If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Jezebel) Cool 17-year-old girl invents nanoparticle that kills cancer. Still no cure for Fark memes   (jezebel.com) divider line 314
More: Cool  
•       •       •

35747 clicks; posted to Main » on 12 Dec 2011 at 7:25 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



314 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-12-12 12:31:26 AM
Awesome news, pretty sure it's a repeat though
 
2011-12-12 02:02:23 AM
She looks incredibly smug in that one photo. However, I think she's earned the right to be smug.

Good for her. It's these things that remind me that I'm decidedly average in intelligence and ambition.
 
2011-12-12 03:35:15 AM
From a WSJ article about this:

Zhang said the particle she designed improves on current cancer treatments because it delivers a drug directly to tumor cells and doesn't affect healthy cells around it. The particle is also able to release a drug when activated by a laser. The idea is still years away from being used in patients, however. Zhang says it could take 25 years between clinical trials and other steps before her research is helping patients.

And in that time, 100 million people will die from cancer.

There's little excuse that this can't be readily implemented into current treatments within a few years logistically speaking. The fact that this will take two and a half decades to get through a hideous regulatory system before being offered to patients at-large is a shame.
 
2011-12-12 03:45:14 AM
I cured diabetes once.
 
2011-12-12 05:17:40 AM
Hydra: From a WSJ article about this:

Zhang said the particle she designed improves on current cancer treatments because it delivers a drug directly to tumor cells and doesn't affect healthy cells around it. The particle is also able to release a drug when activated by a laser. The idea is still years away from being used in patients, however. Zhang says it could take 25 years between clinical trials and other steps before her research is helping patients.

And in that time, 100 million people will die from cancer.

There's little excuse that this can't be readily implemented into current treatments within a few years logistically speaking. The fact that this will take two and a half decades to get through a hideous regulatory system before being offered to patients at-large is a shame.


On the other hand 100 million could die from cancer and an additional 25 million could die from this drug. This hideous regulatory system is in place for a reason.
 
2011-12-12 05:41:33 AM
Klippoklondike: Awesome news, pretty sure it's a repeat though

Mm, sort of. AFAIK this is the first drug-releasing nanoparticle to hit the press. The other ones were just gold nanoparticles. I think. And even if I'm wrong and it is a repeat, I always love seeing high school kids doing actual research.

Hydra: There's little excuse that this can't be readily implemented into current treatments within a few years logistically speaking. The fact that this will take two and a half decades to get through a hideous regulatory system before being offered to patients at-large is a shame.

If a drug is found to be a massive improvement over current treatments, it gets fast tracked by the FDA and can be on the market in under a year.
 
2011-12-12 07:33:09 AM
Some multinational drug corp will give her enough money to put her in sparkle ponies for life and then patent the nanowhatever thing, then make it cost $50,000 per six months of treatments.

/USA! USA!
//One nation, robbing each other blind, forever.
 
2011-12-12 07:38:38 AM
I'm pretty sure technology like that does not exist and may never exist. This is a 'fantasy' deal, like designing the perfect city or a cool car with a motor the size of a penny. It's a great thought exercise but nothing of any applicable value. I'm guessing the article is another lame attempt to get more girls into the sciences.
 
2011-12-12 07:43:07 AM
molinelibraryteens.files.wordpress.com
it begins....
 
2011-12-12 07:46:14 AM
extras.mnginteractive.com
 
2011-12-12 07:47:19 AM
Individual winner: Angela Zhang
Individual runner-up: Brian Kim

Team winners
: Cassee Cain and Ziyuan Liu
Team runners-up: Edgar Wang, Wayne Shu and Justin Yuan

Way to go, Asian kid stereotypes.
 
2011-12-12 07:48:10 AM
There's a WSJ article linked from TFA, but what the hell, subby, let's go with Jezebel.
 
2011-12-12 07:51:18 AM
NobleHam: There's a WSJ article linked from TFA, but what the hell, subby, let's go with Jezebel.

Jezebel is part of the Gawker family, they've got a quota to fill.
 
2011-12-12 07:54:35 AM
4.bp.blogspot.com

You only cured cancer? You're worthless! Don't even look at me.
 
2011-12-12 07:57:15 AM
Crudbucket: Individual winner: Angela Zhang
Individual runner-up: Brian Kim

Team winners: Cassee Cain and Ziyuan Liu
Team runners-up: Edgar Wang, Wayne Shu and Justin Yuan

Way to go, Asian kid stereotypes.


When I grew up in orange county (not florida's thank god), I started taking a lot of STEM classes like calculus ap, physics ap, etc. Once I started taking them, I noticed that I was the only white kid in the class. Everyone else was pretty much Vietnamese. Those parents didnt play around though when it came to education.
 
2011-12-12 07:58:08 AM
Dr. Picklebacon: I cured diabetes once.

Meh. I invented, and then cured, and then completely eradicated triabetes.
 
2011-12-12 07:58:13 AM
My favorite Simpsons is Principal Skinner commenting on the fact that he has a pretty good science fair for a school without that many asian students.

I've judged the county-wide science fair grand prizes for decades, sometimes I am quite amazed at some of the entries. I've seen kids get set up with research labs at their colleges based on the research they did in high school. It's a far cry from the local high school moldy bread experiments that I started out judging.
 
2011-12-12 07:58:34 AM
You know they're coming ...

d24w6bsrhbeh9d.cloudfront.net
 
2011-12-12 08:02:01 AM
Is there anything Mork can't do?
 
2011-12-12 08:05:54 AM
ladylibertytoday.files.wordpress.com

Put her to work on Ann Coulter's goiter, and good luck.
 
2011-12-12 08:06:49 AM
She got a $100,000 scholarship, effectively rendering her immune from any sort of financial hardships for the rest of her life. Now she can attend ITT tech and get that Microsoft certification and work in computers! Baby you know it's true.

Unlimited sparkle ponies!
 
2011-12-12 08:07:35 AM
Phil Moskowitz: Is there anything Mork can't do?

Overcome the Fonz?
 
2011-12-12 08:08:03 AM
Hydra: There's little excuse that this can't be readily implemented into current treatments within a few years logistically speaking. The fact that this will take two and a half decades to get through a hideous regulatory system before being offered to patients at-large is a shame.


And what about the trillions in profit for the Job Creators who paid for all of those hideous regulations? How are they supposed to afford new yachts if the system becomes a free market?
 
2011-12-12 08:10:02 AM
Hydra: From a WSJ article about this:

Zhang said the particle she designed improves on current cancer treatments because it delivers a drug directly to tumor cells and doesn't affect healthy cells around it. The particle is also able to release a drug when activated by a laser. The idea is still years away from being used in patients, however. Zhang says it could take 25 years between clinical trials and other steps before her research is helping patients.

And in that time, 100 million people will die from cancer.

There's little excuse that this can't be readily implemented into current treatments within a few years logistically speaking. The fact that this will take two and a half decades to get through a hideous regulatory system before being offered to patients at-large is a shame.


farm4.static.flickr.com
 
2011-12-12 08:10:18 AM
Hydra: From a WSJ article about this:

Zhang said the particle she designed improves on current cancer treatments because it delivers a drug directly to tumor cells and doesn't affect healthy cells around it. The particle is also able to release a drug when activated by a laser. The idea is still years away from being used in patients, however. Zhang says it could take 25 years between clinical trials and other steps before her research is helping patients.

And in that time, 100 million people will die from cancer.

There's little excuse that this can't be readily implemented into current treatments within a few years logistically speaking. The fact that this will take two and a half decades to get through a hideous regulatory system before being offered to patients at-large is a shame.


Have you seen Rise of the Planet of the Apes? Without a regulatory system we could all be ape biatches.
 
2011-12-12 08:11:53 AM
I remember when I was young and almost cured something, but then I took an arrow to the knee.
 
2011-12-12 08:12:30 AM
smedrick: Have you seen Rise of the Planet of the Apes? Without a regulatory system we could all be ape biatches.

Powder and ball conquer all.

When the apes figure out how to make and use guns, then I'll worry.
 
2011-12-12 08:12:44 AM
approve
images.wikia.com
 
2011-12-12 08:13:33 AM
cbackous: I remember when I was young and almost cured something, but then I took an arrow to the knee.

You're luck I was only mildly perturbed that day. And that you didn't have gray hair.
 
2011-12-12 08:18:16 AM
At 17, I was still learning how to talk to girls.



/although at 19, I started with my new theories in probability and dimensional analysis...but that was just a hobby.
 
2011-12-12 08:18:33 AM
There are probably several cancer treatments that work that are being held up for a variety of reasons...probably including that is it a marginal or questionable economic value to cure cancer. It would probably increase the life span in the Western world by a half decade in one fail swoop and reduce revenue for a wide array of healthcare-related companies. Miss you, Dad.
 
2011-12-12 08:19:04 AM
I don't believe that she "invented" this by herself.
 
2011-12-12 08:20:32 AM
Any cure for repeats?
 
2011-12-12 08:20:52 AM
dittybopper: smedrick: Have you seen Rise of the Planet of the Apes? Without a regulatory system we could all be ape biatches.

Powder and ball conquer all.

When the apes figure out how to make and use guns, then I'll worry.


southpawbeagle.files.wordpress.com

farm4.staticflickr.com


http://theuniblog.evilspacerobot.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/tumbl r _lnkozpbyYg1qhcrb0o1_500.gif

Be afraid. Be very afraid.
 
2011-12-12 08:20:56 AM
That article was pretty light on details.

If it sounds too good to be true and all....is this still just theory or has it been tried out on anything?
 
2011-12-12 08:22:34 AM
Don't all nanoparticles kill cancer?
 
2011-12-12 08:22:50 AM
bbcard1: There are probably several cancer treatments that work that are being held up for a variety of reasons...probably including that is it a marginal or questionable economic value to cure cancer. It would probably increase the life span in the Western world by a half decade in one fail swoop and reduce revenue for a wide array of healthcare-related companies. Miss you, Dad.

Yeah I know, just like the auto companies did with the water engine right?
 
2011-12-12 08:23:05 AM
bbcard1: There are probably several cancer treatments that work that are being held up for a variety of reasons...probably including that is it a marginal or questionable economic value to cure cancer. It would probably increase the life span in the Western world by a half decade in one fail swoop and reduce revenue for a wide array of healthcare-related companies. Miss you, Dad.

I sounds like such a conspiracy, but I tend to agree with you. Do we really want to cure cancer? More people living even longer, with fewer diseases to put them into the ground?

I dunno. Seems like it is immoral to not help human life--but also expensive, and man, we sure are trashing the place.
 
2011-12-12 08:23:51 AM
It seems to me that this so called "advance" is likely to minimize the profitability of cancer for many a pharmaceutical shareholder. What about decent American shareholders huh? We're supposed to help those people! Starting with stockholders! Who's helping them out, huh?!

What's wrong with coming up with a new pill or something? Maybe a slight variation on an existing medication. Or better yet, a naturally occurring substance in pill form. You know, something that does not actually cure cancer, but instead prolongs it so as to increase its profitability.

I am sorry, I did not want to have to say it, but this girl sounds unamerican.
 
2011-12-12 08:26:15 AM
TimonC346: bbcard1: There are probably several cancer treatments that work that are being held up for a variety of reasons...probably including that is it a marginal or questionable economic value to cure cancer. It would probably increase the life span in the Western world by a half decade in one fail swoop and reduce revenue for a wide array of healthcare-related companies. Miss you, Dad.

I sounds like such a conspiracy, but I tend to agree with you. Do we really want to cure cancer? More people living even longer, with fewer diseases to put them into the ground?

I dunno. Seems like it is immoral to not help human life--but also expensive, and man, we sure are trashing the place.


If we cured cancer, how would God test his followers?
 
GBB
2011-12-12 08:26:17 AM
I'm confused: did she actually invent and develop this nanoparticle and has reults showing its effectiveness against certain cancers? Or, is this just some shotty made up nanoparticle that we all wish existed and she just put in down on paper? Cause, when I was a kid, I made up all sorts of things that would change the world and I never won no damn $100K.
 
2011-12-12 08:26:36 AM
Crudbucket: Individual winner: Angela Zhang
Individual runner-up: Brian Kim

Team winners: Cassee Cain and Ziyuan Liu
Team runners-up: Edgar Wang, Wayne Shu and Justin Yuan

Way to go, Asian kid stereotypes.


I also love how they all have "traditional" American kid names and, preseumably, the one white kid has some weird spelling of another.
 
2011-12-12 08:26:44 AM
This would be a little more impressive if my old chem teacher wasn't working on this exact thing for the past decade or so.
 
2011-12-12 08:31:40 AM
GBB: I'm confused: did she actually invent and develop this nanoparticle and has reults showing its effectiveness against certain cancers? Or, is this just some shotty made up nanoparticle that we all wish existed and she just put in down on paper? Cause, when I was a kid, I made up all sorts of things that would change the world and I never won no damn $100K.

You should have seen the hovertanks I designed.
 
2011-12-12 08:33:20 AM
The_Time_Master: Be afraid. Be very afraid.

Meh. Of the two pictures I could see, the one chimp had the gun canted so far to the right that he almost needs Homeboy Sights, and the other has his booger-hook on the bang switch. So either they can't hit anything, or they'll Darwin themselves with ADs.
 
2011-12-12 08:34:36 AM
She hasn't actually invented anything, has she? She's simply done a science fair poster rehashing the "small thing that finds cancer cells and kills them" idea which has been doing the rounds of nanotechnological fantasy since nanotechnologists started fantasising.

We can all do that. I've just invented a pill that prevents heart attacks by somehow preventing heart attacks. All it needs is someone to work out the details of what's in it. Can I have $100k, please?
 
2011-12-12 08:35:27 AM
GBB: I'm confused: did she actually invent and develop this nanoparticle and has reults showing its effectiveness against certain cancers? Or, is this just some shotty made up nanoparticle that we all wish existed and she just put in down on paper? Cause, when I was a kid, I made up all sorts of things that would change the world and I never won no damn $100K.

I was particularly good at designing blowback operated submachine guns when I was in junior high. By high school, though, I had moved on to designing lifting-body reentry vehicles.
 
2011-12-12 08:36:09 AM
MBooda: approve
[images.wikia.com image 640x417]


I missed that show. Thank God for RiffTrax!
 
2011-12-12 08:36:50 AM
Molavian: You should have seen the hovertanks I designed.

Bilko!
 
2011-12-12 08:37:02 AM
udeng01: I also love how they all have "traditional" American kid names and, preseumably, the one white kid has some weird spelling of another.

Yeah, I know. Just like many Americans have Scandinavian or Spanish or Italian or German surnames but have perfectly traditional "American" first names.

Get a grip dude - their parents didn't necessarily just get off the boat while pregnant.
 
Displayed 50 of 314 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »