Snooping also leaves precious little time for commenting on Fark.

More of a mental workout. And an exercise in "holding it".

i thought it was the ice cream.

It's easy. Don't date someone you don't trust, and trust your partner to have a good reason to hide what he's hiding and thats that. Once you go looking for something, you'll find it, confirmation bias will make sure of that.

I don't know what they're talking about, walking a couple blocks and then shimmying up to a second or third story window is a lot more of a work out than it sounds.

*talking about. Walking a...

/farking periods. How do they work?

Also, strike the 'of a' between 'more' and 'out'.

/holy fark, preview...how does it work?
//FAIL
///should just stop posting while drunk.
////slashies!

Never mind that last post.
/facepalms.
//shoot me please.

bingethinker: It's not often somebody Grammar Nazis himself.

Tell me about it...
It'd be so much easier to get away with if we had an edit function.
So it goes.

Snooping... Is that the new codeword for taking the brown acid at Woodstock?

This has to be the biggest piece of horseshiat 'science'/'medical advice'/lifestyle column I've read in a very long time.

Let's break down the logical leaps made in this piece of sh*t article:

1. People who snoop are worriers and worried,
2. Worrying can make you fat.

therefore, people who snoop will get fat.

seriously MSNBC?

Or look up what homes sold for on your street?

Really? That's considered snooping?

I do that all the time. I even have Google alerts set up to alert me of recent transactions. I don't call it snooping. I call it keeping abreast of the real estate market in my neighborhood. Since I'm always thinking about selling my house and moving out of the city, being well informed makes good sense.

Correlation and causation, its all the same thing isnt it?
Isnt it?
No really someone please tell me.
I GOTTA KNOW!
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD SOMEONE LIE THE TRUTH TO ME PLEEEEEAAAAASSSSEEEE!

+10 lbs......
-40 IQ points
+5 min of my life I want back.

MYOB.

So what you're saying is...journalists are fat and stressed.

Good to know.

This seems like a classic correlation is not causation thing, but now I can't help but wonder if my ex's thunder thighs had more to do with her personality type than all those pints of ice cream.

PINGAS

ansius: This has to be the biggest piece of horseshiat 'science'/'medical advice'/lifestyle column I've read in a very long time.

Let's break down the logical leaps made in this piece of sh*t article:

1. People who snoop are worriers and worried,
2. Worrying can make you fat.

therefore, people who snoop will get fat.

seriously MSNBC?


You sound nosey.

It should be illegal to write an article that stupid.

Jamieboy: Or look up what homes sold for on your street?

Really? That's considered snooping?

Came here to say this.

Who thinks up this crap?

[citation needed], subby MSNBC

envirovore: Tell me about it...
It'd be so much easier to get away with if we had an edit function.
So it goes.

But if we had an edit button, none of the threads would make any sense, because people would go back and edit their distressingly stupid comments as soon as everyone started making fun of them.

Oh, the article--if you're the type of person who snoops on others, you're a control freak and probably stressed out all the time, because it's hard to control others without being completely obvious about it. So I hope you do get fat and then die of a heart attack.

/Have known way too many of those assholes.

Unavailable for commenting.

Well, that explains a lot about the TSA...

envirovore: bingethinker: It's not often somebody Grammar Nazis himself.

Tell me about it...
It'd be so much easier to get away with if we had an edit function.
So it goes.

It's important that you never let a msstake slide. Otherwise, you cloud end up one of losers those losers.

This is some of the best reporting MSNBC has ever done.

She was starting to get portly, wasn't she?

What is this? I don't even....

Since when is it considered snooping to look up publically displayed information?