no wrong. Rather, it was his apple-polishers who have been destroying our culture, our institutions, and our way of life. I suppose the next thing he'll have us believe is that he is a refined gentleman with the soundest education and morals you can ...


tldr
 
2011-12-14 04:19:56 PM

epoc_tnac: Lost past? I thought this thread was going to be about sad things that happened in people's childhoods.


Like the time I saw the little girl next door get run over by a car trying to get her puppy out of the street so it wouldn't get hit by a car?

Or the kid across the street who had polio, and lived on crutches, and was asked to play Tiny Tim in our school play?

Or when we had to move in with my grandparents for a few months until we found a house, and I couldn't bring my dog with so we had to get rid of her, even though they had a dog themselves?

Or when I had surgery as a young child and the hospital lost my teddy bear?

/thanks for opening up those wounds
 
2011-12-14 04:20:05 PM
I hope the prize is the entire collection of Fark TV on BluRay.
 
2011-12-14 04:20:25 PM
Boobies on Fark...

Last Post
 
2011-12-14 04:20:39 PM
i.imgur.com
 
2011-12-14 04:20:52 PM
www.piratesk12site.net
www.israellycool.com
cdn.gunaxin.com
 
2011-12-14 04:22:18 PM
I picked the wrong day to stop dropping acid.
 
2011-12-14 04:22:30 PM
Warning!

I hate it when people get their facts wrong. For instance, whenever I hear some corporate fat cat make noises about how character development is not a matter of "strength through adversity" but rather, "entitlement through victimization", I can't help but think that if we take fark.com's false-flag operations to their logical conclusion, we see that in the near future, fark.com will place our children at imminent risk of serious harm. I've repeatedly pointed out to fark.com that its operatives have discounted their brain as a useless organ. That apparently didn't register with it, though. Oh, well; I guess there are arguments that have made respectable organizations out of criticasters like fark.com. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. Fark.com uses big words like "chlamydobacteriaceae" to make itself sound important. For that matter, benevolent Nature has equipped another puny creature, the skunk, with a means of making itself seem important, too. Although fark.com's paroxysms may reek like a skunk, fark.com is right about one thing, namely that fear is what motivates us. Fear of what it means when intolerant troglodytes oppose the visceral views of 98 percent of the nation's citizens. Fear of what it says about our society when we teach our children that fark.com's opinions represent the opinions of the majority-or even a plurality. And fear of intemperate skinflints like fark.com who contaminate or cut off our cities' water supply.

One of the goals of metagrobolism is to render meaningless the words "best" and "worst". Fark.com admires that philosophy because, by annihilating human perceptions of quality, fark.com's own mediocrity can flourish. Fark.com's criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, its criticisms are based solely on its emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in fark.com's "I think ... I believe ... I feel" game. As a parting thought, let these sterling words of wisdom be most thoroughly and attentively perused: Fark.com has nothing but contempt for responsibility, duty, and honor.
 
2011-12-14 04:22:35 PM
winner! no? ok.
 
2011-12-14 04:22:37 PM
img.photobucket.com
 
2011-12-14 04:22:45 PM
img155.imageshack.us
 
2011-12-14 04:22:53 PM
katherineisawesome.files.wordpress.com
 
2011-12-14 04:23:14 PM
I love this thread
 
2011-12-14 04:23:15 PM

dj_spanmaster: What's the term that makes the filters work? "Boobies"? "Weeners"? "Weeners"?

Whatever. I don't care. I'm going home, too little time for this shiat.


Boobies usally changes to boobies and changes your timestamp but it's disabled in this thread.
 
2011-12-14 04:23:27 PM
t1.gstatic.com
t1.gstatic.com
t1.gstatic.com
t1.gstatic.com
t1.gstatic.com
 
2011-12-14 04:23:34 PM
fine dont listen
reap what you sow

Link
 
2011-12-14 04:23:37 PM
i.imgur.com
 
2011-12-14 04:23:45 PM
img.photobucket.com
 
2011-12-14 04:23:50 PM
i738.photobucket.com

Micro changes in air density, my ass.
 
2011-12-14 04:24:05 PM
I wish I didn't have to write a letter like this one, but recent events leave me no choice. If you disagree with my claim that Mr. Drew Curtis's flunkies are capable of little else but hating and lying, even to each other, then read no further. We must face the undeniable fact that Drew wants to turn a deaf ear to need and suffering. It gets better: He actually believes that his beliefs enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness. I guess no one's ever told him that his thesis is that his exegeses are Right with a capital R. That's totally neurotic, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that the central paradox of Drew's views, the twist that makes Drew's ideas so irresistible to phlegmatic mafia dons, is that these people truly believe that Drew is able to abrogate the natural order of effects flowing from causes.

Drew is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. As the oft-repeated saying goes, "It can plausibly be surmised that Drew is one of those petulant smarmy-types who quotes the Bible but never reads it". The importance of that saying is that it reminds us that Drew's latest conjectures are particularly blowsy, even by Drew's blowsy standards. But wait-as they say on late-night television infomercials-there's more: A person who wants to get ahead should try to understand the long-range consequences of his/her actions. Drew has never had that faculty. He always does what he wants to do at the moment and figures he'll be able to lie himself out of any problems that arise. He says that I'm too putrid to advocate social change through dialogue, passive resistance, and nonviolence. Such verbal gems teach us that in the Old Testament, the Book of Kings relates how the priests of Baal were slain for deceiving the people. I'm not suggesting that there be any contemporary parallel involving Drew, but in a rather infamous speech, Drew exclaimed that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive. (I edited out the rest of what he said because, well, it didn't really say anything.)

Drew's capricious long-term goals are the cherry atop the illiberal sundae of immoralism. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. It is well known that Drew's false-flag operations are stuck-up in theory and effete in practice. But the mere mention of Drew's loathsome name jacks my blood pressure up into dangerous territory. But there's the rub; my goal is to get Drew to realize that his buddies fail to recognize that he doesn't care much for airy-fairy things such as morality and integrity. Of course, if he insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed yo-yo, that's his prerogative. I would like to end on a heartfelt note. It is not the case-notwithstanding what Mr. Drew Curtis's scary propaganda so adamantly proclaims-that everyone who fails to think and act in strict accordance with Drew's requirements is a cruel, possession-obsessed doctrinaire-type.
 
2011-12-14 04:24:17 PM
More Zooey = goooood

img3806.imagevenue.com
 
2011-12-14 04:24:39 PM
img202.imageshack.us
 
2011-12-14 04:24:51 PM
You just know that no matter how cool your post is, the last post will be a really lame one right after it.
 
2011-12-14 04:24:55 PM
i450.photobucket.com
 
2011-12-14 04:25:29 PM
fashionablyjust.com
 
2011-12-14 04:25:31 PM
images.cheezburger.com
 
2011-12-14 04:25:42 PM
t1.gstatic.com
t1.gstatic.com
t1.gstatic.com
t1.gstatic.com
t1.gstatic.com
 
2011-12-14 04:25:47 PM
i1125.photobucket.com
 
2011-12-14 04:25:48 PM
This is SO not the last post.
 
2011-12-14 04:26:17 PM
Keep your modest prize, I'll take a free year of Total Fark. I'll bear that burden and on the 12th month drop that shiat in the Fires of Mount Doom
 
Displayed 50 of 12780 comments

First | « | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | » | Last

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report