If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post) Spiffy Same-sex marriages pump $12M into Iowa economy. Supporters a little choked up about the plethora of ceremonies while the fundies are still really butthurt over the whole thing   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 139
More: Spiffy, same-sex marriages, Iowa, UCLA School of Law  
•       •       •

1311 clicks; posted to Politics » on 08 Dec 2011 at 8:50 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



139 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-12-08 12:18:13 AM
michaelnorthrop.net
 
2011-12-08 12:55:42 AM
My daughter and her longtime partner were married in Iowa a couple of weeks ago, so I'm getting a kick...
 
2011-12-08 01:21:40 AM
Hating gays is bad for business
 
2011-12-08 04:28:31 AM
$12m? Over a whole state? Wow, that's a vast sum of money...

It's sad when arguments for allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference have to be turned into stupid economic ones. If I was anti-gay $12m for a state wouldn't make a blind bit of difference.
 
2011-12-08 08:25:45 AM
Slaxl: $12m? Over a whole state? Wow, that's a vast sum of money...

It's sad when arguments for allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference have to be turned into stupid economic ones. If I was anti-gay $12m for a state wouldn't make a blind bit of difference.


Well, it is 3% of the welfare budget. (That's as significant as I can make it.)

By population, that's over $1b for the whole country. A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money.
 
2011-12-08 08:50:53 AM
Gays = job creators
 
2011-12-08 08:55:51 AM
Britney Spear's Speculum: Hating gays is bad for business

This.

We should get off their backs.
 
2011-12-08 08:56:43 AM
They could make EVEN MORE MONEY if they lower the age threshold for marriage. Lets say to 15, that's three more years of money we can make.
Oh yea, Plural marriage will make EVEN MORE MONEY. So will Animal Marriage.
 
2011-12-08 08:57:49 AM
Fundies are always butthurt of some kind of bullshiat or another...

This time of the year it's mostly over not being able to ram their religion down people's throat anymore, but homosexuals are always a go to group to hate for these folks.
 
2011-12-08 08:58:52 AM
Britney Spear's Speculum: Hating gays is bad for business

Live by the free market, die by the free market. If governments and businesses want to hurt themselves by being bigots, that's their damn choice. Screw 'em. But they better understand that there aren't any bailouts for bigots.
 
2011-12-08 08:59:45 AM
No amount of money will ever make a vile bigot change his or her unAmerican hatred.

Especially if it's religiously inspired.
 
2011-12-08 09:04:21 AM
Jake Havechek

Gays = job creators




Jake Havechek = Name Caller
 
2011-12-08 09:05:43 AM
scrotal_aroma: They could make EVEN MORE MONEY if they lower the age threshold for marriage. Lets say to 15, that's three more years of money we can make.
Oh yea, Plural marriage will make EVEN MORE MONEY. So will Animal Marriage.


I agree. Gay Animal Marriage would completely destroy the sanctity of traditional animal marriage. No Fear. I've totally got you're and dolly's back on this one.
 
2011-12-08 09:08:09 AM
olddeegee: My daughter and her longtime partner were married in Iowa a couple of weeks ago, so I'm getting a kick...

My niece recently married her partner. Congrats to your kid on finding happiness.
 
2011-12-08 09:08:57 AM
Slaxl: It's sad when arguments for allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference


Let me guess now, would "allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference" include individuals, institutions and small businesses that don't want to have anything to do with gay marriages?

I'm guessing not.

So knock off the faux-libertarian bullshiat.
 
2011-12-08 09:09:26 AM
karnal: Jake Havechek

Gays = job creators



Jake Havechek = Name Caller


karnal = stalker
 
2011-12-08 09:11:34 AM
Roy_G_Biv: Let me guess now, would "allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference" include individuals, institutions and small businesses that don't want to have anything to do with gay marriages?

How has legalized homosexual marriages restricted individuals, institutions and small businesses against homosexual marriages from living their lives and burdened them with outside interference?
 
2011-12-08 09:13:46 AM
I love this Bachmann quote FTA:

"Marriage, historically, for all human history has been between a man and a woman. It hasn't been the same-sex marriage," she said.

It's so easy to edit...

"Slavery, historically, for all human history has been between a white man and a black man, woman or child. It hasn't been equality," she said.

4.bp.blogspot.com

/Keep farking that chicken GOP...always being on the wrong side of history must be some sort of kinky fetish
 
2011-12-08 09:14:18 AM
keylock71: Roy_G_Biv: Let me guess now, would "allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference" include individuals, institutions and small businesses that don't want to have anything to do with gay marriages?

How has legalized homosexual marriages restricted individuals, institutions and small businesses against homosexual marriages from living their lives and burdened them with outside interference?


And Jesus did say unto thee, Smash thy homos in the face with thine fist until they doth become straight and christian. Amen.
 
2011-12-08 09:14:19 AM
keylock71: Roy_G_Biv: Let me guess now, would "allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference" include individuals, institutions and small businesses that don't want to have anything to do with gay marriages?

How has legalized homosexual marriages restricted individuals, institutions and small businesses against homosexual marriages from living their lives and burdened them with outside interference?


Makes it harder to live a lie?
 
rpl
2011-12-08 09:14:35 AM
scrotal_aroma: They could make EVEN MORE MONEY if they lower the age threshold for marriage. Lets say to 15, that's three more years of money we can make.
Oh yea, Plural marriage will make EVEN MORE MONEY. So will Animal Marriage.


Underage and animal marriages imply a lack of consent on behalf of at least one of the participants. You might be onto something with plural marriages though, good thinking.
 
2011-12-08 09:16:21 AM
vygramul: A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money.

upload.wikimedia.org
Hey Thanks homey.
 
2011-12-08 09:16:44 AM
scrotal_aroma: Plural marriage will make EVEN MORE MONEY

if all the parties are consenting adults who cares...

karnal: Jake Havechek = Name Caller

meta
 
2011-12-08 09:17:45 AM
Roy_G_Biv: Slaxl: It's sad when arguments for allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference


Let me guess now, would "allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference" include individuals, institutions and small businesses that don't want to have anything to do with gay marriages?

I'm guessing not.

So knock off the faux-libertarian bullshiat.


Oh look, it's another idiot making the bullshiat claim that people getting gay marriages somehow interfere with the rights of everybody else.
 
2011-12-08 09:18:00 AM
rpl: scrotal_aroma: They could make EVEN MORE MONEY if they lower the age threshold for marriage. Lets say to 15, that's three more years of money we can make.
Oh yea, Plural marriage will make EVEN MORE MONEY. So will Animal Marriage.

Underage and animal marriages imply a lack of consent on behalf of at least one of the participants. You might be onto something with plural marriages though, good thinking.



Oddly, in Iowa for children 16+ a parent can give consent. You then have someone not legally old enough to consent who is bound by a marriage contract that someone in a position of authority over them has agreed to.
 
2011-12-08 09:18:25 AM
SixPaperJoint: keylock71: Roy_G_Biv: Let me guess now, would "allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference" include individuals, institutions and small businesses that don't want to have anything to do with gay marriages?

How has legalized homosexual marriages restricted individuals, institutions and small businesses against homosexual marriages from living their lives and burdened them with outside interference?

Makes it harder to live a lie?


You know, sometimes you just have to yank knuckle-dragging neanderthals into civility whether they like it or not. That might mean curtailing their "freedom" a little bit. We've done it before, when we curtailed the "freedom" to own slaves. Ask a Southerner how that worked out for them...
 
2011-12-08 09:19:00 AM
Dr. Whoof: I love this Bachmann quote FTA:

"Marriage, historically, for all human history has been between a man and a woman. It hasn't been the same-sex marriage," she said.

It's so easy to edit...

"Slavery, historically, for all human history has been between a white man and a black man, woman or child. It hasn't been equality," she said.

[4.bp.blogspot.com image 478x360]

/Keep farking that chicken GOP...always being on the wrong side of history must be some sort of kinky fetish



Remember back in human history, when Caesar got to "check your bride's virginity" before the honeymoon for the lucky couple?


We should bring that back, you know, in the interest of protecting marriage's wonderful history. That's right right wingers, Obama gets to diddle your ladies, to make sure they're pure.
 
2011-12-08 09:21:04 AM
Dr. Whoof: I love this Bachmann quote FTA:

"Marriage, historically, for all human history has been between a man and a woman. It hasn't been the same-sex marriage," she said.

It's so easy to edit...

"Slavery, historically, for all human history has been between a white man and a black man, woman or child. It hasn't been equality," she said.

[4.bp.blogspot.com image 478x360]

/Keep farking that chicken GOP...always being on the wrong side of history must be some sort of kinky fetish


To be fair, those that were against interracial marriage were predominately democrats.
 
2011-12-08 09:21:24 AM
Iblis824: Remember back in human history, when Caesar got to "check your bride's virginity" before the honeymoon for the lucky couple?


We should bring that back, you know, in the interest of protecting marriage's wonderful history. That's right right wingers, Obama gets to diddle your ladies, to make sure they're pure.


You know, for a country founded on the principles of breaking the established rules (breaking away from the crown, religious freedom, all that sort of enlightened stuff) we sure do have a lot of flag waving assholes who want to go back to the very practices the Founding Fathers were trying to get away from.
 
2011-12-08 09:21:47 AM
Iblis824: Obama gets to diddle your ladies, to make sure they're pure.

He should appoint Cain as Secretary of jus primae noctis
 
2011-12-08 09:23:23 AM
alowishus: To be fair, those that were against interracial marriage were predominately democrats.

Another person claiming to have never heard of the Southern Strategy? (new window)
 
2011-12-08 09:23:46 AM
Gay marriage has been around in some countries for 10 years now. Have they descended into chaos/poverty/death and destruction yet? Why not?
 
2011-12-08 09:24:33 AM
SixPaperJoint: keylock71: Roy_G_Biv: Let me guess now, would "allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference" include individuals, institutions and small businesses that don't want to have anything to do with gay marriages?

How has legalized homosexual marriages restricted individuals, institutions and small businesses against homosexual marriages from living their lives and burdened them with outside interference?

Makes it harder to live a lie?


That's the thing, though, they are still free to be ignorant and bigoted and tell as many lies to themselves (or anyone else) as they want.
 
2011-12-08 09:24:37 AM
Roy_G_Biv: Let me guess now, would "allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference" include individuals, institutions and small businesses that don't want to have anything to do with interracial marriages?

I'm guessing not.

So knock off the faux-libertarian bullshiat.


It's the same thing.
 
2011-12-08 09:26:25 AM
scrotal_aroma:

That's a pretty terrible troll alt you've got yourself there
 
2011-12-08 09:27:04 AM
So with the Right Wing obsessed about "personhood" and "sanctity of marriage", does that mean a corporation can now marry a fetus?
 
2011-12-08 09:27:48 AM
DrD'isInfotainment: vygramul: A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money.

[upload.wikimedia.org image 180x225]
Hey Thanks homey.


Glad someone got the reference.
 
2011-12-08 09:28:24 AM
Jake Havechek: So with the Right Wing obsessed about "personhood" and "sanctity of marriage", does that mean a corporation can now marry a fetus?

Only if the fetus is female.
 
2011-12-08 09:29:24 AM
Rent is too damn high: Gay marriage has been around in some countries for 10 years now. Have they descended into chaos/poverty/death and destruction yet? Why not?

You know what's really funny?

Israel is pro gay rights. Gays can have common law marriages. And while actual marriages aren't performed, Israel does recognize the marriage of gay couples from other nations as legally equal to straight marriages.
 
2011-12-08 09:30:43 AM
Roy_G_Biv: Slaxl: It's sad when arguments for allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference


Let me guess now, would "allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference" include individuals, institutions and small businesses that don't want to have anything to do with gay marriages?

I'm guessing not.

So knock off the faux-libertarian bullshiat.


Who's being forced to have anything to do with gay marriages?
 
2011-12-08 09:30:50 AM
kingoomieiii: Roy_G_Biv: Let me guess now, would "allowing people to live their lives as they desire and free from outside interference" include individuals, institutions and small businesses that don't want to have anything to do with interracial marriages?

I'm guessing not.

So knock off the faux-libertarian bullshiat.

It's the same thing.


It is actually pretty easy. You don't have to take their business. Churches don't have to perform those ceremonies. The folks who have issue, aren't affected in any way, save that they know that somewhere, out there, gay folks are living out lives just like their own.

If that grinds folks' gears, then no matter of law is going to affect that. They just can keep on hating, and their fellow citizens can live their lives.
 
2011-12-08 09:31:34 AM
Headso: meta

The DIMS DIMS DIMS guy complaining about name calling. Now that's funny right there.
 
2011-12-08 09:32:59 AM
alowishus: To be fair, those that were against interracial marriage were predominately democrats.

Sure. But that was when the fundamentalist and racist wackos comprised a large part of the Democratic Party. They nearly all left for the GOP when Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act.

Hell, in Teddy Roosevelt's day, the Republicans were anti-corporate trustbusters.

Weird how things change.
 
2011-12-08 09:33:24 AM
Jackson Herring: Headso: meta

The DIMS DIMS DIMS guy complaining about name calling. Now that's funny right there.


He's a creepy stalker is what he is.
 
2011-12-08 09:33:52 AM
Jake Havechek: So with the Right Wing obsessed about "personhood" and "sanctity of marriage", does that mean a corporation can now marry a fetus?

Good question. I don't believe gay marriage leads to marrying turtles, children, or Euler's equation, because none of those things give consent in a manner we recognize. However, corporations give consent and enter into contracts all the time. So gay marriage WILL lead to person-"person" marriages.
 
2011-12-08 09:34:04 AM
Aarontology: Rent is too damn high: Gay marriage has been around in some countries for 10 years now. Have they descended into chaos/poverty/death and destruction yet? Why not?

You know what's really funny?

Israel is pro gay rights. Gays can have common law marriages. And while actual marriages aren't performed, Israel does recognize the marriage of gay couples from other nations as legally equal to straight marriages.


Yes, but once you-know-who comes back, all that is going to change...
 
2011-12-08 09:34:42 AM
Edsel: Aarontology: Rent is too damn high: Gay marriage has been around in some countries for 10 years now. Have they descended into chaos/poverty/death and destruction yet? Why not?

You know what's really funny?

Israel is pro gay rights. Gays can have common law marriages. And while actual marriages aren't performed, Israel does recognize the marriage of gay couples from other nations as legally equal to straight marriages.

Yes, but once you-know-who comes back, all that is going to change...


Elvis?
 
2011-12-08 09:35:45 AM
Jake Havechek: Jackson Herring: Headso: meta

The DIMS DIMS DIMS guy complaining about name calling. Now that's funny right there.

He's a creepy stalker is what he is.


you should be flattered...
 
2011-12-08 09:36:03 AM
alowishus: To be fair, those that were against interracial marriage were predominately democrats.

To be fair, those that were against interracial marriage were predominately conservative.
 
2011-12-08 09:36:54 AM
CPennypacker: Edsel: Aarontology: Rent is too damn high: Gay marriage has been around in some countries for 10 years now. Have they descended into chaos/poverty/death and destruction yet? Why not?

You know what's really funny?

Israel is pro gay rights. Gays can have common law marriages. And while actual marriages aren't performed, Israel does recognize the marriage of gay couples from other nations as legally equal to straight marriages.

Yes, but once you-know-who comes back, all that is going to change...

Elvis?


Blasphemer.

Elvis is everywhere. Elvis is everybody. Elvis is still The King.
 
Displayed 50 of 139 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »