If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Register) Interesting The solar winds are ruining any future opportunity for lunar crop farming   (theregister.co.uk) divider line 16
More: Interesting, NASA, solar winds, moons, James Webb Space Telescope, Lunar Orbiter, ejections, lander, magnetic fields  
•       •       •

2238 clicks; posted to Geek » on 07 Dec 2011 at 10:53 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



16 Comments   (+0 »)
   
 
2011-12-07 10:13:49 AM
Is there a lunar equivalent to the Dust Bowl?
 
2011-12-07 11:04:41 AM
img849.imageshack.us
Aww, dang it!
 
2011-12-07 11:06:15 AM
That's why you use prisoners for lunar farming.
Who cares if its difficult then?
 
2011-12-07 11:07:46 AM
Those same processes would make a crapload of water when the high energy protons impact Ilmenite in the regolith, BTW.
 
2011-12-07 11:35:52 AM
OMFG LUNAR WARMZ!1111!!!!
 
2011-12-07 11:46:58 AM
"the soooolar wiiiiind, the soooolar wiiiiind"

www.metalsucks.net
 
2011-12-07 12:14:09 PM
images.amazon.com

Inconsolable.
 
2011-12-07 01:34:08 PM
Those winds may be the solution to long distance space travel. I recall seeing the concept many moons ago in a Nat Geo magazine about alternatives to propulsion systems. Solar sails would be two-fold awesome because in addition to the free, constant power of them, one could actually make a space frigate...that had farkin' sails, man!
 
2011-12-07 01:43:07 PM
I wonder how many Boffin spies died bring us this information.
 
2011-12-07 02:07:47 PM
mimg.ugo.com
 
2011-12-07 03:38:15 PM
I bet these guys don't have much experience with permafrost.

The very fact that CMEs are vaporizing all this material means means there are frequent spikes in volatile pressure, subsurface as well as above-ground, and those volatile particles will spread out underground and attach to anything at the subsurface that could bind with them. If you build up a solid layer of that stuff, it'll act as a seal to block anything beneath it from escaping. The same kind of mechanism keeps comets from completely vaporizing away, once they build up a big enough outer shell of dust.

Whether there is some form of volatile-rich cement buried beneath a surface of loose volatile-poor dust is an open question until somebody actually gets up there and starts digging. Given the difficulty Apollo experiments had in getting cores, and the recent hydrogen data, and the solar wind hydrogen flux, I won't be surprised if there is in some places.
 
2011-12-07 04:30:45 PM
My fickle friend, the solar wind
 
2011-12-07 04:58:08 PM
If i'm not mistaken, they dated the age of the moon using dust that was on the very surface, and claimed it had been there undisturbed for millenia so it was a reliable method, while many doubted the accuracy.

I know better than to ask for a public apology, but do you think they'll at least second guess the alleged age of the moon?
 
2011-12-07 05:25:57 PM
says Will Farrell
 
2011-12-07 06:03:50 PM
www.durfee.net

Cardassia here we come!
/hot spoonhead love!
 
2011-12-07 06:36:00 PM
www.selectspecs.com
 
Displayed 16 of 16 comments


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »