If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some TARDIS Databanks) Cool Two lost 1960s Doctor Who episodes have been recovered by the BBC - watch clips of classic Who no one has seen in forty years to the left, complain about how they're not emo or sparkly enough to the right   (tardisdatabanks.com) divider line 116
More: Cool, Doctor Who, Patrick Troughton, Bfi, film institutes, William Hartnell  
•       •       •

3724 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 11 Dec 2011 at 8:34 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



116 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-12-11 07:51:00 PM
To quote Professor Zarof: "Nothing in the world can stop me now!!"

It may not be Tomb of the Cybermen, but I'm just as excited to see new Patrick Troughton and William Hartnell Doctor Who episodes as I was when I heard they'd recovered Tomb 20 years ago.

Well, nearly. But definitely happy.

But now I have to wait for the DVD release!
 
2011-12-11 07:59:14 PM
Are there people on Fark clamoring for more sparkly and emo things? I have missed those threads.
 
2011-12-11 08:08:16 PM
mitchcumstein1: Are there people on Fark clamoring for more sparkly and emo things? I have missed those threads.

There are people who call themselves Who fans who seem think the classic episodes are terrible basically because they weren't made in 2011 -- perhaps "not emo and sparkly enough" is a metaphor...
 
2011-12-11 08:10:19 PM
pseudowho: There are people who call themselves Who fans who seem think the classic episodes are terrible basically because they weren't made in 2011 -- perhaps "not emo and sparkly enough" is a metaphor...

the appeal in the old episodes is in the acting and the storytelling, at least for me.
I watched Tomb of the Cybermen, and the special effects were... not good (although the scene of the Cybermen waking up out of their hibernation was chilling... no pun intended). But the story had me wanting to watch the whole thing.
 
2011-12-11 08:16:42 PM
mitchcumstein1: Are there people on Fark clamoring for more sparkly and emo things? I have missed those threads.

I was sad to find more bronies here than /b/

But this story is good news.
 
2011-12-11 08:17:47 PM
SilentStrider: I watched Tomb of the Cybermen, and the special effects were... not good

but for the time, they were cutting edge on a shoestring budget. Always remember that
 
2011-12-11 08:19:32 PM
cretinbob: SilentStrider: I watched Tomb of the Cybermen, and the special effects were... not good

but for the time, they were cutting edge on a shoestring budget. Always remember that


true, but there was one scene where a Cyberman lifts one of the people up to throw them, and you can clearly see the wire attached to the actor. That sticks in my mind.
But like I said, its about the acting anyway. And Troughton was a damn fine actor.
 
2011-12-11 08:26:20 PM
SilentStrider: the appeal in the old episodes is in the acting and the storytelling, at least for me.
I watched Tomb of the Cybermen, and the special effects were... not good (although the scene of the Cybermen waking up out of their hibernation was chilling... no pun intended). But the story had me wanting to watch the whole thing.


I agree - it's the story, the dialogue, the actors (especially Pat Troughton!) but the thing about the special effects is this: I try to watch the episodes, as best I can, with the eyes of someone at the time, and with understanding of the limits of not only the budget but the basic technology at the time.

That not only applies to the special effects, but the pacing and direction as well. Many modern fans, especially younger ones who haven't watched much older TV, may look at them as slow or boring without really understanding the limits they worked under in the early days.

Cameras the size and weight of refrigerators (and about as mobile) with fixed focus you couldn't change mid-shot, combined with hideously expensive media that prevented retakes, and very crude editing ability required longer shots. Today we're used to quick-quick-quick cuts and camera movement in addition to shorter stories and it can naturally take some adjustment to the different pacing of the old stories. But if you do adjust they're worth it.

I watch these old episodes and instead of looking down my nose at them from the 21st century, prefer to marvel at how much was done with so little. I love it.
 
2011-12-11 08:26:25 PM
SilentStrider: And Troughton was a damn fine actor.

Yes. He set the tone for the rest I think.
 
2011-12-11 08:31:45 PM
SilentStrider: true, but there was one scene where a Cyberman lifts one of the people up to throw them, and you can clearly see the wire attached to the actor. That sticks in my mind.

Special effects were done *live while they shot the scene* not in post-production. Also remember the size of TVs and the resolution (not to mention common broadcast interference/snow) made those wires likely invisible on first airing. We see details on DVD that they never could back in the day.

Almost a pity, really -- I remember watching part one of the Troughton story The Mind Robber back in the 90s on video and Jamie and Zoe were wandering in a perfect white void in the scenes outside of the TARDIS.

Now on DVD you can see where the crew tried covering up the corners of the studio, so in some ways the episodes look worse than they did even 10-15 years ago, let alone compared to the 1960s broadcasts!
 
2011-12-11 08:33:32 PM
pseudowho: I agree - it's the story, the dialogue, the actors (especially Pat Troughton!) but the thing about the special effects is this: I try to watch the episodes, as best I can, with the eyes of someone at the time, and with understanding of the limits of not only the budget but the basic technology at the time.

oh I know, the special effects are no better or worse than what you'd see in episodes of the original Star Trek, and I still love that too.
 
2011-12-11 08:39:43 PM
Complaining that NuWho is "emo and sparkly" - why, this has to be the work of one man.

How you doin', TEM?
 
2011-12-11 08:40:37 PM
Well, Galaxy 4 is unfortunately an orphan episode, but that recovered part of the Troughton serial just might give 'em a reason to animate the two missing parts and put that sucker out on DVD.
 
2011-12-11 08:51:41 PM
Suh ... WEEEEET! I'd given up hope of any more lost episodes ever being found.

/Dear Santa: Now for that missing footage from Logan's Run ... /hope hope pray pray
 
2011-12-11 08:57:08 PM
No Billie Piper? No Amy Pond? FAIL!
 
2011-12-11 08:59:18 PM
pseudowho: remember watching part one of the Troughton story The Mind Robber

img.photobucket.com

more hand colored early images (new window)
 
2011-12-11 09:02:29 PM
Alright, trivia time kids: when was Galaxy 4 referenced in the current series?

/series in the US meaning of the word, not necessarily the most recent season/series
 
2011-12-11 09:05:23 PM
FirstNationalBastard: Well, Galaxy 4 is unfortunately an orphan episode, but that recovered part of the Troughton serial just might give 'em a reason to animate the two missing parts and put that sucker out on DVD.

Hopefully, although I'd heard that further animation was unlikely, given that it wasn't seen to be profitable.
 
2011-12-11 09:08:13 PM
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!

Okay, not the most coherent comment, but new Old Who is like a freaking Grail, so perhaps a little fangirling can be forgiven. It had been so damned long, I figured that they had found pretty much all there was to be found. I love New Who, I do. Matt Smith is adorable, and I'm thrilled the show has found new life. But I grew up with Old Who. It's like a comfortable pair of shoes (Shoes. Shoes! Obvious place!). And new Old Who is like finding a new pair of shoes that have already been broken in for me.
 
2011-12-11 09:10:48 PM
The era of Doctor Who classic episodes I'm most familiar with is that of Tom Baker-which I enjoyed immensely,so I'm unsure as to which is better between the Hartnell and Troughton tenures. Any advice,Farkers?
 
2011-12-11 09:13:19 PM
Apos: The era of Doctor Who classic episodes I'm most familiar with is that of Tom Baker-which I enjoyed immensely,so I'm unsure as to which is better between the Hartnell and Troughton tenures. Any advice,Farkers?

There's less Troughton available, so it's easier to watch it all.

They are kind of apples and oranges. Hartnell was the doddering, yet crafty, old man, while Troughton was... well, his look and a lot of the second Doctor's character is the basis for Matt Smith's Doctor.
 
2011-12-11 09:19:36 PM
FirstNationalBastard: Apos: The era of Doctor Who classic episodes I'm most familiar with is that of Tom Baker-which I enjoyed immensely,so I'm unsure as to which is better between the Hartnell and Troughton tenures. Any advice,Farkers?

There's less Troughton available, so it's easier to watch it all.

They are kind of apples and oranges. Hartnell was the doddering, yet crafty, old man, while Troughton was... well, his look and a lot of the second Doctor's character is the basis for Matt Smith's Doctor.



Got it. Much appreciated.
 
2011-12-11 09:23:32 PM
After all these years, finally an answer to the question: What does a Rill look like?

s3.amazonaws.com
 
2011-12-11 09:25:47 PM
In case anyone needs eye bleach...

s3.amazonaws.com
 
2011-12-11 09:28:45 PM
I wear a lionfish now. Lionfish are cool.

s3.amazonaws.com
 
2011-12-11 09:30:23 PM
Yippeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! I'm gradually trying to work my way through the early episodes and I keep cursing the BBC for destroying so many of the tapes. This is wonderful.
 
2011-12-11 09:30:32 PM
cretinbob: SilentStrider: And Troughton was a damn fine actor.

Yes. He set the tone for the rest I think.


He really did sell it. The whole mad man with a box but with a hint of steel when needed brilliance that is the Doctor owes so much to Troughton.

I had the pleasure of meeting him shortly before his death. I was all of ten years old and at first I just stood there like an idiot, wide eyed and stunned beyond belief. I'm quite sure it was a response he'd gotten many times over the years, but adult me is still damned impressed with how smoothly he slipped into charming Doctor mode. I swear it was like a switch, and I went from stunned to happily chattering away with him. (Much to my sister's shock. I was not a talkative child, especially not with strangers.) I'm sure he probably got tired of dealing with thunderstruck little kids, but you'd never have known it that day. He managed to make it seem as if his meeting me was the event, rather than the other way round. That was one hell of an acting job, even if it was for a very small audience indeed.
 
2011-12-11 09:41:11 PM
mitchcumstein1: Are there people on Fark clamoring for more sparkly and emo things? I have missed those threads.

They're all off cutting themselves in the closet, but will resume clamoring shortly.
 
2011-12-11 09:41:35 PM
cretinbob: more hand colored early images (new window)

Heh. I just watched that serial for the first time last night, and I was like 'heeeeeey Zoe's butt... how you doin?'
 
2011-12-11 09:47:56 PM
Squee!

/why couldn't it have been part 4 of The Tenth Planet though?
 
2011-12-11 09:48:18 PM
So will there be a follow-up story where the BBC sues the guy who had the lost footage?
 
2011-12-11 09:51:22 PM
Well, in perhaps the most ironic way possible, we may be getting the lost WHO episodes back... from SPACE:

Link (new window)
 
2011-12-11 09:52:32 PM
rynthetyn: Yippeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! I'm gradually trying to work my way through the early episodes and I keep cursing the BBC for destroying so many of the tapes. This is wonderful.

Back then, tapes were expensive, and they probably figured no one in their right mind would care about Doctor Who this long after the fact. If I remember correctly, the same thing almost happened to Monty Python until one of the Pythons (Gilliam?) paid out of pocket to buy them from the BBC.

I understand the economics and the train of thought at the time, but it's a damn shame that there are older episodes that probably really are lost forever.
 
2011-12-11 09:53:27 PM
Any Pie Left: Well, in perhaps the most ironic way possible, we may be getting the lost WHO episodes back... from SPACE:

Link (new window)


Damn you for getting my hopes up before noticing the date on the article.
 
2011-12-11 09:54:03 PM
Any Pie Left: Well, in perhaps the most ironic way possible, we may be getting the lost WHO episodes back... from SPACE:

Link (new window)


Now that's just cruel. ;)
 
2011-12-11 10:02:38 PM
href="http://www.fark.com/comments/6806906/73607440#c73607440">CarnySa ur: So will there be a follow-up story where the BBC sues the guy who had the lost footage?

No, that would be silly. Why would they, he should be rewarded. The BBC themselves were the short sighted dummies that destroyed all the missing episodes.
 
2011-12-11 10:07:43 PM
AcneVulgaris: mitchcumstein1: Are there people on Fark clamoring for more sparkly and emo things? I have missed those threads.

They're all off cutting themselves in the closet, but will resume clamoring shortly.


Will The Cure be played?
 
2011-12-11 10:17:35 PM
IMDWalrus: Back then, tapes were expensive, and they probably figured no one in their right mind would care about Doctor Who this long after the fact. If I remember correctly, the same thing almost happened to Monty Python until one of the Pythons (Gilliam?) paid out of pocket to buy them from the BBC.

I understand the economics and the train of thought at the time, but it's a damn shame that there are older episodes that probably really are lost forever.


The story is a bit more complex than that; we liberated the magnetic tape technology from the Germans at the end of the War. We figured out how to make the tape machines easy enough, but sorting out how to make the tape was a mystery, so what little there was got used and reused.

When we could make it, we went ti wiping it because that's what we were used to doing and it was expensive. In the US, more stuff survived because it was shot on film due to the time different between the coasts.

It because established policy at the BBC, and idiotically, no one thought to review it until sometime in the 70s When the Python footage came up to be erased in the early 70s, someone in the BBC archive called Gilliam, who said, "Why don't I just buy you a bunch of shiny few video tape and take the old stuff home?" It cost him $1500 to save ALL the Python episodes.

Not only did he save them, but the Pythons own the shows, which is one of the reasons they've all gotten quite rich and many other British TV stars of the era didn't.

Now, what's absolutely unforgivable is this: I was watching one of the Tom Baker serials recently and the director was on the commentary. He said he called the BBC archives and asked to the materials relating to the show. They told him everything but a few basic things (blocking diagrams and shot lists) had been thrown out in the recent past (last twenty years), which meant there were no set or costume design, or any of the other stuff which would make awesome extras on the Who DVDs.

He was, in a reserved English way, exceedingly pissed about this.
 
2011-12-11 10:28:15 PM
CarnySaur: So will there be a follow-up story where the BBC sues the guy who had the lost footage?

No. They have a standing call for any and all tapes, and I think there may even be rewards.

In the 1990s, when the Beatles wanted to put out the recordings they made at the BBC, they called and were told that the tapes had been wiped. And at the time, home-taping was illegal. So the BBC put out an amnesty and asked people to come forward with their tapes; they very quickly got all but three or four songs out of dozens recorded in many different broadcasts.

If home videotape machines had been available before 1966, we'd have all the Who episodes today from home tapers.
 
2011-12-11 10:38:04 PM
Dwight_Yeast: If home videotape machines had been available before 1966, we'd have all the Who episodes today from home tapers.

This is why the RIAA is very, very bad for History.
 
2011-12-11 11:02:12 PM
mitchcumstein1: AcneVulgaris: mitchcumstein1: Are there people on Fark clamoring for more sparkly and emo things? I have missed those threads.

They're all off cutting themselves in the closet, but will resume clamoring shortly.

Will The Cure be played?


No, that stuff is considered too macho these days. Robert Smith looks like He-Man beside some of the twinkle twinkle little stars on the market these days.

Also, I don't think the 10th Doctor is emo; he, is however, violently emotionally unstable with the teeth and the eyes and the shouting and crying.
 
2011-12-11 11:04:45 PM
cretinbob: mitchcumstein1: Are there people on Fark clamoring for more sparkly and emo things? I have missed those threads.

I was sad to find more bronies here than /b/

But this story is good news.


Someone said bronies in a Doctor Who thread?

images.wikia.com

In all seriousness, I've been watching some of the classic episodes and I have to say that there are some really brilliant writing and performing in a lot of them (I can say that Tomb of the Cybermen, Genesis of the Daleks, and Caves of Androzani are my favorite classics so far).

But I can understand younger fans (that started with the Nu series) not being able to appreciate them as those who have grown up with them. I mean, those episodes where made almost 50 years ago. Kids are dumb... I remember being that dumb...

Hell, being someone who started with the 8th Doctor, I'm not sure of being able to appreciate them at it's full, and I think that they're outstanding!
 
2011-12-11 11:07:01 PM
TV's Vinnie: Dwight_Yeast: If home videotape machines had been available before 1966, we'd have all the Who episodes today from home tapers.

This is why the RIAA is very, very bad for History.


So much this.
 
2011-12-11 11:36:56 PM
TV's Vinnie: Dwight_Yeast: If home videotape machines had been available before 1966, we'd have all the Who episodes today from home tapers.

This is why the RIAA is very, very bad for History.


It probably has more to do with AT&T than the MPAA/RIAA. Bell Labs invented magnetic tape in the 1930's, AT&T squashed it because the thought recorded messages would eat into telephone profits. That ended up pushing the tech back 20 years...
 
2011-12-11 11:43:24 PM
SilentStrider: the appeal in the old episodes is in the acting and the storytelling, at least for me.

FTFA

/the acting through the entire early series was mindbogglingly awful
//interesting story telling tho
 
2011-12-11 11:58:05 PM
Pssh, unless they're getting the episodes FROM SPACE it's not that exciting.

/Actually, it's quite exciting
 
2011-12-12 12:08:58 AM
I just came so hard.

/am doing a marathon of the modern one
 
2011-12-12 12:16:58 AM
I really do need to check out the first two Doctors... And I wish I could get more of my friends into Old-Who.

I didn't grow up with Doctor Who at all. I just watch so many crappy B-movies that bad special and visual effects don't phase me.
 
2011-12-12 12:18:26 AM
bronyrepublic.co.cc
 
2011-12-12 12:34:52 AM
Dwight_Yeast: CarnySaur: So will there be a follow-up story where the BBC sues the guy who had the lost footage?

No. They have a standing call for any and all tapes, and I think there may even be rewards.

You get a Dalek if you find a lost episode. Not some homemade one, a proper used in the show, flashing lights and all Dalek.
A DALEK!
/They are probably aware that sending a Dalek to the house of someone who saved the Doctor is probably risky.
/Remembering the episode of Coupling(I think it was Nightlines and was written by Steven Moffat) where Oliver tried picking up a girl with the news of the latest lost episode find.
 
Displayed 50 of 116 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »