Tebow

/hotlinked

Timothy Richard Tebow!

/he is the answer
//or maybe chris johnson

I Have The Touch of a Shocked Monkey: Von Miller. Anyone, anyone?

He's probably a shoe in for defensive rookie of the year. I think there is probably a case for defensive player of the year. He's had a lot to do with the Broncos recent success.

All that assumes he can get and stay healthy. We missed him against the Vikings. That game wouldn't have come down to a last minute pick and FG if Miller was playing.

James Walker has officially become Peter King ver 2.0. Only this version of Peter King wants to fellate Tom Terrific instead of Bret Favre. No, James Walker, Brady's man meat is reserved for Giselle.

If Rodgers doesn't get this award it could be the crime of the century.

The_Sponge: A Fark Handle: //or maybe chris johnson


Child please.

/Have him on my fantasy team.
//Dude runs hot and cold like my shower.

Same here. I feel like he and Frank Gore should both be paid only every other month, since that's apparently when they play.

The_Sponge: A Fark Handle: //or maybe chris johnson

Child please.

/Have him on my fantasy team.
//Dude runs hot and cold like my shower.

you're right. that was a typo. i meant; ndamukong suh.

GAT_00: TO be fair, we should be happy this article was for Brady, and not Tebow.

I almost MISS the Tom Brady love, what with all the Tebowing going on in the media world.

I like how his whole argument is "Brady has been better over the past 4 weeks, and then the side bar has the following numbers for the season.

QB Yds. Pct. TD INT QBR
Brady 3,916 66.7 30 10 76.6
Rodgers 3,844 70.6 37 5 87.0

(sorry if the formatting sucks)

If James Walker wants to make an argument for MVP of November, he has a good chance of winning. (Timmay?!) But this is a seasonal award, and you can't cherry-pick stats.

Also, if you're looking at how bad the team would be without him, look no further than Caleb Hanie. I'm sure stats geeks have better examples using WAR and other numbers, but God the Bears fell off a cliff when Cutler went out, and then bounced off a ledge and fell more when Forte was injured.

As a Bears fan, I would give the award to Rodgers.

ManateeGag: Payton Manning. He may not have played a down, but the Colt's performance this year shows that he is clearly the team cannot live without him.

Kurt Warner is pissed that last year's MVP trophy was lost in the mail.

skrame: I like how his whole argument is "Brady has been better over the past 4 weeks", and then the side bar has the following numbers for the season.

Oops. I missed a ".

relevant

SlothB77: when tom brady was hurt in the first quarter in the first game of the 2008 season and lost for the remainder of the season, Matt Cassel led the Pats to an 11-5 record.

Curtis Painter/ Orlovsky/ Collins is 0-12 replacing Manning.

this is typical ESPN northeastern favoritism.

Are you saying that 2008 Patriots are comparable to the 2011 Patriots? They had a good defense in 2008 (at 10th) and are allowing over 35% more yards per game right now. Not to say Green Bay is doing much better defensively, but to compare the loss of Brady in 2008 to what it would be like without him now is ludicrous.

And, let's be honest, this Packers defense isn't as good as that Pats defense was... yet, Rodgers is probably a better QB than Brady was in their 18-1 season.

So how Aaron Rodgers could not essentially be considered the unanimous MVP right now is beyond me.

Link
relevant
mods please delete previous

The MVP is in the picture somewhere, I promise.

Sorry, when you confidently assert that Matt Flynn would "keep the ball rolling" for the Pack you lose all credibility. Unless he means to state the obvious, that Green Bay could be 12-4 and still win the division, he is talking out his arse.

The_Sponge: I Have The Touch of a Shocked Monkey: Von Miller. Anyone, anyone?


Sounds like the name of an Olympic skier instead of a football player, amirite?

I believe you are talking about Lindsey Vonn. Two n's. An easy mistake. I will provide a picture of her for future reference.

FTA: The award is meant for the player who is the most important to their team. Let that sink in, because this is a key element to this debate.

I'd vote for Peyton Manning as well, because he's the player who his team obviously can't live without.

I would wager half the GB offensive players would be nothing without him throwing the ball. He has been absolutely lights out and as much as I like to think ESPN isn't bias in this geographical direction (I'm in Baltimore - the east coast) this article just reeks of homerism. It's amazing they turn anyone down from writing for ESPN.

boxiebrown: Hey, is this where we get to equivocate and wank about the meaning of the word "valuable"?? Because that sounds fresh and enjoyable.

Soooo.... You're new to the internet then?

I'm sure Rodgers will be mad about losing league MVP if he wins another Super Bowl and is game MVP. He will have to wipe his eyes with discount doublecheck residuals.

/team first
//one for the thumb

Seriously, by the standard of the article author, if the Broncos win the AFC West, it should be Tebow. It is easy to speculate how the Pack or Pats would be without Rogers or Brady, but we saw how much the Broncos actually did suck in the before Tebow era (BTE). If they come back from 1-4 to actually win the division and finish 10-6 or even 9-5, then how can he not be considered MVP.

/kinda kidding
//is tebow making me question my atheism?
//no

Why no Matt Moore!

muck4doo: Why no Matt Moore!

Matt Moore doesn't exist.

/ESPN

Anyone else thinks that the article is just horribly written?